Skip to main content
Log in

Barley yield and soil microbial and enzyme activities as affected by contamination of two soils with lead, zinc or copper

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of increasing rates of Pb, Zn and Cu on extractable heavy metal levels, barley yields, basal respiration and the activities of catalase, urease, invertase and acid phosphatase were investigated in two soils in a 2-year greenhouse experiment. In the first year, barley yields were decreased by increasing additions of Pb, Zn and Cu. In the second year, increased yields were recorded at lower rates of addition of all three metals in both the chestnut and chernozem soils. Yield depressions were most marked for added Cu and least marked for Pb but, in contrast, accumulation of heavy metals in grain, in excess of recommended limits, was most pronounced for Pb and did not occur for Cu. Increasing rates of all three metals caused a decrease in basal respiration; the degree of inhibition was generally greater in the second than in the first year. After 1 year of incubation, increasing rates of addition of metals reduced all tested enzyme activities. However, after 2 years, the pattern of response was more complex, with increases in enzyme activities being noted at lower rates of addition of all three metals. In general, invertase and urease activities were more markedly inhibited by heavy metal contamination than those of catalase and phosphatase. Ammonium acetate-extractable heavy metal concentrations in soils were less after 2 years than 1 years reaction time due to their transformation into less labile forms. Significant negative correlations between grain yield, basal respiration and enzyme activities were observed in both years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson JPE (1982) Soil respiration. In: Page AL (ed) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. SSSA, Madison, Wis., pp 837–871

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardgett RD, Speir TW, Ross DJ, Yeates GW, Kettles HA (1994) Impact of pasture contamination by copper, chromium, and arsenic timber preservative on soil microbial properties and nematodes. Biol Fertil Soils 18:71–79

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barkay T, Tripp SC, Olson BH (1985) Effect of metal-rich sewage sludge application on the bacterial communities of grasslands. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:333–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Chander K, Dyckmans J, Joergensen RG, Meyer B, Raubuch M (2001) Different sources of heavy metals and their long-term effects on soil microbial properties. Biol Fertil Soils 34:241–247

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaziev TC (1990) The methods of soil enzymology (in Russian). Science Publishers, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies BE (1995) Lead. In: Alloway BJ (ed) Heavy metals in soils. Blackie, London, pp 206–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick RP (1997) Soil enzyme activities as integrative indicators of soil health. In: Pankhurst CE, Doube BM, Gupta VVSR (eds) Biological indicators of soil health. CAB, Wallingford, pp 121–156

    Google Scholar 

  • FließBach A, Martens R, Reber HH (1994) Soil microbial biomass and microbial activity in soils treated with heavy metal contaminated sewage sludge. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1201–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frostegärd A, Tunlid A, Bååth E (1996) Changes in microbial community structure during long-term incubation in two soils experimentally contaminated with metals. Soil Biol Biochem 28:55–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghorbani NR, Salehrastin N, Moeini A (2002) Heavy metals affect the microbial populations and their activities. Proc 17th World Congr Soil Sci 2234:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Giller KE, Wittwer E, McGrath SP (1998) Toxicity of heavy metals to microorganisms and microbial processes in agricultural soils: a review. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1389–1414

    Google Scholar 

  • Giller KE, Witter E, McGrath SP (1999) Assessing risks of heavy metal toxicity in agricultural soils. Human Ecol Risk Assess 5:683–689

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hemida SK, Omar SA, Abdel-Mallek AY (1997) Microbial populations and enzyme activity in soil treated with heavy metals. Water Air Soil Pollut 95:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Impellitteri CA, Allen HE, Yin Y, You SJ, Saxe JK (2001) Soil properties controlling metal partitioning. In: Selim HM, Sparks DL (eds) Heavy metals release in soils. Lewis, Boca Raton, Fla., pp 149–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandeler E, Kampichler C, Horak O (1996) Influence of heavy metals on the functional diversity of soil microbial communities. Biol Fertil Soils 23:299–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazunori S, Oba Y (1994) Effect of fungal to bacterial biomass ratio on the relationship between CO2 evolution and total soil microbial biomass. Biol Fertil Soils 17:39–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JJ, Häggblom M, Tate RL (1999) Effects of the land application of sewage sludge on soil heavy metal concentrations and soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1467–1470

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan M, Scullion J (1999) Microbial activity in grassland soil amended with sewage sludge containing varying rates and combinations of Cu, Ni and Zn. Biol Fertil Soils 30:202–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss S, Pasca D, Dragan-Bularda M (1998) Studies of the soil enzymological effects of industrial emissions originating from multiple sources (many industrial plants manufacturing different products but situated in the same industrial area). In: Kiss S, Pasca D, Dragan-Bularda M (eds) Enzymology of disturbed soils. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 117–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunito T, Oyaizu H, Matsumoto S (1998) Ecology of soil heavy metal-resistant bacteria and perspective of bioremediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils. Rec Res Dev Agric Biol Chem 2:185–206

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leita L, De Nobil M, Muhlbachova G, Mondini C, Marchiol L, Zerbi G (1995) Bioavailability and effects of heavy metals on soil microbial biomass survival during laboratory incubation. Biol Fertil Soils 19:103–108

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin MJ, Hamon RE, McLaren RG, Speir TW, Rogers SL (2000) Review: a bioavailability-based rationale for controlling metal and metalloid contamination of agricultural land in Australia and New Zealand. Aust J Soil Res 38:1037–1086

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mineev VG (2001) Agrochemistry practice (in Russian). Moscow State University, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel JL (1997) Bioavailability of trace elements to terrestrial plants. In: Tarradellas J, Britton G, Rossel D (eds) Soil ecotoxicology. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 141–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P (1994) The potential use of soil enzymes as indicators of productivity, sustainability and pollution. In: Pankhurst CE, Doube BM, Gupta VVSR (eds) Soil biota: management in sustainable farming systems. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 238–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Solovyov AG (1990) The methods of heavy metal definition. In: Mineev VG (ed) Practical work for agrochemistry (in Russian). Moscow University Press, Moscow, pp 113–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparling GP (1997) Soil microbial biomass, activity and nutrient cycling as indicators of soil health. In: Pankhurst CE, Doube BM, Gupta VVSR (eds) Biological indicators of soil health. CAB, Wallingford, pp 97–119

    Google Scholar 

  • State Committee for Hygiene (1989) The limit concentrations of heavy metals in some types of raw food and foodstuffs for Russia (in Russian). Medico-biological requirement bulletin no. 506-89. State Committee for Hygiene—Epidemiological Control of the Russian Federation, Moscow

  • State Committee for Hygiene (1993) List of limit concentrations (LC) and approximate limit concentrations (ALC) for chemical substances in soils (in Russian). State Committee for Hygiene—Epidemiological Control of the Russian Federation, Moscow

  • Tabatabai MA (1994) Soil enzymes. In: Weaver RW, Angle JS, Bottomley PS (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Microbiological and biochemical properties. SSSA, Madison, Wis., pp 775–833

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler G (1981) Heavy metals in soil biology and biochemistry. In: Paul EA, Ladd JN (eds) Soil biochemistry, vol 5. Dekker, New York, pp 371–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenderoth DF, Reber HH (1999) Correlation between structural diversity and catabolic versatility of metal-affected prototrophic bacteria in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 31:345–352

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeates GW, Orchard VA, Spier TW, Hunt JL, Hermans MCC (1994) Impact of pasture contamination by copper, chromium, arsenic timber preservative on soil biological activity. Biol Fertil Soils 18:200–208

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. J. Haynes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Belyaeva, O.N., Haynes, R.J. & Birukova, O.A. Barley yield and soil microbial and enzyme activities as affected by contamination of two soils with lead, zinc or copper. Biol Fertil Soils 41, 85–94 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-004-0820-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-004-0820-9

Keywords

Navigation