Abstract
The transvenous implantation of cardiac devices may sometimes cause serious complications involving the coronary arteries. The left anterior descending artery may be injured during nonapical right ventricular implantation while a right atrial lead may injure the right or circumflex coronary artery. Injury of a left internal mammary graft to a coronary artery may cause myocardial infarction.
Zusammenfassung
Die transvenöse Implantation kardialer Geräte kann manchmal zu schweren Komplikationen führen, welche die Koronararterien betreffen. Zum einen kann der Ramus interventricularis anterior bei nichtapikaler Implantation der rechtsventrikulären Elektrode, zum anderen die rechte Koronararterie und der Ramus circumflexus bei Implantation der rechtsatrialen Elektrode verletzt werden. Verletzungen eines Bypass zwischen A. mammaria interna und einer Koronararterie können zu einem Myokardinfarkt führen.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pang BJ, Barold SS, Mond HG (2015) Injury to the coronary arteries and related structures by implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices. Europace 17:524–529
Pang BJ, Joshi SB, Lui EH, Tacey MA, Alison J, Seneviratne SK, Cameron JD et al (2014) Proximity of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads to coronary arteries as assessed by cardiac computed tomography. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 37:717–723
Pang BJ, Joshi SB, Lui EH, Tacey MA, Ling LH, Alison J, Seneviratne SK et al (2014) Validation of conventional fluoroscopic and ECG criteria for right ventricular pacemaker lead position using cardiac computed tomography. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 37:495–504
Teh AW, Medi C, Rosso R, Lee G, Gurvitch R, Mond HG (2009) Pacing from the rightventricular septum: Is there a danger to the coronary arteries? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 32:894–897
Parwani AS, Rolf S, Haverkamp W (2009) Coronary artery occlusion due to lead insertion into the right ventricular outflow tract. Eur Heart J 30:425
Nishiyama N et al (2012) Implantation of the right ventricular lead of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator complicated by apical myocardial infarction. Circulation 126:1314–1315
Karalis I, Bleeker GB, Schalij MJ (2014) Obstruction of distal left anterior descending artery by the right ventricular lead of an implantable cardiac defibrillator. Neth Heart J 22:309
Nakagawa E, Abe Y, Komatsu R, Naruko T, Itoh A (2015) Right coronary artery perforation by an active-fixation atrial pacing lead resulting in life-threatening tamponade. J Arrhythm 31:313–315
Khoueiry G, Lakhani M, Abi Rafeh N, Azab B, Schwartz C, Kowalski M, Lafferty J, Bekheit S (2012) Right coronary artery fistula as a result of delayed right atrial perforation by a passive fixation lead. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 5:e46–7
Opolski MP, Pregowski J, Kruk M, Staruch AD, Witkowski A, Demkow M, Hryniewiecki T, Michalek P, Ruzyllo W, Kepka C (2014) The prevalence and characteristics of intra-atrial right coronary artery anomaly in 9,284 patients referred for coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur J Radiol 83:1129–1134
Issa ZF, Gill JB (2010) Transaterial pacemaker lead implantation results in acute myocardial infarction. Europace 12:1654–1655
Kypson AP, Frazier DW, Moran JF (2005) Internal thoracic artery injury after transvenous pacemaker implantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129:675–676
Aguilar-Shea AL, Gallardo-Mayo C (2011) Pacemakers and internal mammary arterypseudoaneurysm. J Emerg Med 41:e115–6
Ploux S, Munos E, Barandon L, Bordachar P (2010) False-aneurysm of the mammary artery: a rare complication of pacemaker implantation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 21:1061
Pozo E, González-Ferrer JJ, Pérez Villacastín J, Macaya C (2011) Diaphragm paralysis due to pseudoaneurysm of internal mammary artery after pacemaker implantation. Europace 13:592–593
Chou TM, Chair KM, Jim MH, Boncutter A, Milechman G (2000) Acute occlusion of left internal mammary artery graft during dual-chamber pacemaker implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 51:65–68
Garcia-Bolao I, Macias A, Moreno J, Martin A (2008) Fatal left internal mammary artery graft to subclavian vein fistula complicating dual-chamber pacemaker implantation. Europace 10:890–891
Sharma G, Salahuddin S, Sanders P, Gupta H, Gulati G, Jagia P, Bahl VK (2016) Inadequacy of fluoroscopy and electrocardiogram in predicting septal position in RVOT pacing – validation with cardiac computed tomography. Indian Heart J 68:174–180
Chen D, Wei H, Tang J, Liu L, Wu S, Lin C, Zhang Q, Liang Y, Chen S (2016) A randomized comparison of fluoroscopic techniques for implanting pacemaker lead on the right ventricular outflow tract septum. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 32:721–728
Moore P, Coucher J, Ngai S, Stanton T, Wahi S, Gould P, Booth C, Pratap J, Kaye G (2016) Imaging and right ventricular pacing lead position: a comparison of CT, MRI, and echocardiography. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 39:382–392
Mond HG (2010) The road to right ventricular septal pacing: techniques and tools. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 33:88–98
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
S. S. Barold, B.J. Pang, and H.G. Mond declare that they have no competing interests.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barold, S.S., Pang, B.J. & Mond, H.G. Beware of the coronary arteries with implantable cardiac electronic devices. Herzschr Elektrophys 28, 317–319 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-017-0518-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-017-0518-y
Keywords
- Cardiac pacing
- Myocardial infarction
- Coronary artery injury
- Pacing complications
- Right ventricular outflow tract pacing