Abstract.
This study used intracellular recording of excitatory junction potentials (EJPs) and focal extracellular recording of excitatory junction currents (EJCs) to investigate the effects of agents that modulate intracellular cAMP levels on sympathetic neuroeffector transmission in the guinea-pig vas deferens. In this tissue, postjunctional electrical activity is produced by neurally released ATP.
The adenylate cyclase activator, forskolin (0.5–5 µM) increased the amplitude of all EJPs evoked by trains of 20 stimuli at 1 Hz. Forskolin (5 µM) also increased the probability of recording EJCs without changing the amplitude distributions of spontaneous EJP and EJCs, indicating that this agent does not change the postjunctional sensitivity to spontaneously released quanta of ATP. EJP amplitudes were also increased by 8-bromo-cyclic AMP (10 µM), 8-bromo-cyclic GMP (10 µM), the phosphodiesterase inhibitor, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (100 and 1000 µM) and the β-adrenoceptor agonist, isoprenaline (1 µM). The selective protein kinase A inhibitors, H-89 (10 µM) and the Rp isomer of adenosine-3′,5′-cyclic monophosphorothioate (Rp-cAMPS, 100 µM), and the broad spectrum protein kinase inhibitors, [1-(5-isoquinolinesulphonyl)-3-methylpiperazine-diHCl (H-7, 100 µM) and staurosporine (1 µM), did not block the facilitatory effects of forskolin on EJP amplitude. In addition, the effects of forskolin were not blocked by the cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel blocker, spermine (50 µM).
These results suggest that elevating intracellular cAMP levels increases ATP release in the guinea-pig vas deferens by a mechanism which does not involve activation of protein kinases A or G.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Electronic Publication
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
, ., , . Effects of agents that modulate intracellular cAMP levels on excitatory junction potentials recorded in the guinea-pig vas deferens in vitro. Naunyn-Schmied Arch Pharmacol 362, 559–567 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002100000303
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002100000303