Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamics of sulfate reduction and sulfate-reducing prokaryotes in anaerobic paddy soil amended with rice straw

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Incorporation of rice straw to soil is a common agricultural practice in rice cultivation. In anaerobic paddy soil, the complete mineralization of organic matter to CH4 and CO2 is accomplished by the sequential reduction of nitrate, ferric iron, sulfate, and methanogenesis. In order to estimate the temporal changes of sulfate-reducing prokaryotes (SRP) as decomposers of organic matters, the effects of rice straw amendment on the dynamics of sulfate reduction and SRP were investigated by combining the monitoring of CH4, sulfate, and organic acids with molecular tools such as soil DNA extraction, real-time PCR, cloning, sequencing, and phylogenetic analysis. The incorporation of rice straw into paddy soil significantly increased concentrations of sulfate, formate, acetate, propionate, and lactate and CH4 production. The rate of sulfate reduction in the straw-amended slurries was significantly higher than that in the unamended slurries. The dsrAB gene copy numbers of SRP in the straw-amended soil slurries ranged from 4.26 × 106 to 1.96 × 108 per gram of dry soil, which were significantly higher than those in the unamended control ranging from 1.99 × 106 to 7.90 × 107 per gram of dry soil. Significant correlations were observed between SRP dsrAB gene copy numbers and the concentrations of sulfate and acetate. Cloning and sequencing analyses showed a clear shift of SRP community structure between treatments and time. In the straw-amended slurries, Clostridia-like SRP significantly increased, while Deltaproterobacteria-like SRP (Sytrophobacter, Desulfobacterium, Desulfovibrio, and Desulfomonile) decreased during the incubation period. Novel uncultured SRP were abundant in the straw-amended slurries and changed during the incubation period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achtnich C, Bak F, Conrad R (1995) Competition for electron donors among nitrate reducers, ferric iron reducers, sulfate reducers, and methanogens in anoxic paddy soil. Biol Fertil Soils 19:65–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes RO, Goldberg ED (1976) Methane production and consumption in anoxic marine sediments. Geology 4:297–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boone DR, Bryant MP (1980) Propionate-degrading bacterium, Sytrophobacter wolinii sp. nov., gen. nov., from methanogenic ecosystems. Appl Environ Microbiol 40:626–632

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XP, Zhu YG, Xia Y, Shen JP, He JZ (2008) Ammonia-oxidizing archaea: important players in paddy rhizosphere soil? Environ Microbiol 10:1978–1987

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chidthaisong A, Conrad R (2000a) Turnover of glucose and acetate coupled to reduction of nitrate, ferric iron and sulfate and to methanogenesis in anoxic rice field soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 31:73–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chidthaisong A, Conrad R (2000b) Pattern of non-methanogenic and methanogenic degradation of cellulose in anoxic rice field soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 31:87–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad R, Klose M (2006) Dynamics of the methanogenic archaeal community in anoxic rice soil upon addition of straw. Eur J Soil Sci 57:476–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon JG, Fishbain S, Miller SR, Bebont BM, Habicht KS, Webb SM, Stahl DA (2007) High rates of sulfate reduction in a low-sulfate hot spring microbial mat are driven by a low level of diversity of sulfate-reducing microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5218–5226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feng JN, Hsieh YP (1998) Sulfate reduction in freshwater wetland soils and the effects of sulfate and substrate loading. J Environ Qual 27:968–972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glissmann K, Conrad R (2000) Fermentation pattern of methanogenic degradation of rice straw in anoxic paddy soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 31:117–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grant RF (1998) Simulation of methanogenesis in the mathematical model ECOSYS. Soil Biol Biochem 30:883–896

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hadas O, Pinkas R (1995) Sulfate reduction in the hypolimnion and sediments of Lake Kinneret, Israel. Freshw Biol 33:63–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansel CM, Fendorf S, Jardine PM, Francis CA (2008) Changes in bacterial and archaeal community structure and functional diversity along a geochemically variable soil profile. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:1620–1633

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeeaga M, Asakawa S, Muraoka Y, Kimura M (2003) Bacterial communities associated with nodal roots of rice plants along with the growth stages: estimation by PCR-DGGE and sequences analysis. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 49:591–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Kniemeyer O, Fischer T, Wilkes H, Glockner FO, Widdel F (2003) Anaerobic degradation of ethylbenzene by a new type of marine sulfate-reducing bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:760–768

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leloup J, Quillet L, Berthe T, Petit F (2006) Diversity of the dsrAB (dissimilatory sulfite reductase) gene sequences retrieved from two contrasting mudflats of the Seine estuary, France. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 55:230–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu XZ, Zhang LM, Prosser JI, He JZ (2009) Abundance and community structure of sulfate reducing prokaryotes in a paddy soil of southern China under different fertilization regimes. Soil Biol Biochem 41:687–694

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qatibi AI, Bories A, Garcia HL (1990) Effects of sulfate on lactate and C2-, C3-volatile fatty acid anaerobic degradation by a mixed microbial culture. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 58:241–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oude-Elferink SJWH, Visser A, Hulshoff Pol LW, Stams AJM (1994) Sulfate reduction in methanogenic bioreactors. FEMS Microbiol Rev 15:119–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panganiban AT, Patt TE, Hart W, Hanson RS (1979) Oxidation of methane in the absence of oxygen in lake water samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 37:303–309

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ponnumperuma FN (1984) Straw as a source of nutrients for wetland rice. In: IRRI. (ed) Organic matter and rice. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines, pp 117–136

  • Sass H, Cypionka H, Babenzien HD (1997) Vertical distribution of sulfate-reducing bacteria at the oxic–anoxic interface in sediments of the oligotrophic Lake Stechlin. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 22:245–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalenberger A, Drake HL, Kusel K (2007) High unique diversity of sulfate-reducing prokaryotes characterized in a depth gradient in an acidic fen. Environ Microbiol 9:1317–1328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schnell S, Bak F, Pfennig N (1989) Anaerobic degradation of aniline and dihydroxybenzenes by newly isolated sulfate-reducing bacteria and description of Desulfobacterium aniline. Arch Microbiol 152:556–563

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shen MX, Yang LZ, Yao YM, Wu DD, Wang JG, Guo RL, Yin SY (2007) Long-term effects of fertilizer managements on crop yields and organic carbon storage of a typical rice-wheat agroecosystem of China. Biol Fertil Soils 44:187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shibahara F, Inubushi K (1997) Effect of organic matter application on microbial biomass and available nutrients in various types of paddy soils. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 43:191–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RL, Klug MJ (1981) Electron donors by sulphate-reducing bacteria in eutrophic lake sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 42:116–121

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stams AJM (1994) Metabolic interactions between anaerobic bacteria in methanogenic environments. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 66:271–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The Clustal_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 24:4876–4882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward DM, Winfrey MR (1985) Interactions between methanogenic and sulfate-reducing bacteria in sediments. Adv Aquat Microbiol 3:141–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber S, Stubner S, Conrad R (2001) Bacterial populations colonizing and degrading rice straw in anoxic paddy soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:318–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao H, Conrad R, Wassmann R, Neue HU (1999) Effect of soil characteristics on sequential reduction and methane production in sixteen rice paddy soils from China, the Philippines, and Italy. Biogeochemistry 47:269–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Y, Zhang LM, Zheng YM, Di HJ, He JZ (2008) Abundance and community composition of methanotrophs in a Chinese paddy soil under long-term fertilization practices. J Soils Sediments 8:406–414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZCX1-YW-0603, KZCX2-YW-408), the Ministry of Science and Technology (2005CB121105), and the Natural Science Foundation of China (40701087, 40871129).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji-Zheng He.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

He, JZ., Liu, XZ., Zheng, Y. et al. Dynamics of sulfate reduction and sulfate-reducing prokaryotes in anaerobic paddy soil amended with rice straw. Biol Fertil Soils 46, 283–291 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-009-0426-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-009-0426-3

Keywords

Navigation