Abstract
The HER activity and related electronic properties of monolayer binary V–V compound SbP under the biaxial strains are discussed by employing the first-principles calculations based on DFT. It is found that different compressive and tensile strains would modulate the ΔGH*, εLUS partial charge density affecting the HER activity, and band structures of phosphorene for electrocatalysis. Particularly, as the ΔGH* decreases, the HER activity of strained SbP is improved under the compressive strains. Importantly, in the condition of applying − 6% strain, the value of ΔGH* reduced to 0.27 eV and transfers to metallic feature. In the other conditions, the bandgaps of systems under strains are indirect semiconductors. Comparing with strained-free case, the larger partial charge density of εLUS on the surface of SbP illustrates the more H adsorption sites for electrocatalysis. Moreover, the HER activity is related to the partial charge density of εLUS rather than the εLUS site. The presentation reveals that strain would effectively modulate the HER performances for electrocatalysis. It is expected to provide further understanding in practical applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
L. Li, Y. Yu, G.J. Ye et al., Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 372 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.35
Y. Xu, J. Yuan, K. Zhang et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1702211 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201702211
M. Hu, Z. Yang, W. Zhou et al., Physica E: Low-dimension. Syst. Nanostruct. 98, 60 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2017.12.027
M. Yarmohammadi, M. Mortezaei, K. Mirabbaszadeh, Physica E: Low-dimension. Syst. Nanostruct. 124, 114323 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2020.114323
H.U. Lee, S.C. Lee, J. Won et al., Sci. Report. 5, 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08691
Q. Wei, X. Peng, Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 251915 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3382344
H. Qiao, H. Liu, Z. Huang et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 2002424 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202002424
Z. Shi, X. Ren, H. Qiao et al., J. Photochem. Photobiol. C: Photochem. Rev. 43, 100354 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2020.100354
Z. Guo, H. Zhang, S. Lu et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 6996 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201502902
S.C. Dhanabalan, J.S. Ponraj, Z. Guo et al., Adv. Sci. 4, 1600305 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201600305
J. Gong, L. Li, X. Zhou et al., Physica E: Low-dimension. Syst. Nanostruct. 126, 114495 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2020.114495
O. Boutahir, S. Lakhlifi, S.A.A. Abdelkader et al., Physica E: Low-dimension. Syst. Nanostruct. 132, 114757 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2021.114757
G. Liao, H. Qiao, Z. Huang et al., Opt. Mater. 114, 110934 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2021.110934
J. Han, J. Xie, Z. Zhang et al., Appl. Phys. Express. 8, 041801 (2015). https://doi.org/10.7567/apex.8.041801
C. Wang, Q. Xia, Y. Nie et al., AIP Adv. 6, 035204 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4943548
S. Zhang, M. Xie, F. Li et al., Angew. Chem. 128, 1698 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201507568
D. Kecik, E. Durgun, S. Ciraci, Phys. Rev. B. 94, 205409 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.205409
S. Zhang, Z. Yan, Y. Li et al., Angew. Chem. 127, 3155 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201411246
M. Zhao, X. Zhang, L. Li, Sci. Report. 5, 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16108
S. Zhang, M. Xie, B. Cai et al., Phys. Rev. B. 93, 245303 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.245303
W. Yu, C.-Y. Niu, Z. Zhu et al., J. Mater. Chem. C. 4, 6581 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TC01505K
Y. Nie, M. Rahman, P. Liu et al., Phys. Rev. B. 96, 075401 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.075401
T. Kocabaş, D. Çakır, O. Gülseren et al., Nanoscale 10, 7803 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7nr09349g
S. Guo, Y. Zhang, Y. Ge et al., Adv. Mater. 31, 1902352 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201902352
F. Chen, H. Xu, J. Wang et al., J. Appl. Phys. 125, 214303 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5081489
Z. Zhen, J. Guan, D. Tomanek, Nano Lett. 15, 6042 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02227
L. Kou, Y. Ma, X. Tan et al., J. Phys. Chem. C. 119, 6918 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02096
P. Liu, Y. Nie, Q. Xia et al., Phys. Lett. A. 381, 1102 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2017.01.026
S. Li, W. Ji, P. Li et al., Sci. Reports. 7, 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05420-y
X. Ren, J. Zhou, X. Qi et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1700396 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201700396
Q. Ma, H. Qia, Z. Huang et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 562, 150213 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150213
M. Jia, S. Hong, T.-S. Wu et al., Chem. Commun. 55, 12024 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cc06178a
R. Gusmão, Z. Sofer, D. Bouša et al., Angew. Chem. 129, 14609 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201706389
T. Bo, Y. Liu, J. Yuan et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 507, 145194 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.145194
D. Liu, J. Wang, J. Lu et al., Small Methods. 3, 1900083 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201900083
X. Mao, Z. Qin, S. Ge et al., Mater. Horiz. 10, 340 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2mh01171a
J. Lu, X. Zhang, D. Liu et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfac. 11, 37787 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b13666
X. Xu, T. Liang, D. Kong et al., Mater. Today Nano. 14, 100111 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtnano.2021.100111
G. Kresse, J. Hafner, J. Non-Crystall. Solids. 156, 956 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3093(93)90104-6
P.E. Blochl, Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 50, 17953 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.50.17953
G. Kresse, D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B. 59, 1758 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758
J.P. Perdew, J.A. Chevary, S.H. Vosko et al., Phys. Rev. B. 48, 4978 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.48.4978.2
B. Hammer, L.B. Hansen, J.K. Nørskov, Phys. Rev. B. 59, 7413 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.7413
Y. Liu, J. Wu, K.P. Hackenberg et al., Nat. Energy (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.127
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the grants from Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Hunan (No. 2022JJ30553), Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department (No. 21A0080), Hunan Key Laboratory of Two-Dimensional Materials (No. 2018TP1010), as well as the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT_17R91).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, S., Liu, F., Shu, Y. et al. Tunable hydrogen evolution activity of black antimony–phosphorus monolayers via strain engineering: a first-principles calculation. Appl. Phys. A 129, 340 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-023-06566-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-023-06566-5