Abstract
Neurologically normal individuals devote more attention to the left side; an asymmetry known as pseudoneglect, which reflects right hemisphere involvement in visuospatial attention. The role of eye movements in attentional asymmetries has received little consideration, particularly in terms of the greyscales task. Stimulus length, elevation, and presentation duration were manipulated, while monitoring eye movements during the greyscales task. Region of interest analyses compared time spent examining each quadrant of the stimulus. Further, saccades were examined in conjunction with fixations to gain an understanding of overall eye movement patterns. Scatterplots combining x-and y-coordinates illustrate mean eye position. Results demonstrated a comparison strategy was used, where the dark portions of each rectangle were fixated. Mean eye position was within the lower left quadrant. The left visual field was inspected most for the baseline condition. Interestingly, the lower visual field was examined most when duration, length, or elevation was manipulated. Eye movement patterns provide a possible explanation for why correlations are y not observed between visuospatial tasks. Different strategies, based on specific-task demands, are likely to be used, which in turn, engage separate aspects of visuospatial attention.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrett AM, Crosson B, Crucian GP, Heilman KM (2000) Horizontal line bisections in upper and lower body space. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 6:455–459. doi:10.1017/S135561770064403X
Barton JJS, Behrmann M, Black S (1998) Ocular search during line bisection: the effects of hemi-neglect and hemianopia. Brain 121:1117–1131. doi:10.1093/brain/121.6.1117
Bellgrove MA, Dockree PM, Aimola L, Robertson IH (2004) Attenuation of spatial attentional asymmetries with poor sustained attention. NeuroReport 15:1065–1069. doi:10.1097/00001756-200404290-00027
Benwell CSY, Thut G, Learmonth G, Harvey M (2013) Spatial attention: differential shifts in pseudoneglect direction with time-on-task and initial bias support the idea of observer subtypes. Neuropsychologia 51:2747–2756. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.030
Benwell CSY, Harvey M, Thut G (2014) On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection bias with manipulation of line length. Neuroimage 86:370–380. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.014
Bjoertomt O, Cowey A, Walsh V (2002) Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain 125:2012–2022. doi:10.1093/brain/awf211
Bowers D, Heilman KM (1980) Pseudoneglect: effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia 18:491–498. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(80)90151-7
Cavézian C, Valadao D, Hurwitz M, Saoud M, Danckert J (2012) Finding centre: ocular and fMRI investigations of bisection and landmark task performance. Brain Res 1437:89–103. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.12.002
Çiçek M, Deouell LY, Knight RT (2009) Brain activity during landmark and line bisection tasks. Front Hum Neurosci 3:1–8. doi:10.3389/neuro.09.007.2009
Corbetta M, Shulman GL (2011) Spatial neglect and attention networks. Annu Rev Neurosci 34:569–599. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113731
Corbetta M, Shulman GL, Miezin FM, Petersen SE (1995) Superior parietal cortex activation during spatial attention shifts and visual feature conjunction. Science 270:802–805. doi:10.1126/science.270.5237.802
Demeyer M, De Graef P, Wagemans J, Verfaillie K (2010) Object form discontinuity facilitates displacement discrimination across saccades. J Vis 10:1–14. doi:10.1167/10.6.17
Deubel H (2008) The time course of presaccadic attention shifts. Psychol Res 72:630–640. doi:10.1007/s00426-008-0165-3
Dodds CM, van Belle J, Peers PV, Dove A, Cusack R, Duncan J, Manly T (2008) The effects of time-on-task and concurrent cognitive load on normal visuospatial bias. Neuropsychology 23:545–552. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.22.4.545
Dufour A, Touzalin P, Candas V (2007) Time-on-task effect in pseudoneglect. Exp Brain Res 176:532–537. doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0810-2
Elias LJ, Robinson E, Saucier DM (2005) Rightward biases in free-viewing visual bisection tasks: implications for leftward responses biases on similar tasks. Brain Cogn 59:296–298. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.021
Fimm B, Willmes K, Spijkers W (2006) The effect of low arousal on visuospatial attention. Neuropsychologia 44:1261–1268. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.027
Fink GR, Marshall JC, Shah NJ, Weiss PH, Halligan PW, Grosse-Ruyken M, Ziemons K, Zilles K, Freund HJ (2000) Line bisection judgments implicate right parietal cortex and cerebellum as assessed by fMRI. Neurology 54:1324–1331. doi:10.1212/WNL.54.6.1324
Fink GR, Marshall JC, Weiss PH, Zilles K (2001) The neural basis of vertical and horizontal line bisection judgments: an fMRI study of normal volunteers. NeuroImage 14:S59–S67. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0819
Foxe JJ, McCourt ME, Javitt DC (2003) Right hemisphere control of visuospatial attention: line-bisection judgments evaluated with high-density electrical mapping and source analysis. NeuroImage 19:710–726. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00057-0
Garner KG, Dux PE, Wagner J, Cummins TDR, Chambers CD, Bellgrove MA (2012) Attentional asymmetries in a visual orienting task are related to temperament. Cogn Emot 26:1508–1515. doi:10.1080/02699931.2012.666205
Golz J (2010) Colour constancy: influence of viewing behaviour on grey settings. Perception 39:606–619. doi:10.1068/p6052
Greene C, Robertson IH, Gill M, Bellgrove MA (2010) Dopaminergic genotype influences spatial bias in healthy adults. Neuropsychologia 48:2458–2464. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.04.019
Halligan PW, Manning L, Marshall JC (1991) Hemispheric activation versus spatio-motor cueing in visual neglect: a case study. Neuropsychologia 29:165–176. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(91)90018-4
Harvey M, Milner AD, Roberts RC (1995) An investigation of hemispatial neglect using the landmark task. Brain Cogn 27:59–78. doi:10.1006/brcg.1995.1004
Heber IA, Siebertz S, Wolter M, Kuhlen T, Fimm B (2010) Horizontal and vertical pseudoneglect in peri- and extrapersonal space. Brain Cogn 73:160–166. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2010.04.006
Heilman KM, Watson RT, Valenstein E (2003) Neglect and related disorders. In: Heilman KM, Valenstein E (eds) Clinical neuropsychology, 4th edn edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 296–346
Heywood S, Churcher J (1980) Structure of the visual array and saccadic latency implications for oculomotor control. Q J Exp Psychol 32:335–341. doi:10.1080/14640748008401169
Honda H, Findlay J (1992) The increase in saccade latencies to the lower visual. Percept Psychophys 52:167–174
Hurwitz M, Valadao D, Danckert J (2011) Static versus dynamic judgments of spatial extent. Exp Brain Res 209:271–286. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2539-9
Ibbotson M, Krekelberg B (2011) Visual perception and saccadic eye movements. Curr Opin Neurobiol 21:553–558. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2011.05.012
Ishiai S, Furukawa T, Tsukagoshi H (1989) Visuospatial processes of line bisection and the mechanisms underlying unilateral spatial neglect. Brain 112:1485–1502. doi:10.1093/brain/112.6.1485
Jewell G, McCourt ME (2000) Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia 38:93–110. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00045-7
Johns M, Crowley K, Chapman R, Tucker A, Hocking C (2009) The effect of blinks and saccadic eye movements on visual reaction times. Atten Psychophys 71:783–785. doi:10.3758/APP.71.4.783
Karnath H, Rorden C (2012) The anatomy of spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia 50:1010–1017. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.06.027
Kinsbourne M (1970) The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychol 33:193–201. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(70)90132-0
Kleiser R, Seitz RJ, Krekelberg B (2004) Neural correlates of saccadic suppression in humans. Curr Biol 14:386–390. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.02.036
Leonards U, Stone S, Mohr C (2013) Line bisection by eye and by hand reveal opposite biases. Exp Brain Res 228:513–525. doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3583-4
Loetscher T, Schwarz U, Schubiger M, Brugger P (2008) Head turns bias the brain’s internal random number generator. Curr Biol 18:R60–R62. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.015
Loftus AM, Nicholls MER (2012) Testing the activation-orientation account of spatial attentional asymmetries using transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuropsychologia 50:2573–2576. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.003
Luh KE (1995) Line bisection and perceptual asymmetries in normal individuals: what you see is not what you get. Neuropsychology 9:435–448. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.9.4.435
Manly T, Dobler VB, Dodds CM, George MA (2005) Rightward shift in spatial awareness with declining alertness. Neuropsychologia 43:1721–1728. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.02.009
Manning L, Halligan PW, Marshall JC (1990) Individual variation in line bisection: a study of normal subjects with application to the interpretation of visual neglect. Neuropsychologia 28:647–655. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(90)90119-9
Masson MEJ, Loftus GR (2003) Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Can J Exp Psychol 57:203–220. doi:10.1037/h0087426
Matthias E, Bublak P, Müller HJ, Schneider WX, Krummenacher J, Finke K (2010) The influence of alertness on spatial and nonspatial components of visual attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 36:38–56. doi:10.1037/a0017602
Mattingley JB, Berberovic N, Corben L, Slavin MJ, Nicholls MER, Bradshaw JL (2004) The greyscales task: a perceptual measure of attentional bias following unilateral hemispheric damage. Neuropsychologia 42:387–394. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.07.007
McCourt ME (2001) Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection. Neuropsychologia 39:1065–1076. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00044-6
McCourt ME, Garlinghouse M (2000) Asymmetries of visuospatial attention are modulated by viewing distance and visual field elevation: pseudoneglect in peripersonal and extrapersonal space. Cortex 36:715–731. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70548-3
McCourt ME, Jewell G (1999) Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia 37:843–855. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00140-7
McCourt ME, Garlinghouse M, Slater J (2000) Centripetal versus centrifugal bias in visual line bisection: focusing attention on two hypotheses. Front Biosci 5:D58–D71
Newman DP, O’Connell RG, Nathan PJ, Bellgrove MA (2012) Dopamine transporter genotype predicts attentional asymmetry in healthy adults. Neuropsychologia 50:2823–2829. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.08.012
Newman DP, O’Connell RG, Bellgrove MA (2013) Linking time-on-task, spatial bias and hemispheric activation asymmetry: a neural correlate of rightward attention drift. Neuropsychologia 51:1215–1223. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.027
Nicholls MER, Bradshaw JL, Mattingley JB (1999) Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of brightness, numerosity and size. Neuropsychologia 37:307–314. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00074-8
Nicholls MER, Bradshaw JL, Mattingley JB (2001) Unilateral hemispheric activation does not affect free-viewing perceptual asymmetries. Brain Cogn 46:219–223. doi:10.1016/S0278-2626(01)80070-1
Nuthmann A, Matthias E (2014) Time course of pseudoneglect in scene viewing. Cortex 52:113–119. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.11.007
Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh handedness inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
Posner MI, Rothbart MK (2007) Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science. Annu Rev Psychol 58:1–23. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085516
Post RB, Caufield KJ, Welch RB (2001) Contributions of object- and space-based mechanisms to line bisection errors. Neuropsychologia 39:856–864
Rayner K (1979) Eye guidance in reading: fixation locations within words. Perception 8:21–30. doi:10.1068/p080021
Rayner K (1998) Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol Bull 124:372–422. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
Rueckert L, Dervanesian A, Baboorian D, Lacalamita A, Repplinger M (2002) Pseudoneglect and the cross-over effect. Neuropsychologia 40:162–173. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00082-3
Schmitz R, Deliens G, Mary A, Urbain C, Peigneux P (2011) Selective modulations of attentional asymmetries after sleep deprivation. Neuropsychologia 49:3351–3360. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.08.009
Siman-Tov T, Mendelsohn A, Schonberg T, Avidan G, Podlipsky I, Pessoa L, Gadoth N, Ungerleider LG, Hendler T (2007) Bihemispheric leftward bias in a visuospatial attention-related network. J Neurosci 27:11271–11278. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0599-07.2007
Slagter HA, Davidson RJ, Tomer R (2010) Eye-blink rate predicts individual differences in pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia 48:1265–1268. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.027
Szczepanski SM, Kastner S (2013) Shifting attentional priorities: control of spatial attention through hemispheric competition. J Neurosci 33:5411–5421. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4089-12.2013
Thiebaut de Schotten M, Dell’Acqua F, Forkel SJ, Simmons A, Vergani R, Murphy DG, Catani M (2011) A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention. Nat Neurosci 14:1245–1246. doi:10.1038/nn.2905
Thiele A, Henning P, Kubischik M, Hoffmann KP (2002) Neural mechanisms of saccadic suppression. Science 295:2460–2462. doi:10.1126/science.1068788
Thomas NA, Elias LJ (2010) Do perceptual asymmetries differ in peripersonal and extrapersonal space? J Int Neuropsychol Soc 16:210–214. doi:10.1017/S135561770999097X
Thomas NA, Elias LJ (2011) Upper and lower visual field differences in perceptual asymmetries. Brain Res 1387:108–115. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.02.063
Thomas NA, Elias LJ (2012) Perceptual asymmetries in greyscales: object-based versus space-based influences. Cortex 48:553–562. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.015
Thomas NA, Loetscher T, Nicholls MER (2012a) Central fixations with rightward deviations: saccadic eye movements on the landmark task. Exp Brain Res 220:29–39. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3113-9
Thomas NA, Schneider O, Gutwin C, Elias LJ (2012b) Dorsal stream contributions to perceptual asymmetries. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 18:1–9. doi:10.1017/S1355617711001585
Tomer R (2008) Attentional bias as trait: correlations with novelty seeking. Neuropsychologia 46:2064–2070. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.005
Tomer R, Slagter HA, Christian BT, Fox AS, King CR, Murali D, Davidson RJ (2013) Dopamine asymmetries predict orienting bias in healthy individuals. Cereb Cortex 23:2899–2904. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs277
Toscani M, Valsecchi M, Gegenfurtner KR (2013a) Optimal sampling of visual information for lightness judgments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 10:11163–11168. doi:10.1073/pnas.1216954110
Toscani M, Valsecchi M, Gegenfurtner KR (2013b) Selection of visual information for lightness judgements by eye movements. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 368:20130056. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0056
Valadao DF, Hurwitz M, Danckert J (2010) Examining the influence of ‘noise’ on judgements of spatial extent. Exp Brain Res 207:157–164. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2449-2
Varnava A, Dervinis M, Chambers CD (2013) The predictive nature of pseudoneglect for visual neglect: evidence from parietal theta burst stimulation. PLoS One 8:e65851. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065851
Yi L, Fan Y, Quinn PC, Feng C, Huan D, Li J, Mao G, Lee K (2013) Abnormality in face scanning by children with autism spectrum disorder is limited to the eye region: evidence from multi-method analyses of eye tracking data. J Vis 13:1–13. doi:10.1167/13.10.5
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a Postdoctoral Research Fellowship to NAT from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada).
Conflict of interest
There are no relationships, financial or otherwise, that could be interpreted as a conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thomas, N.A., Loetscher, T. & Nicholls, M.E.R. Asymmetries in attention as revealed by fixations and saccades. Exp Brain Res 232, 3253–3267 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4015-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-014-4015-9