Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Eye rubbing in the aetiology of keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Keratoconus is a potentially blinding condition that slowly deforms the cornea in young people. Despite the increasing prevalence of keratoconus, the exact aetiology of the condition is unknown. This first systematic review examines the evidence of eye rubbing and its association with keratoconus and presents the findings of the meta-analysis.

Methods

Two independent reviewers searched the electronic databases for all potential articles published from 1st of January 1900 to 31st of July 2020 on eye rubbing and keratoconus. The researchers assessed the methodological quality of the studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies. The assessment for statistical heterogeneity was estimated using chi-square and I-square (I2) tests. A p value of < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant and I2 < 30% as homogenous. Begg funnel plot was used to interpret the asymmetry or small study effects.

Results

Eight case-control studies were included in this systematic review. Two studies assessed eye rubbing without odds ratios and thus were excluded. The pooled odds ratios for the six remaining studies included in the meta-analysis was 6.46 (95% CI 4.12–10.1). The study results were heterogenous (I2 = 71.69 [95% CI 35.14–87.88]). All the studies scored moderate quality methodology on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Begg funnel plot showed asymmetry supporting heterogeneity.

Conclusion

Eye rubbing showed consistent association with keratoconus. However, the current evidence is limited to only a small number of case-control studies which present as heterogeneous and of sub-optimal methodological quality. Additionally, the cause-effect temporal relationship cannot be determined. Further studies are needed to address this intricate relationship of eye rubbing and its induction, ongoing progression, and severity of keratoconus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krachmer JH, Feder RS, Belin MW (1984) Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. Surv Ophthalmol 28(4):293–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6257(84)90094-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lema I, Duran JA (2005) Inflammatory molecules in the tears of patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmology 112(4):654–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kenney MC, Chwa M, Opbroek AJ, Brown DJ (1994) Increased gelatinolytic activity in keratoconus keratocyte cultures. A correlation to an altered matrix metalloproteinase-2/tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase ratio. Cornea 13(2):114–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Galvis V, Sherwin T, Tello A, Merayo J, Barrera R, Acera A (2015) Keratoconus: an inflammatory disorder? Eye 29(7):843–859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Shetty R, Ghosh A, Lim RR, Subramani M, Mihir K, Reshma AR, Ranganath A, Nagaraj S, Nuijts RM, Beuerman R, Shetty R, Das D, Chaurasia SS, Sinha-Roy A, Ghosh A (2015) Elevated expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and inflammatory cytokines in keratoconus patients is inhibited by cyclosporine A. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56(2):738–750. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-14831

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Y, Rabinowitz YS, Rotter JI, Yang H (2000) Genetic epidemiological study of keratoconus: evidence for major gene determination. Am J Med Genet 93(5):403–409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tuft SJ, Hassan H, George S, Frazer DG, Willoughby CE, Liskova P (2012) Keratoconus in 18 pairs of twins. Acta Ophthalmol 90(6):1755–3768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Davidson AE, Hayes S, Hardcastle AJ, Tuft SJ (2014) The pathogenesis of keratoconus. Eye 28(2):189–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McComish BJ, Sahebjada S, Bykhovskaya Y, Willoughby CE, Richardson AJ, Tenen A, Charlesworth JC, MacGregor S, Mitchell P, Lucas SEM, Mills RA, Mackey DA, Li X, Wang JJ, Jensen RA, Rotter JI, Taylor KD, Hewitt AW, Rabinowitz YS, Baird PN, Craig JE, Burdon KP (2019) Association of genetic variation with keratoconus. JAMA Ophthalmol 138(2):174–181. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.5293

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. McMahon TT, Kim LS, Fishman GA, Stone EM, Zhao XC, Yee RW, Malicki J (2009) CRB1 gene mutations are associated with keratoconus in patients with leber congenital amaurosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50(7):3185–3187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Woodward MA, Blachley TS, Stein JD (2015) The association between sociodemographic factors, common systemic diseases, and keratoconus: an analysis of a nationwide heath care claims database. Ophthalmology 16(15):01257–01259

    Google Scholar 

  12. Robertson I (1975) Keratoconus and the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a new aspect of keratoconus. Med J Aust 1(18):571–573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gordon-Shaag A, Millodot M, Shneor E (2012) The epidemiology and aetiology of keratoconus. Int J Keratoconus Ectatic Corneal Dis 1(1):7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee HK, Jung EH, Cho BJ (2020) Epidemiological association between systemic diseases and keratoconus in a Korean population: a 10-year nationwide cohort study. Cornea 39(3):348–353. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000002206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gomes JA, Tan D, Rapuano CJ, Belin MW, Ambrósio R, Guell JL (2015) Global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic disease. Cornea 34. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000000501

  16. Rockville R (2011) Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). In: Health Risk Appraisal. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK254040/. Accessed on 16th August 2019

  17. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315(7109):629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M (2000) Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epidemiol 53(11):1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00242-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mostovoy D, Vinker S, Mimouni M, Goldich Y, Levartovsky S, Kaiserman I (2018) The association of keratoconus with blepharitis. Clin Exp Optom 101(3):339–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gordon-Shaag A, Millodot M, Essa M, Garth J, Ghara M, Shneor E (2013) Is consanguinity a risk factor for keratoconus? Optom Vis Sci 90(5):448–454. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e31828da95c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gordon-Shaag A, Millodot M, Kaiserman I, Sela T, Barnett Itzhaki G, Zerbib Y, Matityahu E, Shkedi S, Miroshnichenko S, Shneor E (2015) Risk factors for keratoconus in Israel: a case-control study. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 35(6):673–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Naderan M, Shoar S, Rezagholizadeh F, Zolfaghari M, Naderan M (2015) Characteristics and associations of keratoconus patients. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 38(3):199–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McMonnies CW, Boneham GC (2003) Keratoconus, allergy, itch, eye-rubbing and hand-dominance. Clin Exp Optom 86(6):376–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bawazeer AM, Hodge WG, Lorimer B (2000) Atopy and keratoconus: a multivariate analysis. Br J Ophthalmol 84(8):834–836. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.84.8.834

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Weed KH, MacEwen CJ, Giles T, Low J, McGhee CN (2008) The Dundee University Scottish Keratoconus study: demographics, corneal signs, associated diseases, and eye rubbing. Eye 22(4):534–541

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Moran S, Gomez L, Zuber K, Gatinel D (2020) A case-control study of keratoconus risk factors. Cornea 39(6):697–701. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000002283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McMonnies CW (2007) Abnormal rubbing and keratectasia. Eye Contact Lens 33(6 Pt 1):265–271. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0b013e31814fb64b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McMonnies CW (2009) Mechanisms of rubbing-related corneal trauma in keratoconus. Cornea 28(6):607–615. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e318198384f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. McMonnies CW (2015) Inflammation and keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci 92(2):e35–e41. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hafezi F, Hafezi NL, Pajic B, Gilardoni F, Randleman JB, Gomes JAP, Kollros L, Hillen M, Torres-Netto EA (2020) Assessment of the mechanical forces applied during eye rubbing. BMC Ophthalmol 20(1):301. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-020-01551-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Galvis V, Tello A, Carreño NI, Berrospi RD, Niño CA (2017) Risk factors for keratoconus: atopy and eye rubbing. Cornea 36(1):e1. https://doi.org/10.1097/ico.0000000000001052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. McMonnies CW (2016) Eye rubbing type and prevalence including contact lens ‘removal-relief’ rubbing. Clin Exp Optom 99(4):366–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Norouzpour A, Mehdizadeh A (2012) A novel insight into keratoconus: mechanical fatigue of the cornea. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol 1(1):14–17

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Najmi H, Mobarki Y, Mania K, Altowairqi B, Basehi M, Mahfouz MS, Elmahdy M (2019) The correlation between keratoconus and eye rubbing: a review. Int J Ophthalmol 12(11):1775–1781. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2019.11.17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Balasubramanian SA, Pye DC, Willcox MD (2013) Effects of eye rubbing on the levels of protease, protease activity and cytokines in tears: relevance in keratoconus. Clin Exp Optom 96(2):214–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ionescu IC, Corbu CG, Tanase C, Ionita G, Nicula C, Coviltir V, Potop V, Constantin M, Codrici E, Mihai S, Popescu ID, Enciu AM, Dascalescu D, Burcel M, Ciuluvica R, Voinea LM (2018) Overexpression of tear inflammatory cytokines as additional finding in keratoconus patients and their first degree family members. Mediat Inflamm 2018:4285268. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4285268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Jun AS, Cope L, Speck C, Feng X, Lee S, Meng H, Hamad A, Chakravarti S (2011) Subnormal cytokine profile in the tear fluid of keratoconus patients. PLoS One 6(1):e16437. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Pahuja N, Kumar NR, Shroff R, Shetty R, Nuijts RM, Ghosh A, Sinha-Roy A, Chaurasia SS, Mohan RR (2016) Differential molecular expression of extracellular matrix and inflammatory genes at the corneal cone apex drives focal weakening in keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57(13):5372–5382. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-19677

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Korb DR, Finnemore VM, Herman JP (1982) Apical changes and scarring in keratoconus as related to contact lens fitting techniques. J Am Optom Assoc 53(3):199–205

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lema I, Durán JA, Ruiz C, Díez-Feijoo E, Acera A, Merayo J (2008) Inflammatory response to contact lenses in patients with keratoconus compared with myopic subjects. Cornea 27(7):758–763. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31816a3591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kolozsvári BL, Berta A, Petrovski G, Miháltz K, Gogolák P, Rajnavölgyi E, Hassan Z, Széles P, Fodor M (2013) Alterations of tear mediators in patients with keratoconus after corneal crosslinking associate with corneal changes. PLoS One 8(10):e76333. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Hashemi H, Heydarian S, Hooshmand E, Saatchi M, Yekta A, Aghamirsalim M, Valadkhan M, Mortazavi M, Hashemi A, Khabazkhoob M (2020) The prevalence and risk factors for keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cornea 39(2):263–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Yazdani N, Ostadimoghaddam H, Norouzirad R, Amanzadeh K, Miraftab M, Derakhshan A, Yekta A (2014) The prevalence of keratoconus in a young population in Mashhad, Iran. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 34(5):519–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Millodot M, Shneor E, Albou S, Atlani E, Gordon-Shaag A (2011) Prevalence and associated factors of keratoconus in Jerusalem: a cross-sectional study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 18(2):91–97. https://doi.org/10.3109/09286586.2011.560747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Shneor E, Millodot M, Gordon-Shaag A, Essa M, Anton M, Barbara R, Barbara A (2014) Prevalence of keratoconus among young Arab students in Israel. Int J Keratoconus Ectatic Corneal Dis 3(1):9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) project Ideas grant APP1187763 and Senior Research Fellowship (1138585 to PB), the Angior Family Foundation (SS), Keratoconus Australia (SS), Perpetual Impact Philanthropy grant (SS), Lions Eye Foundation Fellowship (SS), and CERA Hector MacLean Scholarship (SM). The Centre for Eye Research Australia (CERA) receives Operational Infrastructure Support from the Victorian Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Srujana Sahebjada.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All the authors consent for publication.

Declarations

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sahebjada, S., Al-Mahrouqi, H.H., Moshegov, S. et al. Eye rubbing in the aetiology of keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 259, 2057–2067 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05081-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05081-8

Keywords

Navigation