Skip to main content
Log in

Interpretation of drug concentrations in an alternative matrix: the case of meprobamate in bile

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Investigating toxicological causes of death may require alternative matrices when the usual ones are lacking. Whereas forensic toxicology uses bile almost only for xenobiotic screening, a diagnostic test interpreting postmortem bile concentrations of meprobamate is reported. Based on 128 sets of autopsy data, its intrinsic qualities were good, with 0.95 sensitivity and 0.93 specificity. In a French forensic population, the positive and negative predictive factors were 0.90 and 0.97, respectively. It is a useful means of revealing overdoses where blood samples are not available or of confirming blood tests when postmortem redistribution is suspected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mangin P (2002) Autopsie médico-légale. Rev Prat 52:723–728

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pounder DJ, Jones GR (1990) Post-mortem drug redistribution—a toxicological nightmare. Forensic Sci Int 45:253–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. De Letter EA, Lambert WE, Bouche MP, Cordonnier JA, Van Bocxlaer JF, Piette MH (2007) Postmortem distribution of 3,4-methylenedioxy-N,N-dimethyl-amphetamine (MDDM or MDDA) in a fatal MDMA overdose. Int J Legal Med 121:303–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Flanagan RJ (1998) Guidelines for the interpretation of analytical toxicology results and unit of measurement conversion factors. Ann Clin Biochem 35(Pt 2):261–267

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. TIAFT reference blood level list of therapeutic and toxic substances (2005) Available from: http://www.tiaft.org/. Cited July 2007 (database on the Internet)

  6. Musshoff F, Padosch S, Steinborn S, Madea B (2004) Fatal blood and tissue concentrations of more than 200 drugs. Forensic Sci Int 142:161–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Agarwal A, Lemos N (1996) Significance of bile analysis in drug-induced deaths. J Anal Toxicol 20:61–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vanbinst R, Koenig J, Di Fazio V, Hassoun A (2002) Bile analysis of drugs in postmortem cases. Forensic Sci Int 128:35–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Winek CL, Esposito FM (1981) Comparative study of ethanol levels in blood versus bone marrow, vitreous humor, bile and urine. Forensic Sci Int 17:27–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kugelberg FC, Jones AW (2007) Interpreting results of ethanol analysis in postmortem specimens: a review of the literature. Forensic Sci Int 165:10–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kass K, Szlavik N, Klausz G, Rona K (2006) Epebol torteno etilalkohol meghatarozas jelentosege az igazsagugyi orvostani gyakorlatban (in Hungarian). Acta Pharm Hung 76:133–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bévalot F, Fanton L, Le Meur C, Malicier D (2005) Interpretation of biliary drug concentrations: case of cyamemazine, meprobamate and nordazepam. Proceeding of the 17Th Meeting of International Association of Forensic Sciences, Hong Kong, China p. 467

  13. Felby S (1970) Concentrations of meprobamate in the blood and liver following fatal meprobamate poisoning. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh) 28:334–337

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gaillard Y, Billault F, Pepin G (1997) Meprobamate overdosage: a continuing problem. Sensitive GC-MS quantitation after solid phase extraction in 19 fatal cases. Forensic Sci Int 86:173–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Osvath P, Fekete S (2003) A pszichofarmakonvalasztas jellemzoi ongyilkossagi kiserletekben (in Hungarian). Orv Hetil 144:121–124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fanton L, Bevalot F, Schoendorff P, Le Meur C, Gaillard Y, Malicier D (2007) Fatal mephenesin intoxication. J Forensic Sci 52:221–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Maurer HH (1992) Systematic toxicological analysis of drugs and their metabolites by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr 580:3–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fink H, Luppa P, Mayer B, Rosenbrock H, Metzger J, Martyn JA et al (2003) Systemic inflammation leads to resistance to atracurium without increasing membrane expression of acetylcholine receptors. Anesthesiology 98:82–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Peeters MY, Aarts LP, Boom FA, Bras LJ, Tibboel D, Danhof M et al (2008) Pilot study on the influence of liver blood flow and cardiac output on the clearance of propofol in critically ill patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 64:329–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Delco F, Tchambaz L, Schlienger R, Drewe J, Krahenbuhl S (2005) Dose adjustment in patients with liver disease. Drug Safety 28:529–545

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Angelin B, Arvidsson A, Dahlqvist R, Hedman A, Schenck-Gustafsson K (1987) Quinidine reduces biliary clearance of digoxin in man. Eur J Clin Invest 17:262–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shitara Y, Sato H, Sugiyama Y (2005) Evaluation of drug-drug interaction in the hepatobiliary and renal transport of drugs. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 45:689–723

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. De Letter EA, Clauwaert KM, Belpaire FM, Lambert WE, Van Bocxlaer JF, Piette MH (2002) Post-mortem redistribution of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, “ecstasy”) in the rabbit. Part I: experimental approach after in vivo intravenous infusion. Int J Legal Med 116:216–224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maes R, Hodnett N, Landesman H, Kananen G, Finkle B, Sunshine I (1969) The gas chromatographic determination of selected sedatives (ethchlorvynol, paraldehyde, meprobamate, and Carisoprodol) in biological material. J Forensic Sci 14:235–254

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kintz P, Tracqui A, Mangin P, Lugnier AA (1988) Fatal meprobamate self-poisoning. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 9:139–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoizey G, Canas F, Binet L, Bernard MH, Lamiable D (2007) Concentrations tissulaires post-mortem du méprobamate. Proceedings of the XVth meeting of the French Society of Analytical Toxicology (SFTA), Paris p. 72

  27. Hoiseth G, Bramness JG, Christophersen AS, Morland J (2007) Carisoprodol intoxications: a retrospective study of forensic autopsy material from 1992–2003. Int J Legal Med 121:403–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Fanton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fanton, L., Bevalot, F., Gustin, M.P. et al. Interpretation of drug concentrations in an alternative matrix: the case of meprobamate in bile. Int J Legal Med 123, 97–102 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0259-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0259-x

Keywords

Navigation