Abstract
Background
Involuntary admission legislation and rates differ greatly throughout the European Union Member States. In Ireland, the Mental Health Act 2001 has introduced significant changes in the care for patients admitted involuntarily, including mental health tribunals that review the involuntary admission orders.
Aims
To investigate (1) people's perception of the involuntary admission, (2) awareness of legal rights and perception of tribunal, (3) the impact of being admitted involuntarily on the relationship with their family, consultant psychiatrist and prospects for future employment.
Methods
Over a 15-month period patients admitted involuntarily to a Dublin Hospital were interviewed using a semi structured interview.
Results
Eighty-one people participated in the study. Seventy-two percent of patients believed that their involuntary admission was necessary at the time and this was associated with greater insight into illness. A total of 77.8% of patients felt that the treatment they received had been beneficial. A total of 86.4% of patients were aware that they had been admitted involuntarily and 45.5% of patients found it easier to accept that they had been admitted involuntarily as their case was reviewed by a tribunal. A total of 27.5% experienced a negative impact upon the relationship with their family as a result of the involuntary admission, while for 15% there was a positive impact. For 26.6% of patients the doctor-patient relationship was negatively impacted upon and a third felt their prospects for employment could be affected.
Conclusion
The majority of patients reflect positively on their involuntary admission and this opportunity should be used to engage patients in follow-up treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dressing H, Salize HJ (2004) Compulsory admission of mentally ill patients in European Union Member States. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 39(10):797–803
Salize HJ, Dressing H (2004) Epidemiology of involuntary placement of mentally ill people across the European Union. Br J Psychiatry 184:163–168
Zinkler M, Priebe S (2002) Detention of the mentally ill in Europe—a review. Acta Psychiatr Scand 106(1):3–8
European Union (1950) Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Available at http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/Treaties/Html/005.htm
Department of Health [Ireland]. Mental Treatment Act 1945. Available at http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1945/en/act/pub/0019/index.html
Government of Ireland. Criminal Law (Insanity) Act 2006. Available at http://www.oireachtas.ie/documents/bills28/acts/2006/A1106.pdf
World Health Organisation (1992). International classification of diseases, 10th edn (ICD-10). Available at http://apps.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online/
Amador XF, Strauss DH, Yale SA, Flaum MM, Endicott J, Gorman JM (1993) Assessment of insight in psychosis. Am J Psychiatry 150(6):873–879
Mental Health Commission (2006) Rules governing the use of seclusion and mechanical means of bodily restraint. Available at http://www.mhcirl.ie
Mental Health Commission (2007) Annual Report 2007. Available at http://www.mhcirl.ie/Publications/
Katsakou C, Priebe S (2006) Outcomes of involuntary hospital admission—a review. Acta Psychiatr Scand 114(4):232–241
Priebe S, Katsakou C, Amos T, Leese M, Morriss R, Rose D et al (2009) Patients’ views and readmissions 1 year after involuntary hospitalisation. Br J Psychiatry 194(1):49–54
Toews J, el-Guebaly N, Leckie A, Harper D (1984) Patients’ attitudes at the time of their commitment. Can J Psychiatry 29(7):590–595
Toews J, El-Guebaly N, Leckie A (1981) Patients’ reaction to their commitment. Can J Psychiatry 26(4):251–254
Rooney S, Murphy K, Mulvaney F, O’Callaghan E, Larkin C (1996) A comparison of voluntary and involuntary patients admitted to hospital. Ir J Psychol Med 13(4):132–137
Kjellin L, Andersson K, Candefjord IL, Palmstierna T, Wallsten T (1997) Ethical benefits and costs of coercion in short-term inpatient psychiatric care. Psychiatr Serv 48(12):1567–1570
Kane JM, Quitkin F, Rifkin A, Wegner J, Rosenberg G, Borenstein M (1983) Attitudinal changes of involuntarily committed patients following treatment. Arch Gen Psychiatry 40(4):374–377
Rathod S, Kingdon D, Smith P, Turkington D (2005) Insight into schizophrenia: the effects of cognitive behavioural therapy on the components of insight and association with sociodemographics—data on a previously published randomised controlled trial. Schizophr Res 74(2–3):211–219
Kemp R, Hayward P, Applewhaite G, Everitt B, David A (1996) Compliance therapy in psychotic patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 312(7027):345–349
Kemp R, Kirov G, Everitt B, Hayward P, David A (1998) Randomised controlled trial of compliance therapy. 18-month follow-up. Br J Psychiatry 172:413–419
O’Donnell C, Donohoe G, Sharkey L, Owens N, Migone M, Harries R et al (2003) Compliance therapy: a randomised controlled trial in schizophrenia. BMJ 327(7419):834
Mental Health Commission (2006) Your guide to the Mental Health Act, 2001. Available at http://www.mhcirl.ie/Publications
Fadden G, Bebbington P, Kuipers L (1987) The burden of care: the impact of functional psychiatric illness on the patient’s family. Br J Psychiatry 150:285–292
Moller-Leimkuhler AM (2006) Multivariate prediction of relatives’ stress outcome one year after first hospitalization of schizophrenic and depressed patients. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 256(2):122–130
Vaddadi KS, Soosai E, Gilleard CJ, Adlard S (1997) Mental illness, physical abuse and burden of care on relatives: a study of acute psychiatric admission patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand 95(4):313–317
Hallam L (2007) How involuntary commitment impacts on the burden of care of the family. Int J Ment Health Nurs 16(4):247–256
Kjellin L, Andersson K, Bartholdson E, Candefjord IL, Holmstrom H, Jacobsson L et al (2004) Coercion in psychiatric care—patients’ and relatives’ experiences from four Swedish psychiatric services. Nord J Psychiatry 58(2):153–159
Ostman M, Hansson L, Andersson K (2000) Family burden, participation in care and mental health—an 11-year comparison of the situation of relatives to compulsorily and voluntarily admitted patients. Int J Soc Psychiatry 46(3):191–200
Cassidy E, Hill S, O’Callaghan E (2001) Efficacy of a psychoeducational intervention in improving relatives’ knowledge about schizophrenia and reducing rehospitalisation. Eur Psychiatry 16(8):446–450
McWilliams S, Hill S, Mannion N, Kinsella A, O’Callaghan E (2007) Does psychoeducation influence carers’ attitudes to treatment of schizophrenia? Ir J Psychol Med 24(1):27–30
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Sandra Bollard, Mental Health Act administrator in St John of God Hospital and Dr Daria Brennan who provided invaluable assistance to the study. We are also grateful to the participants as well as the psychiatrists and nurses in St John of God Hospital and Cluain Mhuire Family Centre for facilitating this study.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Donoghue, B., Lyne, J., Hill, M. et al. Involuntary admission from the patients’ perspective. Soc Psychiat Epidemiol 45, 631–638 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0104-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0104-7