Abstract
Purpose
Middle ear surgery may benefit from robot-based assistance to hold micro-instruments or an endoscope. However, the surgical gesture performed by one hand may perturb surgeons accustomed to two-handed surgery. A robot-based holder may combine the benefits from endoscopic exposure and a two-handed technique. Furthermore, tremor suppression and accurate tool control might help the surgeon during critical surgical steps. The goal of this work was to study the safety of an otological robot-based assistant under clinical conditions in a limited series of patients.
Methods
The RobOtol system has been used as an endoscope or a micro instrument holder for this series. Eleven cases were operated on with the robot as an endoscope holder for chronic otitis. Twenty-one cases were operated on with the robot as a micro-instrument holder for otosclerosis (9 cases), transtympanic tube placement (2 cases), or cochlear implantation (10 cases).
Results
No complications related to the robot manipulation occurred during surgery nor in postoperative. In the chronic otitis group, all perforations were sealed and 3-month postoperative pure-tone average air–bone gap (PTA ABG) was 15 ± 2.6 dB. In the otosclerosis group, 1-month post-op PTA ABG was 10 ± 1 dB. For cochlear implantation cases, a scala tympani insertion, a vestibular scala translocation occurred and a full scala vestibuli insertion was observed in 7, 2 and 1 case, respectively.
Conclusion
The RobOtol system has reached the clinical stage. It could be used safely and with accurate control as an endoscope holder or a micro instrument holder in 32 cases
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Murbe D, Huttenbrink KB, Zahnert T et al (2001) Tremor in otosurgery: influence of physical strain on hand steadiness. Otol Neurotol 22:672–677
Vendrametto T, McAfee JS, Hirsch BE et al (2015) Robot assisted stapedotomy ex vivo with an active handheld instrument. IEEE pp 4879–4882
Entsfellner K, Schuermann J, Coy JA et al (2015) A modular micro-macro robot system for instrument guiding in middle ear surgery. IEEE pp 374–379
Yasin R, O’Connell BP, Yu H et al (2017) Steerable robot-assisted micromanipulation in the middle ear: preliminary feasibility evaluation. Otol Neurotol 38:290–295. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001288
Razavi CR, Wilkening PR, Yin R et al (2019) Applied force during piston prosthesis placement in a 3D-printed model: freehand vs robot-assisted techniques. Otolaryngol Neck Surg 160:320–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599818815144
Ayache S (2013) Cartilaginous myringoplasty: the endoscopic transcanal procedure. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270:853–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2056-x
Marchioni D, Villari D, Alicandri-Ciufelli M et al (2011) Endoscopic open technique in patients with middle ear cholesteatoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:1557–1563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1533-y
Doğan S, Bayraktar C (2017) Endoscopic tympanoplasty: learning curve for a surgeon already trained in microscopic tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274:1853–1858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4428-0
Ozturan O, Yenigun A, Aksoy F, Ertas B (2018) Proposal of a budget-friendly camera holder for endoscopic ear surgery. J Craniofac Surg 29(1):e47–e49. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004022
De Zinis LOR, Berlucchi M, Nassif N (2017) Double-handed endoscopic myringoplasty with a holding system in children: preliminary observations. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 96:127–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.03.017
Khan MM, Parab SR (2016) Novel concept of attaching endoscope holder to microscope for two handed endoscopic tympanoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 68:230–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-015-0916-6
Miroir M, Nguyen Y, Szewczyk J et al (2012) Design, kinematic optimization, and evaluation of a teleoperated system for middle ear microsurgery. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/907372
Nguyen Y, Bernardeschi D, Sterkers O (2018) Potential of robot-based surgery for otosclerosis surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 51:475–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2017.11.016
Nguyen Y, Miroir M, Kazmitcheff G et al (2012) From conception to application of a tele-operated assistance robot for middle ear surgery. Surg Innov 19:241–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350611426012
Kazmitcheff G, Miroir M, Nguyen Y et al (2011) Evaluation of command modes of an assistance robot for middle ear surgery. IEEE pp 2532–2538
Drouillard M, Torres R, Mamelle E et al (2017) Influence of electrode array stiffness and diameter on hearing in cochlear implanted guinea pig. PLoS ONE 12:e0183674. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183674
Torres R, Kazmitcheff G, De Seta D et al (2017) Improvement of the insertion axis for cochlear implantation with a robot-based system. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274:715–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4329-2
Cohen MS, Basonbul RA, Barber SR et al (2018) Development and validation of an endoscopic ear surgery classification system: endoscopic ear surgery classification system. Laryngoscope 128:967–970. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26802
Canu G, Lauretani F, Russo FY et al (2017) Early functional results using the nitibond prosthesis in stapes surgery. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 137:259–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2016.1247499
Dubovoy T, Shanks AM, Devine S, Kheterpal S (2017) Frequency of inadequate neuromuscular blockade during general anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 36:16–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.09.020
Wegner I, Kamalski DMA, Tange RA et al (2014) Laser versus conventional fenestration in stapedotomy for otosclerosis: a systematic review: laser vs. conventional stapedotomy. Laryngoscope 124:1687–1693. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24514
Lesinski SG (1990) Lasers for otosclerosis–which one if any and why. Lasers Surg Med 10:448–457
Kamalski DMA, Verdaasdonk RM, de Boorder T et al (2014) Comparison of KTP, Thulium, and CO2 laser in stapedotomy using specialized visualization techniques: thermal effects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271:1477–1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2624-8
Thomassin JM, Korchia D, Doris JM (1993) Endoscopic-guided otosurgery in the prevention of residual cholesteatomas. Laryngoscope 103:939–943. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-199308000-00021
Mitchell S, Coulson C (2017) Endoscopic ear surgery: a hot topic? J Laryngol Otol 131:117–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002221511600982
Acknowledgements
This work benefited from the technical support from Collin (Bagneux, France) and was supported by Pour l’Audition Foundation (Early Career Scientific Prize for YN).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
SM is an employee from Collin Orl Ltd. Other authors report no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All of the procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vittoria, S., Lahlou, G., Torres, R. et al. Robot-based assistance in middle ear surgery and cochlear implantation: first clinical report. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278, 77–85 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06070-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06070-z