Skip to main content
Log in

Reducing convergence time of precise point positioning with ionospheric constraints and receiver differential code bias modeling

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Long convergence time has limited the wide application of traditional precise point positioning (PPP) based on an ionosphere-free combination of dual-frequency observations. Different from the traditional PPP, the uncombined PPP method based on raw observations estimates ionospheric delays. When external ionospheric information is available, it can be applied as a constraint to help shorten the convergence time, as a result of the reduced correlation between the position and the ionospheric parameters. The receiver differential code biases (DCBs) will be a concern, however, when applying the external ionospheric information. For receiver DCBs, it is usually assumed that the biases can be absorbed by the receiver clock parameters. We have demonstrated that the receiver DCBs cannot be fully assimilated by one receiver code clock parameter because the receiver DCBs have different effects on the code and carrier phase measurements at any frequency. Additional parameters are necessary to model the receiver DCBs so that their effects on the positioning solution can be minimized. We developed an ionosphere-constrained PPP model to incorporate ionospheric total electron content (TEC) in the slant (STEC) and vertical (VTEC) when leveraging a regional network and global ionospheric maps (GIMs). Both static and kinematic experimental results show that the convergence time and the positioning accuracy can be improved significantly. Accuracies at the first epoch of 0.4 m for GIM constraints, and 0.2 m for the regional constraints, are achievable. The convergence time to 1 dm horizontal accuracy is reduced to 7.5 min at a 68% confidence level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data and products are downloaded from the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and the Crustal Dynamics Data Information System (CDDIS).

References

  • Banville S, Collins P, Zhang W, Langley RB (2014) Global and regional ionospheric corrections for faster PPP convergence. Navigation 61(2):115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisnath S, Gao Y (2008) Current state of precise point positioning and future prospects and limitations. In: Sideris MG (ed) Observing our changing earth, vol 133. Springer, Berlin, pp 615–623

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cai C, Gao Y (2013) Modeling and assessment of combined GPS/GLONASS precise point positioning. GPS Solut 17(2):223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins P (2008) Isolating and estimating undifferenced GPS integer ambiguities. In: Proceedings of ION NTM, pp 720–732

  • de Oliveira PS, Morel L, Fund F, Legros R, Monico JFG, Durand S, Durand F (2017) Modeling tropospheric wet delays with dense and sparse network configurations for PPP-RTK. GPS Solut 21(1):237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge M, Gendt G, Rothacher M, Shi C, Liu J (2008) Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in precise point positioning (PPP) with daily observations. J Geodesy 82(7):389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng J, Shi C (2017) Rapid initialization of real-time PPP by resolving undifferenced GPS and GLONASS ambiguities simultaneously. J Geod 91(4):361–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng J, Teferle FN, Meng X, Dodson A (2011) Towards PPP-RTK: ambiguity resolution in real-time precise point positioning. Adv Space Res 47(10):1664–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo F, Li XX, Zhang XH, Wang JL (2017) The contribution of multi-GNSS experiment (MGEX) to precise point positioning. Adv Space Res 59(11):2714–2725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouba J (2009) A simplified yaw-attitude model for eclipsing GPS satellites. GPS Solut 13(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouba J, Héroux P (2001) Precise point positioning using IGS orbit and clock products. GPS Solut 5(2):12–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurichesse D, Mercier F, Berthias JP, Broca P, Cerri L (2009) Integer ambiguity resolution on undifferenced GPS phase measurements and its application to PPP and satellite precise orbit determination. Navigation 56(2):135–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Zhang X, Ge M (2011) Regional reference network augmented precise point positioning for instantaneous ambiguity resolution. J Geod 85(3):151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Yuan Y, Li H, Ou J, Huo X (2012) Two-step method for the determination of the differential code biases of COMPASS satellites. J Geod 86(11):1059–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Ge M, Dai X, Ren X, Fritsche M, Wickert J, Schuh H (2015a) Accuracy and reliability of multi-GNSS real-time precise positioning: GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, and Galileo. J Geod 89(6):607–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Zhang X, Ren X, Fritsche M, Wickert J, Schuh H (2015b) Precise positioning with current multi-constellation Global Navigation Satellite Systems: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and BeiDou. Sci Rep 5:8328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Li B, Gao Y (2015c) Improved PPP ambiguity resolution considering the stochastic characteristics of atmospheric corrections from regional networks. Sensors 15(12):29772

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Yuan Y, Wang N, Hernandez-Pajares M, Huo X (2015d) SHPTS: towards a new method for generating precise global ionospheric TEC map based on spherical harmonic and generalized trigonometric series functions. J Geod 89(4):331–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Gao Y, Shi J (2016) Improved PPP ambiguity resolution by COES FCB estimation. J Geod 90(5):437–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu GC, Lachapelle G (2002) Ionosphere weighted GPS cycle ambiguity resolution. In: ION National Technical Meeting, San Deigo, CA, pp 1–5

  • Liu T, Yuan Y, Zhang B, Wang N, Tan B, Chen Y (2017) Multi-GNSS precise point positioning (MGPPP) using raw observations. J Geod 91(3):253–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou Y, Zheng F, Gu S, Wang C, Guo H, Feng Y (2016) Multi-GNSS precise point positioning with raw single-frequency and dual-frequency measurement models. GPS Solut 20(4):849–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra P, Enge P (2012) Global positioning system: signals, measurements, and performance, 2nd edn. Ganga-Jumana Press, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie Z, Yang H, Zhou P, Gao Y, Wang Z (2018) Quality assessment of CNES real-time ionospheric products. GPS Solut 23(1):11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petovello MG (2014) Lecture note on estimation for navigation. University of Calgary, Calgary

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovira-Garcia A, Juan JM, Sanz J, Gonzalez-Casado G (2015) A worldwide ionospheric model for fast precise point positioning. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 53(8):4596–4604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seepersad G, Bisnath S (2014) Challenges in assessing PPP performance. J Appl Geod 8(3):205–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi C, Gu S, Lou Y, Ge M (2012) An improved approach to model ionospheric delays for single-frequency precise point positioning. Adv Space Res 49(12):1698–1708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi J, Xu C, Guo J, Gao Y (2014) Local troposphere augmentation for real-time precise point positioning. Earth Planets Space 66(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takasu T (2013) RTKLIB ver 2.4.2 manual

  • Tu R, Ge M, Zhang H, Huang G (2013) The realization and convergence analysis of combined PPP based on raw observation. Adv Space Res 52(1):211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J-T, Wu SC, Hajj GA, Bertiger WI, Lichten SM (1992) Effects of antenna orientation on GPS carrier phase. In: Astrodynamics 1991, pp 1647–1660

  • Xiang Y (2018) Carrier phase-based ionospheric modeling and augmentation in uncombined precise point positioning (UPPP). University of Calgary, Calgary

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang Y, Gao Y (2017) Improving DCB estimation using uncombined PPP. Navigation 64(4):463–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang Y, Yuan Y, Li Z, Wang N (2015) Analysis and validation of different global ionospheric maps (GIMs) over China. Adv Space Res 55(1):199–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiang Y, Gao Y, Shi J, Xu C (2019) Consistency and analysis of ionospheric observables obtained from three precise point positioning models. J Geodesy 93(8):1161–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Teunissen PJ, Odijk D (2011) A novel un-differenced PPP-RTK concept. J Navig 64(S1):S180–S191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Ou J, Yuan Y, Li Z (2012) Extraction of line-of-sight ionospheric observables from GPS data using precise point positioning. Sci China Earth Sci 55(11):1919–1928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Gao Z, Ge M, Niu X, Huang L, Tu R, Li X (2013) On the convergence of ionospheric constrained precise point positioning (IC-PPP) based on undifferential uncombined raw GNSS observations. Sensors 13(11):15708–15725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Chen Y, Yuan Y (2018) PPP-RTK based on undifferenced and uncombined observations: theoretical and practical aspects. J Geod. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1220-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou F, Dong D, Li W, Jiang X, Wickert J, Schuh H (2018) GAMP: an open-source software of multi-GNSS precise point positioning using undifferenced and uncombined observations. GPS Solut 22(2):33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou F, Dong D, Li P, Li X, Schuh H (2019) Influence of stochastic modeling for inter-system biases on multi-GNSS undifferenced and uncombined precise point positioning. GPS Solut 23(3):59

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks go to Fei Liu and Zhitao Lyu for collecting the kinematic data. The authors thank the funding from the Chinese Scholarship Council and the University of Calgary.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YX designed the research, processed data, and prepared the paper draft; YG supervised the research and revised the manuscript. YL and YX contributed to the data analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Xiang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiang, Y., Gao, Y. & Li, Y. Reducing convergence time of precise point positioning with ionospheric constraints and receiver differential code bias modeling. J Geod 94, 8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-019-01334-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-019-01334-x

Keywords

Navigation