Skip to main content
Log in

The neural and humoral pathways in remote limb ischemic preconditioning

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Basic Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a therapeutic intervention that has been demonstrated to reduce myocardial injury in the clinical setting. However, the underlying cardioprotective mechanisms remain unclear. We hypothesised that RIPC utilises both humoral and neural pathways to convey the cardioprotective signal from the preconditioned remote organ to the heart. C57BL/6 mice were anaesthetised and subjected to in vivo 30 min coronary artery ischaemia followed by 120 min of myocardial reperfusion, at the end of which myocardial infarct size was measured and expressed as a percentage of the risk zone. RIPC was induced by 3 cycles of 5 min left femoral artery occlusion interspersed with 5 min reperfusion before prolonged myocardial ischaemia with or without femoral vein occlusion (humoral pathway), femoral nerve resection and/or sciatic nerve resection (neural pathway). RIPC resulted in a smaller myocardial infarct size when compared to control. However, occluding the femoral vein completely abolished the infarct-limiting effect of RIPC. Similarly, combined femoral and sciatic nerve resection also abolished the cardioprotective effect of RIPC. Interestingly, femoral nerve or sciatic nerve resection alone only partially abolished the infarct-limiting effect of RIPC. In conclusion, remote limb ischaemic preconditioning reduced myocardial infarct size in the mice in a manner which implicates both a neural and humoral pathway.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cheung MM, Kharbanda RK, Konstantinov IE, Shimizu M, Frndova H, Li J, Holtby HM, Cox PN, Smallhorn JF, Van Arsdell GS, Redington AN (2006) Randomized controlled trial of the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on children undergoing cardiac surgery: first clinical application in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:2277–2282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen MV, Downey JM (2008) Adenosine: trigger and mediator of cardioprotection. Basic Res Cardiol 103:203–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dickson EW, Lorbar M, Porcaro WA, Fenton RA, Reinhardt CP, Gysembergh A, Przyklenk K (1999) Rabbit heart can be “preconditioned” via transfer of coronary effluent. Am J Physiol 277:H2451–H2457

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dickson EW, Reinhardt CP, Renzi FP, Becker RC, Porcaro WA, Heard SO (1999) Ischemic preconditioning may be transferable via whole blood transfusion: preliminary evidence. J Thromb Thrombolysis 8:123–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ding YF, Zhang MM, He RR (2001) Role of renal nerve in cardioprotection provided by renal ischemic preconditioning in anesthetized rabbits. Sheng Li Xue Bao 53:7–12

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dong JH, Liu YX, Ji ES, He RR (2004) Limb ischemic preconditioning reduces infarct size following myocardial ischemia-reperfusion in rats. Sheng Li Xue Bao 56:41–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gho BC, Schoemaker RG, van den Doel MA, Duncker DJ, Verdouw PD (1996) Myocardial protection by brief ischemia in noncardiac tissue. Circulation 94:2193–2200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hausenloy DJ, Mwamure PK, Venugopal V, Harris J, Barnard M, Grundy E, Ashley E, Vichare S, Di Salvo C, Kolvekar S, Hayward M, Keogh B, MacAllister RJ, Yellon DM (2007) Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 370:575–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM (2007) Preconditioning and postconditioning: United at reperfusion. Pharmacol Ther

  10. Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM (2008) Remote ischaemic preconditioning: underlying mechanisms and clinical application. Cardiovasc Res 79:377–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heusch G, Boengler K, Schulz R (2008) Cardioprotection: nitric oxide, protein kinases, and mitochondria. Circulation 118:1915–1919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Heusch G, Boengler K, Schulz R (2010) Inhibition of mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening: the holy grail of cardioprotection. Basic Res Cardiol 105:151–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heusch G, Schulz R (2002) Remote preconditioning. J Mol Cell Cardiol 34:1279–1281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kanoria S, Jalan R, Seifalian AM, Williams R, Davidson BR (2007) Protocols and mechanisms for remote ischemic preconditioning: a novel method for reducing ischemia reperfusion injury. Transplantation 84:445–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Konstantinov IE, Li J, Cheung MM, Shimizu M, Stokoe J, Kharbanda RK, Redington AN (2005) Remote ischemic preconditioning of the recipient reduces myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury of the denervated donor heart via a KATP channel-dependent mechanism. Transplantation 79:1691–1695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liem DA, Verdouw PD, Ploeg H, Kazim S, Duncker DJ (2002) Sites of action of adenosine in interorgan preconditioning of the heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 283:H29–H37

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lim SY, Davidson SM, Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM (2007) Preconditioning and postconditioning: the essential role of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore. Cardiovasc Res 75:530–535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lim SY, Davidson SM, Yellon DM, Smith CC (2009) The cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist, rimonabant, protects against acute myocardial infarction. Basic Res Cardiol 104:781–792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Loukogeorgakis SP, Panagiotidou AT, Broadhead MW, Donald A, Deanfield JE, MacAllister RJ (2005) Remote ischemic preconditioning provides early and late protection against endothelial ischemia-reperfusion injury in humans: role of the autonomic nervous system. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:450–456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miura T, Miki T (2008) Limitation of myocardial infarct size in the clinical setting: current status and challenges in translating animal experiments into clinical therapy. Basic Res Cardiol 103:501–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA (1986) Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation 74:1124–1136

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Niiyama H, Huang NF, Rollins MD, Cooke JP (2009) Murine model of hindlimb ischemia. J Vis Exp (23). pii:1035. doi:10.3791/1035

  23. Przyklenk K, Bauer B, Ovize M, Kloner RA, Whittaker P (1993) Regional ischemic ‘preconditioning’ protects remote virgin myocardium from subsequent sustained coronary occlusion. Circulation 87:893–899

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schoemaker RG, van Heijningen CL (2000) Bradykinin mediates cardiac preconditioning at a distance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 278:H1571–H1576

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shimizu M, Tropak M, Diaz RJ, Suto F, Surendra H, Kuzmin E, Li J, Gross G, Wilson GJ, Callahan J, Redington AN (2009) Transient limb ischaemia remotely preconditions through a humoral mechanism acting directly on the myocardium: evidence suggesting cross-species protection. Clin Sci (Lond) 117:191–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shiva S, Gladwin MT (2009) Nitrite mediates cytoprotection after ischemia/reperfusion by modulating mitochondrial function. Basic Res Cardiol 104:113–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tapuria N, Kumar Y, Habib MM, Abu AM, Seifalian AM, Davidson BR (2008) Remote ischemic preconditioning: a novel protective method from ischemia reperfusion injury—a review. J Surg Res 150:304–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Valeur HS, Valen G (2009) Innate immunity and myocardial adaptation to ischemia. Basic Res Cardiol 104:22–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wolfrum S, Schneider K, Heidbreder M, Nienstedt J, Dominiak P, Dendorfer A (2002) Remote preconditioning protects the heart by activating myocardial PKCepsilon-isoform. Cardiovasc Res 55:583–589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yellon DM, Hausenloy DJ (2007) Myocardial reperfusion injury. N Engl J Med 357:1121–1135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the British Heart Foundation for continued support. This work was undertaken at University College London Hospital/University College London (UCLH/UCL) which received a proportion of funding from the Department of Health’s National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme. S.Y. Lim is funded by Wellcome Trust.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek M. Yellon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lim, S.Y., Yellon, D.M. & Hausenloy, D.J. The neural and humoral pathways in remote limb ischemic preconditioning. Basic Res Cardiol 105, 651–655 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-010-0099-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-010-0099-y

Keywords

Navigation