Abstract
Purpose
To assess the diagnostic accuracy of antenatal ultrasound and foetal magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) over the past decade in the diagnosis of anomalies of the corpus callosum in a tertiary referral centre.
Methods
A single tertiary referral centre ultrasound database was searched for cases of suspected callosal anomalies between 2003 and 2012. All subsequent ultrasound scans, MRIs, neonatal imaging, postmortem investigations and birth records were reviewed. Callosal anomalies were classified into isolated or complex based on the presence or absence of accompanying congenital anomalies.
Results
Forty-three cases of callosal anomaly were detected; 60 % were investigated by FMRI revealing additional diagnoses in 23 %; half of which were anomalies of cortical development. Of those considered isolated who underwent FMRI, 21 % were diagnosed with additional anomalies, changing the classification to a complex callosal anomaly.
Conclusion
In cases of callosal anomaly suspected on ultrasound, FMRI provides greater certainty and the potential to identify significant additional anomalies. The additional information may alter or clarify prognosis and help parents to better understand the pathology, allowing for informed decisions about the pregnancy to be made. However, some cases may still be diagnosed with additional anomalies after delivery and parents should be aware of such limitations of antenatal imaging.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kier EL, Truwit CL (1996) The normal and abnormal genu of the corpus callosum: an evolutionary embryologic, anatomic, and MR analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17(9):1631–1641
Gupta JK, Lilford RJ (1995) Assessment and management of fetal agenesis of the corpus callosum. Prenat Diagn 15(4):301–312
Sotiriadis A, Makrydimas G (2012) Neurodevelopment after prenatal diagnosis of isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum: an integrative review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206(4):337.e1–337.e5
Mangione R, Fries N, Godard P, Capron C, Mirlesse V, Lacombe D, Duyme M (2011) Neurodevelopmental outcome following prenatal diagnosis of an isolated anomaly of the corpus callosum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37(3):290–295
Santo S, D’Antonio F, Homfray T, Rich P, Pilu G, Bhide A, Thilaganathan B, Papageorghiou AT (2012) Counseling in fetal medicine: agenesis of the corpus callosum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 40(5):513–521. doi:10.1002/uog.12315
Moutard ML, Kieffer V, Feingold J, Lewin F, Baron JM, Adamsbaum C, Gélot A, Isapof A, Kieffer F, de Villemeur TB (2012) Isolated corpus callosum agenesis: a ten-year follow-up after prenatal diagnosis (how are the children without corpus callosum at 10 years of age?). Prenat Diagn 32(3):277–283
Goodyear PW, Bannister CM, Russell S, Rimmer S (2001) Outcome in prenatally diagnosed fetal agenesis of the corpus callosum. Fetal Diagn Ther 16(3):139–145
Paul LK (2011) Developmental malformation of the corpus callosum: a review of typical callosal development and examples of developmental disorders with callosal involvement. J Neurodev Disord 3(1):3–27
Volpe P, Paladini D, Resta M, Stanziano A, Salvatore M, Quarantelli M, De Robertis V, Buonadonna AL, Caruso G, Gentile M (2006) Characteristics, associations and outcome of partial agenesis of the corpus callosum in the fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27(5):509–516
Francesco P, Maria-Edgarda B, Giovanni P, Dandolo G, Giulio B (2006) Prenatal diagnosis of agenesis of corpus callosum: what is the neurodevelopmental outcome? Pediatr Int 48(3):298–304
Malinger G, Lev D, Lerman-Sagie T et al (2002) Is fetal magnetic resonance imaging superior to neurosonography for detection of brain anomalies? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 20(4):317–321
Manfredi R, Tognolini A, Bruno C, Raffaelli R, Franchi M, Pozzi Mucelli R (2010) Agenesis of the corpus callosum in fetuses with mild ventriculomegaly: role of MR imaging. Radiol Med 115(2):301–312
Sonigo PC, Rypens FF, Carteret M, Delezoide AL, Brunelle FO (1998) MR imaging of fetal cerebral anomalies. Pediatr Radiol 28(4):212–222
D’Ercole C, Girard N, Cravello L, Boubli L, Potier A, Raybaud C, Blanc B (1998) Prenatal diagnosis of fetal corpus callosum agenesis by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Prenat Diagn 18(3):247–253
Achiron R, Achiron A (2001) Development of the human fetal corpus callosum: a high resolution, cross-sectional sonographic study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:343–347
Garel C (2004) MRI of the Fetal Brain: normal development and cerebral pathologies. Sauramps, Paris. French Edition: Delezoide V, 1st edn. ISBN-13: 978-3540407478, ISBN-10: 3540407472
Tilea B, Alberti C, Adamsbaum C, Armoogum P, Oury J, Cabrol D, Sebag G, Kalifa G, Garel C (2009) Cerebral biometry in fetal magnetic resonance imaging: new reference data. Ultraosound Obstet Gynecol 33:173–181
Fratelli N, Papageorghiou AT, Prefumo F, Bakalis S, Homfray T, Thilaganathan B (2007) Outcome of prenatally diagnosed agenesis of the corpus callosum. Prenat Diagn 27(6):512–517
Glenn OA, Goldstein RB, Li KC, Young SJ, Norton ME, Busse RF, Goldberg JD, Barkovich AJ (2005) Fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of fetuses referred for sonographically suspected abnormalities of the corpus callosum. J Ultrasound Med 24(6):791–804
National Health and Medical Research Council (2003) When does quality assurance in health care require independent ethical review? http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/e46.pdf. Accessed 2012
guidelines ISUOG (2007) Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system: guidelines for performing the ‘basic examination’ and the ‘fetal neurosonogram’. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:109–116
Paladini D, Pastore G, Cavallaro A, Massaro M, Nappi C (2013) Agenesis of the fetal corpus callosum: sonographic signs change with advancing gestational age. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 42(6):687–690
Conflict of interest
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bell, S., O’Mahony, E., Fink, A.M. et al. Antenatal imaging of anomalies of the corpus callosum: a decade of experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292, 537–542 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3673-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3673-6