Skip to main content
Log in

Hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: does gracilis tendon harvest matter?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 04 December 2012

Abstract

Purpose

Hamstring tendon grafts are a popular choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Typical morbidity reported after hamstring tendon harvest is muscle weakness in flexion, and whilst still a matter for debate, this morbidity may be greater if the gracilis tendon is harvested in addition to the semitendinosus.

This study sought to comprehensively compare the outcome of ACL reconstructions in which the semitendinosus was harvested alone (ST group) or with the gracilis (ST/G group).

Methods

Twenty patients (ten ST, ten ST/G) were assessed with a variety of measures that included subjective scores, function, strength and tibial rotation as measured by gait analysis during a pivoting task.

Results

Results showed that the graft diameter was significantly larger in the ST group, but there were no other differences between the groups for any other outcome measure.

Conclusion

Harvesting the gracilis in addition to semitendinosus does not appear to affect either the outcome or graft-related morbidity after hamstring ACL reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Noyes FR, Butler DL, Grood ES, Zernicke RF, Hefzy MS (1984) Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 66(3):344–352

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yunes M, Richmond JC, Engels EA, Pinczewski LA (2001) Patellar versus hamstring tendons in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Arthroscopy 17(3):248–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barenius B, Nordlander M, Ponzer S, Tidermark J, Eriksson K (2010) Quality of life and clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon graft or quadrupled semitendinosus graft: an 8-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 38(8):1533–1541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pinczewski LA, Lyman J, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Roe J, Linklater J (2007) A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med 35(4):564–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Duquin TR, Wind WM, Fineberg MS, Smolinski RJ, Buyea CM (2009) Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg 22(1):7–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nakamura N, Horibe S, Sasaki S, Kitaguchi T, Tagami M, Mitsuoka T, Toritsuka Y, Hamada M, Shino K (2002) Evaluation of active knee flexion and hamstring strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Arthroscopy 18(6):598–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Viola RW, Sterett WI, Newfield D, Steadman JR, Torry MR (2000) Internal and external tibial rotation strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using ipsilateral semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 28(4):552–555

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tashiro T, Kurosawa H, Kawakami A, Hikita A, Fukui N (2003) Influence of medial hamstring tendon harvest on knee flexor strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A detailed evaluation with comparison of single-and double-tendon harvest. Am J Sports Med 31(4):522–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gobbi A (2010) Single versus double hamstring tendon harvest for ACL reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc 18(1):15–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA (2010) Hamstring strength recovery after hamstring tendon harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison between graft types. Arthroscopy 26(4):462–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Segawa H, Omori G, Koga Y, Kameo T, Iida S, Tanaka M (2002) Rotational muscle strength of the limb after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis tendon. Arthroscopy 18(2):177–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ristanis S, Stergiou N, Patras K, Tsepis E, Moraiti C, Georgoulis AD (2006) Follow-up evaluation 2 years after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft shows that excessive tibial rotation persists. Clin J Sport Med 16(2):111–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Georgoulis AD, Ristanis S, Chouliaras V, Moraiti C, Stergiou N (2007) Tibial rotation is not restored after ACL reconstruction with a hamstring graft. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:89–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Webster KE, Wittwer JE, O’Brien J, Feller JA (2005) Gait patterns after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are related to graft type. Am J Sports Med 33(2):247–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Webster KE, Feller JA (2011) Alterations in joint kinematics during walking following hamstring and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 26(2):175–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Noyes FR, Stabler CL (1989) A system for grading articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 17(4):505–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelborne KD (2001) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29(5):600–613

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Davis Iii RB, Ounpuu S, Tyburski D, Gage JR (1991) A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Mov Sci 10(5):575–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME (1990) Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. J Orthop Res 8(3):383–392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Webster KE, Palazzolo SE, McClelland JA, Feller JA (2012) Tibial rotation during pivoting in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees using a single bundle technique. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 26(5):480–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Prodromos C (2007) The anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and basic science. 2ST/2Gr, 4ST, and 3ST/2Gr techniques: deciding which hamstring configuration to use. Saunders, pp 110–114

  22. Ma CB, Keifa E, Dunn W, Fu FH, Harner CD (2010) Can pre-operative measures predict quadruple hamstring graft diameter? Knee 17(1):81–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zantop T, Ferretti M, Bell KM, Brucker PU, Gilbertson L, Fu FH (2008) Effect of tunnel-graft length on the biomechanics of anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees: intra-articular study in a goat model. Am J Sports Med 36(11):2158–2166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Webster KE, McClelland JA, Wittwer JE, Tecklenburg K, Feller JA (2010) Three dimensional motion analysis of within and between day repeatability of tibial rotation during pivoting. Knee 17(5):329–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. McGinley JL, Baker R, Wolfe R, Morris ME (2009) The reliability of three-dimensional kinematic gait measurements: a systematic review. Gait Posture 29(3):360–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Björn Barenius.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barenius, B., Webster, W.K., McClelland, J. et al. Hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: does gracilis tendon harvest matter?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 37, 207–212 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1672-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1672-9

Keywords

Navigation