Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tropical forcing of Australian extreme low minimum temperatures in September 2019

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We explore the causes and predictability of extreme low minimum temperatures (Tmin) that occurred across northern and eastern Australia in September 2019. Historically, reduced Tmin is related to the occurrence of a positive Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD) and central Pacific El Niño. Positive IOD events tend to locate an anomalous anticyclone over the Great Australian Bight, therefore inducing cold advection across eastern Australia. Positive IOD and central Pacific El Niño also reduce cloud cover over northern and eastern Australia, thus enhancing radiative cooling at night-time. During September 2019, the IOD and central Pacific El Niño were strongly positive, and so the observed Tmin anomalies are well reconstructed based on their historical relationships with the IOD and central Pacific El Niño. This implies that September 2019 Tmin anomalies should have been predictable at least 1–2 months in advance. However, even at zero lead time the Bureau of Metereorolgy ACCESS-S1 seasonal prediction model failed to predict the anomalous anticyclone in the Bight and the cold anomalies in the east. Analysis of hindcasts for 1990–2012 indicates that the model's teleconnections from the IOD are systematically weaker than the observed, which likely stems from mean state biases in sea surface temperature and rainfall in the tropical Indian and western Pacific Oceans. Together with this weak IOD teleconnection, forecasts for earlier-than-observed onset of the negative Southern Annular Mode following the strong polar stratospheric warming that occurred in late August 2019 may have contributed to the Tmin forecast bust over Australia for September 2019.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The JRA-55 reanalyses are available from https://rda.ucar.edu/. The Hurrell SST anayses are available from: https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/merged-hadley-noaaoi-sea-surface-temperature-sea-ice-concentration-hurrell-et-al-2008. The AWAP Australian temperature and rainfall analyses are available from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology: "Australian Gridded Climate Data (AGCD)/AWAP; v1.0.0 Snapshot (1900-01-01 to 2018-12-31)" (https://doi.org/10.4227/166/5a8647d1c23e0). The ACCESS-S1 hindcasts and real time prediction system are described in Hudson et al. (2017).

Code availability

The NCAR Command Language (NCL; http://www.ncl.ucar.edu) version 6.4.0 and IDL version 8.7.3 were used for data analysis and visualization of the results.

Notes

  1. The term "central Pacific El Niño" is used in this study to describe an event whose maximum SST anomaly is found near the dateline. This will not necessarily correspond to a canonical El Niño whose maximum SST anomaly is found across the equatorial central to eastern Pacific.

  2. http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/change/#tabs=Tracker&tracker=timeseries.

  3. This could be partly influenced by a cool bias in recent AWAP Tmin data, relative to the homogenised ACORN-SAT dataset, driven in part by the movement of sites from town to out-of-town locations in the 1990s and 2000s (Trewin 2018; Trewin et al. 2020).

  4. Here we have used the Spearman rank correlation to relate the occurrences of days with Tmin < 2 and 0 °C to the monthly Tmin at each gridpoint because the relationship may not be linear although we assume the relationship between monthly Tmin and number of days below a threshold is monotonic (i.e., number of days below 2 and 0 °C increases with lower values of monthly mean Tmin).

  5. The DMI derived from the HadISST data set (available at Climate Explorer) shows a strong positive trend since the 1960s, and consequently, the 2019 DMI was the highest on record since 1979 before removing the linear trend and the 2nd highest after removing the trend. For the consistency of the SST data for the DMI and the EMI, we computed our own DMI and EMI using the SST data described in Sect. 2. While the positive trend in the DMI is significantly stronger in the HadISST than in the data used in this study, the de-trended DMI of the HadISST is highly correlated with our de-trended DMI by 0.9.

  6. The de-trended DMI and EMI are correlated by 0.3 in September, which is statistically significant at the 10% level, as assessed by a two-tailed Student-t test with 40 samples of 1979–2018. This moderate collinearity of the two indices is appropriately dealt with in multiple linear regression calculation. See Supplementary Information for the calculations of the total explained variance and regression coefficients.

  7. The ratio of the correct forecasts for the occurrence of an event to the total number of forecasts.

  8. The ratio of the incorrect forecasts for the occurrence of an event (i.e., forecasts for the occurrence which are not observed) to the total number of forecasts.

  9. The SAM index in this study was obtained following Gong and Wang (1999)’s definition, which is the difference of normalised zonal-mean MSLP anomalies between 40° S and 65° S.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project is supported by funding from the Australian Government Department of Agriculture and Water Resources as part of its Rural R&D for Profit programme. Andrew King was supported by the Australian Research Council (DE180100638). We are grateful to Dr Alex Pezza and an anonymous reviewer for their thorough review and constructive feedback on the manuscript and to Professor Jianping Li for his editorial effort to coordinate the peer-review process. We thank Dr Peter Hayman at SARDI and Mr Dale Grey at Agriculture Victoria for the useful discussion on the subject of this study and Drs Sharmila Sur and Guomin Wang at the BoM for their constructive feedback on the initial version of the manuscript. We also thank Dr Robin Wedd, Mr Griffith Young and other members of the seasonal prediction teams at the BoM for their work in the generation and curation of the ACCESS-S1 hindcast set. This research was undertaken on the NCI National Facility in Canberra, Australia, which is supported by the Australian Commonwealth Government. The NCAR Command Language (NCL; http://www.ncl.ucar.edu) version 6.4.0 and IDL version 8.7.3 were used for data analysis and visualization of the results. We also acknowledge NCAR/UCAR and JMA for producing and providing the Hurrell et al. (2008) SST analysis and the JRA-55 reanalyses, respectively.

Funding

Support was provided from the Australian Government Department of Agriculture and Water Resources as part of its Rural R&D for Profit programme. Andrew King was supported by the Australian Research Council (DE180100638).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harry H. Hendon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 2130 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lim, EP., Hendon, H.H., Shi, L. et al. Tropical forcing of Australian extreme low minimum temperatures in September 2019. Clim Dyn 56, 3625–3641 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05661-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05661-8

Keywords

Navigation