Skip to main content
Log in

Modulation of corticomotor excitability by an I-wave intervention delivered during low-level voluntary contraction

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interventions that modulate cortical plasticity may achieve a more functional benefit if combined with neuro-rehabilitation therapies. With a TMS protocol targeting I-wave dynamics, it is possible to deliver stimuli while a subject performs a motor task, and this may more effectively target functional networks related to the task. However, the efficacy of this intervention during a simple task such as a low-level voluntary contraction is not known. We delivered paired-pulse TMS at an inter-pulse interval (IPI) of 1.5 ms for 15 min while subjects performed a 10 ± 2.5% voluntary contraction of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle and made motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) curve measurements. Pre-intervention SICF curves showed only a single peak at 1.3–1.5 ms IPI. During the intervention, MEP amplitude steadily increased (P < 0.001) to 137 ± 13% of its initial value. After the intervention, SICF curves were increased in amplitude (P < 0.001) and later peaks emerged at 2.8 and 4.3 ms IPIs. A control experiment, replacing paired-pulse stimulation with single-pulse stimulation showed no effect on MEP amplitude (P = 0.951). We conclude that the I-wave intervention can be administered concurrently with a simple motor task and that it acts by increasing trans-synaptic efficacy across a number of I-waves. The ability to perform a motor task simultaneously with a TMS intervention could confer a degree of specificity to the induced excitability changes and may be beneficial for functional neuro-rehabilitation programs built around motor learning and retraining.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benwell NM, Mastaglia FL, Thickbroom GW (2006) Paired-pulse rTMS at trans-synaptic intervals increases corticomotor excitability and reduces the rate of force loss during a fatiguing exercise of the hand. Exp Brain Res 175:626–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cash RF, Benwell NM, Murray K, Mastaglia FL, Thickbroom GW (2009) Neuromodulation by paired-pulse TMS at an I-wave interval facilitates multiple I-waves. Exp Brain Res 193:1–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Di Lazzaro V, Restuccia D, Oliviero A, Profice P, Ferrara L, Insola A, Mazzone P, Tonali P, Rothwell JC (1998) Effects of voluntary contraction on descending volleys evoked by transcranial stimulation in conscious humans. J Physiol 508(Pt 2):625–633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Di Lazzaro V, Thickbroom GW, Pilato F, Profice P, Dileone M, Mazzone P, Insola A, Ranieri F, Tonali PA, Rothwell JC (2007) Direct demonstration of the effects of repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation at I-wave periodicity. Clin Neurophysiol 118:1193–1197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald PB, Fountain S, Daskalakis ZJ (2006) A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition. Clin Neurophysiol 117:2584–2596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hallett M (2007) Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer. Neuron 55:187–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamada M, Hanajima R, Terao Y, Arai N, Furubayashi T, Inomata-Terada S, Yugeta A, Matsumoto H, Shirota Y, Ugawa Y (2007) Origin of facilitation in repetitive, 1.5 ms interval, paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (rPPS) of the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 118:1596–1601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanajima R, Ugawa Y, Terao Y, Enomoto H, Shiio Y, Mochizuki H, Furubayashi T, Uesugi H, Iwata NK, Kanazawa I (2002) Mechanisms of intracortical I-wave facilitation elicited with paired-pulse magnetic stimulation in humans. J Physiol 538:253–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khedr EM, Farweez HM, Islam H (2003) Therapeutic effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function in Parkinson’s disease patients. Eur J Neurol 10:567–572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim YH, You SH, Ko MH, Park JW, Lee KH, Jang SH, Yoo WK, Hallett M (2006) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced corticomotor excitability and associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke. Stroke 37:1471–1476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orth M, Rothwell JC (2004) The cortical silent period: intrinsic variability and relation to the waveform of the transcranial magnetic stimulation pulse. Clin Neurophysiol 115:1076–1082

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy VM, Cloud G, Tallis RC, Donaldson C, Nayak V, Miller S (2007) Transcranial magnetic stimulation and muscle contraction to enhance stroke recovery: a randomized proof-of-principle and feasibility investigation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 21:509–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reis J, Robertson E, Krakauer JW, Rothwell J, Marshall L, Gerloff C, Wassermann E, Pascual-Leone A, Hummel F, Celnik PA, Classen J, Floel A, Ziemann U, Paulus W, Siebner HR, Born J, Cohen LG (2008) Consensus: “Can tDCS and TMS enhance motor learning and memory formation?”. Brain Stimulat 1:363–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridding MC, Rothwell JC (2007) Is there a future for therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation? Nat Rev Neurosci 8:559–567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sacco P, Thickbroom GW, Thompson ML, Mastaglia FL (1997) Changes in corticomotor excitation and inhibition during prolonged submaximal muscle contractions. Muscle Nerve 20:1158–1166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thickbroom GW (2007) Transcranial magnetic stimulation and synaptic plasticity: experimental framework and human models. Exp Brain Res 180:583–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thickbroom GW (2010) A model of the contribution of late I-waves to α-motoneuronal activation: implications for paired-pulse TMS. Brain Stimulat. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2010.04.002

  • Thickbroom GW, Byrnes ML, Edwards DJ, Mastaglia FL (2006) Repetitive paired-pulse TMS at I-wave periodicity markedly increases corticospinal excitability: a new technique for modulating synaptic plasticity. Clin Neurophysiol 117:61–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tokimura H, Ridding MC, Tokimura Y, Amassian VE, Rothwell JC (1996) Short latency facilitation between pairs of threshold magnetic stimuli applied to human motor cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 101:263–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Werhahn KJ, Kunesch E, Noachtar S, Benecke R, Classen J (1999) Differential effects on motorcortical inhibition induced by blockade of GABA uptake in humans. J Physiol 517(Pt 2):591–597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SA, Lockwood RJ, Thickbroom GW, Mastaglia FL (1993) The muscle silent period following transcranial magnetic cortical stimulation. J Neurol Sci 114:216–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ziemann U, Rothwell JC (2000) I-waves in motor cortex. J Clin Neurophysiol 17:397–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ziemann U, Tergau F, Wassermann EM, Wischer S, Hildebrandt J, Paulus W (1998) Demonstration of facilitatory I wave interaction in the human motor cortex by paired transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Physiol 511(Pt 1):181–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. W. Thickbroom.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silbert, B.I., Gibbons, J.T., Cash, R.H.F. et al. Modulation of corticomotor excitability by an I-wave intervention delivered during low-level voluntary contraction. Exp Brain Res 208, 229–235 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2473-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2473-2

Keywords

Navigation