Skip to main content
Log in

Dissipation of Penconazole in Peach, Plum, Apricot, and Mango by HPLC–DAD

  • Published:
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dissipation of penconazole was estimated in peach, plum, apricot, and mango fruits cultivated in different farms using QuEChERS method for sample preparation and High performance liquid chromatography with diode array detector. Following one application of normal dose 25 mL 100 L−1 water, the average initial deposits of penconazole were observed to be 0.44, 0.35, 0.66 and 1.12 mg kg−1 for peach, plum, apricot, and mango, respectively. The residues dissipated below the maximum residues limit of 0.1 mg kg−1 after 15, 7, 10 and 21 days for peach, plum, apricot, and mango, respectively. The half-life value (T1/2) and pre-harvest interval of penconazole were 7.2 (12), 2.48 (12), 1.53 (7) and 4.54 (21) days for peach, plum, apricot, and mango, respectively. Thus, a waiting period of 21 days was suggested for the safe consumption of penconazole treated mango.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-Alrahman SH, Almaz MM, Ahmed NS (2011a) Dissipation of fungicides, insecticides, and acaricide in tomato using HPLC-DAD and QuEChERS methodology. Food Anal Methods 5:564–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-Alrahman SH, Almaz MM, Osama IA (2011b) Determination of degradation rate of acaricide fenpyroximate in apple, citrus, and grape by HPLC-DAD. Food Anal Methods 5:306–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrus A, Lantos J (2002) Evaluation of the studies on decline of pesticide residues. J Agric Food Chem 50:4846–4851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bromilow R, Evans A, Nicholls P (1999) Factors affecting degradation rates of five triazoles fungicides in two soil types: 2 Field studies. Pest Manag Sci 55:1135–1142

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo-Sanchez J, Aguilera-Del Real A, Rodriguez-Sanchez M, Valverde-Garcia A (2000) Residue levels, decline curves, and plantation distribution of procymidone in green beans grown in greenhouse. J Agric Food Chem 48:2991–2994

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FAO/WHO (2006) Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Program. Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues CX/PR 06/38/5, February 177

  • Fenoll J, Ruiz E, Hellín P, Lacasa A, Flores P (2009) Dissipation rates of insecticides and fungicides in peppers grown in greenhouse and under cold storage conditions. Food Chem 113:727–732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fountain M, Harris AL, Cross JV (2010) The use of surfactants to enhance acaricide control of phytonemus pallidus (Acari:tarsonemidae) in strawberry. Crop Prot 29:1286–1292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garrido Frenich A, Martinez Vidal JL, Pastor-Montoro E, Romero-Gonzalez R (2008) High-throughput determination of pesticide residues in food commodities by use of ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 390:947–959

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim IS, Beaudette LA, Shim JH, Trevors JT, Suh YT (2002) Environmental fate of the triazole fungicide propiconazole in a rice-paddy-soil lysimeter. Plant Soil 239:321–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim IS, Shim JH, Suh YT (2003) Laboratory studies on formation of bound residues and degradation of propiconazole in soils. Pest Manag Sci 59:324–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehotay SJ (2007) Determination of pesticide residues in foods by acetonitrile extraction and partitioning with magnesium sulfate: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 90:485–520

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehotay SJ, de Kok A, Hiemstra M, Van Bodegraven P (2005) Validation of a fast and easy method for the determination of residues from 229 pesticides in fruits and vegetables using gas and liquid chromatography and mass spectrometric detection. J AOAC Int 88:595–614

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paya P, Anastassiades M, Mack D, Sigalova I, Tasdelen B, Oliva J, Barba A (2007) Analysis of pesticide residues using the Quick Easy Cheap Effective Rugged and Safe (QuEChERS) pesticide multiresidue method in combination with gas and liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometric detection. Anal Bioanal Chem 389:1697–1714

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pose-Juan E, Rial-Otero R, Lopez-Periago JE (2010) Sorption of penconazole applied as a commercial water-oil emulsion in soils devoted to vineyards. J Hazard Mater 182:136–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Regulation E (2005) Pesticide EU-MRLs Database, http://ec.europa.eu/sanco_pesticides

  • Sannino A, Bolzoni L, Bandini M (2004) Application of liquid chromatography with electrospray tandem mass spectrometry to the determination of a new generation of pesticides in processed fruits and vegetables. J Chromatogr A 1036:161–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh N, Dureja P (2009) Effect of biocompost-amendment on degradation of triazoles fungicides in soil. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 82:120–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorestensen C, Lode O (2001) Laboratory degradation studies of bentazone, dichlorprop, MCPA and propiconazole in Norwegian soils. J Environ Qual 30:947–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World-Compendium (2000) The pesticide manual. In: Tomlin CDS 12th edn. British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, Surrey, UK, pp 67–68

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project was supported by the Research Center, College of Science, King Saud University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sherif H. Abd-Alrahman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abd-Alrahman, S.H., Ahmed, N.S. Dissipation of Penconazole in Peach, Plum, Apricot, and Mango by HPLC–DAD. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 90, 260–263 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-012-0928-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-012-0928-9

Keywords

Navigation