Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bone loss with antiepileptic drug therapy: a twin and sibling study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Changes in areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and other predictors of bone loss were evaluated in 48 same-sex twin/age-matched sibling pairs discordant for antiepileptic drug (AED) use. AED users had reduced BMD at the hip regions. Prolonged AED users had greater aBMD loss, predicting a higher risk of bone fragility.

Introduction

To investigate the longitudinal associations of bone mineral measures with antiepileptic drug (AED) use, including enzyme-inducing (EIAED) and non-enzyme-inducing (NEIAED) types, and other predictors of bone loss in a study of 48 same-sex twin/age-matched sibling pairs (40 female, 8 male) discordant for AED use.

Methods

Using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and content (BMC) at the hip regions, forearm, lumbar spine, and whole body were measured twice, at least 2 years apart. The mean within-pair difference (MWPD), MWPD%, and mean annual rate of aBMD change were adjusted for age, weight, and height. Predictors of bone loss were evaluated.

Results

AED users, compared to non-users, at baseline and follow-up, respectively, had reduced aBMD at the total hip (MWPD% 3.8, 4.4%), femoral neck (4.7, 4.5%), and trochanter regions (4.1, 4.6%) (p < 0.05). For the whole cohort, the annual rate of change in all aBMD/BMC (p > 0.05) regions did not differ within pairs. Nevertheless, EIAED users had greater aBMD loss than non-users (n = 20 pairs) at the total hip (1.7 vs. 0.3%, p = 0.013) and whole body regions (0.7% loss vs. 0.1% BMD gain, p = 0.019), which was not found in NEIAED-discordant pairs (n = 16). AED use >20 years predicted higher aBMD loss at the forearm (p = 0.028), whole body (p = 0.010), and whole body BMC (p = 0.031).

Conclusions

AED users had reduced aBMD at the hip regions. Prolonged users and EIAED users had greater aBMD loss, predicting a higher risk of bone fragility. Further prospective studies of AED effects on bone microarchitecture are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pack AM (2004) Antiepileptic drugs and bone disease. Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab 2(2):159–165. doi:10.1385/BMM:2:2:159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim SH, Lee JW, Choi K-G, Chung HW, Lee HW (2007) A 6-month longitudinal study of bone mineral density with antiepileptic drug monotherapy. Epilepsy Behav 10(2):291–295. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2006.11.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pack AM, Morrell MJ, Randall A, McMahon DJ, Shane E (2008) Bone health in young women with epilepsy after one year of antiepileptic drug monotherapy. Neurology 70(18):1586–1593. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000310981.44676.de

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ensrud KE, Walczak TS, Blackwell TL, Ensrud ER, Bowman PJ, Stone KL (2004) Antiepileptic drug use increases rates of bone loss in older women: a prospective study. Neurology 62(11):2051–2057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ensrud KE, Walczak TS, Blackwell TL, Ensrud ER, Barrett-Connor E, Orwoll ES (2008) Antiepileptic drug use and rates of hip bone loss in older men: a prospective study. Neurology 71(10):723–730. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000324919.86696.a9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Carbone LD, Johnson KC, Robbins J et al (2010) Antiepileptic drug use, falls, fractures, and BMD in postmenopausal women: findings from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI). J Bone Miner Res 25(4):873–881. doi:10.1359/jbmr.091027

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Andress DL, Ozuna J, Tirschwell D et al (2002) Antiepileptic drug-induced bone loss in young male patients who have seizures. Arch Neurol 59(5):781–786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pack AM (2003) The association between antiepileptic drugs on bone disease. Epilepsy Curr 3(3):91–95. doi:10.1046/j.1535-7597.2003.03306.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakken KO, Tauboll E (2010) Bone loss associated with use of antiepileptic drugs. Expert Opin Drug Saf 9(4):561–571. doi:10.1517/14740331003636475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wark JD (2003) Influence of nutrition on bone health: the twin model approach. In: New S, Bonjour JP (eds) Nutritional aspects of bone health. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 451–461

    Google Scholar 

  11. Petty SJ, Paton LM, O’Brien TJ et al (2005) Effect of antiepileptic medication on bone mineral measures. Neurology 65(9):1358–1365. doi:10.1212/01.Wnl.000180910.72487.18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson GD (2004) Pharmacogenetics and enzyme induction/inhibition properties of antiepileptic drugs. Neurology 63(10 Suppl 4):S3–S8. doi:10.1212/WNL.63.10_suppl_4.S3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Elger CE, Schmidt D (2008) Modern management of epilepsy: a practical approach. Epilepsy Behav 12(4):501–539. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.01.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Riva R, Albani F, Contin M, Baruzzi A (1996) Pharmacokinetic interactions between antiepileptic drugs: clinical considerations. Clin Pharmacokinet 31(6):470–493. doi:10.2165/00003088-199631060-00005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hologic (1999) Model QDR® 4500 fan beam x-ray bone densitometer: technical manual. Hologic Inc., MA

    Google Scholar 

  16. Angus RM, Sambrook PN, Pocock NA, Eisman JA (1989) A simple method for assessing calcium intake in Caucasian women. J Am Diet Assoc 89(2):209–214

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. MacInnis RJ, Cassar C, Nowson C et al (2003) Determinants of bone density in 30- to 65-year-old women: a co-twin study. J Bone Miner Res 18(9):1650–1656. doi:10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.9.1650

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Khosla S, Riggs BL (2005) Pathophysiology of age-related bone loss and osteoporosis. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am 34(4):1015–1030. doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2005.07.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ito M, Nakata T, Nishida A, Uetani M (2011) Age-related changes in bone density, geometry and biomechanical properties of the proximal femur: CT-based 3D hip structure analysis in normal postmenopausal women. Bone 48(3):627–630. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2010.11.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sambrook PN, Cameron ID, Chen JS et al (2007) Influence of fall related factors and bone strength on fracture risk in the frail elderly. Osteoporos Int 18(5):603–610. doi:10.1007/s00198-006-0290-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Milat AJ, Watson WL, Monger C, Barr M, Giffin M, Reid M (2011) Prevalence, circumstances and consequences of falls among community-dwelling older people: results of the 2009 NSW Falls Prevention Baseline Survey. N S W Public Health Bull 22(3–4):43–48. doi:10.1071/NB10065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gill T, Taylor AW, Pengelly A (2005) A population-based survey of factors relating to the prevalence of falls in older people. Gerontology 51(5):340–345. doi:10.1159/000086372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tromp AM, Smit JH, Deeg DJH, Bouter LM, Lips P (1998) Predictors for falls and fractures in the longitudinal aging study Amsterdam. J Bone Miner Res 13(12):1932–1939. doi:10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.12.1932

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shiek Ahmad B, Hill KD, O’Brien TJ, Gorelik A, Habib N, Wark JD (2012) Falls and fractures in patients chronically treated with antiepileptic drugs. Neurology 79(2):145–151. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31825f0466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zielińska-Więczkowska H, Muszalik M, Kędziora-Kornatowska K (2012) The analysis of aging and elderly age quality in empirical research: data based on University of the Third Age (U3A) students. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 55(1):195–199. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2011.07.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shiek Ahmad B, Wark JD, Petty SJ et al (2015) Changes in balance function with chronic antiepileptic drug therapy: a twin and sibling study. Epilepsia 56(11):1714–1722. doi:10.1111/epi.13136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Farhat G, Yamout B, Mikati MA, Demirjian S, Sawaya R, El Hajj FG (2002) Effect of antiepileptic drugs on bone density in ambulatory patients. Neurology 58(9):1348–1353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. El-Hajj Fuleihan G, Dib L, Yamout B, Sawaya R, Mikati MA (2008) Predictors of bone density in ambulatory patients on antiepileptic drugs. Bone 43(1):149–155. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2008.03.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Valimaki MJ, Tiihonen M, Laitinen K et al (1994) Bone mineral density measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and novel markers of bone formation and resorption in patients on antiepileptic drugs. J Bone Miner Res 9(5):631–637. doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650090507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Holzer G, von Skrbensky G, Holzer LA, Pichl W (2009) Hip fractures and the contribution of cortical versus trabecular bone to femoral neck strength. J Bone Miner Res 24(3):468–474. doi:10.1359/jbmr.081108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schneider P, Stauber M, Voide R, Stampanoni M, Donahue LR, Müller R (2007) Ultrastructural properties in cortical bone vary greatly in two inbred strains of mice as assessed by synchrotron light based micro- and nano-CT. J Bone Miner Res 22(10):1557–1570. doi:10.1359/jbmr.070703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Osnes EK, Lofthus CM, Meyer HE et al (2004) Consequences of hip fracture on activities of daily life and residential needs. Osteoporos Int 15(7):567–574. doi:10.1007/s00198-003-1583-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Trombetti A, Herrmann F, Hoffmeyer P, Schurch MA, Bonjour JP, Rizzoli R (2002) Survival and potential years of life lost after hip fracture in men and age-matched women. Osteoporos Int 13(9):731–737. doi:10.1007/s001980200100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wiktorowicz ME, Goeree R, Papaioannou A, Adachi JD, Papadimitropoulos E (2001) Economic implications of hip fracture: health service use, institutional care and cost in Canada. Osteoporos Int 12(4):271–278. doi:10.1007/s001980170116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shiek Ahmad B, O’Brien TJ, Gorelik A, Hill KD, Wark JD (2016) Bone mineral changes in epilepsy patients during initial years of antiepileptic drug therapy. J Clin Densitom 19(4):450–456. doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2016.07.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Patel MX, Doku V, Tennakoon L (2003) Challenges in recruitment of research participants. Adv Psychiatr Treat 9(3):229–238. doi:10.1192/apt.9.3.229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Petty SJ, Hill KD, Haber NE, Paton LM, Lawrence KM, Berkovic SF, Seibel MJ, O’Brien TJ, Wark JD (2010) Balance impairment in chronic antiepileptic drug users: a twin and sibling study. Epilepsia 51(2):280–288. doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Prevrhal S, Meta M, Genant HK (2004) Two new regions of interest to evaluate separately cortical and trabecular BMD in the proximal femur using DXA. Osteoporos Int 15(1):12–19. doi:10.1007/s00198-003-1500-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their highest appreciation to all participants for their invaluable contributions and commitments throughout the study, our collaborators, Ms. Mary Sakellarides who continued the work of Dr. Petty on baseline recruitment, the late Ms. Sue Kantor and Ms. Ashwini Kale at Bone and Mineral Medicine, the Royal Melbourne Hospital, for their assistance during the bone scanning of Melbourne-based participants, Professor Richard L Prince and his research team at the Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital for their support for study visits in Western Australia, Ms. Monique Macara from the RNSH who conducted the assessments for Sydney-based participants, the Australian Twin Registry, and all who have been involved with the University of Melbourne Twin and Sibling Research Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. D. Wark.

Ethics declarations

The Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (HREC 2003.249), Sir Charles Gairdner, HREC, Perth, and HARBOUR HREC of Northern Sydney Central Coast Health (NSCCH) (protocol 0409-199M (Q)) approved this multi-center study. All participants provided written informed consent. The project was approved by the Australian Twin Registry.

Disclosures

This research was funded by National Health and Medical Research Council project grant number (400089), by the Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne and by the Royal Melbourne Hospital Research Foundation. Professors Wark and O’Brien received research support from UCB Pharma and Novartis for unrelated studies. Dr. Petty received research support from UCB Pharma for an unrelated investigator-initiated study. Dr. Shiek Ahmad obtained financial support throughout her PhD from the University of Malaya and the Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Declaration

The work described in this manuscript is consistent with the Journal’s guidelines for ethical publication. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Professor Sambrook passed away in 2012

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shiek Ahmad, B., Petty, S.J., Gorelik, A. et al. Bone loss with antiepileptic drug therapy: a twin and sibling study. Osteoporos Int 28, 2591–2600 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4098-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4098-9

Keywords

Navigation