Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of vigilant scanning behavior in mice using two-point digital video tracking

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

Vigilant scanning of the environment is a major risk assessment activity in many species. However, due to difficulties in its manual scoring, scanning has rarely been quantified in laboratory rodent studies.

Objectives and methods

We developed a novel method for automated measurement of vigilant scanning in mice, based on simultaneous tracking of an animal’s nose- and center-points. The studied scanning parameters included the frequency and duration of scans and scanning (nose-point) speed. The sensitivity of these parameters to anxiolytic diazepam (1–2 mg/kg) and anxiogenic FG-7142 (5 mg/kg) was evaluated upon exposure to the context (conditioning chamber) before and 24 h after footshock.

Results

Scanning behavior was observed in all C57BL/6, 129xC57BL/6, and DBA/2 mice, as recurrent stationary episodes accompanied by observatory head movements. These episodes respectively comprised 28 ± 1%, 29 ± 1%, and 24 ± 2% of preexposure time. Diazepam dose-dependently decreased the scanning frequency and duration, without affecting the scanning speed. Fear conditioning increased freezing and inhibited other behaviors upon reexposure, with scanning being only marginally affected and still comprising 17 ± 2%, 16 ± 2%, and 19 ± 1% of reexposure time, respectively. Consequently, scanning accounted for most (DBA/2) or virtually all (C57BL/6 and 129xC57BL/6) gross motor activities upon reexposure. FG-7142 mirrored the effects of conditioning, inducing behavioral inhibition with scanning being least affected.

Conclusions

Two-point tracking is effective for studying vigilant scanning in mice. Using this approach, we show that scanning is a key risk assessment activity in both unconditioned and conditioned mice; scanning is resistant to threat-induced behavioral inhibition and is highly sensitive to anxiolytic treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrechet-Souza L, Borelli KG, Brandao ML (2008) Activity of the medial prefrontal cortex and amygdala underlies one-trial tolerance of rats in the elevated plus-maze. J Neurosci Methods 169:109–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anseloni VZ, Brandao ML (1997) Ethopharmacological analysis of behaviour of rats using variations of the elevated plus-maze. Behav Pharmacol 8:533–540

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balogh SA, Radcliffe RA, Logue SF, Wehner JM (2002) Contextual and cued fear conditioning in C57BL/6 J and DBA/2 J mice: context discrimination and the effects of retention interval. Behav Neurosci 116:947–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bednekoff PA, Lima SL (1998) Randomness, chaos and confusion in the study of antipredator vigilance. Trends Ecol Evol 13:284–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard RJ, Blanchard DC (1989) Antipredator defensive behaviors in a visible burrow system. J Comp Psychol 103:70–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard DC, Blanchard RJ, Tom P, Rodgers RJ (1990) Diazepam changes risk assessment in an anxiety/defense test battery. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 101:511–518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard RJ, Parmigiani S, Bjornson C, Masuda C, Weiss SM, Blanchard DC (1995) Antipredator behavior of Swiss–Webster mice in a visible burrow system. Aggr Behav 21:123–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwknecht JA, Paylor R (2002) Behavioral and physiological mouse assays for anxiety: a survey in nine mouse strains. Behav Brain Res 136:489–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caine NG (1984) Visual scanning by tamarins: a description of the behavior and tests of two derived hypotheses. Folia Primatol 43:59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choleris E, Thomas AW, Kavaliers M, Prato FS (2001) A detailed ethological analysis of the mouse open field test: effects of diazepam, chlordiazepoxide and an extremely low frequency pulsed magnetic field. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 25:235–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cole JC, Rodgers RJ (1994) Ethological evaluation of the effects of acute and chronic buspirone treatment in the murine elevated plus-maze test: comparison with haloperidol. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 114:288–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JR, Lindsley DB (1975) Hippocampal electrical correlates of free behavior and behavior induced by stimualtion of two hypothalamic-hippocampal systems in the cat. Exp Neurol 49:506–528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deakin JFW, Graeff FG (1991) 5-HT and mechanisms of defence. J Psychopharmacol 5:305–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dielenberg RA, Carrive P, McGregor IS (2001) The cardiovascular and behavioral response to cat odor in rats: unconditioned and conditioned effects. Brain Res 897:228–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eilam D, Izhar R, Mort J (2010) Threat detection: behavioral practices in animals and humans. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35:999–1006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ennaceur A, Michalikova S, van Rensburg R, Chazot PL (2010) Distinguishing anxiolysis and hyperactivity in an open space behavioral test. Behav Brain Res 207:84–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gray JA (1982) Précis of the neuropsychology of anxiety: an enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Behav Brain Sci 5:469–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griebel G, Sanger DJ, Perrault G (1997) Genetic differences in the mouse defense test battery. Aggr Behav 23:19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griebel G, Belzung C, Perrault G, Sanger DJ (2000) Differences in anxiety-related behaviours and in sensitivity to diazepam in inbred and outbred strains of mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 148:164–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes A (2001) Targeted gene mutation approaches to the study of anxiety-like behavior in mice. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 25:261–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs H, Weyers P, Macht M, Weijers HG, Janke W (1997) Scanning behavior of rats during eating under stressful noise. Physiol Behav 62:151–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laxmi TR, Stork O, Pape HC (2003) Generalisation of conditioned fear and its behavioural expression in mice. Behav Brain Res 145:89–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (1987) Vigilance while feeding and its relation to the risk of predation. J Theor Biol 124:303–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton N, Corr PJ (2004) A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: fear/anxiety and defensive distance. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 28:285–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paylor R, Tracy R, Wehner J, Rudy JW (1994) DBA/2 and C57BL/6 mice differ in contextual fear but not auditory fear conditioning. Behav Neurosci 108:810–817

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers RJ, Cole JC, Aboualfa K, Stephenson LH (1995) Ethopharmacological analysis of the effects of putative 'anxiogenic' agents in the mouse elevated plus-maze. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 52:805–813

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers RJ, Haller J, Holmes A, Halasz J, Walton TJ, Brain PF (1999) Corticosterone response to the plus-maze: high correlation with risk assessment in rats and mice. Physiol Behav 68:47–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy V, Chapillon P (2004) Further evidences that risk assessment and object exploration behaviours are useful to evaluate emotional reactivity in rodents. Behav Brain Res 154:439–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simon P, Dupuis R, Costentin J (1994) Thigmotaxis as an index of anxiety in mice. Influence of dopaminergic transmissions. Behav Brain Res 61:59–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia

    Kwok Ho C. Choy, Jing Yu, David Hawkes & Dmitry N. Mayorov

Authors
  1. Kwok Ho C. Choy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jing Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Hawkes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dmitry N. Mayorov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dmitry N. Mayorov.

Additional information

Choy and Yu contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choy, K.H.C., Yu, J., Hawkes, D. et al. Analysis of vigilant scanning behavior in mice using two-point digital video tracking. Psychopharmacology 221, 649–657 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-011-2609-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-011-2609-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation