Abstract
Purpose
To provide a comprehensive overview and update of the joint consultation of the International Consultation on Urological Diseases (ICUD) and Société Internationale d’Urologie on Bladder Cancer Urinary Diversion (UD).
Methods
A detailed analysis of the literature was conducted reporting on the different modalities of UD. For this updated publication, an exhaustive search was conducted in PubMed for recent relevant papers published between October 2013 and August 2018. Via this search, a total of 438 references were identified and 52 of them were finally eligible for analysis. An international, multidisciplinary expert committee evaluated and graded the data according to the Oxford System of Evidence-based Medicine.
Results
The incidence of early complications has been reported retrospectively in the range of 20–57%. Unfortunately, only a few randomized controlled studies exist within the field of UD. Consequently, almost all studies used in this report are of level 3–4 evidence including expert opinion based on “first principles” research.
Conclusions
Complications rates overall following RC and UD are significant, and when strict reporting criteria are incorporated, they are much higher than previously published. Complications can occur up to 20 years after surgery, emphasizing the need for lifelong follow-up. Progress has been made to prevent complications implementing robotic surgery and fast track protocols. Preoperative patient information, patient selection, surgical techniques, and careful postoperative follow-up are the cornerstones to achieve good results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hautmann RE, Abol-Enein H, Lee CT et al (2015) Urinary diversion: how experts divert. Urology 85:233–238
Philips B, Ball C, Sackett D et al (2009) Oxford centre for evidence-based medicine—levels of evidence (March 2009). http://www.cebm.net/oxford-centre-evidence-based-medicine-levels-evidence-march-2009/
Kalble T, Tricker AR, Friedl P et al (1990) Ureterosigmoidostomy: long-term results, risk of carcinoma and etiological factors for carcinogenesis. J Urol 144:1110–1114
Kalble T, Hofmann I, Riedmiller H et al (2011) Tumor growth in urinary diversion: a multicenter analysis. Eur Urol 60:1081–1086
Ravi R, Dewan AK, Pandey KK (1994) Transverse colon conduit urinary diversion in patients treated with very high dose pelvic irradiation. Br J Urol 73:51–54
Fontenot PA Jr, Barnes BD, Parker WP et al (2018) Postoperative outcomes after radical cystectomy in patients with prior pelvic radiation. Urology 116:131–136
Shabsigh A, Korets R, Vora KC et al (2009) Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol 55:164–174
Ballas L, Sargos P, Orre M et al (2017) Tolerance of orthotopic ileal neobladders to radiotherapy: a multi-institutional retrospective study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 15:711–716
Eswara JR, Efstathiou JA, Heney NM et al (2012) Complications and long-term results of salvage cystectomy after failed bladder sparing therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. J Urol 187:463–468
Volkmer BG, Gschwend JE, Herkommer K et al (2004) Cystectomy and orthotopic ileal neobladder: the impact on female sexuality. J Urol 172:2353–2357
Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:606–617
Tyson MD, Chang SS (2016) Enhanced recovery pathways versus standard care after cystectomy: a meta-analysis of the effect on perioperative outcomes. Eur Urol 70:995–1003
Cerruto MA, D’Elia C, Siracusano S et al (2016) Systematic review and meta-analysis of non RCT’s on health related quality of life after radical cystectomy using validated questionnaires: better results with orthotopic neobladder versus ileal conduit. Eur J Surg Oncol 42:343–360
Yang LS, Shan BL, Shan LL et al (2016) A systematic review and meta-analysis of quality of life outcomes after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Surg Oncol 25:281–297
Gacci M, Saleh O, Cai T et al (2013) Quality of life in women undergoing urinary diversion for bladder cancer: results of a multicenter study among long-term disease-free survivors. Health Qual Life Outcomes 11:43
Mansson A, Davidsson T, Hunt S et al (2002) The quality of life in men after radical cystectomy with a continent cutaneous diversion or orthotopic bladder substitution: is there a difference? BJU Int 90:386–390
Lee RK, Abol-Enein H, Artibani W et al (2014) Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: options, patient selection, and outcomes. BJU Int 113:11–23
Somani BK, Gimlin D, Fayers P et al (2009) Quality of life and body image for bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy and urinary diversion—a prospective cohort study with a systematic review of literature. Urology 74:1138–1143
Mattei A, Birkhaeuser FD, Baermann C et al (2008) To stent or not to stent perioperatively the ureteroileal anastomosis of ileal orthotopic bladder substitutes and ileal conduits? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Urol 179:582–586
Yong SM, Dublin N, Pickard R et al (2003) Urinary diversion and bladder reconstruction/replacement using intestinal segments for intractable incontinence or following cystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003306
Madersbacher S, Schmidt J, Eberle JM et al (2003) Long-term outcome of ileal conduit diversion. J Urol 169:985–990
Nieuwenhuijzen JA, de Vries RR, Bex A et al (2008) Urinary diversions after cystectomy: the association of clinical factors, complications and functional results of four different diversions. Eur Urol 53:834–842 (discussion 842–834)
Burkhard FC, Kessler TM, Springer J et al (2006) Early and late urodynamic assessment of ileal orthotopic bladder substitutes combined with an afferent tubular segment. J Urol 175:2155–2160 (discussion 2160–2151)
Waingankar N, Mallin K, Smaldone M et al (2017) Assessing the relative influence of hospital and surgeon volume on short-term mortality after radical cystectomy. BJU Int 120:239–245
Hautmann RE, de Petriconi RC, Volkmer BG (2011) 25 years of experience with 1,000 neobladders: long-term complications. J Urol 185:2207–2212
Studer UE, Danuser H, Thalmann GN et al (1996) Antireflux nipples or afferent tubular segments in 70 patients with ileal low pressure bladder substitutes: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial. J Urol 156:1913–1917
Gross T, Meierhans Ruf SD, Meissner C et al (2015) orthotopic ileal bladder substitution in women: factors influencing urinary incontinence and hypercontinence. Eur Urol 68:664–671
Hautmann RE, Volkmer BG, Schumacher MC et al (2006) Long-term results of standard procedures in urology: the ileal neobladder. World J Urol 24:305–314
Elshal AM, Abol-Enein H, Mosbah A et al (2012) Serous-lined unidirectional valve for construction of continent cutaneous urinary reservoir: the test of time. Urology 80:452–458
Nazmy M, Yuh B, Kawachi M et al (2014) Early and late complications of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a standardized analysis by urinary diversion type. J Urol 191:681–687
Ishioka J, Kageyama Y, Inoue M et al (2008) Prognostic model for predicting survival after palliative urinary diversion for ureteral obstruction: analysis of 140 cases. J Urol 180:618–621 (discussion 621)
Gilja I, Kovacic M, Radej M et al (1996) The sigmoidorectal pouch (Mainz pouch II). Eur Urol 29:210–215
Gerharz EW, Kohl UN, Weingartner K et al (1998) Experience with the Mainz modification of ureterosigmoidostomy. Br J Surg 85:1512–1516
Hautmann RE, Abol-Enein H, Davidsson T et al (2013) ICUD–EAU International Consultation on Bladder Cancer 2012: urinary diversion. Eur Urol 63:67–80
Li K, Lin T, Fan X et al (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies reporting early outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy. Cancer Treat Rev 39:551–560
Leow JJ, Reese S, Trinh QD et al (2015) Impact of surgeon volume on the morbidity and costs of radical cystectomy in the USA: a contemporary population-based analysis. BJU Int 115:713–721
Wang YL, Jiang B, Yin FF et al (2015) Perioperative blood transfusion promotes worse outcomes of bladder cancer after radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 10:e0130122
Abel EJ, Linder BJ, Bauman TM et al (2014) Perioperative blood transfusion and radical cystectomy: does timing of transfusion affect bladder cancer mortality? Eur Urol 66:1139–1147
Kretschmer A, Grimm T, Buchner A et al (2017) Prospective evaluation of health-related quality of life after radical cystectomy: focus on peri- and postoperative complications. World J Urol 35:1223–1231
Parekh DJ, Reis IM, Castle EP et al (2018) Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 391:2525–2536
Tyritzis SI, Hosseini A, Collins J et al (2013) Oncologic, functional, and complications outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with totally intracorporeal neobladder diversion. Eur Urol 64:734–741
Ahmed K, Khan SA, Hayn MH et al (2014) Analysis of intracorporeal compared with extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. Eur Urol 65:340–347
Izumi K, Mizokami A, Maeda Y et al (2011) Current outcome of patients with ureteral stents for the management of malignant ureteral obstruction. J Urol 185:556–561
Desgrandchamps F, Leroux S, Ravery V et al (2007) Subcutaneous pyelovesical bypass as replacement for standard percutaneous nephrostomy for palliative urinary diversion: prospective evaluation of patient’s quality of life. J Endourol 21:173–176
Shekarriz B, Shekarriz H, Upadhyay J et al (1999) Outcome of palliative urinary diversion in the treatment of advanced malignancies. Cancer 85:998–1003
Nix J, Smith A, Kurpad R et al (2010) Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results. Eur Urol 57:196–201
Parekh DJ, Messer J, Fitzgerald J et al (2013) Perioperative outcomes and oncologic efficacy from a pilot prospective randomized clinical trial of open versus robotic assisted radical cystectomy. J Urol 189:474–479
Khan MS, Gan C, Ahmed K et al (2016) A single-centre early phase randomised controlled three-arm trial of open, robotic, and laparoscopic radical cystectomy (CORAL). Eur Urol 69:613–621
Richards KA, Kader AK, Otto R et al (2012) Is robot-assisted radical cystectomy justified in the elderly? A comparison of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in elderly ≥ 75 years old. J Endourol 26:1301–1306
Knox ML, El-Galley R, Busby JE (2013) Robotic versus open radical cystectomy: identification of patients who benefit from the robotic approach. J Endourol 27:40–44
Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Sjoberg DD et al (2015) Comparing open radical cystectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol 67:1042–1050
Hu JC, Chughtai B, O’Malley P et al (2016) Perioperative outcomes, health care costs, and survival after robotic-assisted versus open radical cystectomy: a national comparative effectiveness study. Eur Urol 70:195–202
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Protocol/project development: ORF, MDT, JP, RH. Data collection or management: all authors. Data analysis: ORF, JP, RH. Manuscript writing/editing: all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
For this type of study formal consent is not required. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Faba, O.R., Tyson, M.D., Artibani, W. et al. Update of the ICUD–SIU International Consultation on Bladder Cancer 2018: urinary diversion. World J Urol 37, 85–93 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2484-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2484-3