Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Lean manufacturing implementation: an assessment method with regards to socio-technical and ergonomics practices adoption

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The implementation of lean manufacturing (LM) means a systematic approach of various management methods and practices, which may influence individuals’ job content and the quality of work. However, research related to socio-technical and ergonomics (SE) factors has for a long time solely focused on regular production work to a large extent. This study aims to assess the relationship between LM and SE practices in companies undergoing a lean implementation. The proposed method comprises a combination of techniques that allow the identification of deficiencies related to the adoption of LM practices that may support SE practices implementation, indicating a prioritization of improvements opportunities to better sustain them. Further, through the establishment of the degree of criticality of LM practices, our outcomes allow to identify implementation gaps in the lean process that are highly related with the current status of socio-technical and ergonomics improvements in the company, anticipating problems and developing the practices that converge to them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seppälä P, Klemola S (2004) How do employees perceive their organization and job when companies adopt principles of lean production? Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind 14(2):157–180. doi:10.1002/hfm.10059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Womack J, Jones D (1996) Lean thinking: banish waste and create wealth for your corporation. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marodin G, Saurin T (2013) Implementing lean production systems: research areas and opportunities for future studies. Int J Prod Res 51(22):6663–6680. doi:10.1080/00207543.2013.826831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhamu J, Singh Sangwan K (2014) Lean manufacturing: literature review and research issues. Int J Oper Prod Manag 34(7):876–940. doi:10.1108/IJOPM-08-2012-0315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shah R, Ward P (2003) Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance. J Oper Manag 21(2):129–149. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00108-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Getty L (1999) Ergonomics and the customer satisfaction model: ergonomics in the language of business. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 43(14):815–819. doi:10.1177/154193129904301401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arezes P, Dinis-Carvalho J, Alves A (2015) Workplace ergonomics in lean production environments: a literature review. Work 52(1):57–70. doi:10.3233/WOR-141941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eklund J (2000) Development work for quality and ergonomics. Appl Ergon 31(6):641–648. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(00)00039-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. IEA (2000) The discipline of ergonomics. Available at: www.iea.cc. Accessed 05 may 2016

  10. Dul J, Neumann W (2009) Ergonomics contributions to company strategies. Appl Ergon 40(4):745–752. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2008.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bäckstrand G, Bergman C, Hogberg D, Moestam L (2013) Lean and its impact on workplace design. Proceedings of NES 45th Nordic Ergonomics & Human Factors Society Conference, Iceland

  12. Toralla P, Falzon P, Morais A (2012) Participatory design in lean production: which contribution from employees? For what end? Work 41:2706–2712. doi:10.3233/WOR-2012-0514-2706

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saurin T, Ferreira C (2009) The impacts of lean production on working conditions: a case study of a harvester assembly line in Brazil. Int J Ind Ergon 39:403–412. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2008.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fiore C, (2016) Lean execution: the basic implementation guide for maximizing process performance. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group

  15. Macleod I (2003) Real-world effectiveness of ergonomic methods. Appl Ergon 34:465–477. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00066-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lean Y, Shan F (2012) Brief review on physiological and biochemical evaluations on human mental workload. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind 22:177–187. doi:10.1002/hfm.20269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zink K (2000) TQM in Germany: experiences and perspectives concerning ergonomics. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 44(12):472–475. doi:10.1177/154193120004401210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tortorella G, Fries C, da Silva M, Amaral F, Fogliatto F (2015) Gaps between psychophysical demands and perceived workload—a framework for lean production system. Proceedings of 2015 International Conference on Operations Excellence and Service Engineering, Orlando, Florida, USA, September 10-11th

  19. Koukoulaki T (2014) The impact of lean production on musculoskeletal and psychosocial risks: an examination of sociotechnical trends over 20 years. Appl Ergon 45:198–21. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.07.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Munck-Ulfsfält U, Falck A, Forsberg A, Dahlin C, Eriksson A (2003) Corporate ergonomics programme at Volvo car corporation. Appl Ergon 34(1):17–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Joseph S (2003) Corporate ergonomics programme at ford motor company. Appl Ergon 34(1):23–28. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00079-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Genaidy A, Karwowski W (2003) Human performance in lean production environment: critical assessment and research framework. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind 13(4):317–330. doi:10.1002/hfm.10047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Beevis D (2003) Ergonomics: cost and benefits revisited. Appl Ergon 34:491–496. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00068-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hagg G (2003) Corporate initiatives in ergonomics: an introduction. Appl Ergon 34:3–15. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00078-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tortorella G, Fogliatto F (2014) Method for assessing human resources management practices and organisational learning factors in a company under lean manufacturing implementation. Int J Prod Res 52(15):4623–4645. doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.881577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fraser P, Moultrie J, Gregory M (2002) The use of maturity models/grids as a tool in assessing product development capability. IEEE 1:244–249. doi:10.1109/IEMC.2002.1038431

    Google Scholar 

  27. Capaldo D, Rozenfeld H (2007) Integrating new product development process references with maturity and changes management. ICED ‘07, Paris-FR, August

  28. Longoni A, Pagell M, Johnston D, Veltri A (2013) When does lean hurt?—an exploration of lean practices and worker health and safety outcomes. Int J Prod Res 51(11):3300–3320. doi:10.1080/00207543.2013.765072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ketokivi M, Schroeder R (2004) Manufacturing practices, strategic fit and performance: a routine-based view. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 24(2):171–191. doi:10.1108/01443570410514876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Herron C, Braiden P (2006) A methodology for developing sustainable quantifiable productivity improvement in manufacturing companies. Int J Prod Econ 104:143–153. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pavnascar S, Gershenson J, Jambekar A (2003) Classification scheme for lean manufacturing tools. Int J Prod Res 13:3075–3090. doi:10.1080/0020754021000049817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bhasin S, Burcher P (2006) Lean viewed as a philosophy. J Manuf Technol Manag 17(1):56–72. doi:10.1108/17410380610639506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Doolen T, Hacker M (2005) A review of lean assessment in organizations: an exploratory study of lean practices by electronics manufacturers. Journal of Manufacturing System Singh s 24(1):55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Stentoft A, Vagn F (2013) Evidence of lean: a review of international peer-reviewed journal articles. Eur Bus Rev 25(2):174–205. doi:10.1108/09555341311302675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Shah R, Ward P (2007) Defining and developing measures of lean production. J Oper Manag 25:785–805. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bortolotti T, Boscari S, Danese P (2015) Successful lean implementation: organizational culture and soft lean practices. Int J Prod Econ 160:182–201. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Furlan A, Vinelli A, Dal Pont G (2011) Complementarity and lean manufacturing bundles: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 31(8):835–850. doi:10.1108/01443571111153067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Netland T, Schloetzer J, Ferdows K (2015) Implementing lean: the effect of takt time. Proceedings of Euroma 2015, Nêuchatel, Switzerland

  39. Marodin G, Saurin T, Tortorella G, Denicol J (2015) How context factors influence lean production practices in manufacturing cells. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79(5-8):1389–1399. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-6944-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hines P, Holweg M, Rich N (2004) Learning to evolve: a review of contemporary lean thinking. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 24(10):994–1011. doi:10.1108/01443570410558049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Treville S, Antonakis J (2006) Could lean production job design be intrinsically motivating? Contextual, configurational, and levels-of-analysis issues. J Oper Manag 24(2):99–123. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Stone K (2012) Four decades of lean: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 3(2):112–132. doi:10.1108/20401461211243702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Moyano-Fuentes J, Sacristán-Díaz M (2012) Learning on lean: a review of thinking and research. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 32(5):551–582. doi:10.1108/01443571211226498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Netland T, Ferdows K (2014) What to expect from a corporate lean program. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 55(4):83–89

    Google Scholar 

  45. Jasti N, Kodali R (2015) Lean production: literature review and trends. Int J Prod Res 53(3):867–885. doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.937508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Karwowski W, Salvendy G, Badham R, Brodner P, Clegg C, Hwang S, Lamarsh J (1994) Integrating people, organization, and technology in advanced manufacturing: a position paper based on the joint view of industrial managers, engineers, consultants, and researchers. International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing 4(1):1–19. doi:10.1002/hfm.4530040102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Jaworek M, Marek T, Karwowski W, Andrzejczak C, Genaidy A (2010) Burnout syndrome as a mediator for the effect of work-related factors on musculoskeletal complaints among hospital nurses. Int J Ind Ergon 40(3):368–375. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2010.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner, B (2014) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge

  49. Ferreira L, Gurgueira G (2013) Ergonomia como fator econômico no pensamento Enxuto: uma análise crítica bibliográfica. Gepros: Gestão da Produção, Operações e Sistemas 8(3):39–49

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hoffmeister K, Gibbons A, Schwatka N, Rosecrance J (2015) Ergonomics climate assessment: a measure of operational performance and employee well-being. Appl Ergon 50:160–169. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.03.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Azadeh A, Rouzbahman M, Saberi M, Valianpour F (2014) An adaptive algorithm for assessment of operators with job security and HSEE indicators. J Loss Prev Process Ind 31:26–40. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2014.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Karsh BT, Waterson P, Holden RJ (2014) Crossing levels in systems ergonomics: a framework to support ‘mesoergonomic’inquiry. Appl Ergon 45(1):45–54. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.04.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Guimarães LDM, Ribeiro JLD, Renner JS, de Oliveira PAB (2014) Worker evaluation of a macroergonomic intervention in a Brazilian footwear company. Appl Ergon 45(4):923–935. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Asadzadeh SM, Azadeh A, Negahban A, Sotoudeh A (2013) Assessment and improvement of integrated HSE and macro-ergonomics factors by fuzzy cognitive maps: the case of a large gas refinery. J Loss Prev Process Ind 26(6):1015–1026. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2013.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Haug A (2015) Work instruction quality in industrial management. Int J Ind Ergon 50:170–177. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2015.09.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Guimarães L, Anzanello M, Ribeiro J, Saurin T (2015) Participatory ergonomics intervention for improving human and production outcomes of a Brazilian furniture company. Int J Ind Ergon 49:97–107. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2015.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Koukoulaki T (2010) New trends in work environment—new effects on safety. Saf Sci 48(8):936–942. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2009.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Zare M, Croq M, Hossein‐Arabi F, Brunet R, Roquelaure Y (2016) Does ergonomics improve product quality and reduce costs? A review article. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 26(2):205–223. doi:10.1002/hfm.20623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Thun JH, Lehr CB, Bierwirth M (2011) Feel free to feel comfortable—an empirical analysis of ergonomics in the German automotive industry. Int J Prod Econ 133(2):551–561. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.12.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Pavlovic-Veselinovic S, Hedge A, Veselinovic M (2016) An ergonomic expert system for risk assessment of work-related musculo-skeletal disorders. Int J Ind Ergon 53:130–139. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2015.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kang J, Zhang J, Gao J (2016) Improving performance evaluation of health, safety and environment management system by combining fuzzy cognitive maps and relative degree analysis. Saf Sci 87:92–100. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kothari R (2004) Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International

  63. Mitchell M, Jolley J (2012) Research Design Explained, HB1 College, New York Cengage Learning

  64. Flynn B, Sakakibara S, Schroeder R, Bates K, Flynn E (1990) Empirical research methods in operations management. J Oper Manag 9:250–284. doi:10.1016/0272-6963(90)90098-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Conti R, Angelis J, Cooper C, Faragher B, Gill C (2006) The effects of lean production on worker job stress. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 26(9):1013–1038. doi:10.1108/01443570610682616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Babson S (1993) Lean or mean: the MIT model of lean production at Mazda. Labor Stud J 18(2):3–24

    Google Scholar 

  67. Vieira L, Balbinotti G, Varasquin A, Gontijo L (2012) Ergonomics and kaizen as strategies for competitiveness: a theoretical and practical in an automotive industry. Work 41:1756–1762. doi:10.3233/WOR-2012-0381-1756

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil

    Guilherme Luz Tortorella, Lizandra Garcia Lupi Vergara & Evelise Pereira Ferreira

Authors
  1. Guilherme Luz Tortorella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lizandra Garcia Lupi Vergara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Evelise Pereira Ferreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evelise Pereira Ferreira.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 28 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 93 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tortorella, G.L., Vergara, L.G.L. & Ferreira, E.P. Lean manufacturing implementation: an assessment method with regards to socio-technical and ergonomics practices adoption. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89, 3407–3418 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9227-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9227-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation