Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Study of the validity of a job–exposure matrix for the job strain model factors: an update and a study of changes over time

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The objectives of the study were to construct a job–exposure matrix (JEM) for psychosocial work factors of the job strain model, to evaluate its validity, and to compare the results over time.

Methods

The study was based on national representative data of the French working population with samples of 46,962 employees (2010 SUMER survey) and 24,486 employees (2003 SUMER survey). Psychosocial work factors included the job strain model factors (Job Content Questionnaire): psychological demands, decision latitude, social support, job strain and iso-strain. Job title was defined by three variables: occupation and economic activity coded using standard classifications, and company size. A JEM was constructed using a segmentation method (Classification and Regression Tree—CART) and cross-validation.

Results

The best quality JEM was found using occupation and company size for social support. For decision latitude and psychological demands, there was not much difference using occupation and company size with or without economic activity. The validity of the JEM estimates was higher for decision latitude, job strain and iso-strain, and lower for social support and psychological demands. Differential changes over time were observed for psychosocial work factors according to occupation, economic activity and company size.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that company size in addition to occupation may improve the validity of JEMs for psychosocial work factors. These matrices may be time-dependent and may need to be updated over time. More research is needed to assess the validity of JEMs given that these matrices may be able to provide exposure assessments to study a range of health outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amick BC III, McDonough P, Chang H, Rogers WH, Pieper CF, Duncan G (2002) Relationship between all-cause mortality and cumulative working life course psychosocial and physical exposures in the United States labor market from 1968 to 1992. Psychosom Med 64(3):370–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen I et al (2004) Do factors in the psychosocial work environment mediate the effect of socioeconomic position on the risk of myocardial infarction? Study from the Copenhagen Centre for Prospective Population Studies. Occup Environ Med 61(11):886–892

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonde JP (2008) Psychosocial factors at work and risk of depression: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidence. Occup Environ Med 65(7):438–445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyer J, Hemon D (1993) Studying the performance of a job exposure matrix. Int J Epidemiol 22(Suppl 2):S65–S71

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone CJ, Olshen RA (1984) Classification and regression trees. Taylor & Francis, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohidon C, Niedhammer I, Wild P, Gueguen A, Bonenfant S, Chouaniere D (2004) Exposure to job-stress factors in a national survey in France. Scand J Work Environ Health 30(5):379–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohidon C, Santin G, Chastang JF, Imbernon E, Niedhammer I (2012) Psychosocial exposures at work and mental health: potential utility of a job-exposure matrix. J Occup Environ Med 54(2):184–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove MP, Sargeant LA, Caleyachetty R, Griffin SJ (2012) Work-related stress and Type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup Med (Lond) 62(3):167–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2002) NACE—statistical classification of economic activities in the European community, Rev. 1.1, Luxembourg

  • Fermanian J (1984) Measurement of agreement between 2 judges. Qualitative cases. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publ 32(2):140–147

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frese M, Zapf D (1988) Methodological issues in the study of work stress: objective vs subjective measurement of work stress and the question of longitudinal studies. In: Cooper CL, Payne R (eds) Causes, coping and consequences of stress at work. Wiley series on studies in occupational stress. Wiley, Chichester, pp 375–411

    Google Scholar 

  • INSEE (2003a) Nomenclature des professions et catégories socio-professionnelles 2003. INSEE, Nomenclatures et codes, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • INSEE (2003b) Nomenclatures d’activités et de produits françaises—Edition 2003. INSEE, Nomemclatures et codes, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JV, Stewart WF (1993) Measuring work organization exposure over the life course with a job-exposure matrix. Scand J Work Environ Health 19(1):21–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karasek R, Theorell T (1990) Healthy work: stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B (1998) The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol 3(4):322–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kasl SV (1998) Measuring job stressors and studying the health impact of the work environment: an epidemiologic commentary (see comments). J Occup Health Psychol 3(4):390–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kauppinen T, Toikkanen J, Pukkala E (1998) From cross-tabulations to multipurpose exposure information systems: a new job-exposure matrix. Am J Ind Med 33(4):409–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kivimaki M, Virtanen M, Elovainio M, Kouvonen A, Vaananen A, Vahtera J (2006) Work stress in the etiology of coronary heart disease—a meta-analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health 32(6):431–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kivimaki M et al (2012) Job strain as a risk factor for coronary heart disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet 380(9852):1491–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60994-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamontagne AD, Keegel T, Vallance D, Ostry A, Wolfe R (2008) Job strain—attributable depression in a sample of working Australians: assessing the contribution to health inequalities. BMC Public Health 8:181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaMontagne AD, Krnjacki L, Kavanagh AM, Bentley R (2013) Psychosocial working conditions in a representative sample of working Australians 2001–2008: an analysis of changes in inequalities over time. Occup Environ Med 70(9):639–647. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2012-101171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lang J, Ochsmann E, Kraus T, Lang JW (2012) Psychosocial work stressors as antecedents of musculoskeletal problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis of stability-adjusted longitudinal studies. Soc Sci Med 75(7):1163–1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesuffleur T, Chastang JF, Sandret N, Niedhammer I (2014) Psychosocial factors at work and sickness absence: results from the French National SUMER Survey. Am J Ind Med 57(6):695–708. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesuffleur T, Chastang JF, Cavet M, Niedhammer I (2015a) Psychosocial work factors and self-reported health in the French national SUMER survey. Sante Publique 27(2):177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesuffleur T, Chastang JF, Sandret N, Niedhammer I (2015b) Psychosocial factors at work and occupational injury: results From the French National SUMER survey. J Occup Environ Med 57(3):262–269. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane GJ et al (2009) Evaluation of work-related psychosocial factors and regional musculoskeletal pain: results from a EULAR Task Force. Ann Rheum Dis 68(6):885–891

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malard L, Chastang JF, Schutte S, Parent-Thirion A, Vermeylen G, Niedhammer I (2013) Changes in psychosocial work exposures among employees between 2005 and 2010 in 30 countries in Europe. J Occup Environ Med 55(10):1135–1141. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182a3eb90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malard L, Chastang JF, Niedhammer I (2015) Changes in psychosocial work factors in the French working population between 2006 and 2010. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 88(2):235–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-014-0953-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner A, Niedhammer I, Chastang JF, Spittal MJ, Lamontagne AD (2016) Validity of a job-exposure matrix for psychosocial job stressors: results from the household income and labour dynamics in Australia survey. PLoS One 11(4):e0152980. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152980

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Netterstrom B et al (2008) The relation between work-related psychosocial factors and the development of depression. Epidemiol Rev 30:118–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedhammer I (2002) Psychometric properties of the French version of the Karasek Job Content Questionnaire: a study of the scales of decision latitude, psychological demands, social support, and physical demands in the GAZEL cohort. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 75(3):129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedhammer I, Chea M (2003) Psychosocial factors at work and self reported health: comparative results of cross sectional and prospective analyses of the French GAZEL cohort. Occup Environ Med 60(7):509–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niedhammer I, Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Piciotti M, Bonenfant S (2000) How is sex considered in recent epidemiological publications on occupational risks? Occup Environ Med 57(8):521–527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niedhammer I, Chastang J, Gendrey L, David S, Degioanni S (2006) Propriétés psychométriques de la version française des échelles de la demande psychologique, de la latitude décisionnelle et du soutien social du “Job Content Questionnaire” de Karasek: résultats de l’enquête nationale SUMER. Santé Publique 18(3):413–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niedhammer I, Chastang JF, David S (2008a) Importance of psychosocial work factors on general health outcomes in the national French SUMER survey. Occup Med (Lond) 58(1):15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedhammer I, Chastang JF, David S, Kelleher C (2008b) The contribution of occupational factors to social inequalities in health: findings from the national French SUMER survey. Soc Sci Med 67(11):1870–1881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedhammer I, Chastang JF, Levy D, David S, Degioanni S, Theorell T (2008c) Study of the validity of a job-exposure matrix for psychosocial work factors: results from the national French SUMER survey. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82(1):87–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedhammer I, Sultan-Taieb H, Chastang JF, Vermeylen G, Parent-Thirion A (2014) Fractions of cardiovascular diseases and mental disorders attributable to psychosocial work factors in 31 countries in Europe. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 87(4):403–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-013-0879-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niedhammer I, Lesuffleur T, Algava E, Chastang JF (2015) Classic and emergent psychosocial work factors and mental health. Occup Med (Lond) 65(2):126–134. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqu173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niedhammer I, Lesuffleur T, Coutrot T, Chastang JF (2016) Contribution of working conditions to occupational inequalities in depressive symptoms: results from the national French SUMER survey. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 89(6):1025–1037 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-016-1142-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedhammer I, Lesuffleur T, Memmi S, Chastang JF (2017) Working conditions in the explanation of occupational inequalities in sickness absence in the French SUMER study. Eur J Public Health 27(6):1061–1068. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckx052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyberg ST et al (2014) Job strain as a risk factor for type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis of 124,808 men and women. Diabetes Care 37(8):2268–2275. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-2936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office IL (1990) International standard classification of occupations (ISCO-88). International Labour Office, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz JE, Pieper CF, Karasek RA (1988) A procedure for linking psychosocial job characteristics data to health surveys. Am J Public Health 78(8):904–909

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seidler A, Nienhaus A, Bernhardt T, Kauppinen T, Elo AL, Frolich L (2004) Psychosocial work factors and dementia. Occup Environ Med 61(12):962–971

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solovieva S et al (2014) Evaluation of the validity of job exposure matrix for psychosocial factors at work. PLoS One 9(9):e108987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108987

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stansfeld S, Candy B (2006) Psychosocial work environment and mental health—a meta-analytic review. Scand J Work Environ Health 32(6):443–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sultan-Taieb H, Lejeune C, Drummond A, Niedhammer I (2011) Fractions of cardiovascular diseases, mental disorders, and musculoskeletal disorders attributable to job strain. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 84(8):911–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theorell T, Hasselhorn HM (2005) On cross-sectional questionnaire studies of relationships between psychosocial conditions at work and health—are they reliable? Int Arch Occup Environ Health 78(7):517–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toivanen S (2008) Job control and the risk of incident stroke in the working population in Sweden. Scand J Work Environ Health 34(1):40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toren K, Schioler L, Soderberg M, Giang KW, Rosengren A (2015) The association between job strain and atrial fibrillation in Swedish men. Occup Environ Med 72(3):177–180. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2014-102256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieclaw J, Agerbo E, Mortensen PB, Burr H, Tuchsen F, Bonde JP (2008) Psychosocial working conditions and the risk of depression and anxiety disorders in the Danish workforce. BMC Public Health 8:280

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the members of the DARES (French ministry of labour), all the occupational physicians and ‘médecins inspecteurs régionaux du travail’, and all the employees who participated to the SUMER survey and made this study possible. The authors also thank Laure Ngabirano for her help in the check of the data related to occupation and economic activity.

Funding

This study was funded by the French National Research Program for Environmental and Occupational Health of ANSES, France (Grant no. EST-2016/1/49).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabelle Niedhammer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 140 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niedhammer, I., Milner, A., LaMontagne, A.D. et al. Study of the validity of a job–exposure matrix for the job strain model factors: an update and a study of changes over time. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 91, 523–536 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1299-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1299-2

Keywords

Navigation