Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bone resorption and dietary calcium in pregnancy—a window to future maternal bone health

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pregnancy is characterized by increased bone turnover and reversible loss of bone mineral density (BMD) to meet fetal calcium demands. The long-term effect of bone turnover and maternal diet in pregnancy on maternal bone is not well established.

Objective

We aimed to determine if an association exists between [1] bone resorption, [2] dietary calcium, and [3] serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D in pregnancy with maternal BMD 5-year postpartum.

Design

This is a prospective, longitudinal study of 107 women recruited to the ROLO low glycemic index dietary intervention trial in pregnancy and followed-up at 13, 28, and 34 weeks’ gestation and 5 years’ postpartum. At 13 and 28 weeks’ gestation, a biomarker of bone resorption, urine cross-linked N-telopeptide of type I collagen (uNTX), was measured. At the 5-year follow-up BMD was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Anthropometry, dietary intakes, and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D were measured in pregnancy and at 5 years. Multiple linear regression, controlling for confounders, was used for analysis.

Results

Mean BMD at 5 years was 1.208 g/cm2. In pregnancy, 24–34% reported dietary calcium intakes <800 mg/day. Vitamin D deficiency (< 30 nmol/L) was observed in 38–41% of women in pregnancy and in 29% of women at the 5-year follow-up. At 13 and 28 weeks’ gestation, uNTX levels greater than the median were associated with 0.060 and 0.050 g/cm2 lower BMD 5 years later, respectively. Dietary calcium <800 mg/day in trimester 3 was associated with 0.072 g/cm2 lower BMD 5 years later. Vitamin D deficiency at 5 years, but not in pregnancy, was associated with lower BMD.

Conclusion

Higher bone resorption and low dietary calcium in pregnancy were associated with lower BMD 5 years later. These findings could enable the identification of women at risk of declining of BMD in later life, but further research is needed. Adequate dietary calcium should be advised in the antenatal setting to promote lifelong maternal bone health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BMD:

Bone mineral density

uNTX:

Urine Cross-Linked N-Telopeptides Of Type I Collagen

25OHD:

Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D

DXA:

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

BMI:

Body mass index

ROLO:

Randomized control trial of a low glycemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia

IPAQ:

International Physical Activity Questionnaire

MET:

Metabolic equivalent

IOM:

Institute of Medicine

EAR:

Estimated average requirements

RDA:

Recommended dietary allowances

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. Givens MH, Macy IG. The chemical composition of the human fetus. J Biol Chem [Internet]. 1933 [cited 2015 Sep 10];102:7–17. Available from: http://www.jbc.org/content/102/1/7.citation

  2. Prentice A. Calcium in pregnancy and lactation. Annu Rev Nutr [Internet]. Annual Reviews Inc.; 2000;20:249–72. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=5364903&site=ehost-live

  3. Institute of Medicine (2011) Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D [Internet]. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3046611&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract%5Cn, http://jcem.endojournals.org/content/96/1/53.short

  4. Kovacs CS (2016) Maternal mineral and bone metabolism during pregnancy, lactation, and post-weaning recovery. Physiol Rev [Internet]. [cited 2017 Apr 26];96:449–547. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26887676

  5. Kovacs CS (2005) Calcium and bone metabolism during pregnancy and lactation. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 10:105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ulrich U, Miller PB, Eyre DR, Chesnut CH, Schlebusch H, Soules MR (2003) Bone remodeling and bone mineral density during pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 268:309–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sanz-Salvador L, Garcia-Perez MA, Tarin JJ, Cano A. Bone metabolic changes during pregnancy: a period of vulnerability to osteoporosis and fracture. Eur J Endocrinol [Internet]. 2015;172:R53–65. Available from: http://www.eje-online.org/cgi/doi/10.1530/EJE-14-0424

  8. Ó Breasail M, Prentice A, Ward K (2020) Pregnancy-related bone mineral and microarchitecture changes in women aged 30–45 years. J Bone Miner Res [Internet]. [cited 2020 Apr 26];jbmr.3998. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jbmr.3998

  9. Olausson H, Laskey MA, Goldberg GR, Prentice A (2008) Changes in bone mineral status and bone size during pregnancy and the influences of body weight and calcium intake. Am J Clin Nutr [Internet]. [cited 2015 Oct 6];88:1032–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18842791

  10. Møller UK, Streym S, Mosekilde L, Rejnmark L (2012) Changes in bone mineral density and body composition during pregnancy and postpartum. A controlled cohort study. Osteoporos Int 23:1213–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kolthoff N, Eiken P, Pors Nielsen S. Bone mineral changes during pregnancy and lactation: a longitudinal cohort study. Clin Sci [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2017 Apr 24];94:405–12. Available from: http://www.clinsci.org/content/94/4/405.full-text.pdf

  12. Karlsson MK, Ahlborg HG, Karlsson C (2005) Maternity and bone mineral density. Acta Orthop [Internet]. [cited 2017 Apr 24];76:2–13. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15788303

  13. Tuppurainen M, Kröger H, Saarikoski S, Honkanen R, Alhava E (1995) The effect of gynecological risk factors on lumbar and femoral bone mineral density in peri- and postmenopausal women. Maturitas [Internet]. [cited 2017 Apr 25];21:137–45. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/037851229400878B

  14. Miyamoto T, Miyakoshi K, Sato Y, Kasuga Y, Ikenoue S, Miyamoto K, Nishiwaki Y, Tanaka M, Nakamura M, Matsumoto M (2020) Changes in bone metabolic profile associated with pregnancy or lactation. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Apr 26];9:6787. Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-43049-1

  15. Kyvernitakis I, Reuter TC, Hellmeyer L, Hars O, Hadji P (2018) Subsequent fracture risk of women with pregnancy and lactation-associated osteoporosis after a median of 6 years of follow-up. Osteoporos Int [Internet]. [cited 2019 Aug 14];29:135–42. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28965212

  16. Jarjou LMA, Sawo Y, Goldberg GR, Laskey MA, Cole TJ, Prentice A (2013) Unexpected long-term effects of calcium supplementation in pregnancy on maternal bone outcomes in women with a low calcium intake: a follow-up study. Am J Clin Nutr [Internet]. American Society for Nutrition; [cited 2017 Apr 24];98:723–30. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23902782

  17. Walsh JM, McGowan CA, Mahony R, Foley ME, McAuliffe FM, Walsh JM, McGowan CA, Mahony R, FMM MEF (2012) Low glycaemic index diet in pregnancy to prevent macrosomia (ROLO study): randomised control trial. BMJ. 345:e5605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Brien EC, Geraghty AA, McAuliffe FM (2017) Successful strategies to improve follow-up for longitudinal birth cohort studies. Contemp Clin Trials [Internet]. [cited 2017 Mar 30];57:8–9. Available from: doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2017.03.003

  19. Food Standards Agency (2002) McCance and Widdowson’s the composition of foods, 6th summary edn. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  20. Haase T, Pratschke J (2012) The 2011 Pobal HP Deprivation Index for Small Areas ( SA ) Introduction and Reference Tables [Internet]. Available from: https://www.pobal.ie/Publications/Documents/Introduction and Reference Tables.pdf

  21. Godin G, Shephard RJ (1985) A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci [Internet]. [cited 2017 Apr 20];10:141–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4053261

  22. O’Brien EC, Kilbane MT, McKenna MJ, Segurado R, Geraghty AA, McAuliffe FM (2018) Calcium intake in winter pregnancy attenuates impact of vitamin D inadequacy on urine NTX, a marker of bone resorption. Eur J Nutr [Internet]. [cited 2018 Jul 3];57:1015–23. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28224220

  23. Harrington J, Perry I, Lutomski J, Morgan K, McGee H, Shelley E, Watson D, Barry M. SLÁN 2007: Survey of Lifestyle, Attitudes and Nutrition in Ireland. Dietary Habits of the Irish Population. Psychol Reports [Internet]. 2008;6. Available from: http://epubs.rcsi.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=psycholrep

  24. Public Health England. (2015) McCance and Widdowson’s The Composition of Foods Integrated Dataset 2015 [Internet]. London; Available from: www.gov.uk/phe

  25. Food Standards Agency (2002) Food Portion Sizes. London: The Stationary Office

  26. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, et al. (2003) International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-Country Reliability and Validity. Med Sci Sport Exerc [Internet]. [cited 2017 Jun 13];35:1381–95. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12900694

  27. International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Guidelines for Data Processing and Analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)–Short Form. [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2017 Apr 20]. Available from: https://sites.google.com/site/theipaq/scoring-protocol

  28. McKenna MJ, Murray BF, O’Keane M, Kilbane MT. (2015) Rising trend in vitamin D status from 1993 to 2013: dual concerns for the future. Endocr Connect [Internet]. [cited 2015 Nov 19];4:163–171. Available from: http://www.endocrineconnections.com/cgi/doi/10.1530/EC-15-0037

  29. Ettinger AS, Lamadrid-figueroa H, Mercado-garcía A, Kordas K, Wood RJ, Peterson KE, Hu H, Hernández-avila M, Téllez-rojo MM (2014) Effect of calcium supplementation on bone resorption in pregnancy and the early postpartum : a randomized controlled trial in Mexican women. Nutr J 13:116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Janakiraman V, Ettinger A, Mercado-Garcia A, Hu H, Hernandez-Avila M (2003) Calcium supplements and bone resorption in pregnancy: a randomized crossover trial. Am J Prev Med 24:260–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. O’Brien EC, O’Sullivan EJ, Kilbane MT, Geraghty AA, McKenna MJ, McAuliffe FM (2017) Season and vitamin D status are independently associated with glucose homeostasis in pregnancy. Nutr Metab (Lond) [Internet]. BioMed Central; [cited 2017 Aug 17];14:50. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28775759

  32. O’Brien KO, Donangelo CM, Vargas Zapata CL, Abrams SA, Spencer EM, King JC (2006) Bone calcium turnover during pregnancy and lactation in women with low calcium diets is associated with calcium intake and circulating insulin-like growth factor 1 concentrations. Am J Clin Nutr 83:317–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jarjou LMA, Sawo Y, Goldberg GR, Laskey MA, Cole TJ, Prentice A, Sawo Y, Goldberg GR, Cole TJ, Prentice A, et al. (2010) Effect of calcium supplementation in pregnancy on maternal bone outcomes in women with a low calcium intake. Am J Clin Nutr [Internet]. American Society for Nutrition; [cited 2015 Sep 2];98:450–7. Available from: http://www.ajcn.org/cgi/doi/10.3945/ajcn.2010.29217

  34. Compston J, Cooper A, Cooper C, Gittoes N, Gregson C, Harvey N, Hope S, Kanis JA, McCloskey E V., Poole KES, et al. (2017) UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Arch Osteoporos [Internet]. [cited 2017 Apr 26];12:43. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28425085

  35. Zhu K, Whitehouse AJ, Hart PH, Kusel M, Mountain J, Lye S, Pennell C, Walsh JP (2014) Maternal vitamin d status during pregnancy and bone mass in offspring at 20 years of age: a prospective cohort study. J Bone Miner Res [Internet]. 29:1088–95. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24189972

  36. Baird J, Barker M, Harvey NC, Lawrence W, Vogel C, Jarman M, Begum R, Tinati T, Mahon P, Strommer S, et al. (2016) Southampton PRegnancy Intervention for the Next Generation (SPRING): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials [Internet]. BioMed Central; [cited 2017 Feb 7];17:493. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27729061

  37. Cooper C, Harvey NC, Bishop NJ, Kennedy S, Papageorghiou AT, Schoenmakers I, Fraser R, Gandhi S V., Carr A, D’Angelo S, et al. (2016) Maternal gestational vitamin D supplementation and offspring bone health (MAVIDOS): A multicentre, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol [Internet]. [cited 2016 Nov 7];4:393–402. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2213858716000449

  38. Prentice A (2003) Micronutrients and the bone mineral content of the mother, fetus and newborn. J Nutr 133:1693S–1699S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ip S, Chung M, Raman G, Chew P, Magula N, DeVine D, Trikalinos T, Lau J (2007) Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) [Internet]. [cited 2017 Apr 25];1–186. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17764214

  40. Lenora J, Lekamwasam S, Karlsson MK (2009) Effects of multiparity and prolonged breast-feeding on maternal bone mineral density: a community-based cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health [Internet]. BioMed Central; [cited 2017 Apr 24];9:19. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19570205

  41. Song SY, Kim Y, Park H, Kim YJ, Kang W, Kim EY (2017) Effect of parity on bone mineral density: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone [Internet]. [cited 2017 Aug 25];101:70–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28450215

  42. Shapses SA, Pop LC, Wang Y (2017) Obesity is a concern for bone health with aging. Nutr Res [Internet]. [cited 2017 May 2];39:1–13. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28385284

  43. O’Brien OA, Lindsay KL, McCarthy M, McGloin AF, Kennelly M, Scully HA, McAuliffe FM. Influences on the food choices and physical activity behaviours of overweight and obese pregnant women: A qualitative study. Midwifery [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Mar 29];28–35. Available from: www.elsevier.com/locate/midw

  44. Wheater G, Elshahaly M, Tuck SP, Datta HK, van Laar JM (2013) The clinical utility of bone marker measurements in osteoporosis. J Transl Med [Internet]. BioMed Central; [cited 2017 May 3];11:201. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23984630

Download references

Acknowledgments

ECOB designed research, conducted research, analyzed data, wrote paper; AAG conducted research, wrote paper; MTK conducted research, provided essential reagents, wrote paper; MJMcK provided essential reagents, wrote paper; FMcA designed research and had primary responsibility for final content.

Data sharing

Data described in the manuscript, code book, and analytic code will be made available upon request pending.

Funding

This study was supported by the Health Research Centre for Health and Diet Research (Health Research Board Ireland), The National Maternity Hospital Medical Fund and the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013), project EarlyNutrition under grant agreement no. 289346. The funding sources had no involvement in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F.M. McAuliffe.

Ethics declarations

Disclaimers

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOC 87 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Brien, E., Geraghty, A., Kilbane, M. et al. Bone resorption and dietary calcium in pregnancy—a window to future maternal bone health. Osteoporos Int 32, 1803–1814 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05891-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05891-w

Keywords

Navigation