Skip to main content
Log in

Acute effect of static exercise in patients with aortic regurgitation assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: role of left ventricular remodelling

  • Cardiac
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

In patients with aortic regurgitation (AR), the effect of static exercise (SE) on global ventricular function and AR severity has not been previously studied.

Methods

Resting and SE cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) were prospectively performed in 23 asymptomatic patients with AR.

Results

During SE, we observed a decrease in regurgitant volume in both end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic (ESV) volume in both ventricles, as well as a slight decrease in LV ejection fraction (EF). Interestingly, responses varied depending on the degree of LV remodelling. Among patients with a greater degree of LV remodelling, we observed a decrease in LVEF (56 ± 4 % at rest vs 48 ± 7 % during SE, p = 0.001) as a result of a lower decrease in LVESV (with respect to LVEDV. Among patients with a lower degree of LV remodelling, LVEF remained unchanged. RVEF remained unchanged in both groups.

Conclusions

In patients with AR, SE provoked a reduction in preload, LV stroke volume, and regurgitant volume. In those patients with higher LV remodelling, we observed a decrease in LVEF, suggesting a lower LV contractile reserve.

Key points

In patients with aortic regurgitation, static exercise reduced preload volume.

In patients with aortic regurgitation, static exercise reduced stroke volume.

In patients with aortic regurgitation, static exercise reduced regurgitant volume.

In patients with greater remodelling, static exercise unmasked a lower contractile reserve.

Effect of static exercise on aortic regurgitation was assessed by cardiac MR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singh JP, Evans JC, Levy D et al (1999) Prevalence and clinical determinants of mitral, tricuspid, and aortic regurgitation (the Framingham Heart Study). Am J Cardiol 83:897–902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Babaee Bigi MA, Aslani A (2007) Aortic root size and prevalence of aortic regurgitation in elite strength trained athletes. Am J Cardiol 100:528–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mellwig KP, van Buuren F, Gohlke–Baerwolf C et al (2008) Recommendations for the management of individuals with acquired valvular heart diseases who are involved in leisure–time physical activities or competitive sports. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 15:95–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F et al (2012) Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio–Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 42:S1–S44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marterer R, Hongchun Z, Tschauner S, Koestenberger M, Sorantin E (2015) Cardiac MRI assessment of right ventricular function: impact of right bundle branch block on the evaluation of cardiac performance parameters. Eur Radiol 25(12):3528–3535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alegret JM, Beltrán–Debón R, La Gerche A et al (2015) Acute effect of static exercise on the cardiovascular system: assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur J Appl Physiol 115:1195–1203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kramer–Fox R et al (1989) Two–dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults. Am J Cardiol 64:507–512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lorenz CH, Walker ES, Morgan VL et al (1999) Normal human right and left ventricular mass, systolic function, and gender differences by cine magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 1:7–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Higgins CB, Wagner S, Kondo C, Suzuki J, Caputo GR (1991) Evaluation of valvularheart disease with cine gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 84(3 Suppl):I198–I207

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Globits S, Frank H, Mayr H, Neuhold A, Glogar D (1992) Quantitative assessment of aortic regurgitation by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 13:78–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Myerson SG, d’Arcy J, Mohiaddin R et al (2012) Aortic regurgitation quantification using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: association with clinical outcome. Circulation 126:1452–1460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morganroth J, Maron BJ, Henry WL, Epstein SE (1975) Comparative left ventricular dimensions in trained athletes. Ann Intern Med 82:521–524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baggish AL, Wang F, Weiner RB et al (2008) Training–specific changes in cardiac structure and function: a prospective and longitudinal assessment of competitive athletes. J Appl Physiol (1985) 104:1121–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haykowsky M, Taylor D, Teo K et al (2001) Left ventricular wall stress during leg–press exercise performed with a brief Valsalva maneuver. Chest 119:150–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zendaoui A, Lachance D, Roussel E, Couet J, Arsenault M (2011) Usefulness of carvedilol in the treatment of chronic aortic valve regurgitation. Circ Heart Fail 4:207–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bonow RO, Cheitlin MD, Crawford MH et al (2005) Task Force 3: valvular heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:1334–1340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pelliccia A, Fagard R, Bjørnstad HH et al (2005) Recommendations for competitive sports participation in athletes with cardiovascular disease: a consensus document from the Study Group of Sports Cardiology of the Working Group of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology and the Working Group of My. Eur Heart J 26:1422–1445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cook JN, DeVan AE, Schleifer JL et al (2006) Arterial compliance of rowers: implications for combined aerobic and strength training on arterial elasticity. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 290:H1596–H1600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chaturvedi A, Hamilton–Craig C, Cawley PJ, Mitsumori LM, Otto CM, Maki JH (2015) Quantitating aortic regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: significant variations due to slice location and breath holding. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4120-6

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Maite Martín and Monique Mendoza for their invaluable technical support.

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Josep M Alegret, Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan, Reus (Spain). The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

This study has received funding by a grant from the Consejo Superior de Deportes, Government of Spain and by a grant from the Societat Catalana de Cardiologia.

One of the authors has significant statistical expertise.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Josep M. Alegret.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alegret, J.M., Martinez-Micaelo, N., La Gerche, A. et al. Acute effect of static exercise in patients with aortic regurgitation assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: role of left ventricular remodelling. Eur Radiol 27, 1424–1430 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4520-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4520-2

Keywords

Navigation