Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rival assessment and comparison of morphological and performance-based predictors of fighting ability in Lake Eyre dragon lizards, Ctenophorus maculosus

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the outcome of contests is often critical to fitness, we still have much to learn regarding the reliability of different predictors of fighting ability (e.g. morphological traits versus performance measures) and the strategies individuals use to decide when to withdraw. We examined predictors of contest success and assessment strategies in staged contests between male Lake Eyre dragon lizards, Ctenophorus maculosus, in which males engage in escalated contests. Bite force was the only significant predictor of contest success. Although head width and depth predicted the number and duration of bites during contests, neither of these traits predicted contest outcome, nor did body size or experience in the prior two contests. These results support the view that measures of physical performance may be more reliable indicators of male fighting ability in escalated contests than morphological traits, because performance is more directly linked to the quality being signalled (i.e. fighting ability). Contest intensity was positively associated with the resource holding potential (RHP) of the loser, but not that of the winner or RHP asymmetry, indicating that individuals base their decision to withdraw on assessment of their own cost threshold (self-assessment) rather than assessment of their opponent’s ability (mutual assessment). Lastly, the number of displays (head bobs and push-ups) was also correlated with the RHP of losers (but not winners or RHP asymmetry), consistent with the recently proposed ‘information conflict hypothesis’, which predicts that weaker individuals should limit information transfer about their ability by performing fewer displays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnott G, Elwood RW (2008) Information gathering and decision making about resource value in animal contests. Anim Behav 76:529–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnott G, Elwood RW (2009) Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests. Anim Behav 77:991–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley RA, Terry ME (1952) Rank analysis of incomplete block designs I: the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 39:324–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Briffa M, Elwood RW (2009) Difficulties remain in distinguishing between mutual and self-assessment in animal contests. Anim Behav 77:759–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan R, Stuart-Fox D, Jessop TS (2009) Why are females ornamented? A test of the courtship stimulation and courtship rejection hypotheses. Behav Ecol 20:1334–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen IP, Stuart-Fox D, Hugall AF, Symonds MRE (2012) Sexual selection and the evolution of complex color patterns in dragon lizards. Evolution 66:3605–3614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elias DO, Kasumovic MM, Punzalan D, Andrade MCB, Mason AC (2008) Assessment during aggressive contests between male jumping spiders. Anim Behav 76:901–910

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood RW, Arnott G (2012) Understanding how animals fight with Lloyd Morgan's canon. Anim Behav 84:1095–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood RW, Arnott G (2013) Assessments in contests are frequenctly assumed to be complex when simple explanations will suffice. Anim Behav 86:e8–e12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enquist M, Leimar O (1983) Evolution of fighting behaviour: decision rules and assessment of relative strength. J Theor Biol 102:387–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firth D (2005) Bradley–Terry models in R. J Stat Softw 12:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton DG, Whiting MJ, Pryke SR (2013) Fiery frills: carotenoid-based coloration predicts contest success in frillneck lizards. Behav Ecol 24:1138–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henningsen JP, Irschick DJ (2012) An experimental test of the effect of signal size and performance capacity on dominance in the green anole lizard. Funct Ecol 26:3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrel A, De Grauw E, Lemos-Espinal JA (2001) Head shape and bite performance in xenosaurid lizards. J Exp Zool 290:101–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hews DK (1990) Examining hypotheses generated by field measures of sexual selection on male lizards, Uta palmeri. Evolution 44:1956–1966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu YY, Earley RL, Wolf LL (2006) Modulation of aggressive behaviour by fighting experience: mechanisms and contest outcomes. Biol Rev 81:33–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu YY, Lee SP, Chen MH, Yang SY, Cheng KC (2008) Switching assessment strategy during a contest: fighting in killifish Kryptolebias marmoratus. Anim Behav 75:1641–1649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husak JF, Lappin AK, Fox SF, Lemos-Espinal JA (2006) Bite-force performance predicts dominance in male venerable collared lizards (Crotaphytus antiquus). Copeia 2006:301–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huyghe K, Vanhooydonck B, Scheers H, Molina-Borja M, Van Damme R (2005) Morphology, performance and fighting capacity in male lizards, Gallotia galloti. Funct Ecol 19:800–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasumovic MM, Mason AC, Andrade MCB, Elias DO (2011) The relative importance of RHP and resource quality in contests with ownership asymmetries. Behav Ecol 22:39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lailvaux SP, Irschick DJ (2007) The evolution of performance-based male fighting ability in Caribbean Anolis lizards. Am Nat 170:573–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lailvaux SP, Herrel A, VanHooydonck B, Meyers JJ, Irschick DJ (2004) Performance capacity, fighting tactics and the evolution of life-stage male morphs in the green anole lizard (Anolis carolinensis). Proc R Soc Lond B 271:2501–2508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lappin AK, Husak JF (2005) Weapon performance, not size, determines mating success and potential reproductive output in the collared lizard (Crotaphytus collaris). Am Nat 166:426–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Losos JB (1985) An experimental demonstration of the species-recognition role of Anolis dewlap color. Copeia 1985:905–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean CA, Stuart-Fox D (2010) Do female Lake Eyre dragon lizards adjust courtship rejection behaviour under high predation risk? Behaviour 147:1803–1818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesterton-Gibbons M, Heap SM (2014) Variation between self- and mutual assessment in animal contests. Am Nat 183:199–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mesterton-Gibbons M, Marden JH, Dugatkin LA (1996) On wars of attrition without assessment. J Theor Biol 181:65–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell FJ (1973) Studies on the ecology of the agamid lizard Amphibolorus maculosus. T R Soc South Aust 97:47–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrell LJ, Backwell PRY, Metcalfe NB (2005) Fighting in fiddler crabs Uca mjoebergi: what determines duration? Anim Behav 70:653–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor DE, Shine R (2004) Parental care protects against infanticide in the lizard Egernia saxatilis (Scincidae). Anim Behav 68:1361–1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson M (1995a) Forced copulation and costly female resistance behavior in the Lake Eyre dragon, Ctenophorus maculosus. Herpetologica 51:19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson M (1995b) Territoriality in Lake Eyre dragons Ctenophorus maculosus—are males superterritorial? Ethology 101:222–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1974) Assessment strategy and the evolution of fighting behaviour. J Theor Biol 47:223–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Rubenstein DI (1981) Role assessment, reserve strategy and acquisition of information in asymmetric animal contests. Anim Behav 26:221–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne RJH (1998) Gradually escalating fights and displays: the cumulative assessment model. Anim Behav 56:651–662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Payne RJH, Pagel M (1996a) Escalation and time costs in displays of endurance. J Theor Biol 183:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne RJH, Pagel M (1996b) When is false modesty a false economy? An optimality model of escalating signals. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1545–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne RJH, Pagel M (1997) Why do animals repeat displays? Anim Behav 54:109–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perry G, Levering K, Girard I, Garland T (2004) Locomotor performance and social dominance in male Anolis cristatellus. Anim Behav 67:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt NC, Alberts AC, Fulton-Medler KG, Phillips JA (2004) Behavioral, physiological, and morphological components of dominance and mate attraction in male green iguanas. Zoo Biol 11:153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prenter J, Elwood RW, Taylor PW (2006) Self-assessment by males during energetically costly contests over precopula females in amphipods. Anim Behav 72:861–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, http://www.R-project.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson MA, Miles DB (2000) Locomotor performance and dominance in male tree lizards, Urosaurus ornatus. Funct Ecol 14:338–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneddon LU, Huntingford FA, Taylor AC, Orr JF (2000) Weapon strength and competitive success in the fights of shore crabs (Carcinus maenas). J Zool 250:397–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart-Fox DM, Johnston GR (2005) Experience overrides colour in lizard contests. Behaviour 142:329–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart-Fox DM, Ord TJ (2004) Sexual selection, natural selection and the evolution of dimorphic coloration and ornamentation in agamid lizards. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:2249–2255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart-Fox DM, Firth D, Moussalli A, Whiting MJ (2006) Multiple signals in chameleon contests: designing and analysing animal contests as a tournament. Anim Behav 71:1263–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PW, Elwood RW (2003) The mismeasure of animal contests. Anim Behav 65:1195–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokarz RR (1985) Body size as a factor determining dominance in staged agonistic encounters between male brown anoles (Anolis sagrei). Anim Behav 33:746–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner H, Firth D (2012) Bradley–Terry Models in R: the BradleyTerry2 Package. J Stat Softw 48:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting MJ (1999) When to be neighbourly: differential agonistic responses in the lizard Platysaurus broadleyi. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:210–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilczynski W, Ryan MJ (2010) The behavioral neuroscience of anuran social signal processing. Curr Opin Neurobiol 20:754–763

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Adnan Moussalli for assistance in the field and thank Rita Chan, Ashton Dickerson and Angela Schneider for help with animal husbandry, experimental tests and scoring video data. Bob Elwood and an anonymous reviewer provided valuable feedback on an earlier version of the manuscript. Funding was provided by the Australian Research Council (DP0772215) and The University of Melbourne (ECR 600065).

Ethical standards

Research was conducted with approval from the Department of Environment and Heritage, South Australia (permit ID: S25421_1), the Wildlife Ethics Committee, South Australia (approval ID: 13/2007) and The University of Melbourne Animal Ethics Committee, Victoria (approval ID: 0701400).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biosciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia

    Claire A. McLean & Devi Stuart-Fox

  2. Sciences Department, Museum Victoria, Carlton Gardens, Melbourne, VIC, 3053, Australia

    Claire A. McLean

Authors
  1. Claire A. McLean
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Devi Stuart-Fox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire A. McLean.

Additional information

Communicated by S. J. Downes

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McLean, C.A., Stuart-Fox, D. Rival assessment and comparison of morphological and performance-based predictors of fighting ability in Lake Eyre dragon lizards, Ctenophorus maculosus . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69, 523–531 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1863-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1863-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation