Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Slow-transit constipation with concurrent upper gastrointestinal dysmotility and its response to transcutaneous electrical stimulation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) speeds up colonic transit in children with slow-transit constipation (STC). This study examined if concurrent upper gastrointestinal dysmotility (UGD) affected response to TES.

Methods

Radio-nuclear transit studies (NTS) were performed before and after TES treatment of STC as part of a larger randomised controlled trial. UGD was defined as delayed gastric emptying and/or slow small bowel transit. Improvement was defined as increase of ≥1 Geometric Centre (median radiotracer position at each time [small bowel = 1, toilet = 6]).

Results

Forty-six subjects completed the trial, 34 had NTS after stimulation (21 M, 8–17 years, mean 11.3 years; symptoms >9 years). Active stimulation increased transit in >50% versus only 25% with sham (p = 0.04). Seventeen children also had UGD. In children with STC and either normal upper GI motility (NUGM) and UGD, NTS improved slightly after 1 month (57 vs. 60%; p = 0.9) and more after 2 months (88 vs. 40%; p = 0.07). However, mean transit rate significantly increased with NUGM, but not UGD (5.0 ± 0.2: 3.6 ± 0.6, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation was beneficial for STC, with response weakly associated with UGD. As measured by NTS, STC children with NUGM responded slightly more, but with significantly greater increased transit compared to those with UGD. Higher numbers are needed to determine if the difference is important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. El-Salhy M (2003) Chronic idiopathic slow transit constipation: pathophysiology and management. Colorectal Dis 5:288–296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Watier A, Devroede G, Duranceau A et al (1983) Constipation with colonic inertia. A manifestation of systemic disease? Dig Dis Sci 28:1025–1033

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Preston DM, Lennard-Jones JE (1986) Severe chronic constipation of young women: ‘idiopathic slow transit constipation’. Gut 27:41–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Benninga MA, Buller HA, Tytgat GN, Akkermans LM, Bossuyt PM, Taminiau JA (1996) Colonic transit time in constipated children: does pediatric slow-transit constipation exist? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 23:241–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Southwell BR, Clarke MC, Sutcliffe J, Hutson JM (2009) Colonic transit studies: normal values for adults and children with comparison of radiological and scintigraphic methods. Pediatr Surg Int 25:559–572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stivland T, Camilleri M, Vassallo M et al (1991) Scintigraphic measurement of regional gut transit in idiopathic constipation. Gastroenterology 101:107–115

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. van der Sijp JR, Kamm MA, Nightingale JM et al (1993) Disturbed gastric and small bowel transit in severe idiopathic constipation. Dig Dis Sci 38:837–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Charles F, Camilleri M, Phillips SF, Thomforde GM, Forstrom LA (1995) Scintigraphy of the whole gut: clinical evaluation of transit disorders. Mayo Clin Proc 70:113–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. MacDonald A, Baxter JN, Bessent RG, Gray HW, Finlay IG (1997) Gastric emptying in patients with constipation following childbirth and due to idiopathic slow transit. Br J Surg 84:1141–1143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Camilleri M, Hasler WL, Parkman HP, Quigley EM, Soffer E (1998) Measurement of gastrointestinal motility in the GI laboratory. Gastroenterology 115:747–762

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bannister JJ, Timms JM, Barfield LJ, Donnelly TC, Read NW (1986) Physiological studies in young women with chronic constipation. Int J Colorectal Dis 1:175–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Abid S, Lindberg G (2007) Electrogastrography: poor correlation with antro-duodenal manometry and doubtful clinical usefulness in adults. World J Gastroenterol 13:5101–5107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mollen RM, Hopman WP, Kuijpers HH, Jansen JB (1999) Abnormalities of upper gut motility in patients with slow-transit constipation. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:701–708

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cook BJ, Lim E, Cook D et al (2005) Radionuclear transit to assess sites of delay in large bowel transit in children with chronic idiopathic constipation. J Pediatr Surg 40:478–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sutcliffe JR, King SK, Hutson JM, Cook DJ, Southwell BR (2009) Gastrointestinal transit in children with chronic idiopathic constipation. Pediatr Surg Int 25:465–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reynolds JC, Ouyang A, Lee CA, Baker L, Sunshine AG, Cohen S (1987) Chronic severe constipation. Prospective motility studies in 25 consecutive patients. Gastroenterology 92:414–420

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bassotti G, Stanghellini V, Chiarioni G et al (1996) Upper gastrointestinal motor activity in patients with slow-transit constipation. Further evidence for an enteric neuropathy. Dig Dis Sci 41:1999–2005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Penning C, Vu MK, Delemarre JB, Masclee AA (2001) Proximal gastric motor and sensory function in slow transit constipation. Scand J Gastroenterol 36:1267–1273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Panagamuwa B, Kumar D, Ortiz J, Keighley MR (1994) Motor abnormalities in the terminal ileum of patients with chronic idiopathic constipation. Br J Surg 81:1685–1688

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Penning C, Gielkens HA, Hemelaar M et al (2000) Prolonged ambulatory recording of antroduodenal motility in slow-transit constipation. Br J Surg 87:211–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chase J, Robertson VJ, Southwell B, Hutson J, Gibb S (2005) Pilot study using transcutaneous electrical stimulation (interferential current) to treat chronic treatment-resistant constipation and soiling in children. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 20:1054–1061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Clarke MC, Chase JW, Gibb S, Hutson JM, Southwell BR (2009) Improvement of quality of life in children with slow transit constipation after treatment with transcutaneous electrical stimulation. J Pediatr Surg 44:1268–1272 (discussion 1272)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Clarke MC, Chase JW, Gibb S et al (2009) Decreased colonic transit time after transcutaneous interferential electrical stimulation in children with slow transit constipation. J Pediatr Surg 44:408–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ismail KA, Chase J, Gibb S et al (2009) Daily transabdominal electrical stimulation at home increased defecation in children with slow-transit constipation: a pilot study. J Pediatr Surg 44:2388–2392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Notghi A, Hutchinson R, Kumar D, Tulley N, Harding LK (1994) Use of geometric center and parametric images in scintigraphic colonic transit studies. Gastroenterology 107:1270–1277

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Johnson MI, Tabasam G (2003) An investigation into the analgesic effects of different frequencies of the amplitude-modulated wave of interferential current therapy on cold-induced pain in normal subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:1387–1394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tabasam G, Johnson MI (2006) The use of interferential therapy for pain management by physiotherapists…including commentary by Poitras S. Int J Therapy Rehabilitation 13:357–364

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ward AR (2009) Electrical stimulation using kilohertz-frequency alternating current. Phys Ther 89:181–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ward AR, Chuen WL (2009) Lowering of sensory, motor, and pain-tolerance thresholds with burst duration using kilohertz-frequency alternating current electric stimulation: part II. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90:1619–1627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ganne J-M (1988) Stimulation of bone healing with interferential therapy. Aust J Physiother 34:9–20

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dumoulin C, Seaborne DE, Quirion-DeGirardi C, Sullivan SJ (1995) Pelvic-floor rehabilitation, part 2: Pelvic-floor re-education with interferential currents and exercise in the treatment of genuine stress incontinence in postpartum women—a cohort study. Phys Ther 75:1075–1081

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kajbafzadeh AM, Sharifi-Rad L, Baradaran N, Nejat F (2009) Effect of pelvic floor interferential electrostimulation on urodynamic parameters and incontinency of children with myelomeningocele and detrusor overactivity. Urology 74:324–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bridget R. Southwell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yik, Y.I., Clarke, M.C.C., Catto-Smith, A.G. et al. Slow-transit constipation with concurrent upper gastrointestinal dysmotility and its response to transcutaneous electrical stimulation. Pediatr Surg Int 27, 705–711 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-011-2872-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-011-2872-x

Keywords

Navigation