Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rubber band ligation of symptomatic hemorrhoids: an old solution to an everyday problem

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this prospective study is to present the results of rubber band ligation (RBL) in 2635 consecutive patients with 2nd, 3rd, and 4th degree symptomatic hemorrhoids, the pain risk factors, and the applicability of the method in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

Methods

A total of 1256 patients with 2nd, 1159 with 3rd, and 220 with 4th degree hemorrhoids were included in the study. Fifty-seven patients with hemorrhoids had liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. RBL was performed using St Marks’, McGinvey, and suction ligators. Single ligation was done in 178 patients, while 2457 patients had synchronous multiple ligations, in one (272), two (1289), and three (896 patients) sessions.

Results

After the end of treatment, 86.8% of our patients were asymptomatic and 84.5% remained asymptomatic 2 years later. A total of 593 patients had complications. Thirty required hospitalization, while pain was the most frequent complication (16.16 %). Multiple banding, young age, male sex, and external hemorrhoids were pain risk factors. RBL proved to be safe in 57 patients with coagulation disorders due to cirrhosis. Symptomatic recurrence was detected in 327 out of 2110 patients (15.49%), with repeat RBL in 219 cases and surgery in 108 cases.

Conclusion

RBL is a safe, effective method for treating symptomatic 2nd and 3rd degree hemorrhoids. It can also be applied in selected cases of 4th degree hemorrhoids and patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable

References

  1. Carpeti EA, Kann MA, McDonald PJ et al (1998) Double blind randomized controlled trial of effect of metronidazole on pain after day-care haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 351:169–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balfour L, Stokovitc SG, Botterill ID et al (2002) A randomized double-blind trial of the effect of metronidazole on pain after closed haemorrhoidectomy Dis. Colon Rectum 45:1186–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ala S, Saedi M, Eshgh F et al (2008) Topical metronidazole can reduce pain after surgery and pain on defecation in postoperative haemorrhoidectomy Dis. Colon rectum 51:235–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Steinberg DM, Liegois H, Alexander Williams J (1975) Long- term view of the results of rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids. Br J Surg 62:144–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bartizal J, Slosberg P (1977) An alternative to hemorrhoidectomy. Arch Surg 112:534–535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bat L, Melzer E, Koler M, Dreznick Z, Shemesh E (1993) Complications of rubber band ligation of symptomatic internal hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 36:287–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bayer I, Myslovaty B, Picovsky BM (1996) Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids. Convenient and economic treatment. J Clin Gastrenterol 23:50–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Spallanzani A, Ricchi E, Carriero A, Fundaro S, Perrone S, Pezcoller C (1997) Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids. Our experience. Minerva Chir 52:1047–1051

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Komborozos V, Skrekas G, Pissiotis C (2000) Rubber band ligation of symptomatic internal hemorrhoids: results of 500 cases. Dig Surg 17:71–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pezzulo A, Palladino E (2000) Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids. 5-year follow-up. G Chir 21(5):253–256

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bernal JC, Enguix M, García JL, Romero JG, Peris RT (2005) Rubber- band ligation for hemorrhoids in a Colorectal Unit: A prospective study. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 97(1):38–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Watson NF, Liptrott S, Maxwell-Armstrong CA (2006) A prospective audit of early pain and patient satisfaction following out- patient band ligation of haemorrhoids. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88:275–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hollingshead JR, Phillips RK (2016) Haemorrhoids: modern diagnosis and treatment. Postgrad MedJ. 92:4–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kheng-Seong N (2020) Melanie Holzgang, Christopher Young. Still a Case of “No Pain, No Gain”? An Updated and Critical Review of the Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management Options for Hemorrhoids in 2020. Ann Coloproctol 36(3):133–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ayman M, Amir A, Waleed H, Elyamani M, Tito A (2008) Hosam E Rubber band ligation for 750 cases of symptomatic hemorrhoids out of 2200 cases. World J Gastrenterol 14(42):6526–6530

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aram FO (2016) Rubber Band Ligation for Hemorrhoids: an Office Experience. Indian J Surg 78(4):271–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cocorullo G, Tutino R, Falco N, Licari L, Orlando G, Fontana T, Raspanti C, Salamone G, Scerrino G, Gallo G, Trompetto M, Gulotta G (2017) The non-surgical management for hemorrhoidal disease. A systematic review. G Chir 38(1):5–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Longman RJ, Thomson WH (2006) A prospective study of outcome from rubber band ligation of piles. Colorectal Dis 8:145–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hooker GD, Plewes EA, Rajgopal C, Taylor BM (1999) Local injection of bupivacaine after rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids: prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 42:174–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sajid MS, Bhatti MI, Caswell J, Sains P, Baig MK (2015) Local anaesthetic infiltration for the rubber band ligation of early symptomatic hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Updates Surg 67:3–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta P (2004) Radiofrequency coagulation versus rubber band ligation in early hemorrhoids: pain versus gain. Medicina (Kaunas) 40:232–237

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lee HH, Spencer RJ, Beart RW (1994) Multiple hemorrhoidal bandings in a single session. Dis Colon Rectum 37:37–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gehamy RA, Weakley FL (1974) Internal hemorrhoidectomy by elastic ligation. Dis Colon Rectum 17:347–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hardwick RH, Durdey P (1994) Should rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids be performed at the initial outpatient visit? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 76:185–187

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Khubchandani IT (1983) A randomized comparison of single and multiple rubber band ligations. Dis Colon Rectum 26:705–708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Poon GP, Chu KW, Lau WY, Lee JM, Yeung C, Fan ST, Yiu TF, Wong SH, Wong KK (1986) Conventional vs. triple rubber band ligation for hemorrhoids. A prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 29:836–838

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Odelowo OO, Mekasha G, Johnson MA (2002) Massive life-threatening lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage following hemorrhoidal rubber band ligation. J Natl Med Assoc 94:1089–1092

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Beatie GC, Rao MM, Campbell WJ (2004) Secondary hemorrhage after rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids in patients taking clopidogrel- a cautionary note. Ulster Med J 73:139–141

    Google Scholar 

  29. Patel S, Shahzad G, Rizvon K, Subramani K, Viswanathan P, Mustacchia P (2014) Rectal ulcers and massive bleeding after hemorrhoidal band ligation while on aspirin. World J Clin Cases 2:86–89

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Nelson RS, Ewing BM, Ternet C, Shashidharan M, Blatchford GJ, Thorson AG (2008) Risk of late bleeding following hemorrhoidal banding in patients on antithrombotic prophylaxis. Am J Surg 196:994–999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wechter DG, Luna GK (1987) An unusual complication of rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 30:137–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Clay LD, White JJ, Davidson JT, Chandler JJ (1986) Early recognition and successful management of pelvic cellulitis following hemorrhoidal banding. Dis Colon Rectum 29:579–581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shemesh EI, Kodner IJ, Fry RD, Neufeld DM (1987) Severe complication of rubber band ligation of internal hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 30:199–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Quevedo-Bonilla G, Farkas AM, Abcarian H, Hambrick E, Orsay CP (1988) Septic complications of hemorrhoidal banding. Arch Surg 123:650–651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Scarpa FJ, Hillis W, Sabetta JR (1988) Pelvic cellulitis: a life-threatening complication of hemorrhoidal banding. Surgery 103:383–385

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Buchmann P, Seefeld U (1989) Rubber band ligation for piles can be disastrous in HIV- positive patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 4:57–58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Duchateau A, Huyghe M (2014) Perirectal sepsis after rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids: a case report. Acta Chir Belg 114:344–348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Murphy KJ (1978) Tetanus after rubber- band ligation of haemorrhoids. Br Med J 1:1590–1591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Kasher JA, Mathisen G (2007) Acquiring tetanus after hemorrhoid banding and other gastrointestinal procedures. J Gastrointest Surg 11:515–519

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. O’Hara VS (1980) Fatal clostridial infection following hemorrhoidal banding. Dis Colon Rectum 23:570–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sim HL, Tan KY, Poon PL, Cheng A, Mak K (2009) Life-threatening perineal sepsis after rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol 13:161–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Johanson JF, Rimm A (1992) Optimal nonsurgical treatment of hemorrhoids: A comparative analysis of infrared coagulation, rubber band ligation and injection sclerotherapy. Am J Gastrenterol 87:1601–1606

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cataldo PA, MacKeigan JM (1992) The necessity of routine pathologic evaluation of hemorrhoidectomy specimens. Surg Gynecol Obstet 174:302–304

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Code availability

Not applicable

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Vasilios Komporozos: method application and composing the “Discussion” section

Antonia Papazoglou: coordination, editing, and correspondence

Vasiliki Ziozia: collection of material and results and writing

Aikaterini Komporozou: statistical analysis

George Stravodimos: collection of material and results and writing

Ageliki Kolinioti: collection of material and results and writing

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonia Papazoglou.

Ethics declarations

The current study regards an already approved technique and not an experimental procedure. Therefore, no ethical approval was required.

Consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Conflict of interest

Nothing to declare

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Komporozos, V., Ziozia, V., Komporozou, A. et al. Rubber band ligation of symptomatic hemorrhoids: an old solution to an everyday problem. Int J Colorectal Dis 36, 1723–1729 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03900-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03900-2

Keywords

Navigation