Skip to main content
Log in

Amperometric and spectrophotometric determination of carbaryl in natural waters and commercial formulations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The work presented describes the development and evaluation of two flow-injection analysis (FIA) systems for the automated determination of carbaryl in spiked natural waters and commercial formulations. Samples are injected directly into the system where they are subjected to alkaline hydrolysis thus forming 1-naphthol. This product is readily oxidised at a glassy carbon electrode. The electrochemical behaviour of 1-naphthol allows the development of an FIA system with an amperometric detector in which 1-naphthol determination, and thus measurement of carbaryl concentration, can be performed. Linear response over the range 1.0×10−7 to 1.0×10−5 mol L−1, with a sampling rate of 80 samples h−1, was recorded. The detection limit was 1.0×10−8 mol L−1. Another FIA manifold was constructed but this used a colorimetric detector. The methodology was based on the coupling of 1-naphthol with phenylhydrazine hydrochloride to produce a red complex which has maximum absorbance at 495 nm. The response was linear from 1.0×10−5 to 1.5×10−3 mol L−1 with a detection limit of 1.0×10−6 mol L−1. Sample-throughput was about 60 samples h−1. Validation of the results provided by the two FIA methodologies was performed by comparing them with results from a standard HPLC–UV technique. The relative deviation was <5%. Recovery trials were also carried out and the values obtained ranged from 97.0 to 102.0% for both methods. The repeatability (RSD, %) of 12 consecutive injections of one sample was 0.8% and 1.6% for the amperometric and colorimetric systems, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guiberteau A, Díaz TG, Salinas F, Ortiz JM (1995) Anal Chim Acta 307:219–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pérez-López JA, Zapardiek A, Bermejo E, Arauzo E, Hernández L (1994) Fresenius J Anal Chem 350:620–625

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gil-Agusti M, Alvarez-Rodriguez L, Monferrer-Pons L, Bose D, Durgbanshi A, Esteve-Romero J (2002) Anal Lett 35:1721–1734

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Toscano IAS, Ribeiro ML, Santelli SE, Guardia M (2000) Quim Nova 23:466–471

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hidalgo C, Sancho JV, Roig-Navarro A, Hernandez F (1998) Chromatographia 47:596–600

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Abad A, Moreno MJ, Pelegri R, Martinez MI, Saez A, Gamon M, Montoya A (1999) J Chromatogr A 833:3–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Diaz TG, Guiberteau A, Salinas F, Ortiz JM (1996) J Liq Chromatogr Related Technol 19:2681–2690

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Patil VB, Shingare MS (1993) J Chromatogr A 653:181–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tunceli A, Bag H, Turker AR ( 2001) Fresenius J Anal Chem 371:1134–1138

    Google Scholar 

  10. Demirbas A (2000) Environ Technol 21:351–356

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Demirbas A (1998) Sci Total Environ 220:235–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alvarez Rodriguez L, Monferrer-Pons L, Esteve Romero JS, Garcia Alvarez CMC, Ramis Ramos G (1997) Analyst 122:459–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Daghbouche Y, Garrigues S, Guardia M (1995) Anal Chim Acta 314:203–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reis BF, Morales-Rubio A, Guardia M (1999) Anal Chim Acta 392:265–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cassela RJ, Garrigues S, Santelli RE, Guardia M (2000) Talanta 52:717–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. La Rosa C, Pariente F, Hernández L, Lorenzo E (1995) Anal Chim Acta 308:129–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Alegret S, Alonso J, Bartroli J, Machado AASC, Lima JLFC, Paulis JM (1987) Quim Anal 6:278–292

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Riedel–de Haën (1999) Certificate of analysis, carbaryl

  19. Ruzicka J, Hansen EH (1988) Flow-injection analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

  20. Metrohm (1984) Electrochemical detection in HPLC. Metrohm AG, CH-9100, Herisau

  21. Miller JC, Miller JN (1993) Statistics for analytical chemistry, 3rd edn. Ellis Horwood, New York

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia and Feder for financial support (POCTI/35287/AGR/1999).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Carmo V. F. Vaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Portela, D.C., Pereira, I.M.F., Paíga, P. et al. Amperometric and spectrophotometric determination of carbaryl in natural waters and commercial formulations. Anal Bioanal Chem 377, 356–361 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2107-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2107-7

Keywords

Navigation