Abstract
Sexual segregation in trophic ecology is widespread among sexually dimorphic marine vertebrates. The degree of such segregation can change throughout the annual cycle, however, year-round data on seabird inter-sexual differences are scarce. Here, we investigated sexual trophic segregation in yellow-legged gulls Larus michahellis evaluating two hypothetical drivers of such segregation: the different nutritional requirements hypothesis and the sexual size dimorphism hypothesis. We used stable isotope analyses of blood and feathers to estimate year-round gull trophic ecology in four colonies along the western Iberian coast. δ15N and δ13C values were consistently higher in males than in females throughout the year and in all four study colonies, suggesting consistent sexual differences in trophic level prey as well as in foraging habitats. Significantly wider isotopic niches of females in the innermost primary and eight secondary feathers suggest that they are more generalists than males during most of the annual cycle. In accordance, isotopic mixing models estimated a higher proportion of marine invertebrates in female diet, while males consumed a higher proportion of fish, which could indicate that males foraged more in association with fisheries, having major implications in view of the newly implemented discard ban policy. Overall, our results revealed a clear pattern of sexual trophic segregation in yellow-legged gulls that was maintained throughout the year in four colonies along the western Iberian coast, arguing against the different nutritional requirements hypothesis and suggesting that sexual size dimorphism plays an important role in driving sexual segregation in trophic niches.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its electronic supplementary material.
References
Allen J (1877) The influence of physical conditions in the genesis of species. Radic Rev 1:108–140
Arcos JM, Oro D, Sol D (2001) Competition between the yellow-legged gull Larus cachinnans and Audouin’s gullLarus audouinii associated with commercial fishing vessels: the influence of season and fishing fleet. Mar Biol 139:807–816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270100651
Arizaga J, Aldalur A, Herrero A, Galicia D (2008) Sex Differentiation of Yellow-legged Gull (Larus michahellis lusitanius): the use of biometrics, bill morphometrics and wing tip coloration. Waterbirds 31:211–219. https://doi.org/10.1675/1524-4695(2008)31[211:SDOYGL]2.0.CO;2
Baert JM, Stienen EWM, Heylen BC, Kavelaars MM, Buijs R-J, Shamoun-Baranes J, Lens L, Müller W (2018) High-resolution GPS tracking reveals sex differences in migratory behaviour and stopover habitat use in the Lesser Black-backed Gull Larus fuscus. Sci Rep 8:5391. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23605-x
Barrionuevo M, Ciancio J, Steinfurth A, Frere E (2019) Geolocation and stable isotopes indicate habitat segregation between sexes in Magellanic penguins during the winter dispersion. J Avian Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.02325
Barros Á, Álvarez D, Velando A (2013) Climate influences fledgling sex ratio and sex-specific dispersal in a seabird. PLoS ONE 8:e71358. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071358
Bearhop S, Waldron S, Votier SC, Furness RW (2002) Factors that influence assimilation rates and fractionation of nitrogen and carbon stable isotopes in avian blood and feathers. Physiol Biochem Zool 75:451–458. https://doi.org/10.1086/342800
Bergmann K (1847) Über die Verhältnisse der Wärmeökonomie der Thiere zu ihrer Grösse. Gottinger Stud 3:595–708
Bicknell AWJ, Oro D, Camphuysen K, Votier SC (2013) Potential consequences of discard reform for seabird communities. J Appl Ecol 50:649–658. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12072
Boecklen WJ, Yarnes CT, Cook BA, James AC (2011) On the use of stable isotopes in trophic ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 42:411–440. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144726
Bond AL, Jardine TD, Hobson KA (2016) Multi-tissue stable-isotope analyses can identify dietary specialization. Methods Ecol Evol 7:1428–1437. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12620
Bosch M (1996) Sexual size dimorphism and determination sex in yellow-legged gulls. J F Ornithol 67:534–541
Bosman DS, de Neve L, Lens L, Stienen EWM, Vercruijsse HJP, Vincx M (2012) Effects of body size on sex-related migration vary between two closely related gull species with similar size dimorphism. Ibis 154:52–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2011.01182.x
Burke CM, Montevecchi WA, Regular PM (2015) Seasonal variation in parental care drives sex-specific foraging by a monomorphic seabird. PLoS ONE 10:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141190
Calado J (2015) Stable isotopes and regurgitations reveal differential consumption of fishery discards by yellow-legged and Audouin’s gulls breeding in sympatry. MSc Thesis. Universidade de Coimbra. Universidade de Coimbra.
Calado JG, Matos DM, Ramos JA, Moniz F, Ceia FR, Granadeiro JP, Paiva VH (2018) Seasonal and annual differences in the foraging ecology of two gull species breeding in sympatry and their use of fishery discards. J Avian Biol 49:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.01463
Camphuysen CJ, Gronert A (2012) Apparent survival and fecundity of sympatric lesser black-backed gulls and herring gulls with contrasting population trends. Ardea 100:113–122. https://doi.org/10.5253/078.100.0202
Camphuysen KCJ, Shamoun-Baranes J, Van Loon EE, Bouten W (2015) Sexually distinct foraging strategies in an omnivorous seabird. Mar Biol 162:1417–1428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-015-2678-9
Catry I, Catry T, Alho M, Franco AMA, Moreira F (2016) Sexual and parent-offspring dietary segregation in a colonial raptor as revealed by stable isotopes. J Zool 299:58–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12324
Caut S, Angulo E, Courchamp F (2009) Variation in discrimination factors (Δ15N and Δ13C): the effect of diet isotopic values and applications for diet reconstruction. J Appl Ecol 46:443–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01620.x
Ceia FR, Paiva VH, Fidalgo V, Morais L, Baeta A, Crisóstomo P, Mourato E, Garthe S, Marques JC, Ramos JA (2014) Annual and seasonal consistency in the feeding ecology of an opportunistic species, the yellow-legged gull Larus michahellis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 497:273–284. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10586
Ceia FR, Cherel Y, Paiva VH, Ramos JA (2018) Stable isotope dynamics (δ13C and δ15N) in neritic and oceanic waters of the North Atlantic inferred from GPS-tracked cory’s shearwaters. Front Mar Sci 5:377. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00377
Cherel Y, Hobson KA, Weimerskirch H (2005) Using stable isotopes to study resource acquisition and allocation in procellariiform seabirds. Oecologia 145:533–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0156-7
Cherel Y, Fontaine C, Richard P, Labat JP (2010) Isotopic niches and trophic levels of myctophid fishes and their predators in the Southern Ocean. Limnol Oceanogr 55:324–332. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.1.0324
Cherel Y, Jaquemet S, Maglio A, Jaeger A (2014) Differences in δ13C and δ15N values between feathers and blood of seabird chicks: implications for non-invasive isotopic investigations. Mar Biol 161:229–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-013-2314-5
Colominas-Ciuró R, Santos M, Coria N, Barbosa A (2018) Sex-specific foraging strategies of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae): females forage further and on more krill than males in the Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Biol 41:2635–2641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-018-2395-1
Cortés V, García-Barcelona S, González-Solís J (2018) Sex- and age-biased mortality of three shearwater species in longline fisheries of the Mediterranean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 588:229–241. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12427
Duhem C, Vidal E, Roche P, Legrand J (2005) How is the diet of yellow-legged gull chicks influenced by parents’ accessibility to landfills? Waterbirds 28:46–52. https://doi.org/10.1675/1524-4695(2005)028[0046:HITDOY]2.0.CO;2
European Union (2015) Regulation (EU) 2015/812 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 amending Council Regulations (EC) No 850/98, (EC) No 2187/2005, (EC) No 1967/2006, (EC) No 1098/2007, (EC) No 254/2002, (EC) No 2347/ 2002 and (EC) No 1224/2009, and Regulations (EU) No 1379/ 2013 and (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, as regards the landing obligation, and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1434/98. Off J Eur Union L133:1–20
Forero MG, Hobson KA, Bortolotti GR, Donázar JA, Bertellotti M, Blanco G (2002) Food resource utilisation by the Magellanic penguin evaluated through stable-isotope analysis: segregation by sex and age and influence on offspring quality. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 234:289–299. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps234289
Fridolfsson A-K, Ellegren H (1999) A Simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J Avian Biol 30:116. https://doi.org/10.2307/3677252
Galarza A, Hidalgo J, Ocio G, Rodríguez P (2008) Sexual size dimorphism and determination of sex in Atlantic yellow-legged gulls Larus michahellis lusitanius from Northern Spain. Ardeola 55:41–47
García-Tarrasón M, Bécares J, Bateman S, Arcos JM, Jover L, Sanpera C (2015) Sex-specific foraging behaviour in response to fishing activities in a threatened seabird. Ecol Evol 5:2348–2358. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3702.8566
Gianuca D, Phillips RA, Townley S, Votier SC (2017) Global patterns of sex- and age-specific variation in seabird bycatch. Biol Conserv 205:60–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.11.028
Gianuca D, Votier SC, Pardo D, Wood AG, Sherley RB, Ireland L, Choquet R, Pradel R, Townley S, Forcada J, Tuck GN, Phillips RA (2019) Sex-specific effects of fisheries and climate on the demography of sexually dimorphic seabirds. J Anim Ecol 88:1366–1378. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13009
Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson RJG (1998) A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol 7:1071–1075. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00389.x
Hobson KA (1999) Tracing origins and migration of wildlife using stable isotopes: a review. Oecologia 120:314–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050865
Hobson KA (2006) Using stable isotopes to quantitatively track endogenous and exogenous nutrient allocations to eggs of birds that travel to breed. Ardea 94:359–369
Hobson KA, Bond AL (2012) Extending an indicator: year-round information on seabird trophic ecology from multiple-tissue stable-isotope analyses. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 461:233–243. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09835
Hobson KA, Clark RG (1992a) Assessing avian diets using stable isotopes I: turnover of 13C in tissues. Condor 94:181–188. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368807
Hobson KA, Clark RG (1992b) Assessing avian diets using stable isotopes II: factors influencing diet-tissue fractionation. Condor 94:189–197. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368808
Hobson KA, Clark RG (1993) Turnover of 13C in cellular and plasma fractions of blood: implications for nondestructive sampling in avian dietary studies. Auk 110:638–641. https://doi.org/10.2307/4088430
Inger R, Bearhop S (2008) Applications of stable isotope analyses to avian ecology. Ibis 150:447–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00839.x
Jackson AL, Inger R, Parnell AC, Bearhop S (2011) Comparing isotopic niche widths among and within communities: SIBER-Stable Isotope Bayesian Ellipses in R. J Anim Ecol 80:595–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01806.x
Karris G, Ketsilis-Rinis V, Kalogeropoulou A, Xirouchakis S, Machias A, Maina I, Kavadas S (2018) The use of demersal trawling discards as a food source for two scavenging seabird species: a case study of an eastern Mediterranean oligotrophic marine ecosystem. Avian Res 9:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40657-018-0118-5
Kazama K, Nishizawa B, Tsukamoto S, Gonzalez JE, Kazama MT, Watanuki Y (2018) Male and female Black-tailed Gulls Larus crassirostris feed on the same prey species but use different feeding habitats. J Ornithol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-018-1565-9
Kelly JF (2000) Stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen in the study of avian and mammalian trophic ecology. Can J Zool 78:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1139/z99-165
Kiat Y, Vortman Y, Sapir N (2019) Feather moult and bird appearance are correlated with global warming over the last 200 years. Nat Commun 10:2540. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10452-1
Kojadinovic J, Richard P, Le Corre M, Cosson R, Bustamante P (2008) Effects of lipid extraction on δ13C and δ15N values in seabird muscle, liver and feathers. Waterbirds 31:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1675/1524-4695(2008)31
Lenth R (2019) emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.3.4. https://cran.r-project.org/package=emmeans.
Lewis S, Benvenuti S, Dall-Antonia L, Griffiths R, Money L, Sherratt TN, Wanless S, Hamer KC (2002) Sex-specific foraging behaviour in a monomorphic seabird. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 269:1687–1693. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2083
Lewis S, Schreiber EA, Daunt F, Wanless S, Schenk GA, Orr K, Adams A, Wanless S, Hamer KC (2005) Sex-specific foraging behaviour in tropical boobies: does size matter? Ibis 147:408–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919x.2005.00428.x
Lewison R, Oro D, Godley B, Underhill L, Bearhop S, Wilson RP, Ainley D, Arcos JM, Boersma PD, Borboroglu PG, Boulinier T, Frederiksen M, Genovart M, González-Solís J, Green JA, Grémillet D, Hamer KC, Hilton GM, Hyrenbach KD, Martínez-Abraín A, Montevecchi WA, Phillips RA, Ryan PG, Sagar P, Sydeman WJ, Wanless S, Watanuki Y, Weimerskirch H, Yorio P (2012) Research priorities for seabirds: improving conservation and management in the 21st century. Endanger Species Res 17:93–121. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00419
Ludynia K, Dehnhard N, Poisbleau M, Demongin L, Masello JF, Voigt CC, Quillfeldt P (2013) Sexual segregation in rockhopper penguins during incubation. Anim Behav 85:255–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.11.001
Matos DM, Ramos JA, Calado JG, Ceia FR, Hey J, Paiva VH (2018) How fishing intensity affects the spatial and trophic ecology of two gull species breeding in sympatry. ICES J Mar Sci 75:1949–1964. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsy096
McMahon KW, Hamady LL, Thorrold SR (2013) A review of ecogeochemistry approaches to estimating movements of marine animals. Limnol Oceanogr 58:697–714. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2013.58.2.0697
Mendes RF, Ramos JA, Paiva VH, Calado JG, Matos DM, Ceia FR (2018) Foraging strategies of a generalist seabird species, the yellow-legged gull, from GPS tracking and stable isotope analyses. Mar Biol 165:168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-018-3421-0
Moreno R, Jover L, Munilla I, Velando A, Sanpera C (2010) A three-isotope approach to disentangling the diet of a generalist consumer: the yellow-legged gull in northwest Spain. Mar Biol 157:545–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-009-1340-9
Munilla I (1997) Henslow’s swimming crab (Polybius henslowii) as an important food for yellow-legged gulls (Larus cachinnans) in NW Spain. ICES J Mar Sci 54:631–634. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1997.0249
Navarro J, Louzao M, Igual JM, Oro D, Delgado A, Arcos JM, Genovart M, Hobson KA, Forero MG (2009) Seasonal changes in the diet of a critically endangered seabird and the importance of trawling discards. Mar Biol 156:2571–2578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-009-1281-3
Navarro J, Oro D, Bertolero A, Genovart M, Delgado A, Forero MG (2010) Age and sexual differences in the exploitation of two anthropogenic food resources for an opportunistic seabird. Mar Biol 157:2453–2459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-010-1509-2
Newsome SD, del Rio CM, Bearhop S, Phillips D (2007) A niche for isotopic ecology. Front Ecol Environ 5:429–436. https://doi.org/10.1890/060150.01
Oliveira N, Henriques A, Miodonski J, Pereira J, Marujo D, Almeida A, Barros N, Andrade J, Marçalo A, Santos J, Oliveira IB, Ferreira M, Araújo H, Monteiro S, Vingada J, Ramírez I (2015) Seabird bycatch in Portuguese mainland coastal fisheries: an assessment through on-board observations and fishermen interviews. Glob Ecol Conserv 3:51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2014.11.006
Olsen KM, Larsson H (2004) Gulls of Europe. Bloomsbury Publishing, London
Oro D, Ruiz X (1997) Exploitation of trawler discards by breeding seabirds in the north-western Mediterranean: differences between the Ebro Delta and the Balearic Islands areas. ICES J Mar Sci 54:695–707. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1997.0246
Oro D, Álvarez D, Velando A (2018) Complex demographic heterogeneity from anthropogenic impacts in a coastal marine predator. Ecol Appl 28:612–621. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1679
Parnell AC, Inger R, Bearhop S, Jackson AL (2010) Source partitioning using stable isotopes: coping with too much variation. PLoS ONE 5:e9672. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009672
Patrick SC, Weimerskirch H (2014) Personality, foraging and fitness consequences in a long lived seabird. PLoS ONE 9:e87269. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087269
Payo-Payo A, Oro D, Igual JM, Jover L, Sanpera C, Tavecchia G (2015) Population control of an overabundant species achieved through consecutive anthropogenic perturbations. Ecol Appl 25:2228–2239. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-2090.1
Phillips RA, Silk JRD, Phalan B, Catry P, Croxall JP (2004) Seasonal sexual segregation in two Thalassarche albatross species: competitive exclusion, reproductive role specialization or foraging niche divergence? Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 271:1283–1291. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2718
Phillips RA, McGill RAR, Dawson DA, Bearhop S (2011) Sexual segregation in distribution, diet and trophic level of seabirds: insights from stable isotope analysis. Mar Biol 158:2199–2208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-011-1725-4
Phillips DL, Inger R, Bearhop S, Jackson AL, Moore JW, Parnell AC, Semmens BX, Ward EJ (2014) Best practices for use of stable isotope mixing models in food web studies. Can J Zool 92:823–835. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2014-0127
Phillips RA, Lewis S, González-Solís J, Daunt F (2017) Causes and consequences of individual variability and specialization in foraging and migration strategies of seabirds. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 578:117–150. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12217
Plummer M (2018) rjags: Bayesian Graphical Models using MCMC. R package version 4–8. https://cran.r-project.org/package=rjags.
Pons J-M (1994) Feeding strategies of male and female Herring gulls during the breeding season under various feeding conditions. Ethol Ecol Evol 6:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.1994.9523003
Ramírez F, Hobson KA, Wangensteen OS, Genovart M, Viscor G, Sanpera C, Jover L (2010) A physiological marker for quantifying differential reproductive investment between the sexes in Yellow-legged gulls (Larus michahellis). J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 396:48–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2010.09.012
Ramírez F, García-Tarrasón M, Rami L, Genovart M, Jover L, Sanpera C (2013) The role of calcium in constraining egg synthesis in the Audouin’s Gull (Ichthyaetus audouinii). Can J Zool 91:640–645. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2013-0016
Ramos R, Ramírez F, Sanpera C, Jover L, Ruiz X (2009) Diet of Yellow-legged Gull (Larus michahellis) chicks along the Spanish Western Mediterranean coast: the relevance of refuse dumps. J Ornithol 150:265–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-008-0346-2
Ramos R, Ramírez F, Carrasco JL, Jover L (2011) Insights into the spatiotemporal component of feeding ecology: an isotopic approach for conservation management sciences. Divers Distrib 17:338–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00736.x
R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org/
Ruckstuhl KE, Neuhaus P (2005) Sexual segregation in vertebrates: ecology of the two sexes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Schreiber EA, Burger J (2002) Biology of Marine Birds. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Shaffer SA, Weimerskirch H, Costa DP (2001) Functional significance of sexual dimorphism in Wandering Albatrosses, Diomedea exulans. Funct Ecol 15:203–210. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2001.00514.x
Slatkin M (1984) Ecological causes of sexual Dimorphism. Evolution 38:622–630
Smith JA, Mazumder D, Suthers IM, Taylor MD (2013) To fit or not to fit: evaluating stable isotope mixing models using simulated mixing polygons. Methods Ecol Evol 4:612–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12048
Stauss C, Bearhop S, Bodey TW, Garthe S, Gunn C, Grecian WJ, Inger R, Knight ME, Newton J, Patrick SC, Phillips RA, Waggitt JJ, Votier SC (2012) Sex-specific foraging behaviour in northern gannets Morus bassanus: incidence and implications. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 457:151–162. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09734
Steigerwald EC, Igual J-M, Payo-Payo A, Tavecchia G (2015) Effects of decreased anthropogenic food availability on an opportunistic gull: evidence for a size-mediated response in breeding females. Ibis 157:439–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12252
Tasker ML, Camphuysen CJ, Cooper J, Garthe S, Montevecchi WA, Blaber SJM (2000) The impacts of fishing on marine birds. ICES J Mar Sci 57:531–547. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2000.00714
Thaxter CB, Ross-Smith VH, Bouten W, Clark NA, Conway GJ, Rehfisch MM, Burton NHK (2015) Seabird-wind farm interactions during the breeding season vary within and between years: a case study of lesser black-backed gull Larus fuscus in the UK. Biol Conserv 186:347–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.027
Tyson C, Shamoun-Baranes J, Van Loon EE, Camphuysen K, Hintzen NT (2015) Individual specialization on fishery discards by lesser black-backed gulls (Larus fuscus). ICES J Mar Sci 72:1882–1891. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv021
Valeiras J (2003) Attendance of scavenging seabirds at trawler discards off Galicia, Spain. Sci Mar 67:77–82. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2003.67s277
Velando A, Munilla I, López-Alonso M, Freire J, Pérez C (2010) EROD activity and stable isotopes in seabirds to disentangle marine food web contamination after the Prestige oil spill. Environ Pollut 158:1275–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.01.029
Votier SC, Bearhop S, Witt MJ, Inger R, Thompson D, Newton J (2010) Individual responses of seabirds to commercial fisheries revealed using GPS tracking, stable isotopes and vessel monitoring systems. J Appl Ecol 47:487–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01790.x
Votier SC, Bicknell A, Cox SL, Scales KL, Patrick SC (2013) A bird’s eye view of discard reforms: bird-borne cameras reveal seabird/fishery interactions. PLoS ONE 8:e57376. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057376
Watanuki Y (1992) individual diet difference, parental care and reproductive success in slaty-backed gulls. Condor 94:159–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/1368805
Wearmouth VJ, Sims DW (2008) Chapter 2 sexual segregation in marine fish, reptiles, birds and mammals. behaviour patterns, mechanisms and conservation implications. In: Sims DW (ed) Advances in marine biology. Academic Press, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 107–170
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the support of Portuguese national funds provided by ‘Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P.’ (FCT), through the strategic project UIDB/04292/2020 granted to MARE and the fellowships PD/BD/127991/2016, SFRH/BPD/95372/2013, and SFRH/BPD/85024/2012 granted to JGC, FRC, and VHP, respectively.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed and all necessary approvals have been obtained by the Parque Nacional de las Islas Atlánticas de Galicia (45/RX97704) and Xunta de Galicia (1459/RX201708) in Spain and by the Institute for Nature Conservation – ICNF (169/CAPT/2018) in Portugal.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: T. A. Clay.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Reviewed by I. R Cleasby, V. Pujol and an undisclosed expert.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Calado, J.G., Paiva, V.H., Ceia, F.R. et al. Stable isotopes reveal year-round sexual trophic segregation in four yellow-legged gull colonies. Mar Biol 167, 65 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-020-3676-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-020-3676-0