Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A phase II study of biweekly pemetrexed and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Pemetrexed (PEM) is a novel folate antimetabolite which inhibits thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyl transferase. This phase II study was designed to assess the efficacy of Gemcitabine (GEM) and PEM given in a novel schedule in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients.

Methods

Eligible patients had MBC and received one prior chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease; Performance status (PS) 0–2; measurable disease (RECIST criteria). PEM(500 mg/m2) was administered intravenously (IV) over 10 min prior to GEM(1,500 mg/m2) IV given over 30 min on day 1 every 14 days.

Results

Median age of the 16 patients in the study was 54 years (range 33–77). Fourteen patients had a PS of 0/1 and were evaluable for response. There were no reported complete or partial responses, seven patients with stable disease, six patients with disease progression and one patient with unknown response. Most common toxicities were skin rash: Grade 1/2(8) and Grade 3/4(1). Grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities were fatigue(1); anorexia(1); pneumonia(1); peripheral ischemia(1) and elevation of liver transaminases(1). Three patients experienced febrile neutropenia (FN). This study did not meet the predefined criteria to proceed with additional accrual.

Conclusions

This regimen of PEM and GEM showed no clinical activity in the dose and schedule tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CT:

Computed tomography

CTCAE:

Common terminology criteria for adverse event

DHFR:

Dihydrofolate reductase

ECOG:

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

FEC:

Anthracycline based combination therapy

FN:

Febrile neutropenia

GARFT:

Glycinamide ribonucleotide formyl transferase

GEM:

Gemcitabine

GET:

Gemcitabine combination therapy

HER-2:

Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2

IHC:

Immuno histo chemistry

LY231514:

Pemetrexed, ALIMTA, multitargeted antifolate

MBC:

Metastatic breast cancer

NSCLC:

Non-small cell lung cancer

PEM:

Pemetrexed

PS:

Performance status

RECIST:

Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors

TS:

Thymidylate synthase

References

  1. Canadian Cancer Statistics (2007) Canadian Cancer Society/National Cancer Institute of Canada

  2. Grindey GB, Shih C, Barnett CJ et al (1992) LY231514, a novel pyrrolopyrimidine antifolate that inhibits thymidylate synthase (TS). Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 33:411 (Abstract 2451)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shih C, Grindey GB, Barnett CJ et al (1992) Structure-activity relationship studies of novel pyrrolopyrimidine antifolate LY231514. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 33:411 (Abstract 2452)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shih C, Gosset L, Gates S et al (1996) LY231514 and its polyglutamates exhibit potent inhibition against both human dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) and thymidylate synthase (TS): multiple folate enzyme inhibition. Ann Oncol 7(Suppl 1):85 (Abstract 289)

    Google Scholar 

  5. O’Shaughnessy JA, Clark RS, Blum JL et al (2005) Phase II study of pemetrexed in patients pretreated with an Anthracycline, Taxane, and Capecitabine for advanced breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 6:143–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miles DW, Smith IE, Coleman RE, Calvert AH, Lind MJ (2001) A phase II study of Pemetrexed disodium (LY231514) in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 37:1366–1371

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dent S, Messersmith H, Trudeau M (2008) Gemcitabine in the management of metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 108:319–331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tonkinson JL, Worzalla JF, Teng CH et al (1999) Cell cycle modulation by a multitargeted antifolate, LY231514, increases the cytotoxicity and antitumour activity of Gemcitabine in HT29 colon carcinoma. Cancer Res 59:3671–3676

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rauchwerger D, Firby P, Hedley D, Moore M (2000) Equilibrative-sensitive nucleotide transporter and its role in Gemcitabine sensitivity. Cancer Res 60:6075–6079

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Giovanetti E, Mey V, Danesi R, Mosca I, Del Tacca M (2004) Synergistic cytotoxicity and pharmacogenetics of Gemcitabine and Pemetrexed combinations in pancreatic cancer cell lines. Clin Cancer Res 10:2936–2943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Adjei AA, Erlichman C, Sloan JA et al (2000) Phase I and pharmacologic study of sequences of Gemcitabine and the multitargeted antifolate agent in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 18:1748–1757

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tesei A, Ricotti L, DePaola F, Amadori D, Frassineti GL, Zoli W (2002) In vitro schedule-dependent interactions between the multitargeted antifolate LY231514 and Gemcitabine in human colon adenocarcinoma cell lines. Clin Cancer Res 8:233–239

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma CX, Steen P, Rowland KM et al (2006) A phase II trial of a combination of Pemetrexed and Gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer: an NCCTG study. Ann Oncol 17:226–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kalykaki A, Vamvakas L, Agelaki S et al (2006) A dose escalation study of Gemcitabine plus Pemetrexed administered biweekly in patients with solid tumours. Oncology 71:197–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dudek AZ, Larson T, McCleod MJ et al (2008) Phase 1/2 dose escalating study of twice-monthly Pemetrexed and Gemcitabine in patients with advanced cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 3:394–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dent S, Zee B, Dancey J, Hanauske A, Wanders J, Eisenhauer E (2001) Application of a new multinomial phase II stopping rule using response and early progression. J Clin Oncol 19:785–791

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ma CX, Nair S, Thomas S et al (2005) Randomized phase II trial of three schedules of Pemetrexed and Gemcitabine as front-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:5929–5937

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Lisa Vandermeer, Jessica Verreault and Jonathan Azzi for help with manuscript preparation. This study was funded by Eli Lilly Canada.

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan F. Dent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dent, S.F., Gertler, S., Verma, S. et al. A phase II study of biweekly pemetrexed and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 65, 557–561 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-1064-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-1064-z

Keywords

Navigation