Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reasons for low cervical cancer survival in new accession European Union countries: a EUROCARE-5 study

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

With better access to early diagnosis and appropriate treatment, cervical cancer (CC) burden decreased in several European countries. In Eastern European (EE) countries, which accessed European Union in 2004, CC survival was worse than in the rest of Europe. The present study investigates CC survival differences across five European regions, considering stage at diagnosis (local, regional and metastatic), morphology (mainly squamous versus glandular tumours) and patients’ age.

Methods

We analysed 101,714 CC women diagnosed in 2000–2007 and followed-up to December 2008. Age-standardised 5-year relative survival (RS) and the excess risks of cancer death in the 5 years after diagnosis were computed.

Results

EE women were older and less commonly diagnosed with glandular tumours. Proportions of local stage cancers were similar across Europe, while morphology- and stage-specific RS (especially for non-metastatic disease) were lower in Eastern Europe. Adjusting for age and morphology, excess risk of local stage CC death for EE patients remained higher than that for other European women.

Conclusion

Stage, age and morphology alone do not explain worse survival in Eastern Europe: less effective care may play a role, probably partly due to fewer or inadequate resources being allocated to health care in this area, compared to the rest of Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Further information regarding survival data is available on the website of the EUROCARE study (https://www.eurocare.it) at the following page: https://w3.iss.it/site/EU5Results/forms/SA0007.aspx.

References

  1. von Karsa L, Anttila A, Ronco G, Ponti A, Malila N, Arbyn M et al (2008) Cancer screening in the European Union. Report on the implementation of the Council Recommendation on cancer screening, 1st edn. European Communities, Brussels

  2. IARC (2018) The Global Cancer Observatory. https://gco.iarc.fr. Accessed 14 Nov 2019

  3. National Cancer Institute (1999) NCI Issues Clinical Announcement on Cervical Cancer: Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Improves Survival. https://www3.scienceblog.com/community/older/archives/B/nih478.html. Accessed 14 Nov 2019

  4. Sant M, Chirlaque Lopez MD, Agresti R, Sánchez Pérez MJ, Holleczek B, Bielska-Lasota M et al (2015) Survival of women with cancers of breast and genital organs in Europe 1999–2007: results of the EUROCARE-5 study. Eur J Cancer 51:2191–2205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Romaniuk P, Szromek AR (2016) The evolution of the health system outcomes in Central and Eastern Europe and their association with social, economic and political factors: an analysis of 25 years of transition. BMC Health Serv Res 16:95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maver PJ, Seme K, Korać T, Dimitrov G, Döbrőssy L, Engele L et al (2013) Cervical cancer screening practices in central and eastern Europe in 2012. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat 22:7–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, Francisci S, Baili P, Pierannunzio D et al (2014) Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5—a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 15:23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen T, Jansen L, Gondos A, Emrich K, Holleczek B, Luttmann S et al (2012) Survival of cervical cancer patients in Germany in the early 21st century: a period analysis by age, histology, and stage. Acta Oncol 51:915–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Haelens A, Roche L, Bastos J, Woronoff AS, Zorzi M, Francart J et al (2017) Trends in net survival from cervical cancer in six European Latin countries: results from the SUDCAN population-based study. Eur J Cancer Prev 26 Trends in cancer net survival in six European Latin Countries: the SUDCAN study:S92-S99

  10. Vaccarella S, Franceschi S, Zaridze D, Poljak M, Veerus P, Plummer M et al (2016) Preventable fractions of cervical cancer via effective screening in six Baltic, central, and eastern European countries 2017–40: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 17:1445–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin L, Parkin DM et al (2013) International classification of diseases for oncology (ICD-O), 3rd edn. World Health Organisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rossi S, Baili P, Capocaccia R, Caldora M, Carrani E, Minicozzi P et al (2015) The EUROCARE-5 study on cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007: database, quality checks and statistical analysis methods. Eur J Cancer 51:2104–2119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Minicozzi P, Innos K, Sánchez M-J, Trama A, Walsh PM, Marcos-Gragera R et al (2017) Quality analysis of population-based information on cancer stage at diagnosis across Europe, with presentation of stage-specific cancer survival estimates: A EUROCARE-5 study. Eur J Cancer 84:335–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dickman PW, Sloggett A, Hills HT (2004) Regression models for relative survival. Stat Med 23:51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Surveillance Research Program (2013) SEER*Stat software: release 8.0.4. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda

  16. StataCorp (2011) Stata statistical software: release 12. StataCorp LP, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kirschner B, Poll S, Rygaard C, Wåhlin A, Junge J (2011) Screening history in women with cervical cancer in a Danish population-based screening program. Gynecol Oncol 120:68–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Andrae B, Andersson TM-L, Lambert PC, Kemetli L, Silfverdal L, Strander B et al (2012) Screening and cervical cancer cure: population based cohort study. BMJ 344:e900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pettersson BF, Hellman K, Vaziri R, Andersson S, Hellström AC (2011) Cervical cancer in the screening era: who fell victim in spite of successful screening programs? J Gynecol Oncol 22:76–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Espina C, Soerjomataram I, Forman D, Martín-Moreno JM (2018) Cancer prevention policy in the EU: Best practices are now well recognised; no reason for countries to lag behind. J Cancer Policy 18:40–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Anttila A, von Karsa L, Aasmaa A, Fender M, Patnick J, Rebolj M et al (2009) Cervical cancer screening policies and coverage in Europe. Eur J Cancer 45:2649–2658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Anttila A, Ronco G, Working Group on the Registration, and Monitoring of Cervical Cancer Screening Programmes in the European Union; within the European Network for Information on Cancer (EUNICE) (2009) Description of the national situation of cervical cancer screening in the member states of the European Union. Eur J Cancer 45:2685–2708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. The Council of the European Union (2003) Council Recommendation of 2 December 2003 on cancer screening. Off J Eur Union 878:34–38

    Google Scholar 

  24. Arbyn M, Anttila A, Jordan J, Ronco G, Schenck U, Segnan N et al (2008) European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening, 2nd edn. Office for Official Publications on the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  25. Serraino D, Gini A, Taborelli M, Ronco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Zappa M et al (2015) Changes in cervical cancer incidence following the introduction of organized screening in Italy. Prev Med 75:56–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Puig-Tintoré LM, Castellsagué X, Torné A, de Sanjosé S, Cortés J, Roura E et al (2008) Coverage and factors associated with cervical cancer screening: results from the AFRODITA study: a population-based survey in Spain. J Low Genit Tract Dis 12:82–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zadnik V, Primic Zakelj M, Lokar K, Jarm K, Ivanus U, Zagar T (2017) Cancer burden in Slovenia with the time trends analysis. Radiol Oncol 51:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Burton-Jeangros C, Cullati S, Manor O, Courvoisier DS, Bouchardy C, Guessous I (2017) Cervical cancer screening in Switzerland: cross-sectional trends (1992–2012) in social inequalities. Eur J Public Health 27:167–173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nowakowski A, Cybulski M, Śliwczyński A, Chil A, Teter Z, Seroczyński P et al (2015) The implementation of an organised cervical screening programme in Poland: an analysis of the adherence to European guidelines. BMC Cancer 15:279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Andrae B, Kemetli L, Sparén P, Silfverdal L, Strander B, Ryd W et al (2008) Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:622–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zucchetto A, Franceschi S, Clagnan E, Serraino D, Zanier L, Franzo A et al (2010) Screening history of women with invasive cervical cancer in north-east Italy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 152:200–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Quinn BA, Deng X, Colton A, Bandyopadhyay D, Carter JS, Fields EC (2019) Increasing age predicts poor cervical cancer prognosis with subsequent effect on treatment and overall survival. Brachytherapy 18:29–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shimamoto K, Saito T, Kitade S, Tomita Y, Nagayama R, Yamaguchi S et al (2018) A study of treatments and outcomes in elderly women with cervical cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 228:174–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Albert A, Lee A, Allbright R, Vijayakumar S (2019) Impact of age on receipt of curative treatment for cervical cancer: an analysis of patterns of care and survival in a large, national cohort. J Geriatr Oncol 10:465–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Darlin L, Borgfeldt C, Widén E, Kannisto P (2014) Elderly women above screening age diagnosed with cervical cancer have a worse prognosis. Anticancer Res 34:5147–5151

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Darlin L, Borgfeldt C, Forslund O, Hénic E, Hortlund M, Dillner J et al (2013) Comparison of use of vaginal HPV self-sampling and offering flexible appointments as strategies to reach long-term non-attending women in organized cervical screening. J Clin Virol 58:155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, Harewood R, Matz M, Nikšić M et al (2018) Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet 391:1023–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. OECD/EU (2008) Health at a Glance: Europe 2018: State of Health in the EU Cycle. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wright JD, Chen L, Tergas AI, Burke WM, Hou JY, Neugut AI et al (2015) Population-level trends in relative survival for cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 213:670.e1–670.e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Simone Bonfarnuzzo for his assistance, and Camilla Amati for language revision. EUROCARE-5 working group: Austria: M. Hackl, P. Ihle (Austrian CR); Belgium: E. Van Eycken, K. Henau (Belgian CR); Bulgaria: Z. Valerianova, N. Dimitrova (Bulgarian CR); Croatia: M. Sekerija, P. Cukelj (Croatian CR); Czech Republic: L. Dušek, M. Zvolský (Czech National CR); Estonia: M. Mägi (Estonian CR); T. Aareleid (National Institute for Health Development); Finland: N. Malila, K. Seppä (Finnish CR); France: M. Velten (Bas Rhin CR); A. V. Guizard (Calvados, General CR); J. Faivre* (Côte d'Or Digestive Tract Registry, Burgundy); A. S. Woronoff (Doubs CR); B. Tretarre (Hérault CR); N. Bossard* (Hospices Civils de Lyon); Z. Uhry (Hospices Civils de Lyon; Institut de Veille Sanitaire); M. Colonna* (Isère CR); F. Molinié, A. Cowppli-Bony (Loire-Atlantique/Vendée CR); S. Bara (Manche CR); B. Lapôtre-Ledoux (Somme CR); P. Grosclaude (Tarn CR); Germany: R. Stabenow (Berlin CR; Brandenburg CR; Mecklenburg-West Pomerania CR; Saxony CR; Saxony-Anhalt CR; Thüringen CR); S. Luttmann, A. Eberle (Bremen CR, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology); H. Brenner (German Cancer Research Center); A. Nennecke (Hamburg CR); J. Engel, G. Schubert-Fritschle (Munich CR); J. Heidrich (North Rhine-Westphalia CR); B. Holleczek (Saarland CR); A. Katalinic* (Schleswig–Holstein CR); Iceland: H. Birgisson, L. Tryggvadóttir (Icelandic CR); Ireland: K. Clough-Gorr (National Cancer Registry Ireland); Italy: G. Mazzoleni, A. Bulatko (Alto Adige CR); C. Buzzoni (Associazione Italiana Registri Tumore); A. Sutera Sardo, P. Mancuso (Catanzaro CR); S. Ferretti (Ferrara CR); A. Barchielli, A. Caldarella (Firenze-Prato CR); G. Gatta*, M. Sant*, C. Amati, P. Baili*, F. Berrino*, S. Bonfarnuzzo, L. Botta, R. Capocaccia*, R. Foschi, C. Margutti, E. Meneghini, P. Minicozzi, A. Trama (Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan); D. Serraino, L. Dal Maso (Friuli Venezia Giulia CR, CRO Aviano National Cancer Institute); R. De Angelis*, C. Di Benedetto, M. Caldora, S. Francisci*, F. Galati, S. Mallone, D. Pierannunzio, M. Tallon, S. Rossi, M. Santaquilani, A. Tavilla (Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome); F. Pannozzo, S. Busco (Latina CR); R. A. Filiberti, E. Marani (Liguria CR, IRCCS AOU San Martino—IST); P. Ricci (Mantova CR); G. Spagnoli, C. Cirilli (Modena CR); M. Fusco, M. F. Vitale (Napoli 3 South CR); M. Usala (Nuoro CR); F. Vitale, W. Mazzucco (Palermo CR); M. Michiara (Parma CR); R. Zanetti, S. Rosso (Piemonte CR); R. Tumino (Ragusa CR); L. Mangone, E. Di Felice (Reggio Emilia CR); A. G. Russo, A. Andreano (Registro tumori ATS della Città metropolitana di Milano); F. Falcini (Romagna CR, IRCCS AUSL-IRST Meldola); A. L. Caiazzo (Salerno CR); R. Cesaraccio (Sassari CR); S. Piffer (Servizio Epidemiologia Clinica e Valutativa, Trento); A. Madeddu, F. Tisano (Siracusa CR); A. C. Fanetti, I. Cometti (Sondrio CR); P. Candela, T. Scuderi (Trapani CR); F. Stracci, F. Bianconi (Umbria CR); G. Tagliabue, P. Contiero (Varese Province CR, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori); M. Rugge, M. Zorzi (Veneto CR); Latvia: S. Pildava (Latvian CR); Lithuania: G. Smailyte (Lithuanian CR); Malta: M. Azzopardi, N. Calleja (Malta National Cancer Registry, Health Information and Research); Norway: T. B. Johannesen (Norwegian CR); Poland: J. Rachtan (Cracow CR); S. Góźdź, P. Macek (Kielce CR); J. Błaszczyk, M. Bębenek (Lower Silesia CR, Wroclaw); M. Bielska-Lasota* (National Institute of Public Health-National Institute of Hygiene, Warsaw); Portugal: G. Forjaz de Lacerda (Açores CR); M. J. Bento, L. Antunes (Northern Portugal CR); A. Miranda, A. Mayer-da-Silva (Southern Portugal CR); Slovakia: C. Safaei Diba (Slovakian National CR); Slovenia: V. Zadnik (Cancer Registry of Republic of Slovenia); M. Primic-Zakelj*; Spain: A. Lopez de Munain, L. Gil (Basque Country CR); J. M. Díaz García, A. I. Marcos-Navarro (Cuenca CR); R. Marcos-Gragera*, M. Puigdemont (Girona CR); M. J. Sanchez, D. Y. L. Chang (Granada CR, CIBERESP, ibs.Granada); M. D. Chirlaque (Murcia CR, CIBERESP, IMIB-Arrixaca); E. Ardanaz, M. Guevara (Navarra CR, CIBERESP, IdiSNA); J. Galceran, M. Carulla (Tarragona CR); Sweden: M. Lambe* (Regionalt cancercentrum and Karolinska Institutet); S. Khan (Swedish CR); Switzerland: K. Staehelin (Basel CR); C. Bouchardy, E. Fournier (Geneva CR); S. M. Mousavi, S. M. Ess (Grisons-Glarus CR); M. Lorez (NICER); M. Mousavi, C. Herrmann (St. Gallen CR); A. Bordoni, A. Spitale (Ticino CR); I. Konzelmann (Valais CR); The Netherlands: O. Visser, M. Aarts (The Netherlands CR); R. Otter*; UK-England: M. Coleman*, C. Allemani, B. Rachet (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine); J. Rashbass, J. Broggio (Public Health England); J. Verne*; UK-Northern Ireland: A. Gavin, D. Donnelly (Northern Ireland CR); UK-Scotland: D. Morrison, R. Black (Scottish CR); UK-Wales: D. W. Huws, R. Thomas (Welsh Cancer Intelligence and Surveillance Unit). (*EUROCARE Steering Committee).

Funding

This work was funded by the Compagnia di San Paolo, the Cariplo Foundation, the European Commission [grant number 20102202, European Action Against Cancer, EPAAC Joint Action], and the Italian Ministry of Health [Grant number 1529710, Ricerca Finalizzata 2009, RF-2009]. The funding sources had no role in study design, the collection, analysis or interpretation of data, the writing of the report, or the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

MBL and PM designed the study and drafted the report. MBL and MK defined morphology grouping and literature searching. PM and SR carried out statistical analysis and helped to write the manuscript. MBL, PM and AH revised critically the manuscript and contributed to data interpretation. All authors contributed to the writing of the paper. They reviewed and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela Minicozzi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committees of the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (Milan) and of the Italian National Institute of Health (Istituto Superiore di Sanità-Rome). Data sending was considered to imply ethics approval of participating cancer registries.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The members of EUROCARE-5 Working Group are listed in “Acknowledgements” section.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 275 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bielska-Lasota, M., Rossi, S., Krzyżak, M. et al. Reasons for low cervical cancer survival in new accession European Union countries: a EUROCARE-5 study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 301, 591–602 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05412-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05412-5

Keywords

Navigation