Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of contextual variables on learning organization in firms that are implementing lean: a study in Southern Brazil

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lean manufacturing (LM) is an approach that comprises principles and management practices that aim to reduce waste and improve operational effectiveness throughout the entire value stream in continuous improvement endless journey. Due to that, the ability to innovate, change and learn continuously is a key element in the LM implementation. Several contextual variables were mentioned in the literature as possible barriers for LM implementation. However, little has been known about the influence of these variables on the dimensions of learning organization (LO). Thus, this paper aims to examine the relationship between six contextual variables and the occurrence frequency of LO problems in companies that are implementing LM. Moreover, the identification of relevant relationships between dimensions of LO and contextual variables may contribute to specify the contexts in which problems are expected to occur. The study sample comprises 13 companies already undergoing LM implementation. The results indicate that the same contextual variables, which are deemed as influential for implementing LM, have a different relationship with the organizational learning capability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saurin TA, Ferreira CF (2008) Qualitative assessment of the implementation of lean production practices: a case study in a heavy machinery manufacturer. Gestão and Produção 15(3):449–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Das B, Venkatadri U, Pandey P (2014) Applying lean manufacturing system to improving productivity of airconditioning coil manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71:307–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mann D (2005) Creating a lean culture: tools to sustain lean conversion. Productivity Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hua Y (2000) Double-loop learning control (DLC) model for reengineering: a “yin” and “yang” balanced approach for effective organizational change. Int J of Prod Econ, n 110

  5. Motley W (2004) Lean thinking. Power 148

  6. Bhasin S (2011) Measuring the leanness of an organization. Int J Lean Six Sigma 2(1):55–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. García JL, Maldonado AA, Alvarado A, Rivera DG (2014) Human critical success factors for kaizen and its impacts in industrial performance. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 70:2187–2198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liker JK, Convis GL (2012) The Toyota way to lean leadership. McGraw-Hill

  9. Bhasin S (2011) Performance of organizations treating lean as an ideology. Bus Proc Manag J 17(6):986–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hines P, Holweg M, Rich N (2004) Learning to evolve: a review of contemporary lean thinking. Int J Oper Prod Manag 24(10):994–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sim K, Rogers J (2009) Implementing lean production systems: barriers to change. Manag Res News 32(1):37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Achanga P, Shehab E, Roy R, Nelder G (2006) Critical success factors for lean implementation within SMEs. J Manuf Technol Manag 17(4):460–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Worley J, Doolen T (2006) The role of communication and management support in a lean manufacturing implementation. Manag Decis 44(2):228–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sezen B, Karakadilar I, Buyukozkan G (2012) Proposition of a model for measuring adherence to lean practices: applied to Turkish automotive part suppliers. Int J Prod Res 50(14):3878–3894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bonavia T, Marin J (2006) An empirical study of lean production in the ceramic tile industry in Spain. Int J Oper Prod Manag 26(5):505–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shah R, Ward P (2003) Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles and performance. J Oper Manag 21:129–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Marodin G, Saurin T (2013) Implementing lean production: research areas and future opportunities. Int J Prod Res 51(22):6663–6680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Song J, Joo B, Chermack T (2009) The Dimensions of Learning Organization Questionnaire (DLOQ): a validation study in a Korean context. Hum Resou Develop Quarterly 20(1)

  19. Marsick V (2013) The Dimensions of a Learning Organization Questionnaire (DLOQ): introduction to the special issue examining DLOQ use over a decade. Adv Dev Hum Resour 15(2):127–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim Y, Marsick V (2013) Using the DLOQ to support learning in Republic of Korea SMEs. Adv Dev Hum Resour 20:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  21. Saad NM, Al-Ashaab A, Maksimovic M, Zhu L, Shehab E, Ewers P, Kassam A (2013) A3 thinking approach to support knowledge-driven design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(5–8):1371–1386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marsick V, Watkins K (2003) Demonstrating the value of an organization’s learning culture: the dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Adv Dev Hum Resour 5(2):132–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Magee D (2007) How Toyota became number one. Penguin. com

  24. Sackmann S, Rehart P, Friesl M (2009) Sustainable change: long-term efforts toward developing a learning organizational. J Appl Behav Sci 45(4):521–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kontoghiorghes C, Awbrey S, Feurig P (2005) Examining the relationship between learning organization characteristics and change adaptation, innovation and organizational performance. Hum Resou Develop Quarterly 16(2)

  26. Lee C et al (2013) Evaluating the influence of perceived organizational learning capability on user acceptance of information technology among operating room nurse staff. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 51:22–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liker JK, Meier D (2006) The Toyota way fieldbook: a practical guide for implementing toyota’s 4Ps. McGraw-Hill

  28. Chiva R, Alegre J, Lapiedra R (2007) Measuring organizational learning capability among the workforce. Int J Manpow 28:224–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Noruzy A, Dalfard VM, Azhdari B, Nazari-Shirkouhi S, Rezazadeh A (2013) Relations between transformational leadership, organizational learning, knowledge management, organizational innovation, and organizational performance: an empirical investigation of manufacturing firms. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64(5–8):1073–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chiva R (2004) The facilitating factors for organizational learning in the ceramic sector. Hum Resour Dev Int 7(2):233–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bhatnagar J (2006) Measuring organizational learning capability in Indian managers and establishing firm performance linkage: an empirical analysis. Learn Organ 13(5):416–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hult G, Ferrell O (1997) Global organizational learning capability in purchasing: construct and measurement. J Bus Res 40:97–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Senge PM (1994) The fifth discipline fieldbook. Random House Digital, Inc

  34. Gómez J, José J, Céspedes L, Valle C (2004) Organizational learning capability: a proposal of measurement. J Bus Rev 58(6):715–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nakhchian A, Arki A, Bemani A (2013) The role of learning organizations in improving human resources management. Europ J of Bus and Manag 5(13)

  36. Yazdani N, Hussain S (2013) Organizational learning: an evaluation of relevant literature. Proceedings of 3rdInternational Confe on Bus Manag, University of Manag and Tech

  37. Garvin D, Edmonson A, Gino F (2008) Is yours a learning organization? Harv Bus Rev 86:109–116

    Google Scholar 

  38. Augustsson H, Tornquist A, Hasson H (2013) Challenges in transferring individual learning to organizational learning in the residential care of older people. J Health Org Manag 27(3):390–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sereshkeh S, Amirnejad S (2013) The relationship between organizational learning and readiness for change in the staffs of physical education offices. Ann App Sport Sci 1(1):19–22

    Google Scholar 

  40. Akhtar N, Khan R, Mujtaba B (2013) Exploring and measuring organizational learning capability and competitive advantage of petroleum industry firms. Int Bus Manag 6(1):89–103

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mehrabi J et al. (2013) Explaining the relationship between organizational structure and dimensions of learning organizations. Int J of Acade Resea in Bus and Social Sci 3(4)

  42. Ahmad S, Muniam M, Rehman A (2013) Comparative study between two service sector organizations to measure organizational learning. Int J of Managt & Org Stud 2

  43. Ghorbani S, Dizgah M, Chegini M (2013) The relationship between intellectual capital and knowledge productivity and moderating role of organizational learning in the branches of state banks in Rasht. J Basic Appl Sci Resea 3(2):1191–1197

    Google Scholar 

  44. Chiva R, Alegre J (2008) Emotional intelligence and job satisfaction: the role of organizational learning capability. Pers Rev 37(6):680–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Desai V (2010) Do organizations have to change to learn? Examining the effects of technological change and learning from failures in the natural gas industry. Ind Corp Chang 19(3):713–739

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Mbengue A, Sane S (2013) Organizational learning capability: theoretical analysis and empirical study in the context of official development aid project teams. Can J Adm Sci 30:26–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Goh S, Richards G (1997) Benchmarking the learning capability of organizations. Eur Manag J 15(5):575–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Pettersen J (2009) Defining lean production: some conceptual and practical issues. Total Qual Manag J 21(2):127–142

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bhasin S (2012) Prominent obstacles to lean. Int J Prod Perform Manag 61(4):403–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Pavnascar S, Gershenson J, Jambekar A (2003) Classification scheme for lean manufacturing tools. Int J Prod Res 13(41):3075–3090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Anvari A et al (2011) A proposed dynamics model for a lean roadmap. Afr J of Bus Manag 5(16):6727–6737

    Google Scholar 

  52. Desai V (2011) Learning to learn from failures: the impact of operating experience on railroad accident responses. Ind Corp Chang 20(2):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  53. Amores M, Rodriguez M, Navarro J (2005) Strategies of renewal: the transition from total quality management to the learning organization. Manag Learn 36(2):149–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Anand G, Kodali R (2008) Selection of lean manufacturing systems using the PROMETHEE. J Model Manag 3(1):40–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kull TJ et al (2014) The moderation of lean manufacturing effectiveness by dimensions of national culture: testing practice-culture congruence hypotheses. Int J Prod Econ 153:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Marodin GA, Saurin TA (2014). Classification and relationships between risks that affect lean production implementation: a study in Southern Brazil. J of Manuf Tech Manag, 26(1)

  57. Azadegan A et al (2013) The effect of environmental complexity and environmental dynamism on lean practices. J Oper Manag 31:193–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Glover W et al (2011) Critical success factors for the sustainability of kaizen event human resource outcomes: an empirical study. Int J Prod Econ 132:197–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Doolen T, Hacker M (2005) A review of lean assessment in organizations: an exploratory study of lean practices by electronics manufacturers. J of Manuf Sys 24(1)

  60. Sanchez J, Vijande M, Gutierrez J (2011) The effects of manufacturer’s organizational learning on distributor satisfaction loyalty in industrial markets. Ind Mark Manag 40:624–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Dora M et al (2013) Operational performance and critical success factors of lean manufacturing in European food processing SMEs. Trends Food Sci Tech 20:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  62. Foster S, Hawking P, Zhu C (2007) The human side of ERP implementations: can change management really make a difference? Int Fed Info Proc 254:239–249

    Google Scholar 

  63. Herron C, Braiden P (2006) A methodology for developing sustainable quantifiable productivity improvement in manufacturing companies. Int J Prod Eco 104:143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Bhasin S (2012) An appropriate change strategy for lean success. Manag Dec 50(3):439–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Ellinger A, Yang B, Howton S (2003) Making the business case for the learning organization concept: the problem and the solution. Adv Dev Hum Resou 5(2):163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Dennis P (2006) Getting the right things done: a leader’s guide to planning and execution. Lean Enter Inst Incorporated

  67. Badrabadi H, Akbarpour T (2013) A study on the effect of intellectual capital and organizational learning process on organizational performance. Afr J Bus Manag 7(16):1470–1485

    Google Scholar 

  68. Song J, Kim H, Kolb J (2009) The effect of learning organization culture on the relationship between interpersonal trust and organizational commitment. Hum Resou Devel Quarterly 20(2)

  69. Karim A, Zaman K (2013) A methodology for effective implementation of lean strategies and its performance evaluation in manufacturing organizations. Bus Proc Manag 19(1):169–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Farris J et al (2009) Critical success factors for human resource outcomes in kaizen events: an empirical study. Int J Prod Econ 117:42–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Markowart M (2006) Creating learning organizations. Tehran University Publication

  72. Chouseinoglou O et al. (2013) AiOLoS: a model for assessing organizational learning in software development organizations. Info and Soft Tech

  73. Rouzbahani M et al (2013) Studying the effects of organizational learning based on organizational learning dimensions on its levels and organizational culture. J Basic App Sci Res 3(2):1297–1301

    Google Scholar 

  74. Garrido M, Camarero C (2009) Assessing the impact of organizational learning and innovation on erformance in cultural organizations. Int J of Nonprofit and Volun Sector Marke

  75. Scott B, Wilcock A, Kanetkar V (2009) A survey of structured continuous improvement programs in the Canadian food sector. Food Control 20:209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Qahtani F, Ghoneim S (2013) Organizational learning: as an approach for transforming to learning organization concept in Saudi universities. Mediterranean J of Soc Sci 4(2)

  77. Baghdadi A, Abadi H (2010) Organizational learning and learning organization and their relationship to the contemporary administrative concepts. Warraq for Publishing, Jordan

    Google Scholar 

  78. Narasimhan R, Swink M, Kim S (2006) Disentangling leanness and agility: an empirical investigation. J Oper Manag 24:440–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Akao Y (2004) HoshinKanri: policy deployment for successful TQM. Productivity Press

  80. Armstrong M (2006) Hum Res Manag. Kogan Page, London

    Google Scholar 

  81. Saurin TA, Ribeiro JL, Marodin G (2010) Identification of research opportunities based on a survey on lean production implementation conducted in Brazilian and foreign companies. Gestão and Produção 17(4):829–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Boyle TA, Scherrer-Rathje M, Stuart I (2011) Learning to be lean: the influence of external information sources in lean improvements. J Manuf Technol Manag 22(5):587–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Shah R, Ward P (2007) Defining and developing measures of lean production. J of Oper Managt 25:785–805

    Google Scholar 

  84. SEBRAE (2013) Brazilian service to support the small and micro companies empresas. http://www.sebrae.com.br/leis/. Accessed 25 May

  85. BNDES (2013) National bank of developlement http://www.bndes.gov.br/SiteBNDES/bndes/bndes_pt/Institucional/Apoio_Financeiro/porte.html. Accessed 4 May

  86. MTE (2013) Work and Job National Department. http://portal.mte.gov.br/geral/estatisticas.htm. Accessed 19 July

  87. IW (2013) Industry week: manufacturing leadership excellence. http://www.industryweek.com/global-economy/demographics. Accessed 19 July

  88. Montgomery DC (2001) Design and analysis of experiments, 5th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  89. Meyers LS, Gamst G, Guarino AJ (2006) Applied multivariate research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  90. Wong A, Tjosvold D (2006) Collectivist values for learning in organizational relationships in China: the role of trust and vertical coordination. Asia Pac J Manag 23:299–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Shook J (2010) How to change a culture: lessons learned from Nummi. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 51(2):63–72

    Google Scholar 

  92. Gilley A, Gilley J, Mcmillan H (2009) Organizational change: motivation, communication and leadership effectiveness. Perform Improv Q 21(4):75–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Sawhney R, Chason S (2005) Human behavior based exploratory model for successful implementation of lean enterprise in industry. Perf Improv Q 18(2):76–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. LEI (Lean Enterprise Institute) (2010) Lean road map. http://www.lean.org.br/Events/LeanRoadMap.cfm. Accessed 25 October

  95. Bhasin S, Burcher P (2006) Lean viewed as a philosophy. J Manuf Technol Manag 17(1):56–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Jimmieson N, Peach M, White K (2008) Utilizing the theory of planned behavior to inform change management. J Appl Behav Sci 44(2):237–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Bessant J, Caffyn S, Gallagher M (2001) An evolutionary model of continuous improvement behavior. Technovation 21:67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Forza C (1996) Work organization in lean production and traditional plants: what are the differences? Int J Oper rod Manag 16(2):42–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Calarge F et al (2012) Evaluation of lean production system by using SAE J4000 standard: case study in Brazilian and Spanish automotive component manufacturing organizations. Afr J Bus Manag 6(49):11839–11850

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guilherme Luz Tortorella.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tortorella, G.L., Marodin, G.A., Miorando, R. et al. The impact of contextual variables on learning organization in firms that are implementing lean: a study in Southern Brazil. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78, 1879–1892 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6791-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6791-1

Keywords

Navigation