Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus fibrin glue in cryptogenic fistula-in-ano: a phase III single-center, randomized, double-blind trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the clinical outcome of autologous platelet-rich growth factor (PRP) with commercial fibrin glue in the management of high cryptogenic fistulae-in-ano.

Method

The study was conducted at a single center between July 2012 and July 2015 and performed as a phase III, randomized, double-blind comparison of autologously prepared PRP versus fibrin glue for cryptoglandular anal fistulae without active sepsis. Patients were assessed with clinical and endosonographic follow-up. Patients were followed up at 1 week and then at 3, 6, and 12 postoperative months. The primary outcome measure was the fistula healing rate (complete, partial, and non-healing) with secondary outcome measures assessing fistula recurrence, continence status, quality of life, and visual analog pain scores.

Results

Of the 56 enrolled patients, 32 were PRP-treated and 24 were fibrin-treated. The groups were well matched for fistula type with an improved overall healing rate for PRP-treated over fibrin-treated cases (71% vs. 58.3%, respectively; P = 0.608); a complete healing rate of 48.4% vs. 41.7%, respectively; and a partial healing rate of 22.6% vs. 16.7%, respectively. The median pain scores of PRP-treated patients were lower at the first visit with a greater initial pain decrease early during follow-up. Improvements in pain reduction impacted the quality of life measures (P = 0.035). All adverse events were minor and no patient experienced a negative impact on continence.

Conclusion

Treatment of complex cryptoglandular anal fistula with autologous PRP is as effective as fibrin glue with less cost and no adverse effect on continence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sainio P (1984) Fistula in ano in a defined population. Incidence and epidemiological aspects. Ann Chir Gynecol 73:219–224

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pearce L, Newton K, Smith SR, Barrow P, Smith J, Hancock L, Kirwan CC, Hill J, the North West Research Collaborative (2016) North west research collaborative. Multicentre observational study of outcomes after drainage of acute perianal abscess. Br J Surg 103:1063–1068

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sangwan YP, Rosen L, Riether RD, Stasik JJ, Sheets JA, Khubchandani IT (1994) Is simple fistula-in-ano simple? Dis Colon Rectum 37:885–889

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blumetti J, Abcarian A, Quinteros F, Chaudhry V, Prasad L, Abcarian H (2012) Evolution of treatment of fistula in ano. World J Surg 36:1162–1167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Narang SK, Keogh K, Alam NN, Pathak S, Daniels IR, Smart NJ (2017) A systematic review of new treatments for cryptoglandular fistula in ano. Surgeon 15:30–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Atkin GK, Martins J, Tozer P, Ranchod P, Phillips RK (2011) For many high anal fistulas, lay open is still a good option. Tech Coloproctol 15:143–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Damin DC, Rosito MA, Contu PC, Tarta C (2009) Fibrin glue in the management of complex anal fistula. Arq Gastroenterol 46:300–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Haim N, Neufeld D, Ziv Y, Tulchinsky H, Koller M, Khaikin M, Zmora O (2011) Long-term results of fibrin glue treatment for cryptogenic perianal fistulas: a multicenter study. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1279–1283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Anitua E (2000) Plasma rich in growth factors: preliminary results of use in the preparation of future sites for implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14:529–535

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yu P, Zhai Z, Jin X, Yang X, Qi Z (2018) Clinical application of platelet-rich fibrin in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a systematic review. Aesthet Plast Surg 42:511–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pérez-Lara FJ, Moreno Serrano A, Ulecia Moreno J, Hernández-Carmona J, Ferrer-Márquez M, Romero-Pérez L, del Rey Moreno A, Oliva-Muñoz H (2015) Platelet-rich fibrin sealant as a treatment for complex perianal fistulas: a multicentre study. J Gastrointest Surg 19:360–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moreno-Serrano A, García-Díaz JJ, Ferrer-Márquez M, Alarcón-Rodríguez R, Álvarez-García A, Reina-Duarte Á (2016) Using autologous platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of complex fistulas. Rev Esp Enferm Dig (Madrid) 108:123–128

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Van der Hagen SJ, Baeten CG, Soeters PB, van Gemert WG (2011) Autologous platelet-derived growth factors (platelet-rich plasma) as an adjunct to mucosal advancement flap in high cryptoglandular perianal fistulae: a pilot study. Color Dis 13:215–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Göttgens KW, Vening W, van der Hagen SJ, van Gemert WG, Smeets RR, Stassen LP, Baeten CG, Breukink SO (2014) Long-term results of mucosal advancement flap combined with platelet-rich plasma for high cryptoglandular perianal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 57:223–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Göttgens KWA, Smeets RR, Stassen LPS, Beets GL, Pierik M, Breukink SO (2015) Treatment of Crohn’s disease-related high perianal fistulas combining the mucosa advancement flap with platelet-rich plasma: a pilot study. Tech Coloproctol 19:455–459

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Velada JL, Hollingsbee DA, Menzies AR, Cornwell R, Dodd RA (2002) Reproducibility of the mechanical properties of Vivostat patient-derived fibrin sealant. Biomaterials 23:2249–2254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Eppley BL, Woodell GE, Higgins J (2004) Platelet quantification and growth factor analysis from platelet-rich plasma: implications for wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1502–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bai MY, Wang CW, Wang JY, Lin MF, Chan WP (2017) Three- dimensional structure and cytokine distribution of platelet-rich fibrin. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 72:116–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. de la Portilla F, Segura-Sampedro JJ, Reyes-Díaz ML, Maestre MV, Cabrera AM, Jimenez-Rodríguez RM, Vázquez-Monchul JM, Diaz-Pavón JM, Padillo-Ruiz FJ (2017) Treatment of transsphincteric fistula-in-ano with growth factors from autologous platelets: results of a phase II clinical trial. Int J Color Dis 32:1545–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sentovich SM (2003) Fibrin glue for anal fistulas: long-term results. Dis Colon Rectum 46:498–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Giordano P, Sileri P, Buntzen S, Stuto A, Nunoo-Mensah J, Lenisa L, Singh B, Thorlacius-Ussing O, Griffiths B, Ziyaie D (2016) A prospective multicentre observational study of Permacol collagen paste for anorectal fistula: preliminary results. Color Dis 18:286–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Garcia-Olmo D, Guadalajara H, Rubio-Perez I, Herreros MD, de la-Quintana P, Garcia-Arranz M (2015) Recurrent anal fistulae: limited surgery supported by stem cells. World J Gastroenterol 21:3330–3336

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Andrew Zbar for the critical review of the manuscript.

Funding

A Grant for this work was provided by the Fundación Española de Coloproctología.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

FDP and VDMC: Study design, interpreting results, drafting of the manuscript.

MVM: Data acquisition.

JMVM, ANGC, MLR, JMDP, and RMJR: Surgical protocol, study design, interpreting results.

FJP: Critical review of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando de la Portilla.

Ethics declarations

The study was conducted as a phase III, randomized, double-blind parallel group design which was approved by the local University Ethics Committee, with each patient included providing written informed consent for participation.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de la Portilla, F., Muñoz-Cruzado, M.V.D., Maestre, M.V. et al. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus fibrin glue in cryptogenic fistula-in-ano: a phase III single-center, randomized, double-blind trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 34, 1113–1119 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03290-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03290-6

Keywords

Navigation