Skip to main content
Log in

Selective effects of different fatigue protocols on the function of upper body muscles assessed through the force–velocity relationship

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study explored the feasibility of the force–velocity relationship (FV) to detect the acute effects of different fatigue protocols on the selective changes of the maximal capacities of upper body muscles to produce force, velocity, and power.

Methods

After determining the bench press one-repetition maximum (1RM), participants’ FV relationships were assessed during the bench press throw exercise on five separate sessions after performing one of the following fatiguing protocols: 60%1RM failure, 60%1RM non-failure, 80%1RM failure, 80%1RM non-failure, and no-fatigue. In the non-failure protocols, participants performed half the maximum number of repetitions than in their respective failure protocols.

Results

The main findings revealed that (1) all FV relationships were highly linear (median r = 0.997 and r = 0.982 for averaged across participants and individual data, respectively), (2) the fatiguing protocols were ranked based on the magnitude of power loss as follows: 60%1RM failure > 80%1RM failure > 60%1RM non-failure > 80%1RM non-failure, while (3) the assessed maximum force and velocity outputs showed a particularly prominent reduction in the protocols based on the lowest and highest levels of fatigue (i.e., 80%1RM non-failure and 60%1RM failure), respectively.

Conclusions

The results support the use of FV to assess the effects of fatigue on the distinctive capacities of the muscles to produce force, velocity, and power output while performing multi-joint tasks, while the assessed maximum force and velocity capacities showed a particularly prominent reduction in the protocols based on the lowest and highest levels of fatigue (i.e., 80%1RM non-failure and 60%1RM failure), respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

1RM:

One repetition maximum

a :

Linear regression slope

BP:

Bench press

BPT:

Bench press throw

F:

Force

F 0 :

Regression parameter (F-intercept) depicting maximum force

FV :

Force–velocity relationship

P:

Power

P 0 :

Regression parameter [(F 0 × V 0)/4] depicting maximum power

r :

Correlation coefficient

V:

Velocity

V 0 :

Regression parameter (V-intercept) depicting maximum velocity

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Serbian Research Council under Grant 175037.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amador García-Ramos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Nicolas Place.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

García-Ramos, A., Torrejón, A., Feriche, B. et al. Selective effects of different fatigue protocols on the function of upper body muscles assessed through the force–velocity relationship. Eur J Appl Physiol 118, 439–447 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3786-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3786-7

Keywords

Navigation