Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Social disadvantage, bone mineral density and vertebral wedge deformities in the Tasmanian Older Adult Cohort

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

The relationship between social disadvantage and bone mineral density (BMD) is complex and remains unclear; furthermore, little is known of the relationship with vertebral deformities. We observed social disadvantage to be associated with BMD for females, independent of body mass index (BMI). A lower prevalence of vertebral deformities was observed for disadvantaged males.

Introduction

The relationship between social disadvantage and BMD appears complex and remains unclear, and little is known about the association between social disadvantage and vertebral wedge deformities. We examined the relationship between social disadvantage, BMD and wedge deformities in older adults from the Tasmanian Older Adult Cohort.

Methods

BMD and wedge deformities were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and associations with extreme social disadvantage was examined in 1,074 randomly recruited population-based adults (51 % female). Socioeconomic status was assessed by Socio-economic Indexes for Areas values derived from residential addresses using Australian Bureau of Statistics 2001 census data. Lifestyle variables were collected by self-report. Regression models were adjusted for age, BMI, dietary calcium, serum vitamin D (25(OH)D), smoking, alcohol, physical inactivity, calcium/vitamin D supplements, glucocorticoids and hormone therapy (females only).

Results

Compared with other males, socially disadvantaged males were older (65.9 years versus 61.9 years, p = 0.008) and consumed lower dietary calcium and alcohol (both p ≤ 0.03). Socially disadvantaged females had greater BMI (29.9 ± 5.9 versus 27.6 ± 5.3, p = 0.002) and consumed less alcohol (p = 0.003) compared with other females. Socially disadvantaged males had fewer wedge deformities compared with other males (33.3 % versus 45.4 %, p = 0.05). After adjustment, social disadvantage was negatively associated with hip BMD for females (p = 0.02), but not for males (p = 0.70), and showed a trend for fewer wedge deformities for males (p = 0.06) but no association for females (p = 0.85).

Conclusions

Social disadvantage appears to be associated with BMD for females, independent of BMI and other osteoporosis risk factors. A lower prevalence of vertebral deformities was observed for males of extreme social disadvantage. Further research is required to elucidate potential mechanisms for these associations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brennan SL, Henry MJ, Wluka AE, Nicholson GC, Kotowicz MA, Williams JW, Pasco JA (2009) BMD in population-based adult women is associated with socioeconomic status. J Bone Miner Res 24:809–815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brennan SL, Henry MJ, Wluka AE, Nicholson GC, Kotowicz MA, Pasco JA (2010) Socioeconomic status and bone mineral density in a population-based sample of men. Bone 46:993–999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brennan SL, Henry MJ, Kotowicz MA, Nicholson GC, Zhang Y, Pasco JA (2011) Incident hip fracture and social disadvantage in an Australian population aged 50 years or greater. Bone 48:607–610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brennan SL, Henry MJ, Nicholson GC, Kotowicz MA, Pasco JA (2009) Socioeconomic status and risk factors for obesity and metabolic disorders in a population-based sample of adult females. Prev Med 49:165–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brennan SL, Henry MJ, Nicholson GC, Kotowicz MA, Pasco JA (2010) Socioeconomic status, obesity and lifestyle in men: The Geelong Osteoporosis Study. J Men's Health 7:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ball K, Mishra G, Crawford D (2002) Which aspects of socioeconomic status are related to obesity among men and women? Int J Obes 26:559–565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ball K, Crawford D (2005) Socioeconomic status and weight change in adults: a review. Soc Sci Med 60:1987–2010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ismail AA, Cooper C, Felsenberg D, Varlow J, Kanis JA, Silman AJ, O'Neill TW (1999) Number and type of vertebral deformities: epidemiological characteristics and relation to back pain and height loss. European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group. Osteoporos Int 9:206–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pasco JA, Henry MJ, Korn S, Nicholson GC, Kotowicz MA (2009) Morphometric vertebral fractures of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine, physical function and quality of life in men. Osteoporos Int 20:787–792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Laslett LL, Just Nee Foley SJ, Quinn SJ, Winzenberg TM, Jones G (2012) Excess body fat is associated with higher risk of vertebral deformities in older women but not in men: a cross-sectional study. Osteoporos Int 23:67–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yin J, Winzenberg T, Quinn S, Giles G, Jones G (2011) Beverage-specific alcohol intake and bone loss in older men and women: a longitudinal study. Europ J Clin Nutr 65:526-532

    Google Scholar 

  12. Australia M (2009) MIMS annual. CMP Medica Australia Pty Ltd, St Leonards, NSW

  13. ABS (2001) Census of population and housing: Socio-economic Indexes for Areas; Australia 2001 number 2039.0. In: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, Australia

  14. Pasco JA, Sanders KM, Henry MJ, Nicholson GC, Seeman E, Kotowicz MA (2000) Calcium intakes among Australian women: Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Aust NZ J Med 30:21–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. NHMRC (2009) Australian guidelines to reduce health risks from drinking alcohol. In: NHMRC, Canberra, Australia

  16. Ding C, Cicuttini FM, Parameswaran V, Burgess J, Quinn S, Jones G (2009) Serum levels of vitamin D, sunlight exposure, and knee cartilage loss in older adults. Arthrit Rheum 60:1381–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Morin S, Leslie WD, Program MBD (2009) High bone mineral density is associated with high body mass index. Osteoporos Int 20:1267–1271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Albala C, Yanez M, Devoto E, Sostin C, Zeballos L, Santos JL (1996) Obesity as a protective factor for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 20:1027–1032

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Reid IR, Plank LD, Evans MC (1992) Fat mass is an important determinant of whole body bone density in premenopausal women but not in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 75:779–782

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pesonen J, Sirola J, Tuppurainen M, Jurvelin J, Alhava E, Honkanen R et al (2005) High bone mineral density among perimenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 16:1899–1906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Felson DT, Zhang Y, Hannan MT, Anderson JJ (1993) Effects of weight and body mass index on bone mineral density in men and women: the Framingham Study. J Bone Miner Res 8:567–573

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Reid I (2002) Relationships among body mass, its components and bone. Bone 31:547–555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Beck TJ, Oreskovic TL, Stone KL, Ruff CB, Ensrud K, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Cummings SR (2001) Structural adaptation to changing skeletal load in the progression toward hip fragility: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 16:1108–1119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Edelstein SL, Barrett-Connor E (1993) Relation between body size and bone mineral density in elderly men and women. Am J Epidemiol 138:160–169

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pasco JA, Henry MJ, Kotowicz MA, Collier GR, Ball MJ, Ugoni AM, Nicholson GC (2001) Serum leptin levels are associated with bone mass in nonobese women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:1884–1887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Silman AJ, O'Neill TW, Cooper C, Kanis J, Felsenberg D (1997) Influence of physical activity on vertebral deformity in men and women: results from the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 12:813–819

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ismail AA, O'Neill TW, Cooper C, Silman AJ, and the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group (2000) Risk factors for vertebral deformities in men: relationship to number of vertebral deformities. J Bone Miner Res 15:278–283

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wilkinson RG, Marmot MG (eds) (1998) Social determinants of health: the solid facts. WHO European Region, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  29. Turrell G, Stanley L, de Looper M, Oldenburg B (2006) Health inequalities in Australia: morbidity, health behaviours, risk factors and health service use. In: Canberra, Queensland University of Technology and the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants who made this study possible. The assistance of J Cochrane for data extraction is gratefully acknowledged.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia, the Arthritis Foundation of Australia, the Tasmanian Community Fund and the University of Tasmania (Institutional Research Grant scheme) funded this study. SL Brennan is the recipient of NHMRC Early Career Fellowship (1012472). AE Wluka is the recipient of NHMRC Clinical Career Development Award (545876). G Jones is the recipient of NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (1025222).

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. L. Brennan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brennan, S.L., Winzenberg, T.M., Pasco, J.A. et al. Social disadvantage, bone mineral density and vertebral wedge deformities in the Tasmanian Older Adult Cohort. Osteoporos Int 24, 1909–1916 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-012-2211-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-012-2211-7

Keywords

Navigation