Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is increased peripheral ligamentous laxity in term pregnant women associated with obstetric anal sphincter injury?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

Increased ligamentous laxity is associated with pelvic floor distension in pregnant women. This considered, it may also be related to the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). Our objective was to assess the association among increased ligamentous laxity, perineal tear severity, and OASI occurrence.

Methods

This is a prospective study. We assessed ligamentous laxity between the 36th week of pregnancy and the onset of labor, by measuring the passive extension of the nondominant index finger for a 0.26 N.m torque applied to the second metacarpophalangeal joint (MCP laxity). We collected perineal tear occurrence and classification (Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists). We investigated the MCP laxity distribution according to the stage of perineal tears, and then we looked for a predictive level of MCP laxity for OASI.

Results

A total of 272 of the 300 pregnant women included had a vaginal delivery and were considered for the analysis. Mean age was 29 years, mean body mass index was 24.5 kg/m2 and 39.2% of women were nulliparous. We reported 12 cases of OASI. MCP laxity significantly increased with the stage of perineal tears from 58° in stage 0 to 69° and 66° for stages 3a and 3b respectively. An MCP laxity higher than 64° was associated with OASI with sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 56%, and an area under the curve of 0.65.

Conclusion

Increased ligamentous laxity seems associated with OASI occurrence, which is the opposite of the initial hypothesis. This suggests that the stiffest tissues might be at a lower risk of injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Green-top Guideline No. 29. The management of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears 2015. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg29/. Accessed 07 June 2017.

  2. Meister MR, Cahill AG, Conner SN, et al. Predicting obstetric anal sphincter injuries in a modern obstetric population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:310.e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Villot A, Deffieux X, Demoulin G, et al. Management of third and fourth degree perineal tears: a systematic review. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2015;44:802–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Baghestan E, Irgens LM, Bordahl PE, et al. Trends in risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in Norway. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Friedman AM, Ananth CV, Prendergast E, et al. Evaluation of third-degree and fourth-degree laceration rates as quality indicators. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:927–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Borello-France D, Burgio KL, Richter HE, et al. Fecal and urinary incontinence in primiparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:863–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Faltin DL, Otero M, Petignat P, et al. Women’s health 18 years after rupture of the anal sphincter during childbirth: I. Fecal incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:1255–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Visscher AP, Lam TJ, Hart N, et al. Fecal incontinence, sexual complaints, and anorectal function after third-degree obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): 5-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:607–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Geller EJ, Robinson BL, Matthews CA, et al. Perineal body length as a risk factor for ultrasound-diagnosed anal sphincter tear at first delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:631–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Webb SS, Hemming K, Khalfaoui MY, et al. An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool? Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:367–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Williams A, Tincello DG, White S, et al. Risk scoring system for prediction of obstetric anal sphincter injury. BJOG. 2005;112:1066–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Drusany Staric K, Bukovec P, Jakopic K, et al. Can we predict obstetric anal sphincter injury? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;210:196–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gachon B, Desseauve D, Fradet L, et al. Changes in pelvic organ mobility and ligamentous laxity during pregnancy and postpartum. Review of literature and prospects. Prog Urol. 2016;26:385–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gachon B, Fritel X, Fradet L, et al. Is levator hiatus distension associated with peripheral ligamentous laxity during pregnancy? Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:1123–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jobbins B, Bird HA, Wright V. A joint hyperextensometer for the quantification of joint laxity. Engineering Med. 1979;8:103–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Knoepp LR, McDermott KC, Munoz A, et al. Joint hypermobility, obstetrical outcomes, and pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:735–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Beighton P, Grahame R, Bird HA. Assessment of hypermobility. In: Beighton P, editor. Hypermobility of joints. 4th ed. New York: Springer; 2012. p. 11–26.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Meriwether KV, Rogers RG, Dunivan GC, et al. Perineal body stretch during labor does not predict perineal laceration, postpartum incontinence, or postpartum sexual function: a cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:1193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nordin MLT, Campello M, Nordin M, et al. Biomechanics of tendons and ligaments. In: Nordin M, Frankel VH, editors. Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 102–25.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Alperin M, Kaddis T, Pichika R, et al. Pregnancy-induced adaptations in intramuscular extracellular matrix of rat pelvic floor muscles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:210.e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hug F, Tucker K, Gennisson JL, et al. Elastography for muscle biomechanics: toward the estimation of individual muscle force. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2015;43:125–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gennisson JL, Deffieux T, Fink M, et al. Ultrasound elastography: principles and techniques. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013;94:487–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gennisson JL, Muller M, Gabor P, et al. Quantification of elasticity changes in the myometrium during labor using supersonic shear imaging: a feasibility study. Ultrasonics. 2015;56:183–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Muller M, Ait-Belkacem D, Hessabi M, et al. Assessment of the cervix in pregnant women using shear wave Elastography: a feasibility study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:2789–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bertrand Gachon.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no financial disclosure and no conflicts of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gachon, B., Desgranges, M., Fradet, L. et al. Is increased peripheral ligamentous laxity in term pregnant women associated with obstetric anal sphincter injury?. Int Urogynecol J 29, 1589–1595 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3598-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3598-2

Keywords

Navigation