Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The clinical profile of NMOSD in Australia and New Zealand

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are an inflammation of the central nervous system associated with autoantibodies to aquaporin-4. We have undertaken a clinic-based survey of NMOSD in the Australia and New Zealand populations with the aim of characterising the clinical features and establishing the value of recently revised diagnostic criteria. Cases of possible NMOSD and age and sex-matched controls with multiple sclerosis (MS) were referred from centres across Australia and New Zealand. Cases were classified as NMOSD if they met the 2015 IPND criteria and remained as suspected NMOSD if they did not. Clinical and paraclinical data were compared across the three groups. NMOSD was confirmed in 75 cases and 89 had suspected NMOSD. There were 101 controls with MS. Age at onset, relapse rates and EDSS scores were significantly higher in NMOSD than in MS. Lesions and symptoms referable to the optic nerve were more common in NMOSD whereas brainstem, cerebellar and cerebral lesions were more common in MS. Longitudinally extensive spinal cord lesions were seen in 48/71 (68%) of cases with NMOSD. Elevations of CSF, white cell count and protein were more common in NMOSD. We have confirmed a clinical pattern of NMOSD that has been seen in several geographical regions. We have demonstrated the clinical utility of the current diagnostic criteria. Distinct patterns of disease are evident in NMOSD and MS, but there remains a large number of patients with NMOSD-like features who do not meet the current diagnostic criteria for NMOSD and remain a diagnostic challenge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF (2016) Neuromyelitis optica and the evolving spectrum of autoimmune aquaporin-4 channelopathies: a decade later. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1366(1):20–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Trebst C, Jarius S, Berthele A, Paul F, Schippling S, Wildemann B, Borisow N, Kleiter I, Aktas O, Kumpfel T, Neuromyelitis Optica Study G (2014) Update on the diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica: recommendations of the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS). J Neurol 261(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-7169-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Palace J, Leite MI, Nairne A, Vincent A (2010) Interferon beta treatment in neuromyelitis optica: increase in relapses and aquaporin 4 antibody titers. Arch Neurol 67(8):1016–1017. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2010.188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacob A, Hutchinson M, Elsone L, Kelly S, Ali R, Saukans I, Tubridy N, Boggild M (2012) Does natalizumab therapy worsen neuromyelitis optica? Neurology 79(10):1065–1066. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826845fe

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kira J, Itoyama Y, Kikuchi S, Hao Q, Kurosawa T, Nagato K, Tsumiyama I, von Rosenstiel P, Zhang-Auberson L, Saida T (2014) Fingolimod (FTY720) therapy in Japanese patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis over 12 months: results of a phase 2 observational extension. BMC Neurol 14:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-14-21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kowarik MC, Hoshi M, Hemmer B, Berthele A (2016) Failure of alemtuzumab as a rescue in a NMOSD patient treated with rituximab. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 3(2):e208. https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000208

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang W, Wang L, Zhang B, Zhou L, Zhang T, Quan C (2019) Effectiveness and tolerability of immunosuppressants and monoclonal antibodies in preventive treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 35:246–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2019.08.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cree BAC, Bennett JL, Kim HJ, Weinshenker BG, Pittock SJ, Wingerchuk DM, Fujihara K, Paul F, Cutter GR, Marignier R, Green AJ, Aktas O, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, Drappa J, Barron G, Madani S, Ratchford JN, She D, Cimbora D, Katz E, Investigators NMs (2019) Inebilizumab for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (N-MOmentum): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31817-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Araki M, Matsuoka T, Miyamoto K, Kusunoki S, Okamoto T, Murata M, Miyake S, Aranami T, Yamamura T (2014) Efficacy of the anti-IL-6 receptor antibody tocilizumab in neuromyelitis optica: a pilot study. Neurology 82(15):1302–1306. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Pittock SJ, Berthele A, Fujihara K, Kim HJ, Levy M, Palace J, Nakashima I, Terzi M, Totolyan N, Viswanathan S, Wang KC, Pace A, Fujita KP, Armstrong R, Wingerchuk DM (2019) Eculizumab in aquaporin-4-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. N Engl J Med 381(7):614–625. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1900866

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wingerchuk DM, Banwell B, Bennett JL, Cabre P, Carroll W, Chitnis T, de Seze J, Fujihara K, Greenberg B, Jacob A, Jarius S, Lana-Peixoto M, Levy M, Simon JH, Tenembaum S, Traboulsee AL, Waters P, Wellik KE, Weinshenker BG, International Panel for NMOD (2015) International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology 85(2):177–189. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001729

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Weinshenker BG (2006) Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 66(10):1485–1489. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000216139.44259.74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, Fujihara K, Havrdova E, Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Lublin FD, Montalban X, O'Connor P, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Thompson AJ, Waubant E, Weinshenker B, Wolinsky JS (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69(2):292–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22366

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Prain K, Woodhall M, Vincent A, Ramanathan S, Barnett MH, Bundell CS, Parratt JDE, Silvestrini RA, Bukhari W, Australian T, New Zealand NMO, Collaboration BF, Waters P, Broadley SA (2019) AQP4 antibody assay sensitivity comparison in the era of the 2015 diagnostic criteria for NMOSD. Front Neurol 10:1028

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wingerchuk DM, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Lennon VA, Weinshenker BG (2007) A secondary progressive clinical course is uncommon in neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 68(8):603–605. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000254502.87233.9a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Paty DW, Oger JJ, Kastrukoff LF, Hashimoto SA, Hooge JP, Eisen AA, Eisen KA, Purves SJ, Low MD, Brandejs V (1988) MRI in the diagnosis of MS: a prospective study with comparison of clinical evaluation, evoked potentials, oligoclonal banding, and CT. Neurology 38(2):180–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang CS, Zhang DQ, Wang JH, Jin WN, Li MS, Liu J, Zhang CJ, Li T, Shi FD, Yang L (2014) Clinical features and sera anti-aquaporin 4 antibody positivity in patients with demyelinating disorders of the central nervous system from Tianjin, China. CNS Neurosci Ther 20(1):32–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.12156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Srikajon J, Siritho S, Ngamsombat C, Prayoonwiwat N, Chirapapaisan N, Siriraj Neuroimmunology Research G (2018) Differences in clinical features between optic neuritis in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 4(3):2055217318791196. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055217318791196

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Pittock SJ, Lennon VA, de Seze J, Vermersch P, Homburger HA, Wingerchuk DM, Lucchinetti CF, Zephir H, Moder K, Weinshenker BG (2008) Neuromyelitis optica and non organ-specific autoimmunity. Arch Neurol 65(1):78–83. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2007.17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jarius S, Jacobi C, de Seze J, Zephir H, Paul F, Franciotta D, Rommer P, Mader S, Kleiter I, Reindl M, Akman-Demir G, Seifert-Held T, Kristoferitsch W, Melms A, Wandinger KP, Wildemann B (2011) Frequency and syndrome specificity of antibodies to aquaporin-4 in neurological patients with rheumatic disorders. Mult Scler 17(9):1067–1073. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458511403958

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shahmohammadi S, Doosti R, Shahmohammadi A, Mohammadianinejad SE, Sahraian MA, Azimi AR, Harirchian MH, Asgari N, Naser Moghadasi A (2019) Autoimmune diseases associated with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: a literature review. Mult Scler Relat Disord 27:350–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2018.11.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bukhari W, Prain KM, Waters P, Woodhall M, O'Gorman CM, Clarke L, Silvestrini RA, Bundell CS, Abernethy D, Bhuta S, Blum S, Boggild M, Boundy K, Brew BJ, Brown M, Brownlee WJ, Butzkueven H, Carroll WM, Chen C, Coulthard A, Dale RC, Das C, Dear K, Fabis-Pedrini MJ, Fulcher D, Gillis D, Hawke S, Heard R, Henderson APD, Heshmat S, Hodgkinson S, Jimenez-Sanchez S, Killpatrick T, King J, Kneebone C, Kornberg AJ, Lechner-Scott J, Lin MW, Lynch C, Macdonell R, Mason DF, McCombe PA, Pender MP, Pereira JA, Pollard JD, Reddel SW, Shaw C, Spies J, Stankovich J, Sutton I, Vucic S, Walsh M, Wong RC, Yiu EM, Barnett MH, Kermode AG, Marriott MP, Parratt JDE, Slee M, Taylor BV, Willoughby E, Wilson RJ, Vincent A, Broadley SA (2017) Incidence and prevalence of NMOSD in Australia and New Zealand. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2016-314839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Adoni T, Lino AM, da Gama PD, Apostolos-Pereira SL, Marchiori PE, Kok F, Callegaro D (2010) Recurrent neuromyelitis optica in Brazilian patients: clinical, immunological, and neuroimaging characteristics. Mult Scler 16(1):81–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458509353651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Eskandarieh S, Nedjat S, Azimi AR, Moghadasi AN, Sahraian MA (2017) Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders in Iran. Mult Scler Relat Disord 18:209–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2017.10.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Houzen H, Kondo K, Niino M, Horiuchi K, Takahashi T, Nakashima I, Tanaka K (2017) Prevalence and clinical features of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders in northern Japan. Neurology 89(19):1995–2001. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hyun JW, Jeong IH, Joung A, Kim SH, Kim HJ (2016) Evaluation of the 2015 diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Neurology 86(19):1772–1779. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pandit L, Kundapur R (2014) Prevalence and patterns of demyelinating central nervous system disorders in urban Mangalore, South India. Mult Scler 20(12):1651–1653. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458514521503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jacob A, Panicker J, Lythgoe D, Elsone L, Mutch K, Wilson M, Das K, Boggild M (2013) The epidemiology of neuromyelitis optica amongst adults in the Merseyside county of United Kingdom. J Neurol 260(8):2134–2137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-6926-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen H, Liu SM, Zhang XX, Liu YO, Li SZ, Liu Z, Dong HQ (2016) Clinical features of patients with multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Chin Med J (Engl) 129(17):2079–2084. https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.189046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jurynczyk M, Craner M, Palace J (2015) Overlapping CNS inflammatory diseases: differentiating features of NMO and MS. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 86(1):20–25. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2014-308984

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jarius S, Ruprecht K, Wildemann B, Kuempfel T, Ringelstein M, Geis C, Kleiter I, Kleinschnitz C, Berthele A, Brettschneider J, Hellwig K, Hemmer B, Linker RA, Lauda F, Mayer CA, Tumani H, Melms A, Trebst C, Stangel M, Marziniak M, Hoffmann F, Schippling S, Faiss JH, Neuhaus O, Ettrich B, Zentner C, Guthke K, Hofstadt-van Oy U, Reuss R, Pellkofer H, Ziemann U, Kern P, Wandinger KP, Bergh FT, Boettcher T, Langel S, Liebetrau M, Rommer PS, Niehaus S, Munch C, Winkelmann A, Zettl UU, Metz I, Veauthier C, Sieb JP, Wilke C, Hartung HP, Aktas O, Paul F (2012) Contrasting disease patterns in seropositive and seronegative neuromyelitis optica: a multicentre study of 175 patients. J Neuroinflamm 9:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-9-14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Shosha E, Dubey D, Palace J, Nakashima I, Jacob A, Fujihara K, Takahashi T, Whittam D, Leite MI, Misu T, Yoshiki T, Messina S, Elsone L, Majed M, Flanagan E, Gadoth A, Huebert C, Sagen J, Greenberg BM, Levy M, Banerjee A, Weinshenker B, Pittock SJ (2018) Area postrema syndrome: Frequency, criteria, and severity in AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD. Neurology 91(17):e1642–e1651. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006392

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding for this project was provided by Multiple Sclerosis Research Australia (Project Grant 11-038), Brain Foundation, Griffith Univerrsity/Gold Coast Hospital Foundation, Contributing to Australian Scholarship and Science, and NHS National Specialised Commissioning Group for NMO, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research centre.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DA, MHB, SBh, SBl, MBo, KB, BJB, SAB, MBr, WBr, HB, WMC, CC, AC, RCD, CD, KD, DG, SHa, RH, APDH, SHo, AGK, TJK, JK, CK, JL-S, CL, RALM, MPMa, DFM, PAMcC, CO’G, JPa, JPe, JDP, KMP, SWR, CS, MS, JSp, JSt, IS, BVT, AV, SV, MWa, PW, EW, RJW and RCW conceived and designed the study. SA, SAB, WBu, CSB, LC, KD, MJF-P, DG, SHe, SJ-S, M-WL, KMP, RS, JSt, BVT, PW, RJW, MWo and EMY conducted the analyses. WBu and LC prepared the initial draft and SA, MHB, BJB, FB, SAB, WMC, RCD, KD, MJF-P, DF, APDH, SHo, AJK, JL-S, M-WL, MPMa, PAMcC, MPMe, KMP, SR, RS, MS, BVT, AV, SV, MWa, PW, EW, RJW, RCW, MWo and EMY contributed to revisions. All authors approved the final draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon A. Broadley.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

MHB has received honoraria for participation in advisory boards and travel sponsorship from Novartis, BioCSL, Genzyme and Biogen Idec. MBo has received travel sponsorship and honoraria from Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, Novartis, Biogen Idec and Roche. BJB has received honoraria as a board member for GlaxoSmithKline, Biogen Idec, ViiV Healthcare and Merck Serono, has received speaker honoraria from ViiV Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbott, Abbvie, and Biogen Idec; has received travel sponsorship from Abbott and Viiv Healthcare, and has received research support funding from EI Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, ViiV Healthcare and Merck Serono. SAB has received honoraria for attendance at advisory boards and travel sponsorship from Bayer-Scherring, Biogen-Idec, Merck-Serono, Novartis, and Sanofi-Genzyme, has received speakers honoraria from Biogen-Idec and Genzyme, is an investigator in clinical trials sponsored by Biogen Idec, Novartis and Genzyme, and was the recipient of an unencumbered research grant from Biogen-Idec. HB has received honoraria for serving on scientific advisory boards for Biogen Idec, Novartis and Sanofi-Genzyme, has received conference travel sponsorship from Novartis and Biogen Idec, has received honoraria for speaking and acting as Chair at educational events organised by Novartis, Biogen Idec, Medscape and Merck Serono, serves on steering committees for trials conducted by Biogen Idec and Novartis, is chair (honorary) of the MSBase Foundation, which has received research support from Merck Serono, Novartis, Biogen Idec, Genzyme Sanofi and CSL Biopharma and has received research support form Merck Serono. WMC has been the recipient of travel sponsorship from, and provided advice to, Bayer Schering Pharma, Biogen-Idec, Novartis, Genzyme, Sanofi-Aventis, BioCSL and Merck-Serono. RCD has received research funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council, MS Research Australia, Star Scientific Foundation, Pfizer Neuroscience, Tourette Syndrome Association, University of Sydney, and the Petre Foundation and has received honoraria from Biogen-Idec and Bristol-Myers Squibb as an invited speaker MjF-P has received travel sponsorship from Biogen Australia and New Zealand. RH has received honoraria, educational support and clinic funding from Novartis, Biogen Idec, Genzyme and BioCSL. AGK has received scientific consulting fees and/or lecture honoraria from Bayer, BioCSL, Biogen-Idec, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, and Teva. TJK has received travel sponsorship from Novartis, BioCSL, Novartis, Merck Serono and Biogen Idec, has received speaker honoraria from Biogen Idec, BioCSL, Merck Serono, Teva, Genzyme and Novartis, has received research support from Biogen Idec, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Bayer-Schering and Merck Serono, and has received scientific consulting fees from GlaxoSmithKline China, Biogen-Idec and Novartis. JK has received remuneration for advisory board activities and presentations from Bayer Healthcare, Biogen Idec, BioCSL, Genzyme and Novartis. CK has received travel support, honoraria and advisory board payments from Biogen Idec, Bayer, Genzyme, Novartis and Serono. JL-S has received unencumbered funding as well as honoraria for presentations and membership on advisory boards from Sanofi Aventis, Biogen Idec, Bayer Health Care, CSL, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis Australia and Teva. RALM has received honoraria for attendance at advisory boards and travel sponsorship from Bayer, Biogen, CSL, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Celgene, Teva and Genzyme. MPMa has received travel sponsorship, honoraria, trial payments, research and clinical support from Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, BioCSL, Genzyme, Novartis and Sanofi Aventis Genzyme. DFM has received honoraria for attendance at advisory boards from Biogen-Idec and Novartis, and travel sponsorship from Bayer-Scherring, Biogen-Idec, and Sanofi-Genzyme. PAMcC has received honoraria or travel sponsorship from Novatis, Sanofi-Aventis and Biogen Idec. JAP has received travel sponsorship, honoraria for presentations and membership on advisory boards from Biogen Idec and Novartis and Sanofi Aventis. JDP has received honoraria for seminars or advisory boards from Teva, Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Merck, Bayer and research grants or fellowships from Merck, Novartis, Bayer, Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva SWR has received travel sponsorship, honoraria, trial payments, research and clinical support from Aspreva, Baxter, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, BioCSL, Genzyme, Novartis, Sanofi Aventis Genzyme and Servier, and is a director of Medical Safety Systems Pty Ltd. CPS has received travel sponsorship from Biogen Idec, Novartis and Bayer-Schering. IS has received remuneration for Advisory Board activities from Biogen, CSL, and Bayer Schering and educational activities with Biogen, CSL and travel sponsorship from Biogen, Novartis and Bayer Schering. MS has received research support from Novartis, Biogen Idec and BioCSL. JSp has received honoraria for lectures and participation in advisory boards, and travel sponsorship from Novartis, BioCSL, Genzyme and Biogen Idec. BVT has received travel sponsorship from Novartis and Bayer Schering. AV and the University of Oxford hold patents and receive royalties for antibody testing. PW and the University of Oxford hold patents for antibody assays and have received royalties, has received speaker honoraria from Biogen Idec and Euroimmun AG, and travel grants from the Guthy-Jackson Charitable Foundation. EW has received honoraria for participation in advisory boards from Biogen-Idec and Novartis, travel sponsorship from Biogen-Idec, Bayer-Schering and Teva and is an investigator in clinical trials funded by Biogen-Idec and Teva. DA, SBh, SBl, KB, MBr, WBr, WBu, CSB, CCM, LC, AC, CD, KD, DF, DG, SHa, APDH, SHe, SHo, SJ-S, AJK, M-WL, CL, CO’G, MPM, CS, RS, JSt, AV, SV, MWa, RJW, RCW, MWo and EMY report no disclosures.

Ethical standard

Human Research Ethics Commitee approval was sought and obtained for all 23 clinical site and the 5 laboratories involved in this research.

Informed consent

All participants provided written, informed consent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bukhari, W., Clarke, L., O’Gorman, C. et al. The clinical profile of NMOSD in Australia and New Zealand. J Neurol 267, 1431–1443 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-09716-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-09716-4

Keywords

Navigation