Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Guidelines for Using Movement Science to Inform Biodiversity Policy

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Substantial advances have been made in our understanding of the movement of species, including processes such as dispersal and migration. This knowledge has the potential to improve decisions about biodiversity policy and management, but it can be difficult for decision makers to readily access and integrate the growing body of movement science. This is, in part, due to a lack of synthesis of information that is sufficiently contextualized for a policy audience. Here, we identify key species movement concepts, including mechanisms, types, and moderators of movement, and review their relevance to (1) national biodiversity policies and strategies, (2) reserve planning and management, (3) threatened species protection and recovery, (4) impact and risk assessments, and (5) the prioritization of restoration actions. Based on the review, and considering recent developments in movement ecology, we provide a new framework that draws links between aspects of movement knowledge that are likely the most relevant to each biodiversity policy category. Our framework also shows that there is substantial opportunity for collaboration between researchers and government decision makers in the use of movement science to promote positive biodiversity outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Government (2012) National wildlife corridors plan. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Beger M et al (2010) Incorporating asymmetric connectivity into spatial decision making for conservation. Conserv Lett 3:359–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennetts RE, Kitchens WM (1997) Population dynamics and conservation of Snail Kites in Florida: the importance of spatial and temporal scale. Colon Waterbirds 20:324–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bograd SJ, Block BA, Costa DP, Godley BJ (2010) Biologging technologies: new tools for conservation. Introduction. Endanger Spec Res 10:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brederveld RJ, Jahnig SC, Lorenz AW, Brunzel S, Soons MB (2011) Dispersal as a limiting factor in the colonization of restored mountain streams by plants and macroinvertebrates. J Appl Ecol 48:1241–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosi BJ, Armsworth PR, Daily GC (2008) Optimal design of agricultural landscapes for pollination services. Conserv Lett 1:27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull JW, Suttle KB, Singh NJ, Milner-Gulland EJ (2013) Conservation when nothing stands still: moving targets and biodiversity offsets. Front Ecol Environ 11:203–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgman M (2005) Risks and decisions for conservation and environmental management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butchart SHM et al (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328:1164–1168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia (2010) Australia’s biodiversity conservation strategy 2010–2030. Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowther M et al (2013) Climate-mediated habitat selection in an arboreal folivore. Ecography 36:336–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Damschen EI et al (2014) How fragmentation and corridors affect wind dynamics and seed dispersal in open habitats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:3484–3489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH, Dapporto L, Dover JW, Shreeve TG (2013) Corridors and barriers in biodiversity conservation: a novel resource-based habitat perspective for butterflies. Biodivers Conserv 22:2709–2734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingle H (1996) Migration: the biology of life on the move. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge S et al (2013) The environmental-data automated track annotation (Env-DATA) system: linking animal tracks with environmental data. Mov Ecol 1:3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovers S, Hussey K (2013) Environment & sustainability: a policy handbook, 2nd edn. The Federation Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • DPIE (2013) Sub-regional species strategy for Growling Grass Frog. Department of Primary Industries and Environment, State Government of Victoria, Melbourne. http://www.depi.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/204343/GGF-SSS-text-only.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2014

  • Drielsma M, Ferrier S, Manion G (2007) A raster-based technique for analysing habitat configuration: the cost-benefit approach. Ecol Modell 202:324–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll DA, Banks SC, Barton PS, Lindenmayer DB, Smith AL (2013) Conceptual domain of the matrix in fragmented landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol 28:605–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll DA et al (2014) The trajectory of dispersal research in conservation: systematic review. PLoS ONE 9(4):e95053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco AMA et al (2009) Surrogacy and persistence in reserve selection: landscape prioritization for multiple taxa in Britain. J Appl Ecol 46:82–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick PC, Bildstein KL, Fleury B, Ogden J (1996) Conservation of large, nomadic populations of White Ibises (Eudocimus albus) in the United States. Conserv Biol 10:203–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golet GH, Gardali T, Hunt JW, Koenig DA, Williams NM (2011) Temporal and taxonomic variability in response of fauna to riparian restoration. Restor Ecol 19:126–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haight RG, Travis LE (2008) Reserve design to maximize species persistence. Environ Model Assess 13:243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale JM et al (2013) Structure and fragmentation of growling grass frog metapopulations. Conserv Genet 14:313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396:41–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hart DD et al (2002) Dam removal: challenges and opportunities for ecological research and river restoration. Bioscience 52:669–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heard GW, Scroggie MP, Clemann N (2010) Guidelines for managing the endangered Growling Grass Frog in urbanising landscapes. Technical Report Series 208. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Heidelberg

  • Hintze C, Heydel F, Hoppe C, Cunze S, König A, Tackenberg O (2013) D3: the dispersal and diaspore database—baseline data and statistics on seed dispersal. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 15:180–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson JA, Moilanen A, Wintle BA, Thomas CD (2011) Habitat area, quality and connectivity: striking the balance for efficient conservation. J Appl Ecol 48:148–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak M, Casagrandi R, Nathan R, Revilla E, Spiegel O (2008) Trends and missing parts in the study of movement ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19060–19065

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme PE (2009) Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J Appl Ecol 46:10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeltsch F et al (2013) Integrating movement ecology with biodiversity research—exploring new avenues to address spatiotemporal biodiversity dynamics. Mov Ecol 1:6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser-Bunbury CN, Traveset A, Hansen DM (2010) Conservation and restoration of plant-animal mutualisms on oceanic islands. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 12:131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh RP, Stanton MA, Herring MW (2007) Eucalypt plantings on farms benefit woodland birds in south-eastern Australia. Austral Ecol 32:635–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levesque SL (2001) The Yellowstone to Yukon conservation initiative: reconstructing boundaries, biodiversity, and beliefs. In: Blatter J, Ingram HM (eds) Reflections on water: new approaches to transboundary conflicts and cooperation. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 123–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J (2006) Habitat fragmentation and landscape change: an ecological and conservation synthesis. CSIRO Publishing, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Cunningham R, Crane M, Michael D, Montague-Drake R (2007) Farmland bird responses to intersecting replanted areas. Landsc Ecol 22:1555–1562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB et al (2008) A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. Ecol Lett 11:78–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Knight EJ, Crane MJ, Montague-Drake R, Michael DR, MacGregor CI (2010) What makes an effective restoration planting for woodland birds? Biol Conserv 143:289–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascia MB, Pailler S (2011) Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) and its conservation implications. Conserv Lett 4:9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthysen E (2012) Multicausality of dispersal: a review. In: Clobert J, Baguette M, Benton T, Bullock JM (eds) Dispersal ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCook LJ et al (2010) Adaptive management of the Great Barrier Reef: a globally significant demonstration of the benefits of networks of marine reserves. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:18278–18285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGlynn TP, Shotell MD, Kelly MS (2003) Responding to a variable environment: home range, foraging behavior, and nest relocation in the costa rican rainforest ant Aphaenogaster araneoides. J Insect Behav 16:687–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRae BH, Dickson BG, Keitt TH, Shah VB (2008) Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology 89:2712–2724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melvin SL, Gawlik DE, Scharff T (1999) Long-term movement patterns for seven species of wading birds. Waterbirds 22:411–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner-Gulland EJ, Fryxell JM, Sinclair ARE (2011) Animal migration: a synthesis. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen A (2005) Reserve selection using nonlinear species distribution models. Am Nat 165:695–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen A, Wilson KA, Possingham H (2009) Spatial conservation prioritization: quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Moir ML, Brennan KEC, Koch JM, Majer JD, Fletcher MJ (2005) Restoration of a forest ecosystem: the effects of vegetation and dispersal capabilities on the reassembly of plant-dwelling arthropods. For Ecol Manag 217:294–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokany K, Harwood TD, Ferrier S (2013) Comparing habitat configuration strategies for retaining biodiversity under climate change. J Appl Ecol 50:519–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller T, Fagan W (2008) Search and navigation in dynamic environments–from individual behaviors to population distributions. Oikos 117:654–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan R (2008) An emerging movement ecology paradigm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19050–19051

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan R et al (2008) A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:19052–19059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nehlsen W (1997) Prioritizing watersheds in Oregon for salmon restoration. Restor Ecol 5:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson KA et al (2010) Annual movements of Mongolian gazelles: nomads in the Eastern Steppe. J Arid Environ 74:1435–1442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overdijk O, Navedo JG (2012) A massive spoonbill stopover episode: identifying emergency sites for the conservation of migratory waterbird populations. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 22:695–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira HM et al (2010) Scenarios for global biodiversity in the 21st century. Science 330:1496–1501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pressey RL, Cabeza M, Watts ME, Cowling RM, Wilson KA (2007) Conservation planning in a changing world. Trends Ecol Evol 22:583–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullin AS, Knight TM, Stone DA, Charman K (2004) Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making? Biol Conserv 119:245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed JM, Doerr PD, Walters JR (1988) Minimum viable population size of the red-cockaded woodpecker. J Wildl Manag 52:385–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson GR, Handel SN (1993) Forest restoration on a closed landfill—rapid addition of new species by bird dispersal. Conserv Biol 7:271–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DL, Heinsohn R (2008) Winter habitat use by the endangered, migratory Swift Parrot (Lathamus discolor) in New South Wales. Emu 108:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saura S, Bodin O, Fortin MJ (2014) Stepping stones are crucial for species’ long-distance dispersal and range expansion through habitat networks. J Appl Ecol 51:171–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schick RS et al (2008) Understanding movement data and movement processes: current and emerging directions. Ecol Lett 11:1338–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield G et al (2010) Inter-annual variability in the home range of breeding turtles: implications for current and future conservation management. Biol Conserv 143:722–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer CL (1995) Values and shortcomings of small reserves. Bioscience 45:80–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirey PD, Lamberti GA (2010) Assisted colonization under the US Endangered Species Act. Conserv Lett 3:45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shohami D, Nathan R (2014) Fire-induced population reduction and landscape opening increases gene flow via pollen dispersal in Pinus halepensis. Mol Ecol 23:70–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AL, Bull CM, Gardner MG, Driscoll DA (2014) Life history influences how fire affects genetic diversity in two lizard species. Mol Ecol 23:2428–2441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soons MB, Heil GW (2002) Reduced colonization capacity in fragmented populations of wind-dispersed grassland forbs. J Ecol 90:1033–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé ME (1985) What is conservation biology? Bioscience 35:727–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinitz O, Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Nathan R (2012) Effects of forest plantations on the genetic composition of conspecific native Aleppo pine populations. Mol Ecol 21:300–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart RR, Noyce T, Possingham HP (2003) Opportunity cost of ad hoc marine reserve design decisions: an example from South Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 253:25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton AR, Robertson RJ, Brisson J, Strasburg J (2001) Disrupting evolutionary processes: the effect of habitat fragmentation on collared lizards in the Missouri Ozarks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:5426–5432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton AR, Brazeal H, Neuwald JL (2011) The transition from isolated patches to a metapopulation in the eastern collared lizard in response to prescribed fires. Ecology 92:1736–1747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tesson S, Edelaar P (2013) Dispersal in a changing world: opportunities, insights and challenges. Mov Ecol 1:10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD (2011) Translocation of species, climate change, and the end of trying to recreate past ecological communities. Trends Ecol Evol 26:216–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trakhtenbrot A, Nathan R, Perry G, Richardson DM (2005) The importance of long-distance dispersal in biodiversity conservation. Divers Distrib 11:173–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travis JMJ et al (2013) Dispersal and species’ responses to climate change. Oikos 122:1532–1540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuberville TD, Clark EE, Buhlmann KA, Gibbons JW (2005) Translocation as a conservation tool: site fidelity and movement of repatriated gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus). Anim Conserv 8:349–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1992) Convention on biological diversity. United Nations, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Program (1979) Convention on the conservation of migratory species of wild animals. United Nations

  • United Nations Environment Program (1985) Convention for the protection, management and development of the marine and coastal environment of the Western Indian Ocean. United Nations, Nairobi

  • van Kerkoff L (2005) Integrated research: concepts of connection in environmental science and policy. Environ Sci Policy 8:452–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wintle BA, Kavanagh RP, McCarthy MA, Burgman MA (2005) Estimating and dealing with detectability in occupancy surveys for forest owls and arboreal marsupials. J Wildl Manag 69:905–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With KA, Crist TO (1995) Critical thresholds in species responses to landscape structure. Ecology 76:2446–2459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf AJ, Hellgren EC, Bogosian V, Moody RW (2013) Effects of habitat disturbance on texas horned lizards: an urban case study. Herpetologica 69:265–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock BA et al (2012) Identifying time lags in the restoration of grassland butterfly communities: a multi-site assessment. Biol Conserv 155:50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Resources Institute, International Union for Conservation of Nature, UN Environment Programme (1992) Global Biodiversity Strategy. Washington, DC

  • Zeigler SL, Fagan W (2014) Transient windows for connectivity in a changing world. Mov Ecol 2:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Karen Ikin for helpful comments on an early version of the manuscript. Ran Nathan acknowledges support of an International Collaboration Award from the Australian Research Council Discovery project grant (DP110101480), the Adelina and Massimo Della Pergola Chair of Life Sciences, and the Minerva Center for Movement Ecology. The ideas presented in this paper were developed by the authors at a workshop funded by the National Environmental Research Program, Environmental Decisions Hub. Thanks to Randall Storey for valuable contributions at the workshop. The National Environmental Research Program is a policy initiative employed by the Australian Government to facilitate the integration of science and policy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip S. Barton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barton, P.S., Lentini, P.E., Alacs, E. et al. Guidelines for Using Movement Science to Inform Biodiversity Policy. Environmental Management 56, 791–801 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0570-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0570-5

Keywords

Navigation