Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparing functional outcomes between transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LaTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is concern that transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) may result in poorer functional outcomes as compared to laparoscopic TME (LaTME). These concerns arise from the fact that TaTME entails both a low anastomosis and prolonged dilatation of the anal sphincter from the transanal platform.

Objectives

This paper aimed to assess the comparative functional outcomes following TaTME and LaTME, with a focus on anorectal and genitourinary outcomes.

Data sources

A meta-analysis and systematic review was performed on available literature between 2000 and 2020 from the PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases.

Study selection

All comparative studies assessing the functional outcomes following taTME versus LaTME in adults were included.

Main outcome measure

Functional anorectal and genitourinary outcomes were evaluated using validated scoring systems.

Results

A total of seven studies were included, consisting of one randomised controlled trial and six non-randomised studies. There were 242 (52.0%) and 233 (48.0%) patients in the TaTME and LaTME groups respectively. Anorectal functional outcomes were similar in both groups with regard to LARS scores (30.6 in the TaTME group and 28.3 in the LaTME group), Jorge-Wexner incontinence scores, and EORTC QLQ C30/29 scores. Genitourinary function was similar in both groups with IPSS scores of 5.5 to 8.0 in the TaTME group, and 3.5 to 10.1 in the LaTME group. (p = 0.835).

Conclusion

This review corroborates findings from previous studies in showing that the transanal approach is not associated with increased anal sphincter damage. Further prospective clinical trials are needed in this field of research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brouwer NP, Bos AC, Lemmens VE, Tanis PJ, Hugen N, Nagtegaal ID et al (2018) An overview of 25 years of incidence, treatment and outcome of colorectal cancer patients. Int J Cancer 143(11):2758–2766

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, Van Der Pas MH, De Lange-De Klerk ES et al (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372(14):1324–1332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, Lacy AM (2010) NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc 24(5):1205–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Keane C, Fearnhead NS, Bordeianou L, Christensen P, Espin Basany E, Laurberg S, Mellgren A, Messick C, Orangio GR, Verjee A, Wing K, Bissett I, the LARS International Collaborative Group, An V, Bryant A, Byrne C, Chen T, Clark D, Croft S, Dinning P, Gladman M, Heriot A, Kariappa S, Keck J, Lubowski D, Khera A, Kirkwood K, Petersen D, Sloots K, Totten B, Weston M, Andersen P, Bachmann C, Barht H, Emmertsen K, Faaborg P, Gögenur I, Ingerslev P, Isaksen D, Iversen H, Iversen L, Jacobsen K, Jansen T, Jocobsen I, Juul T, Kjær D, Krogh K, Majgaard M, Mynster A, Neuenschwander A, Nielsen C, Nielsen M, Nielsen R, Nielsen T, Olsen J, Poulsen B, Rahr H, Snedker B, Sørensen G, Stolzenburg T, Vaabengaard P, Acheson A, Andreyev J, Bach S, Battersby N, Bradbury J, Brown S, Cecil T, Chapman M, Chapman S, Chave H, Cook T, Cuffy L, Davies J, Dawson C, Dixon J, Duff S, Edwards C, Geh I, Hamilton C, Hancock L, Harji D, Hill J, Holtham S, Jenkins J, Johnston R, Kapur S, Maxwell-Armstrong C, McArthur D, Moran B, Norton C, Nugent K, Pateman L, Perston Y, Rockall T, Sagar P, Saunders M, Sebag-Montefiore D, Senapati A, Singh B, Skaife P, Smart N, Sykes H, Taylor C, Thorpe G, Tierney G, Voyce S, Walsh C, Warren O, Wheeler J, Woodward A, Winter D, Abbott S, Beban V, Bennett M, Chadwick T, Collinson R, Corbett S, Dennett E, Eglinton T, Fraser A, Glue J, Hohaia D, Menzi E, O’Connor M, Stevenson D, Wells C, Wolyncewicz S, Woodfield J, Bence K, Boutros M, Brueseke M, DeKorte J, Floruta C, Francone T, Frederick F, Grasso J, Gurland B, Higgins K, Hull T, Keller D, Laffan A, Lovett S, Marlatt J, McAdams D, McCarthy C, Milch H, Natale S, Pappou E, Paquette I, Pulskamp S, Rich M, Savitt L, Shafi M, Steele S, Stein S, Tolbert M, Varma M, Vogler S, Vuong T, Wells K, Wexner S, Wo J, Wright J, Wunderlich C, Campbell K, Lim M, Moug S, Oliphant R, Araujo-Ferreiro M, Ballester C, Belen-Bueno A, Blanco-Colino R, Carrillo-Moreno J, Castillo J, Codina-Cazador A, Enriquez-Navascuez JM, Gallego-García M, Jerez J, Jimenez LM, Labaka-Aretaga I, Martin-Fernández M, Martinez-Sanchez C, Muñoz A, Paniagua-Cayetano G, Pascual-Damieta M, de la Portilla F, Ramirez L, Sanchez-García C, Vaquer-Casas G, Vico-García E, Vigorita V, Adams R, Cornish J, Davies M, Evans M, Torkington J, Turner J (2020) International consensus definition of low anterior resection syndrome. Color Dis 22(3):331–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Koedam T, Van Ramshorst G, Deijen C, Elfrink A, Meijerink W, Bonjer H et al (2017) Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: effects on patient-reported quality of life and functional outcome. Techniques in coloproctology 21(1):25–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Andersson J, Abis G, Gellerstedt M, Angenete E, Angerås U, Cuesta M et al (2014) Patient-reported genitourinary dysfunction after laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery in a randomized trial (COLOR II). Br J Surg 101(10):1272–1279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Roodbeen SX, Penna M, Mackenzie H, Kusters M, Slater A, Jones OM, Lindsey I, Guy RJ, Cunningham C, Hompes R (2019) Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes. Surg Endosc 33(8):2459–2467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Foo CC, Kin Ng K, Tsang JS, Siu-hung Lo O, Wei R, Yip J, Lun Law W (2020) Low anterior resection syndrome after transanal total mesorectal excision: a comparison with the conventional top-to-bottom approach. Dis Colon Rectum 63(4):497–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bjoern MX, Nielsen S, Perdawood SK (2019) Quality of life after surgery for rectal Cancer: a comparison of functional outcomes after Transanal and laparoscopic approaches. J Gastrointest Surg 23(8):1623–1630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rubinkiewicz M, Zarzycki P, Witowski J, Pisarska M, Gajewska N, Torbicz G, Nowakowski M, Major P, Budzyński A, Pędziwiatr M (2019) Functional outcomes after resections for low rectal tumors: comparison of Transanal with laparoscopic Total Mesorectal excision. BMC Surg 19(1):79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dou R (2019) SunW, Luo S, Hou Y, Zhang C, Kang L. comparison of postoperative bowel function between patients undergoing transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 22:246–254

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mora L, Zarate A, Serra-Aracil X, Pallisera A, Serra S, Navarro-Soto S (2018) Afectación funcional y calidad de vida tras cirugía de cáncer rectal [Functional impairment and quality of life after rectal cancer surgery]. Cir Cir 86(2):140–147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Veltcamp Helbach M, Koedam TWA, Knol JJ, Velthuis S, Bonjer HJ, Tuynman JB, Sietses C (2019) Quality of life after rectal cancer surgery: differences between laparoscopic and transanal total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc 33(1):79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pontallier A, Denost Q, Van Geluwe B, Adam JP, Celerier B, Rullier E (2016) Potential sexual function improvement by using transanal mesorectal approach for laparoscopic low rectal cancer excision. Surg Endosc 30(11):4924–4933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rouanet P, Mourregot A, Azar CC, Carrere S, Gutowski M, Quenet F, Saint-Aubert B, Colombo PE (2013) Transanal endoscopic proctectomy: an innovative procedure for difficult resection of rectal tumors in men with narrow pelvis. Dis Colon Rectum 56(4):408–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kang L, Sylla P, Atallah S, Ito M, Wexner SD, Wang J-P. taTME: boom or bust? : Oxford University Press; 2020

  17. Van der Heijden J, Koëter T, Smits L, Sietses C, Tuynman J, Maaskant-Braat A et al (2020) Functional complaints and quality of life after transanal total mesorectal excision: a meta-analysis. Br J Surg 107(5):489–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Juul T, Ahlberg M, Biondo S, Emmertsen KJ, Espin E, Jimenez LM, Matzel KE, Palmer G, Sauermann A, Trenti L, Zhang W, Laurberg S, Christensen P (2014) International validation of the low anterior resection syndrome score. Ann Surg 259(4):728–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen TY-T, Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S (2015) What are the best questionnaires to capture anorectal function after surgery in rectal cancer? Current colorectal cancer reports 11(1):37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tuech J-J, Karoui M, Lelong B, De Chaisemartin C, Bridoux V, Manceau G et al (2015) A step toward NOTES total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: endoscopic transanal proctectomy. Ann Surg 261(2):228–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ribas Y, Aguilar F, Jovell-Fernández E, Cayetano L, Navarro-Luna A, Muñoz-Duyos A (2017) Clinical application of the LARS score: results from a pilot study. Int J Color Dis 32(3):409–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. O'Connor R (2004) Measuring quality of life in health. Measuring quality of life in health. p. xvi, 264-xvi,

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Substantial contributions to the conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data: All authors

Drafting and revising the article: All authors

Final approval of the version to be published: All authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph C. Kong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Kay T. Choy and Tze Wei Wilson Yang are co-first authors and have contributed to this study equally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choy, K.T., Yang, T.W.W., Prabhakaran, S. et al. Comparing functional outcomes between transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LaTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 36, 1163–1174 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03849-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03849-2

Keywords

Navigation