Abstract
Additive manufacture (AM) enables the fabrication of highly efficient lattice structures. However, the mathematical efficiency of characterising AM lattice geometry can be poor, potentially restricting the commercial application of AM lattice structures. This research quantifies the effect of the polygon order used to characterise the geometric resolution of lattice strut elements on the associated manufacturability and geometric qualities of the manufactured lattice. The effect of these design parameters on manufactured quality is experimentally determined for aluminium and titanium specimens fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM), although the method can be generally applied to any AM technology. This research finds that geometric thresholds exist, below which additional geometric resolution does not result in increased part quality. These thresholds are a function of material, lattice inclination angle, cross-sectional area and the polynomial order used to represent the cross section. These findings enable significantly reduced computational cost in managing AM lattice structures, and can be directly integrated with algorithmic methods for the optimisation of AM lattice structures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahn D, Kim H, Lee S (2009) Surface roughness prediction using measured data and interpolation in layered manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 209(2):664–671
ASTM standard F2792-12a, D (2012) F2792-12a. Standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
Berman B (2012) 3-D printing: the new industrial revolution. Bus Horiz 55(2):155–162
Brandt M, Sun SJ, Leary M, Feih S, Elambasseril J, Liu QC (2013) High-value SLM aerospace components: from design to manufacture. Adv Mater Res 633:135–147
Clijsters S, Craeghs T, Buls S, Kempen K, Kruth JP (2014) In situ quality control of the selective laser melting process using a high-speed, real-time melt pool monitoring system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75(5-8):1089–1101
Croft HT (1991) Unsolved problems in geometry: unsolved problems in intuitive mathematics. Springer New York, New York
Drizo A, Pegna J (2006) Environmental impacts of rapid prototyping: an overview of research to date. Rapid Prototyp J 12(2):64–71
Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23(6):1917–1928
Gebhardt A, Schmidt F-M, Hötter J-S, Sokalla W, Sokalla P (2010) Additive manufacturing by selective laser melting the realizer desktop machine and its application for the dental industry. Phys Procedia 5:543–549
Gibson R, Stucker (2010) Additive manufacturing technologies - rapid prototyping to direct digital manufacturing
Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B (2015) Powder Bed Fusion Processes, in Additive Manufacturing Technologies. Springer pp 107–145
Hiller JD, Lipson H (2009) STL 2.0: a proposal for a universal multi-material additive manufacturing file format. In: Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium
ISO/ASTM (2015) Additive manufacturing — general principles — terminology. 52900. ISO/ASTM, Geneva 52900
ISO/ASTM (2016) Standard specification for additive manufacturing file format (AMF) version 1.2
Jywe W-Y, Liu C-H, Chen C o-K (1999) The min–max problem for evaluating the form error of a circle. Measurement 26(4):273–282
Leary M, Babaee M, Brandt M, Subic A (2013) Feasible build orientations for self-supporting fused deposition manufacture: a novel approach to space-filling tesselated geometries. Adv Mater Res 633:148–168
Ma D, Lin F, Chua CK (2001) Rapid prototyping applications in medicine. Part 2: STL file generation and case studies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 18:118–127
Mani K, Kulkarni P, Dutta D (1999) Region-based adaptive slicing . Computer-Aided Design 31: 317–333
Marcu T, Todea M, Gligor I, Berce P, Popa C (2012) Effect of surface conditioning on the flowability of Ti6Al7Nb powder for selective laser melting applications. Appl Surf Sci 258(7):3276–3282
Mazur M, Leary M, Sun S, Vcelka M, Shidid D, Brandt M (2016) Deformation and failure behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting (SLM). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84:1391–1411
Mazur M, Leary M, McMillan M, Elambasseril J, Brandt M (2016a) SLM additive manufacture of H13 tool steel with conformal cooling and structural lattices. Rapid Prototyp J 22(3):504–518
Mazur M, Leary M, McMillan M, Sun S, Shidid D, Brandt M (2016b) Mechanical properties of Ti6Al4V and AlSi12Mg lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting (SLM). Laser Additive Manufacturing: Materials, Design, Technologies, and Applications: 119–161
Mazur M, Brincat P, Leary M, Brandt M (2017) Numerical and experimental evaluation of a conformally cooled H13 steel injection mould manufactured with selective laser melting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:1–20
McMillan ML, Jurg M, Leary M, Brandt M (2017a) Programmatic generation of computationally efficient lattice structures for additive manufacture. Rapid Prototyp J 23(3):486–494
McMillan M, Leary M, Brandt M (2017b) Computationally efficient finite difference method for metal additive manufacturing: a reduced-order DFAM tool applied to SLM. Mater Des 132:226–243
Promoppatum P, Onler R, Yao S-C (2017) Numerical and experimental investigations of micro and macro characteristics of direct metal laser sintered Ti-6Al-4V products. J Mater Process Technol 240:262–273
Sexton L, Lavin S, Byrne G, Kennedy A (2002) Laser cladding of aerospace materials. J Mater Process Technol 122(1):63–68
Shidid D, Leary M, Choong P, Brandt M (2016) Just-in-time design and additive manufacture of patient-specific medical implants. Phys Procedia 83:4–14
Strano G, Hao L, Everson RM, Evans KE (2013) Surface roughness analysis, modelling and prediction in selective laser melting. J Mater Process Technol 213(4):589–597
Vaithilingam J, Kilsby S, Goodridge RD, Christie SD, Edmondson S, Hague RJ (2015) Functionalisation of Ti6Al4V components fabricated using selective laser melting with a bioactive compound. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 46:52–61
Vandenbroucke B, Kruth JP (2007) Selective laser melting of biocompatible metals for rapid manufacturing of medical parts. Rapid Prototyp J 13(4):196–203
Wang X, Xu S, Zhou S, Xu W, Leary M, Choong P, Qian M, Brandt M, Xie YM (2016) Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopaedic implants: a review. Biomaterials 83:127–141
Williams CB, Cochran JK, Rosen DW (2010) Additive manufacturing of metallic cellular materials via three-dimensional printing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53(1-4):231–239
Wong KV, Hernandez A (2012) A review of additive manufacturing. ISRN Mech Eng 2012:1–10
Zhai Y, Lados DA, LaGoy JL (2014) Additive manufacturing: making imagination the major limitation. Jom 66(5):808–816
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge use of facilities within the RMIT Advanced Manufacturing Precinct and the RMIT Microscopy and Microanalysis Facility. This research was conducted by the Australian Research Council Industrial Transformation Training Centre in Additive Biomanufacturing (IC160100026) http:// www.additivebiomanufacturing.org.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alghamdi, A., Lozanovski, B., McMillan, M. et al. Effect of polygon order on additively manufactured lattice structures: a method for defining the threshold resolution for lattice geometry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105, 2501–2511 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04168-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04168-1