Skip to main content
Log in

Pseudoneglect for mental alphabet lines is affected by prismatic adaptation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While patients with right parietal damage and spatial neglect bisect lines to the right, the general population bisects lines to the left; a phenomenon known as pseudoneglect. The leftward bias also occurs for mental representations, such as number and alphabet lines. Prismatic adaptation can have a dramatic effect on attentional bias and corrects neglect and pseudoneglect for physical and mental number lines. This study examined whether prismatic adaptation can correct leftward bisection biases for alphabet lines, which may have a different spatial arrangement compared to number lines. In pre-adaptation testing, students (n = 42) were shown letter trigrams (e.g. C H P) and judged whether the alphabetical distance before or after the inner-letter was larger. Participants were then split into three groups and were adapted to left-shifting, control or right-shifting prims. After adaptation, the mental alphabet bisection task was re-administered. The length of left side of the alphabet lines was overestimated by all three groups in the pre-adaptation phase. Right-shifting prisms and control spectacles had no effect on the leftward bias whereas exposure to left-shifting prisms corrected the bias. The results replicate an effect observed for mental number lines and demonstrate that low-level sensory-motor shifts can correct attentional biases associated with high-level representations, such as letters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartolomeo P, Bachoud-Lévi A, Azouvi P, Chokron S (2005) Time to imagine space: a chronometric exploration of representational neglect. Neuropsychologia 43:1249–1257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berberovic N, Mattingley JB (2003) Effects of prismatic adaptation on judgements of spatial extent in peripersonal and extrapersonal space. Neuropsychologia 41:493–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bisiach E, Luzzatti C (1978) Unilateral neglect of representational space. Cortex 14:129–133

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bjoertomt O, Cowey A, Walsh V (2002) Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain 125:2012–2022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers D, Heilman KM (1980) Pseudoneglect: effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia 18:491–498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bultitude J, Aimola-Davies AM (2006) Putting attention on the line: investigating the activation–orientation hypothesis of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia 44:1849–1858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colent C, Pisella L, Bernieri C, Rode G, Rossetti Y (2000) Cognitive bias induced by visuomotor adaptation to prisms: a simulation of unilateral neglect in normal individuals. Neuroreport 11:1899–1902

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S, Bossini S, Giraux P (1993) The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. J Exp Psychol Gen 122:371–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd MD, Van der Stigchel S, Leghari MA, Fung G, Kingstone A (2008) Attentional SNARC: there’s something special about numbers (let us count the ways). Cognition (in press)

  • Ferber S, Murray LJ (2005) Are perceptual judgments dissociated from motor processes? A prism adaptation study. Cogn Brain Res 23:453–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foxe JJ, McCourt ME, Javitt DC (2003) Parietal control of visuospatial attention: Line bisection judgments evaluated with high-density electrical mapping and source analysis. NeuroImage 19:710–726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frassinetti F, Angeli V, Meneghello F, Avanzi S, Làdavas E (2002) Long-lasting amelioration of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation. Brain 125:608–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gevers W, Reynvoet B, Fias W (2003) The mental representation of sequences is spatially organized. Cognition 87:87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göbel SM, Calabria M, Farnè A, Rossetti Y (2006) Parietal rTMS distorts the mental number line: simulating spatial neglect in healthy subjects. Neuropsychologia 44:860–868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halligan PW, Marshall JC (1988) How long is a piece of string? A study of line bisection in a case of visual neglect. Cortex 24:321–328

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman KM, Watson RT, Valenstein E (1993) Neglect and related disorders. In: Heilman KM, Valenstein E (eds) Clinical neuropsychology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 279–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard EM, Piazza M, Pinel P, Dehaene S (2005) Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Rev Neurosci 6(6):435–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jewell G, McCourt ME (2000) Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia 38:93–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus AM, Nicholls MER, Mattingley JB, Bradshaw JL (2008a) Left to right: representational biases for numbers and the effect of visuomotor adaptation. Cognition 107:1048–1058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus A, Nicholls MER, Mattingley JB, Chapman HL, Bradshaw JL (2008b) Pseudoneglect for the bisection of mental number lines. Q J Exp Psychol (in press)

  • Longo MR, Lourenco SF (2007) Spatial attention and the mental number line: evidence for characteristic biases and compression. Neuropsychologia 45:1400–1407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCourt ME (2001) Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection. Neuropsychologia 39:1065–1076

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCourt ME, Garlinghouse M, Slater J (2000) Centripetal versus centrifugal bias in visual line bisection: focusing attention on two hypotheses. Front Biosci 5:D58–D71 (Special Issue on Selective Attention Mechanisms in the Primate)

    Google Scholar 

  • McCourt ME, Jewell G (1999) Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia 37:843–855

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nichelli P, Rinaldi M, Cubelli R (1989) Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Brain Cogn 9:57–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls MER, Bradshaw JL, Mattingley JB (1999) Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of shade, numerosity and size. Neuropsychologia 37:307–314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls MER, Loftus A (2007) Pseudoneglect and neglect for mental alphabet lines. Brain Res 1152:130–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nijboer TCW, McIntosh RD, Nys GM, Dijkerman HC, Milner AD (2008) Prism adaptation improves voluntary but not automatic orienting in neglect. Neuroreport 19:293–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pisella L, Rode G, Farnè A, Tilikete C, Rossetti Y (2006) Prism adaptation in the rehabilitation of patients with visuo-spatial cognitive disorders. Current Opin Neurol 19:534–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding GM, Rossetti Y, Wallace B (2005) Applications of prism adaptation: a tutorial in theory and method. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:431–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rode G, Rossetti Y, Boisson D (2001) Prism adaptation improves representational neglect. Neuropsychologia 39:1250–1254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossetti Y, Jacquin-Coutois S, Rode G, Ota H, Michel C, Boisson D (2004) Does action make the link between number and space representation? Psychol Sci 15(6):426–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rossetti Y, Rode G, Pisella L, Farné A, Li L, Boisson D, Perenin M-T (1998) Prism adaptation to rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature 395:166–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Serino A, Angeli V, Frassinetti F, Làdavas E (2006) Mechanisms underlying neglect recovery after prism adaptation. Neuropsychologia 44:1068–1078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Striemer C, Sablatnig J, Danckert J (2006) Differential influences of prism adaptation on reflexive and voluntary covert attention. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 12:337–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waberski TD, Gobbelé R, Lamberty K, Buchner H, Marshall JC, Fink GR (2008) Timing of visuo-spatial information processing: electrical source imaging related to line bisection judgements. Neuropsychologia 46:1201–1210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zorzi M, Priftis K, Meneghell F, Marenzi R, Umilta C (2006) The Spatial representation of numerical and non-numerical sequences: evidence from Neglect. Neuropsychologia 44:1061–1067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zorzi M, Priftis K, Umiltà C (2002) Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature 417:138–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael E. R. Nicholls.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nicholls, M.E.R., Kamer, A. & Loftus, A.M. Pseudoneglect for mental alphabet lines is affected by prismatic adaptation. Exp Brain Res 191, 109–115 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1502-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1502-x

Keywords

Navigation