Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Moderate Sedation for Echocardiography of Preschoolers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Preschoolers frequently require sedation for echocardiograms. This study compared various sedation drugs at the authors’ institution, as well as the charges for moderate versus deep sedation. From 2001 to 2007, sedation was administered to 703 patients ages 2 to 4 years. Four drug regimens were used: chloral hydrate (CH), chloral hydrate with diphenhydramine (CH + D), chloral hydrate with hydroxyzine hydrochloride (CH + H), and midazolam. The mean onset of sedation was 37 min, and the mean duration of sedation was 47 min. The CH group fell asleep the most quickly (30 min; p < 0.001), and the CH + D patients experienced the most prolonged sedations (13%; p < 0.001). Studies were completed by 97% of the chloral hydrate group, 98% of the CH + D group, and 94% of the CH + H group compared with 66% of the midazolam group (p < 0.001). Complications (7.4%) were minor and not significant for any particular medication. The charges for moderate sedation averaged $709 compared with $3,628 for deep sedation. The findings demonstrated that chloral hydrate was the fastest-acting agent and had a high success rate with minimally prolonged sedations. The low complication rate for chloral hydrate, and the much lower cost for its use to induce moderate sedation have made chloral hydrate our preference for the echocardiographic sedation of preschoolers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Task Force of the Pediatric Council of the American Society of Echocardiography (2006) Guidelines and standards for performance of a pediatric echocardiogram. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 19:1413–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Buck ML (2005) The use of chloral hydrate in infants and children. Pediatr Pharm 11(9):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  3. D’Agostino J, Terndrup TE (2000) Chloral hydrate versus midazolam for sedation of children for neuroimaging: a randomized clinical trial. Pediatr Emerg Care 16:1–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kohli V (2000) Sedation for pediatric echocardiography: a brief review. Heart Views 1:314–316

    Google Scholar 

  5. Napoli KL, Ingall CG, Martin GR (1996) Safety and efficacy of chloral hydrate sedation in children undergoing echocardiography. J Pediatr 129:287–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wheeler DS, Jensen RA, Poss WB (2001) A randomized, blinded comparison of chloral hydrate and midazolam sedation in children undergoing echocardiography. Clin Pediatr 40:381–387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sheroan MM, Dilley DC, Lucas WJ, Vann WF (2006) A prospective study of 2 sedation regimens in children: chloral hydrate, meperidine, and hydroxyzine versus midazolam, meperidine, and hydroxyzine. Anesth Prog 53:83–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Torres-Perez J, Tapia-Garcia I, Roasales-Berber MA, Hernandez-Sierra JF, Pozos-Guillen AJ (2007) Comparison of three conscious sedation regimens for pediatric dental patients. J Clin Pediatr Dent 31:183–186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Child Development Institute, LLC. General developmental sequence, toddler through preschool. www.childdevelopmentinfo.com/development/devsequences.html. Accessed 25 May 2009

  10. Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, Cote C, Wilson S, the Working Group on Sedation (2006) Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: an update. Pediatrics 118:2587–2602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Malviya S, Voepel-Lewis T, Tait AR, Merkel S, Tremper K, Naughton N (2002) Depth of sedation in children undergoing computed tomography: validity and reliability of the University of Michigan sedation scale (UMSS). Br J Anaesth 88:241–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Istaphanous GK, Loepke AW (2009) General anesthetics and the developing brain. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 22:368–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Young TE, Mangum B (2007) Neofax: a manual of drugs used in neonatal care, 20th edn. Thompson Healthcare, Montvale, NJ, p 163

  14. Lazol JP, DeGroff CG (2009) Minimal sedation second-dose strategy with intranasal midazolam in an outpatient pediatric echocardiographic setting. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22:383–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Heistein LC, Ramaciotti C, Scott WA, Coursey M, Sheeran PW, Lemier MS (2006) Chloral hydrate sedation for pediatric echocardiography: physiologic responses, adverse events, and risk factors. Pediatrics 117:e434–e441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roach CL, Husain N, Garg R, Welch E (2009, spring newsletter) Summary of an online survey: re: sedation for echocardiography in preschoolers. Society of Pediatric Cardiovascular Nursing, St. Petersburg, FL

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol Lafayette Roach.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roach, C.L., Husain, N., Zabinsky, J. et al. Moderate Sedation for Echocardiography of Preschoolers. Pediatr Cardiol 31, 469–473 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-009-9622-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-009-9622-z

Keywords

Navigation