Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stimulant and relaxant drugs combined with stimulant and relaxant information: a study of active placebo

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

The active placebo hypothesis states that placebo effects are potentiated when an active drug is administered.

Objective

This hypothesis was tested in an experiment where information about the effect of a drug was combined with administration of an active drug or placebo.

Methods

Information that a drug acted as a relaxant, a stimulant, or as a placebo was crossed with oral administration of a relaxant drug (700 mg carisoprodol), a stimulant drug (400 mg caffeine) or placebo (lactose) in healthy volunteers (n=94). Dependent variables were subjective and physiological measures of arousal, as well as serum carisoprodol and caffeine levels. Data were collected from 15 to 280 min after administration of drug or placebo.

Results

Caffeine increased alertness, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, startle blink reflexes, and skin conductance responses. Subjects were calmer after carisoprodol, and heart rate was increased. There was a positive correlation between increased arousal and carisoprodol levels when stimulant information had been provided. However, this was only seen when carisoprodol levels were very low. There was no evidence that caffeine modulated the placebo response.

Conclusions

Active placebo responses were seen only transiently when carisoprodol levels were low, and only in the subjective arousal data. Caffeine did not support active placebo responses. The overall findings did not favour the active placebo hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amanzio M, Pollo A, Maggi G, Benedetti F (2001) Response variability to analgesics: a role for non-specific activation of endogenous opioids. Pain 90:205–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti F, Amanzio M, Casadio C, Oliaro A, Maggi G (1997) Blockade of nocebo hyperalgesia by the cholecystokinin antagonist proglumide. Pain 71:135–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bond A, Lader M (1974) The use of visual analogue scales in rating subjective feelings. Br J Med Psychol 47:211–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodeur DW (1965) The effects of stimulant and tranquilizer placebos on healthy subjects in a real-life situation. Psychopharmacologia 7:444–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinnerstein AJ, Halm J (1970) Modification of placebo effects by means of drugs: effects of aspirin and placebos on self-rated moods. J Abnorm Psychol 75:308–314

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dinnerstein AJ, Lowenthal M, Blitz B (1966) The interaction of drugs with placebos in the control of pain and anxiety. Perspect Biol Med 10:103–117

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flaten MA (1993) A comparison of electromyographic and photoelectric techniques in the study of classical eyeblink conditioning and startle reflex modification. J Psychophysiol 7:230–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaten MA (1998) Information about drug effects modify arousal. An investigation of the placebo response. Nord J Psychiatry 52:147–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaten MA, Blumenthal TD (1999) Caffeine-associated stimuli elicit conditioned responses: an experimental model of the placebo effect. Psychopharmacology 145:105–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaten MA, Simonsen T, Olsen H (1999) Drug-related information generates placebo and nocebo responses that modify the drug response. Psychosom Med 61:250–255

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MP, Karoly P (1991) Motivation and expectancy factors in symptom perception: a laboratory study of the placebo effect. Psychosom Med 53:144–152

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen O, Brox J, Flaten MA (2003) Placebo and nocebo responses, cortisol, and circulating beta-endorphin. Psychosom Med 65:786–790

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch I (1999) How expectancies shape experience. American Psychological Association, Washington D.C.

  • Kirsch I, Sapirstein G (1998) Listening to prozak but hearing placebo: a meta-analysis of antidpressant medication. Prev Treat 1:Article 0002a

    Google Scholar 

  • Luparello T, Leist N, Lourie CH, Sweet P (1970) The interaction of psychologic stimuli and pharmacologic agents on airway reactivity in asthmatic subjects. Psychosom Med 32:509–513

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyerly SB, Ross S, Krugman AD, Clyde DJ (1964) The effects of instructions upon performance and mood under amphetamine sulphate and chloral hydrate. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 68:321–327

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mikalsen A, Bertelsen B, Flaten MA (2001) The effects of caffeine, caffeine-associated stimuli, and caffeine-related information on psychological and physiological arousal. Psychopharmacology 157:373–380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell SH, Laurent CL, deWit H (1996) Interaction of expectancy and the pharmacological effects of d-amphetamine: subjective effects and self-administration. Psychopharmacology 125:371–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosqueda-Garcia R, Robertson D, Robertson RD (1993) The cardiovascular effects of caffeine. In: Garattini S (ed) Caffeine, coffee, and health. Raven, New York, pp 157–176

  • Penick SB, Fisher S (1965) Drug–set interaction: psychological and physiological effects of epinephrine under differential expectations. Psychosom Med 27:177–182

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sager G, Trovik T, Slordal L, Jaeger R, Prytz PS, Brox J et al. (1988) Catecholamine binding and concentrations in acute phase plasma after surgery. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 48:419–424

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sager G, Slørdal L, Huseby N-E, Florholmen J (1991) Beta-adrenoceptor regulation in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 51:283–288

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S, Baptista MAS, Kim JA, McDonald RV, Weise-Kelly L (2000) Pavlovian psychopharmacology: the associative basis of tolerance. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 8:276–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was approved by the Committee for Medical Research Ethics in Health Region V in Norway (project number 21/97), and was supported by The Council for Psychiatric Health (project number 97/1060) and the Norwegian Science Foundation (project numbers 122709/320 and 115012/320). The authors thank the staff at the Department of Clinical Research at the University Hospital of North Norway for their assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magne Arve Flaten.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flaten, M.A., Simonsen, T., Zahlsen, K. et al. Stimulant and relaxant drugs combined with stimulant and relaxant information: a study of active placebo. Psychopharmacology 176, 426–434 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-004-1886-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-004-1886-7

Keywords

Navigation