Skip to main content
Log in

Functional data modelling approach for analysing and predicting trends in incidence rates—an application to falls injury

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Policy decisions about the allocation of current and future resources should be based on the most accurate predictions possible. A functional data analysis (FDA) approach improves the understanding of current trends and future incidence of injuries. FDA provides more valid and reliable long-term predictions than commonly used methods.

Introduction

Accurate information about predicted future injury rates is needed to inform public health investment decisions. It is critical that such predictions derived from the best available statistical models to minimise possible error in future injury incidence rates.

Methods

FDA approach was developed to improve long-term predictions but is yet to be widely applied to injury epidemiology or other epidemiological research. Using the specific example of modelling age-specific annual incidence of fall-related severe head injuries of older people during 1970–2004 and predicting rates up to 2024 in Finland, this paper explains the principles behind FDA and demonstrates their superiority in terms of prediction accuracy over the more commonly reported ordinary least squares (OLS) approach.

Results

Application of the FDA approach shows that the incidence of fall-related severe head injuries would increase by 2.3–2.6-fold by 2024 compared to 2004. The FDA predictions had 55% less prediction error than traditional OLS predictions when compared to actual data.

Conclusions

In summary, FDA provides more accurate predictions of long-term incidence trends than commonly used methods. The production of FDA prediction intervals for future injury incidence rates gives likely guidance as to the likely accuracy of these predictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kannus P, Niemi S, Palvanen M et al (2000) Continuously increasing number and incidence of fall-induced, fracture-associated, spinal cord injuries in elderly persons. Arch Intern Med 160:2145–2149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kannus P, Parkkari J, Koskinen S et al (1999) Fall-induced injuries and deaths among older adults. JAMA 281:1895–1899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boufous S, Finch C, Lord S et al (2005) The increasing burden of pelvic fractures in older people, New South Wales, Australia. Injury 36:1323–1329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boufous S, Finch CF, Lord SR (2004) Incidence of hip fracture in New South Wales: are our efforts having an effect? Med J Aust 180:623–626

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moller J (2005) Current costing models: are they suitable for allocating health resources? The example of fall injury prevention in Australia. Accid Anal Prev 37:25–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hindmarsh DM, Hayen A, Finch CF et al (2009) Relative survival after hospitalisation for hip fracture in older people in New South Wales, Australia. Osteoporos Int 20:221–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kannus P, Parkkari J, Niemi S et al (2005) Fall-induced deaths among elderly people. Am J Public Health 95(3):422–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S et al (1999) Increasing number and incidence of fall-induced severe head injuries in older adults: nationwide statistics in Finland in 1970–1995 and prediction for the future. Am J Epidemiol 149:143–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mann E, Icks A, Haastert B et al (2008) Hip fracture incidence in the elderly in Austria: an epidemiological study covering the years 1994 to 2006. BMC Geriatr 8:35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kannus P, Niemi S, Palvanen M et al (2005) Rising incidence of fall-induced injuries among elderly adults. J Public Health 13:212–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S et al (2009) Rate of proximal humeral fractures in older Finnish women between 1970 and 2007. Bone 44:656–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Robertson MC, Campbell AJ, Herbison P (2005) Statistical analysis of efficacy in falls prevention trials. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 60:530–534

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lord SR (2006) Visual risk factors for falls in older people. Age Ageing 35(Suppl 2):42–45

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boufous S, Finch C, Lord S et al (2006) The epidemiology of hospitalised wrist fractures in older people, New South Wales, Australia. Bone 39:1144–1148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S et al (2007) Alarming rise in the number and incidence of fall-induced cervical spine injuries among older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 62:180–183

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J et al (2007) Alarming rise in fall-induced severe head injuries among elderly people. Injury 38:81–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J et al (1999) Hip fractures in Finland between 1970 and 1997 and predictions for the future. Lancet 353:802–805

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S et al (2002) Increasing number and incidence of low-trauma ankle fractures in elderly people: Finnish statistics during 1970–2000 and projections for the future. Bone 31:430–433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Finch CF, Hayen A (2006) Governmental health agencies need to assume leadership in injury prevention. Inj Prev 12:2–3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. MacKenzie EJ (2000) Epidemiology of injuries: current trends and future challenges. Epidemiol Rev 22:112–119

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bangdiwala SI (2009) Random or accidental—what is the goodness of the fit? Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot 16:59–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rivara FP, Cummings P, Koepsell TD et al (2001) Injury control: a guide to research and program evaluation. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Erbas B, Hyndman RJ, Gertig DM (2007) Forecasting age-specific breast cancer mortality using functional data models. Stat Med 26:458–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mathers CD, Loncar D (2006) Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med 3:2011–2030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li G, Shahpar C, Grabowski JG, Baker SP (2001) Secular trends of motor vehicle mortality in the United States, 1910–1994. Accid Anal Prev 33:423–432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wildner M, Casper W, Bergmann KE (1999) A secular trend in hip fracture incidence in East Germany. Osteoporos Int 9:144–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Icks A, Haastert B, Wildner M et al (2008) Trend of hip fracture incidence in Germany 1995–2004: a population-based study. Osteoporos Int 19:1139–1145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Holford TR (1991) Understanding the effects of age, period, and cohort on incidence and mortality rates. Annu Rev Public Health 12:425–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Willets RC (2004) The cohort effect: insights and explanations. Br Actur J 10:833–877

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hyndman RJ, Ullah S (2007) Robust forecasting of mortality and fertility rates: a functional data approach. Comput Stat Data Anal 51:4942–4956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee RD, Carter LR (1992) Modeling and forecasting U.S. mortality. J Am Stat Assoc 87:659–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee R, Miller T (2002) An approach to forecasting health expenditures, with application to the U.S. Medicare system. Health Serv Res 37:1365–1386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee RD, Miller T (2001) Evaluating the performance of the Lee–Carter method for forecasting mortality. Demography 38:537–549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hyndman RJ, Booth H (2008) Stochastic population forecasts using functional data models for mortality, fertility and migration. Int J Forecast 24:323–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. De Jong P, Tickle L (2006) Extending Lee–Carter mortality forecasting. Math Popul Stud 13:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ruppert D, Wand MP, Carroll RJ (2003) Semiparametric regression. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Simonoff JS (1996) Smoothing methods in statistics. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ramsay JO, Dalzell CJ (1991) Some tools for functional data analysis. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 53:539–572

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ramsay JO, Silverman BW (2002) Applied functional data analysis. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Ramsay JO, Silverman BW (2005) Functional data analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lee RD, Tuljapurkar S (1994) Stochastic population forecasts for the United States: beyond high, medium, and low. J Am Stat Assoc 89:1175–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hyndman RJ, Koehler AB, Ord JK, Snyder RD (2005) Prediction intervals for exponential smoothing using two new classes of state space models. J Forecast 24:17–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hyndman RJ, Koehler AB, Snyder RD et al (2002) A state space framework for automatic forecasting using exponential smoothing methods. Int J Forecast 18:439–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tashman LJ (2000) Out-of-sample tests of forecasting accuracy: an analysis and review. Int J Forecast 16:437–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. R Development Core Team (2004) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.R-project.org

  46. Renshaw A, Haberman S (2003) Lee–Carter mortality forecasting: a parallel generalized linear modelling approach for England and Wales mortality projections. Appl Stat 52:119–137

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lee RD (1993) Modeling and forecasting the time series of US fertility: age distribution, range, and ultimate level. Int J Forecast 9:187–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Booth H, Maindonald J, Smith L (2002) Applying Lee–Carter under conditions of variable mortality decline. Popul Stud 56:325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. O’Connor PJ (2005) Forecasting of spinal cord injury annual case numbers in Australia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:48–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Makridakis S, Wheelwright SC, Hyndman RJ (1998) Forecasting: methods and applications, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Professor Pekka Kannus, Chief Physician and Head, Injury & Osteoporosis Research Centre, UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere, Finland for providing the data analysed in this study.

Dr Shahid Ullah was supported by an Injury Trauma and Rehabilitation (ITR) Research Fellowship funded through a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Capacity Building Grant in Population Health. Professor Caroline Finch was supported by an NHMRC Principal Research Fellowship.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Ullah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ullah, S., Finch, C.F. Functional data modelling approach for analysing and predicting trends in incidence rates—an application to falls injury. Osteoporos Int 21, 2125–2134 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1189-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1189-2

Keywords

Navigation