Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Interobserver reliability of Masei index validation by a multicenter collaborative group of rheumatologists

  • Imaging
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

MASEI is the main validated ultrasound score for the evaluation of enthesis. The lack of studies facing the agreement to achieve for the interpretation of the MAdrid Sonographic Enthesis Index (MASEI) among researchers from different centers in multicenter studies is of concern. The aim of this multicenter was to evaluate the interobserver reliability of MASEI. An experienced ultrasonographer-rheumatologist performed ultrasound scans of the areas included in MASEI index in three patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis and Psoriatic Arthritis. Videos were captured. The videos were then evaluated by 24 rheumatologists of the ultrasound working group of the Catalan Society of Rheumatology (EcoCAT). A face-to-face training meeting was held. Ten days after the workshop, the study participants evaluated the videos. A reliability assessment was performed. The ICC for the MASEI scores after the workshop was of 0.97 (95% CI 89–99). Reliability did not vary statistically with examiner experience. Globally, no problems of reliability by structures were seen, and all the ICCs were above 0.90 and improved slightly after the educational program. However, the correlation observed between examiners at plantar aponeursis and triceps tendon was weak. The small variability observed in the results of the index validation in our study, suggests that the MASEI index is reproducible by different observers when those are well trained and show awesome results of the enthesis when examined by ultrasound.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Feldtkeller E, Khan MA, van der Heijde D, van der Linden S, Braun J (2003) Age at disease onset and diagnosis delay in HLA-B27 negative vs. positive patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int 23(2):61–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-002-0237-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ozgocmen S, Ardicoglu O, Kamanli A et al (2009) Pattern of disease onset, diagnostic delay, and clinical features in juvenile onset and adult onset ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 36(12):2830–2833. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.090435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fallahi S, Jamshidi AR (2016) Diagnostic delay in ankylosing spondylitis: related factors and prognostic outcomes. Arch Rheumatol 31(1):24–30. https://doi.org/10.5606/ArchRheumatol.2016.5562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Deodhar A, Mease PJ, Reveille JD et al (2016) Frequency of axial spondyloarthritis diagnosis among patients seen by US rheumatologists for evaluation of chronic back pain. Arthritis Rheumatol (Hoboken, NJ). 68(7):1669–1676. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39612

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sykes MP, Doll H, Sengupta R, Gaffney K (2015) Delay to diagnosis in axial spondyloarthritis: are we improving in the UK? Rheumatology (Oxford) 54(12):2283–2284. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kev288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Masson Behar V, Dougados M, Etcheto A et al (2017) Diagnostic delay in axial spondyloarthritis: a cross-sectional study of 432 patients. Jt Bone Spine 84(4):467–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2016.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Redeker I, Callhoff J, Hoffmann F et al (2019) Determinants of diagnostic delay in axial spondyloarthritis: an analysis based on linked claims and patient-reported survey data. Rheumatology (Oxford) 58(9):1634–1638. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Garrido-Cumbrera M, Poddubnyy D, Gossec L et al (2019) The European map of axial spondyloarthritis: capturing the patient perspective—an analysis of 2846 patients across 13 countries. Curr Rheumatol Rep 21(5):19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-019-0819-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rudwaleit M, Haibel H, Baraliakos X et al (2009) The early disease stage in axial spondylarthritis: results from the German Spondyloarthritis Inception Cohort. Arthritis Rheum 60(3):717–727. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McGonagle D, Gibbon W, O’Connor P, Green M, Pease C, Emery P (1998) Characteristic magnetic resonance imaging entheseal changes of knee synovitis in spondylarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum 41(4):694–700. https://doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(199804)41:4%3c694::AID-ART17%3e3.0.CO;2-#

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McGonagle D, Gibbon W, Emery P (1998) Classification of inflammatory arthritis by enthesitis. Lancet (London, England) 352(9134):1137–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)12004-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McGonagle D, Marzo-Ortega H, O’Connor P et al (2002) Histological assessment of the early enthesitis lesion in spondyloarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis 61(6):534–537. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.61.6.534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mander M, Simpson JM, McLellan A, Walker D, Goodacre JA, Dick WC (1987) Studies with an enthesis index as a method of clinical assessment in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 46(3):197–202. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.46.3.197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Heuft-Dorenbosch L, Spoorenberg A, van Tubergen A, et al. (2003) Assessment of enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 62(2):127–132. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12525381

  15. Maksymowych WP, Mallon C, Morrow S et al (2009) Development and validation of the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index. Ann Rheum Dis 68(6):948–953. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.084244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Balint PV, Kane D, Wilson H, McInnes IB, Sturrock RD (2009) Ultrasonography of entheseal insertions in the lower limb in spondyloarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis 61(10):905–910. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.61.10.905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D’Agostino M-A, Said-Nahal R, Hacquard-Bouder C, Brasseur J-L, Dougados M, Breban M (2003) Assessment of peripheral enthesitis in the spondylarthropathies by ultrasonography combined with power Doppler: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Rheum 48(2):523–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kamel M, Eid H, Mansour R. (2003) Ultrasound detection of heel enthesitis: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Rheumatol 30(4):774–778. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12672198.

  19. Kamel M, Eid H, Mansour R (2004) Ultrasound detection of knee patellar enthesitis: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Rheum Dis 63(2):213–214. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2003.010314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Wakefield RJ, Balint P V, Szkudlarek M, et al. (2005) Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. J Rheumatol. 32(12):2485–2487. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16331793

  21. de Miguel E, Cobo T, Muñoz-Fernández S et al (2009) Validity of enthesis ultrasound assessment in spondyloarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis 68(2):169–174. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.084251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. de Miguel E, Muñoz-Fernández S, Castillo C, Cobo-Ibáñez T, Martín-Mola E (2011) Diagnostic accuracy of enthesis ultrasound in the diagnosis of early spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 70(3):434–439. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2010.134965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rudwaleit M, Landewé R, van der Heijde D et al (2009) The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part I): classification of paper patients by expert opinion including uncertainty appraisal. Ann Rheum Dis 68(6):770–776. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.108217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R et al (2009) The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis 68(6):777–783. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.108233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Taylor W, Gladman D, Helliwell P et al (2006) Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study. Arthritis Rheum 54(8):2665–2673. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ozsoy-Unubol T, Yagci I (2018) Is ultrasonographic enthesitis evaluation helpful for diagnosis of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis? Rheumatol Int 38(11):2053–2061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-4164-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Macía-Villa C, Falcao S, Medina J, De Miguel E (2019) Ultrasonography of enthesis in psoriatic arthritis: a descriptive and reliability analysis of elemental lesions and power Doppler subtypes. Scand J Rheumatol 2019:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2019.1602881

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Moya Alvarado.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest were reported by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moya Alvarado, P., de Agustín de Oro, J.J., Aparicio Espinar, M. et al. Interobserver reliability of Masei index validation by a multicenter collaborative group of rheumatologists. Rheumatol Int 42, 441–448 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-020-04733-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-020-04733-y

Keywords

Navigation