Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of the visual system in Friedreich ataxia

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To use optical coherence tomography (OCT) and contrast letter acuity to characterize vision loss in Friedreich ataxia (FRDA). High- and low-contrast letter acuity and neurological measures were assessed in 507 patients with FRDA. In addition, OCT was performed on 63 FRDA patients to evaluate retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular thickness. Both OCT and acuity measures were analyzed in relation to genetic severity, neurologic function, and other disease features. High- and low-contrast letter acuity was significantly predicted by age and GAA repeat length, and highly correlated with neurological outcomes. When tested by OCT, 52.7 % of eyes (n = 110) had RNFL thickness values below the fifth percentile for age-matched controls. RNFL thickness was significantly lowest for those with worse scores on the Friedreich ataxia rating scale (FARS), worse performance measure composite Z 2 scores, and lower scores for high- and low-contrast acuity. In linear regression analysis, GAA repeat length and age independently predicted RNFL thickness. In a subcohort of participants, 21 % of eyes from adult subjects (n = 29 eyes) had macular thickness values below the first percentile for age-matched controls, suggesting that macular abnormalities can also be present in FRDA. Low-contrast acuity and RNFL thickness capture visual and neurologic function in FRDA, and reflect genetic severity and disease progression independently. This suggests that such measures are useful markers of neurologic progression in FRDA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lynch DR, Farmer JM, Balcer LJ, Wilson RB (2002) Friedreich ataxia: effects of genetic understanding on clinical evaluation and therapy. Arch Neurol 59:743–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schulz JB, Denmer T, Schols L et al (2000) Oxidative stress in patients with Friedreich ataxia. Neurology 55:1719–1721

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bidichandani SI, Ashizawa T, Patel PI (1997) Atypical Friedreich ataxia caused by compound heterozygosity for a novel missense mutation and the GAA triple-repeat expansion. Am J Hum Genet 60:1251–1256

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cossee M, Durr A, Schmitt M et al (1999) Friedreich’s ataxia: point mutations and clinical presentation of compound heterozygotes. Ann Neurol 45:200–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Monros E, Molto MD, Martinez F et al (1997) Phenotype correlation and intergenerational dynamics of the Friedreich ataxia GAA trinucleotide repeat. Am J Hum Genet 61:101–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Babady NE, Carelle N, Wells RD et al (2007) Advancements in the pathophysiology of Friedreich’s ataxia and new prospects for treatments. Molec Genet Metabolism 92:23–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper JM, Schapira AH (2003) Friedreich’s ataxia: disease mechanisms, antioxidant and coenzyme Q10 therapy. BioFactors 18:163–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harding AE (1981) Friedreich’s ataxia: a clinical and genetic study of 90 families with an analysis of early diagnostic criteria and intrafamilial clustering of clinical features. Brain 104:589–620

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pandolfo M (1999) Molecular pathogenesis of Friedreich ataxia. Arch Neurol 56:1201–1208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fahey MC, Cremer PD, Aw ST et al (2008) Vestibular, saccadic and fixation abnormalities in genetically confirmed Friedreich ataxia. Brain 131:1035–1045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fortuna F, Barboni P, Liguori R et al (2009) Visual system involvement in patients with Friedreich’s ataxia. Brain 132(part 1):116–123

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Newman NJ, Biousse V (2004) Hereditary optic neuropathies. Eye 18:1144–1160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Carelli V, Ross-Cisneros FN, Sadun AA (2002) Optic nerve degeneration and mitochondrial dysfunction: genetic and acquired optic neuropathies. Neurochem Int 40:573–584

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Teesalu P, Tuulonen A, Airaksinen PJ (2000) Optical coherence tomography and localized defects of the retinal nerve fiber layer. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 78:49–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Syc SB, Warner CV, Hiremath GS et al (2010) Reproducibility of high-resolution optical coherence tomography in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 0:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fisher JB, Jacobs DA, Markowitz CE et al (2006) Relation of visual function to retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in multiple sclerosis. Ophthalmology 113(2):324–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cettomai D, Pulicken M, Gordon-Lipkin E et al (2008) Reproducibility of optical coherence tomography in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 65:1218–1222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanamori A, Nakamura M, Escano MF et al (2003) Evaluation of the glaucomatous damage on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 135:513–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Talman LS, Bisker ER, Sackel DJ et al (2010) Longitudinal study of vision and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 67:749–760

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Trip SA, Schlottmann PG, Jones SJ et al (2005) Retinal nerve fiber layer axonal loss and visual dysfunction in optic neuritis. Ann Neurol 58(3):383–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Costello F, Coupland S, Hodge W et al (2006) Quantifying axonal loss after optic neuritis with optical coherence tomography. Ann Neurol 59(6):963–969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lynch DR, Farmer JM, Tsou AY et al (2006) Measuring Friedreich ataxia: complementary features of examination performance measures. Neurology 66:1711–1716

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Subramony SH, May W, Lynch D et al (2005) Cooperative ataxia group. measuring Friedreich ataxia: interrater reliability of a neurologic rating scale. Neurology 64:1261–1262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Friedman LS, Farmer JM, Perlman S et al (2010) Measuring the rate of progression in Friedreich ataxia: implications for clinical trial design. Mov Disord 25:426–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Deutsch EC, Santani AB, Perlman SL et al (2010) A rapid, non-invasive immunoassay for frataxin: utility in assessment of Friedreich ataxia. Mol. Gen. Metab. 101:238–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS et al (1985) Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 28(7):412–419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lynch DR, Farmer JM, Rochestie D, Balcer LJ (2002) Contrast letter acuity as a measure of visual dysfunction in patients with Friedreich ataxia. J Neuroophthalmol 22:270–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ratchford JN, Quigg ME, Conger A et al (2009) Optical coherence tomography helps differentiate neuromyelitis optica and MS optic neuropathies. Neurology 73:302–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. McCormack ML, Guttmann RP, Schumann M et al (2000) Frataxin point mutations in two patients with Friedreich’s ataxia and unusual clinical features. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 68:661–664

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pinto F, Amantini A, deScisciolo G et al (1988) Visual involvement in Friedreich’s ataxia: pERG and VEP study. Eur Neurol 28(5):246–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by grants awarded by the Friedreich Ataxia Research Alliance (FARA), the Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA), and the National Eye Institute (NEI).

Conflicts of interest

This study was sponsored by the Friedreich Ataxia Research Alliance (FARA), the Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA), and the National Eye Institute (NEI). Ms. Seyer, Ms. Galetta, Mr. Wilson, Ms. Sakai, Dr. Gomez, Dr. Ashizawa, and Dr. Bushara report no disclosures. Dr. Perlman obtains salary support from clinical billing of insurance companies for treatment patients and from several research grants- FARA/MDA subcontract grant for Clinical Outcome Measures in FA; National Ataxia Foundation (NAF); Huntingtons Disease Society of America; and the CHDI Foundation, Inc. Dr. Mathews receives research support from PTC Therapeutics as a clinical trial site. She receives research support from the CDC, the NIH, Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy (PPMD), and FARA. Dr. Wilmot receives a consultant fee from Santhera Pharmaceuticals for serving on the Data Safety Monitoring Board for trials involving the drug idebenone. He also receives grant funding from FARA. Dr. Ravina is currently employed at Biogen-Idec. Dr. Zesiewicz is supported by grants from FARA, the NAF, Pfizer, Baxter, and the Bobby Allison Ataxia Research Center. She receives funds for speaking engagements by TEVA Pharmaceuticals and GE Healthcare. Dr. Subramony is a member of the Speaker’s Bureau for Athena Diagnostics and receives honoraria for such speaking engagements. He receives research support from the NAF. Dr. Delatycki receives support from the National Health and Medical Research Council in Australia, and FARA. He has a Healthscope Pathology consultancy. Ms. Brocht receives FARA salary support. Dr. Balcer is supported by grants from the NEI, National Multiple Sclerosis Society, NIH, NINDS, DAD’s Foundation, and FARA. She also holds consultancies at Biogen-Idec, Vaccinex, and Accorda. Dr. Lynch is supported by grants from the NIH, MDA/FARA (Clinical research network in Friedreich ataxia), the Trisomy 21 program of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Penwest Pharmaceuticals, and Edison Pharmaceuticals. He is a FARA board member and holds consultancies at Apopharma and Athena Diagnostics. He also holds an NMDA receptor encephalitis patent.

Ethical standard

All protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and other sites. Informed consent was obtained before participation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren A. Seyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seyer, L.A., Galetta, K., Wilson, J. et al. Analysis of the visual system in Friedreich ataxia. J Neurol 260, 2362–2369 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-6978-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-6978-z

Keywords

Navigation