Abstract
Mating with dominant males may confer considerable benefits, but also incur significant costs, hence intrasexual competitiveness is a likely target of mate choice. In addition to established modes of mate assessment, females may use cues or signals associated with agonistic experience effects to assess the relative competiveness of males. Experience effects, where the outcome of a fight increases the likelihood of a similar outcome in subsequent fights, may result from an animal’s altered state after conflict, but can also arise from strategic rival use of information perceived about this altered state. While females may similarly use this information in mate choice decisions, this potential consequence of male–male conflict has largely been neglected. Here, we investigate the effects of experience on subsequent agonistic performance in the earwig Euborellia brunneri by imposing winning or losing experiences on males and rematching them with naïve, size-matched rivals. We reveal a strong loser effect in subsequent fights, with nearly all previous “losers” losing against new rivals. In contrast, we found no equivalent winner effect, with previous “winners” exhibiting no increased likelihood of winning. We subsequently test whether the effects of male agonistic experience extend to pre-copulatory female mate choice. We show that females, when allowed to choose between naïve males and “winners” or “losers”, do not discriminate between males based on their recent agonistic experience. Therefore, while fighting history can play an important role in male–male interactions, females may not attend to this information.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acharya L, McNeil JN (1998) Predation risk and mating behavior: the responses of moths to bat-like ultrasound. Behav Ecol 9:552–558
Alatalo RV, Hoglund J, Lundberg A (1991) Lekking in the black grouse—a test of male viability. Nature 352:155–156
Alexander RD (1961) Aggressiveness, territoriality, and sexual behaviour in field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Behaviour 17:130–223
Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Berglund A, Bisazza A, Pilastro A (1996) Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biol J Linn Soc 58:385–399
Bergman DA, Kozlowski CP, McIntyre JC, Huber R, Daws AG, Moore PA (2003) Temporal dynamics and communication of winner-effects in the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. Behaviour 140:805–825
Bergman DA, Martin AL, Moore PA (2005) Control of information flow through the influence of mechanical and chemical signals during agonistic encounters by the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. Anim Behav 70:485–496
Burr M (1939) Modern work on earwigs. Sci Prog 34:20–30
Candolin U (2000) Male–male competition ensures honest signaling of male parental ability in the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:57–61
Doutrelant C, McGregor PK (2000) Eavesdropping and mate choice in female fighting fish. Behaviour 137:1655–1669
Dugatkin LA (1997) Winner and loser effects and the structure of dominance hierarchies. Behav Ecol 8:583–587
Ewing LS (1967) Fighting and death from stress in a cockroach. Science 155:1035–1036
Ewing LS, Ewing AW (1973) Correlates of subordinate behaviour in the cockroach, Nauphoeta cinerea. Anim Behav 21:571–578
Forslund P (2000) Male–male competition and large size mating advantage in European earwigs, Forficula auricularia. Anim Behav 59:753–762
Francis RC (1988) On the relationship between aggression and social dominance. Ethology 78:223–237
Hack MA (1997) The energetic costs of fighting in the house cricket, Acheta domesticus L. Behav Ecol 8:28–36
Hsu Y, Earley RL, Wolf LL (2006) Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes. Biol Rev 81:33–74
Hsu YY, Wolf LL (1999) The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences. Anim Behav 57:903–910
Johnstone RA, Keller L (2000) How males can gain by harming their mates: sexual conflict, seminal toxins, and the cost of mating. Am Nat 156:368–377
Karavanich C, Atema J (1998) Olfactory recognition of urine signals in dominance fights between male lobster, Homarus americanus. Behaviour 135:719–730
Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33–38
Kortet R, Hedrick A (2005) The scent of dominance: female field crickets use odour to predict the outcome of male competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:77–83
Kou R, Chang HW, Huang ZY, Yang RL (2008) Pheromone, juvenile hormone, and social status in the male lobster cockroach Nauphoeta cinerea. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 68:144–155
Maynard Smith J, Price GR (1973) The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246:15–18
Møller AP (1987a) Social control of deception among status signaling house sparrows Passer domesticus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:307–311
Møller AP (1987b) Variation in badge size in male house sparrows Passer domesticus: evidence for status signalling. Anim Behav 35:1637–1644
Moore AJ (1990) The inheritance of social dominance, mating behavior and attractiveness to mates in male Nauphoeta cinerea. Anim Behav 39:388–397
Moore PJ, Reagan-Wallin NL, Haynes KF, Moore AJ (1997) Odour conveys status on cockroaches. Nature 389:25–25
Nijhout H (2003) The control of body size in insects. Dev Biol 261:1–9
Obermeier M, Schmitz B (2003) Recognition of dominance in the big-clawed snapping shrimp (Alpheus heterochaelis Say 1818) part I: Individual or group recognition? Mar Fresh Behav Physiol 36:1–16
Oliveira RF, Almada VC, Canario AVM (1996) Social modulation of sex steroid concentrations in the urine of male cichlid fish Oreochromis mossambicus. Horm Behav 30:2–12
Otronen M (1990) The effect of prior experience on the outcome of fights in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus humator. Anim Behav 40:980–982
Otter K, McGregor PK, Terry AMR, Burford FRL, Peake TM, Dabelsteen T (1999) Do female great tits (Parus major) assess males by eavesdropping? A field study using interactive song playback. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266:1305–1309
Parker GA (1974) Assessment strategy and evolution of fighting behavior. J Theor Biol 47:223–243
Peschke K (1987) Cuticular hydrocarbons regulate mate recognition, male aggression, and female choice of the rove beetle, Aleochara curtula. J Chem Ecol 13:1993–2008
Pitnick S, Garcia-Gonzalez F (2002) Harm to females increases with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269:1821–1828
Qvarnström A, Forsgren E (1998) Should females prefer dominant males? Trends Ecol Evol 13:498–501
R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Rentz DCF, Kevan DKM (1970) Dermaptera. In: Naumann ID (ed) The insects of Australia. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne
Rohwer S, Ewald PW (1981) The cost of dominance and advantage of subordination in a badge signaling system. Evolution 35:441–454
Rutte C, Taborsky M, Brinkhof MWG (2006) What sets the odds of winning and losing? Trends Ecol Evol 21:16–21
Savage KE, Hunt J, Jennions MD, Brooks R (2005) Male attractiveness covaries with fighting ability but not with prior fight outcome in house crickets. Behav Ecol 16:196–200
Schneider D (1964) Insect antennae. Annu Rev Entomol 9:103–122
Shapiro LE, Dewsbury DA (1986) Male dominance, female choice and male copulatory behavior in 2 species of voles (Microtus ochrogaster and Microtus montanus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:267–274
Slifer EH (1967) Sense organs on antennal flagella of earwigs (Dermaptera) with special reference to those of Forficula auricularia. J Morphol 122:63–79
Sréng L, Léoncini I, Clément JL (1999) Regulation of sex pheromone production in the male Nauphoeta cinerea cockroach: role of brain extracts, corpora allata (CA), and juvenile hormone (JH). Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 40:165–172
Taylor PW, Jackson RR (2003) Interacting effects of size and prior injury in jumping spider conflicts. Anim Behav 65:787–794
Tibbetts EA, Dale J (2004) A socially enforced signal of quality in a paper wasp. Nature 432:218–222
Tomkins JL, Simmons LW (1999) Heritability of size but not symmetry in a sexually selected trait chosen by female earwigs. Heredity 82:151–157
Valone TJ, Templeton JJ (2002) Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357:1549–1557
van Lieshout E, Elgar MA (2009) Armament under direct sexual selection does not exhibit positive allometry in the earwig Euborellia brunneri. Behav Ecol 20:258–264
Whitehouse MEA (1997) Experience influences male–male contests in the spider Argyrodes antipodiana (Theridiidae: Araneae). Anim Behav 53:913–923
Wiley RH, Poston J (1996) Perspective: indirect mate choice, competition for mates, and coevolution of the sexes. Evolution 50:1371–1381
Wong BBM, Candolin U (2005) How is female mate choice affected by male competition? Biol Rev 80:559–571
Zulandt Schneider RA, Schneider RWS, Moore PA (1999) Recognition of dominance status by chemoreception in the red swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. J Chem Ecol 25:781–794
Acknowledgements
We thank the Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment for research funding. E.v.L. would like to thank the Australian government for providing an International Postgraduate Research Scholarship and the University of Melbourne for providing a Melbourne International Research Scholarship.
Ethical standards declaration
The experiments described comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.
Conflict of interests declaration
The authors do not have a financial relationship with the organisation that sponsored the research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by T. Moore
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Lieshout, E., van Wilgenburg, E. & Elgar, M.A. No male agonistic experience effect on pre-copulatory mate choice in female earwigs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63, 1727–1733 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0788-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0788-4