Abstract
The work presented describes the development and evaluation of two flow-injection analysis (FIA) systems for the automated determination of carbaryl in spiked natural waters and commercial formulations. Samples are injected directly into the system where they are subjected to alkaline hydrolysis thus forming 1-naphthol. This product is readily oxidised at a glassy carbon electrode. The electrochemical behaviour of 1-naphthol allows the development of an FIA system with an amperometric detector in which 1-naphthol determination, and thus measurement of carbaryl concentration, can be performed. Linear response over the range 1.0×10−7 to 1.0×10−5 mol L−1, with a sampling rate of 80 samples h−1, was recorded. The detection limit was 1.0×10−8 mol L−1. Another FIA manifold was constructed but this used a colorimetric detector. The methodology was based on the coupling of 1-naphthol with phenylhydrazine hydrochloride to produce a red complex which has maximum absorbance at 495 nm. The response was linear from 1.0×10−5 to 1.5×10−3 mol L−1 with a detection limit of 1.0×10−6 mol L−1. Sample-throughput was about 60 samples h−1. Validation of the results provided by the two FIA methodologies was performed by comparing them with results from a standard HPLC–UV technique. The relative deviation was <5%. Recovery trials were also carried out and the values obtained ranged from 97.0 to 102.0% for both methods. The repeatability (RSD, %) of 12 consecutive injections of one sample was 0.8% and 1.6% for the amperometric and colorimetric systems, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Guiberteau A, Díaz TG, Salinas F, Ortiz JM (1995) Anal Chim Acta 307:219–226
Pérez-López JA, Zapardiek A, Bermejo E, Arauzo E, Hernández L (1994) Fresenius J Anal Chem 350:620–625
Gil-Agusti M, Alvarez-Rodriguez L, Monferrer-Pons L, Bose D, Durgbanshi A, Esteve-Romero J (2002) Anal Lett 35:1721–1734
Toscano IAS, Ribeiro ML, Santelli SE, Guardia M (2000) Quim Nova 23:466–471
Hidalgo C, Sancho JV, Roig-Navarro A, Hernandez F (1998) Chromatographia 47:596–600
Abad A, Moreno MJ, Pelegri R, Martinez MI, Saez A, Gamon M, Montoya A (1999) J Chromatogr A 833:3–12
Diaz TG, Guiberteau A, Salinas F, Ortiz JM (1996) J Liq Chromatogr Related Technol 19:2681–2690
Patil VB, Shingare MS (1993) J Chromatogr A 653:181–183
Tunceli A, Bag H, Turker AR ( 2001) Fresenius J Anal Chem 371:1134–1138
Demirbas A (2000) Environ Technol 21:351–356
Demirbas A (1998) Sci Total Environ 220:235–241
Alvarez Rodriguez L, Monferrer-Pons L, Esteve Romero JS, Garcia Alvarez CMC, Ramis Ramos G (1997) Analyst 122:459–463
Daghbouche Y, Garrigues S, Guardia M (1995) Anal Chim Acta 314:203–212
Reis BF, Morales-Rubio A, Guardia M (1999) Anal Chim Acta 392:265–272
Cassela RJ, Garrigues S, Santelli RE, Guardia M (2000) Talanta 52:717–725
La Rosa C, Pariente F, Hernández L, Lorenzo E (1995) Anal Chim Acta 308:129–136
Alegret S, Alonso J, Bartroli J, Machado AASC, Lima JLFC, Paulis JM (1987) Quim Anal 6:278–292
Riedel–de Haën (1999) Certificate of analysis, carbaryl
Ruzicka J, Hansen EH (1988) Flow-injection analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Metrohm (1984) Electrochemical detection in HPLC. Metrohm AG, CH-9100, Herisau
Miller JC, Miller JN (1993) Statistics for analytical chemistry, 3rd edn. Ellis Horwood, New York
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia and Feder for financial support (POCTI/35287/AGR/1999).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Portela, D.C., Pereira, I.M.F., Paíga, P. et al. Amperometric and spectrophotometric determination of carbaryl in natural waters and commercial formulations. Anal Bioanal Chem 377, 356–361 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2107-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2107-7