Skip to main content
Log in

No male agonistic experience effect on pre-copulatory mate choice in female earwigs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mating with dominant males may confer considerable benefits, but also incur significant costs, hence intrasexual competitiveness is a likely target of mate choice. In addition to established modes of mate assessment, females may use cues or signals associated with agonistic experience effects to assess the relative competiveness of males. Experience effects, where the outcome of a fight increases the likelihood of a similar outcome in subsequent fights, may result from an animal’s altered state after conflict, but can also arise from strategic rival use of information perceived about this altered state. While females may similarly use this information in mate choice decisions, this potential consequence of male–male conflict has largely been neglected. Here, we investigate the effects of experience on subsequent agonistic performance in the earwig Euborellia brunneri by imposing winning or losing experiences on males and rematching them with naïve, size-matched rivals. We reveal a strong loser effect in subsequent fights, with nearly all previous “losers” losing against new rivals. In contrast, we found no equivalent winner effect, with previous “winners” exhibiting no increased likelihood of winning. We subsequently test whether the effects of male agonistic experience extend to pre-copulatory female mate choice. We show that females, when allowed to choose between naïve males and “winners” or “losers”, do not discriminate between males based on their recent agonistic experience. Therefore, while fighting history can play an important role in male–male interactions, females may not attend to this information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharya L, McNeil JN (1998) Predation risk and mating behavior: the responses of moths to bat-like ultrasound. Behav Ecol 9:552–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alatalo RV, Hoglund J, Lundberg A (1991) Lekking in the black grouse—a test of male viability. Nature 352:155–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander RD (1961) Aggressiveness, territoriality, and sexual behaviour in field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behaviour 17:130–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglund A, Bisazza A, Pilastro A (1996) Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biol J Linn Soc 58:385–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman DA, Kozlowski CP, McIntyre JC, Huber R, Daws AG, Moore PA (2003) Temporal dynamics and communication of winner-effects in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. Behaviour 140:805–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman DA, Martin AL, Moore PA (2005) Control of information flow through the influence of mechanical and chemical signals during agonistic encounters by the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. Anim Behav 70:485–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burr M (1939) Modern work on earwigs. Sci Prog 34:20–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Candolin U (2000) Male–male competition ensures honest signaling of male parental ability in the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:57–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doutrelant C, McGregor PK (2000) Eavesdropping and mate choice in female fighting fish. Behaviour 137:1655–1669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugatkin LA (1997) Winner and loser effects and the structure of dominance hierarchies. Behav Ecol 8:583–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing LS (1967) Fighting and death from stress in a cockroach. Science 155:1035–1036

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing LS, Ewing AW (1973) Correlates of subordinate behaviour in the cockroach, Nauphoeta cinerea. Anim Behav 21:571–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forslund P (2000) Male–male competition and large size mating advantage in European earwigs, Forficula auricularia. Anim Behav 59:753–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Francis RC (1988) On the relationship between aggression and social dominance. Ethology 78:223–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hack MA (1997) The energetic costs of fighting in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus L. Behav Ecol 8:28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu Y, Earley RL, Wolf LL (2006) Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes. Biol Rev 81:33–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu YY, Wolf LL (1999) The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences. Anim Behav 57:903–910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone RA, Keller L (2000) How males can gain by harming their mates: sexual conflict, seminal toxins, and the cost of mating. Am Nat 156:368–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karavanich C, Atema J (1998) Olfactory recognition of urine signals in dominance fights between male lobster, Homarus americanus. Behaviour 135:719–730

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kortet R, Hedrick A (2005) The scent of dominance: female field crickets use odour to predict the outcome of male competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kou R, Chang HW, Huang ZY, Yang RL (2008) Pheromone, juvenile hormone, and social status in the male lobster cockroach Nauphoeta cinerea. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 68:144–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Price GR (1973) The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246:15–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1987a) Social control of deception among status signaling house sparrows Passer domesticus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:307–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1987b) Variation in badge size in male house sparrows Passer domesticus: evidence for status signalling. Anim Behav 35:1637–1644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore AJ (1990) The inheritance of social dominance, mating behavior and attractiveness to mates in male Nauphoeta cinerea. Anim Behav 39:388–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore PJ, Reagan-Wallin NL, Haynes KF, Moore AJ (1997) Odour conveys status on cockroaches. Nature 389:25–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nijhout H (2003) The control of body size in insects. Dev Biol 261:1–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Obermeier M, Schmitz B (2003) Recognition of dominance in the big-clawed snapping shrimp (Alpheus heterochaelis Say 1818) part I: Individual or group recognition? Mar Fresh Behav Physiol 36:1–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira RF, Almada VC, Canario AVM (1996) Social modulation of sex steroid concentrations in the urine of male cichlid fish Oreochromis mossambicus. Horm Behav 30:2–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Otronen M (1990) The effect of prior experience on the outcome of fights in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus humator. Anim Behav 40:980–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otter K, McGregor PK, Terry AMR, Burford FRL, Peake TM, Dabelsteen T (1999) Do female great tits (Parus major) assess males by eavesdropping? A field study using interactive song playback. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266:1305–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1974) Assessment strategy and evolution of fighting behavior. J Theor Biol 47:223–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peschke K (1987) Cuticular hydrocarbons regulate mate recognition, male aggression, and female choice of the rove beetle, Aleochara curtula. J Chem Ecol 13:1993–2008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pitnick S, Garcia-Gonzalez F (2002) Harm to females increases with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269:1821–1828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qvarnström A, Forsgren E (1998) Should females prefer dominant males? Trends Ecol Evol 13:498–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Rentz DCF, Kevan DKM (1970) Dermaptera. In: Naumann ID (ed) The insects of Australia. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohwer S, Ewald PW (1981) The cost of dominance and advantage of subordination in a badge signaling system. Evolution 35:441–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutte C, Taborsky M, Brinkhof MWG (2006) What sets the odds of winning and losing? Trends Ecol Evol 21:16–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savage KE, Hunt J, Jennions MD, Brooks R (2005) Male attractiveness covaries with fighting ability but not with prior fight outcome in house crickets. Behav Ecol 16:196–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider D (1964) Insect antennae. Annu Rev Entomol 9:103–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro LE, Dewsbury DA (1986) Male dominance, female choice and male copulatory behavior in 2 species of voles (Microtus ochrogaster and Microtus montanus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:267–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slifer EH (1967) Sense organs on antennal flagella of earwigs (Dermaptera) with special reference to those of Forficula auricularia. J Morphol 122:63–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sréng L, Léoncini I, Clément JL (1999) Regulation of sex pheromone production in the male Nauphoeta cinerea cockroach: role of brain extracts, corpora allata (CA), and juvenile hormone (JH). Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 40:165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PW, Jackson RR (2003) Interacting effects of size and prior injury in jumping spider conflicts. Anim Behav 65:787–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts EA, Dale J (2004) A socially enforced signal of quality in a paper wasp. Nature 432:218–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins JL, Simmons LW (1999) Heritability of size but not symmetry in a sexually selected trait chosen by female earwigs. Heredity 82:151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valone TJ, Templeton JJ (2002) Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357:1549–1557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Lieshout E, Elgar MA (2009) Armament under direct sexual selection does not exhibit positive allometry in the earwig Euborellia brunneri. Behav Ecol 20:258–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse MEA (1997) Experience influences male–male contests in the spider Argyrodes antipodiana (Theridiidae: Araneae). Anim Behav 53:913–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RH, Poston J (1996) Perspective: indirect mate choice, competition for mates, and coevolution of the sexes. Evolution 50:1371–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong BBM, Candolin U (2005) How is female mate choice affected by male competition? Biol Rev 80:559–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zulandt Schneider RA, Schneider RWS, Moore PA (1999) Recognition of dominance status by chemoreception in the red swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. J Chem Ecol 25:781–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment for research funding. E.v.L. would like to thank the Australian government for providing an International Postgraduate Research Scholarship and the University of Melbourne for providing a Melbourne International Research Scholarship.

Ethical standards declaration

The experiments described comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.

Conflict of interests declaration

The authors do not have a financial relationship with the organisation that sponsored the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emile van Lieshout.

Additional information

Communicated by T. Moore

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Lieshout, E., van Wilgenburg, E. & Elgar, M.A. No male agonistic experience effect on pre-copulatory mate choice in female earwigs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63, 1727–1733 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0788-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0788-4

Keywords

Navigation