Abstract
The purpose of this study is to provide a force–velocity (F–V) equation that combines a linear and a hyperbolic region, and to compare its derived results to those obtained from linear equations. A total of 10 cross-training athletes and 14 recreationally resistance-trained young men were assessed in the unilateral leg press (LP) and bilateral bench press (BP) exercises, respectively. F–V data were recorded using a force plate and a linear encoder. Estimated maximum isometric force (F0), maximum muscle power (Pmax), and maximum unloaded velocity (V0) were calculated using a hybrid (linear and hyperbolic) equation and three different linear equations: one derived from the hybrid equation (linearhyb), one applied to data from 0 to 100% of F0 (linear0–100), and one applied to data from 45 to 100% of F0 (linear45–100). The hybrid equation presented the best fit to the recorded data (R2 = 0.996 and 0.998). Compared to the results derived from the hybrid equation in the LP, significant differences were observed in F0 derived from linear0-100; V0 derived from linearhyb, linear0–100 and linear45–100; and Pmax derived from linearhyb and linear45–100 (all p < 0.05). For the BP, compared to the hybrid equation, significant differences were found in F0 derived from linear0–100; and V0 and Pmax derived from linearhyb, linear0–100 and linear45–100 (all p < 0.05). An F–V equation combining a linear and a hyperbolic region showed to fit adequately recorded F–V data from ~ 20 to 100% of F0, and overcame the limitations shown by linear equations while providing relevant results.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data analyzed during this study are included in this published article (Supplementary material).
Abbreviations
- F–V :
-
Force–velocity
- F 0 :
-
Estimated maximum isometric force
- F opt :
-
Optimal force
- Linearhyb :
-
Linear equation included in the hybrid equation
- Linear0–100 :
-
Linear equation applied to all force–velocity data
- Linear45–100 :
-
Linear equation applied to force–velocity data above 45% of maximum isometric force
- P max :
-
Maximum muscle power
- R 2 :
-
Coefficient of determination
- SEE:
-
Standard error of the estimate
- S FV :
-
Slope of the linear force–velocity relationship
- V 0 :
-
Estimated maximum unloaded velocity
- V opt :
-
Optimal velocity
References
Alcazar J, Rodriguez-Lopez C, Ara I, Alfaro-Acha A, Manas-Bote A, Guadalupe-Grau A, Garcia-Garcia FJ, Alegre LM (2017) The force–velocity relationship in older people: reliability and validity of a systematic procedure. Int J Sports Med 38(14):1097–1104. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-119880
Alcazar J, Rodriguez-Lopez C, Ara I, Alfaro-Acha A, Rodriguez-Gomez I, Navarro-Cruz R, Losa-Reyna J, Garcia-Garcia FJ, Alegre LM (2018) Force-velocity profiling in older adults: an adequate tool for the management of functional trajectories with aging. Exp Gerontol 108:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2018.03.015
Alcazar J, Csapo R, Ara I, Alegre LM (2019) On the shape of the force–velocity relationship in skeletal muscles: the linear, the hyperbolic, and the double-hyperbolic. Front Physiol 10:769. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00769
Alcazar J, Cornejo-Daza PJ, Sánchez-Valdepeñas J, Alegre LM, Pareja-Blanco F (2021a) Dose-response relationship between velocity loss during resistance training and changes in the squat force–velocity relationship. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 16(12):1736–1745. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2020-0692
Alcazar J, Pareja-Blanco F, Rodriguez-Lopez C, Navarro-Cruz R, Cornejo-Daza PJ, Ara I, Alegre LM (2021b) Comparison of linear, hyperbolic and double-hyperbolic models to assess the force–velocity relationship in multi-joint exercises. Eur J Sport Sci 21(3):359–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2020.1753816
Armstrong R, Baltzopoulos V, Langan-Evans C, Clark D, Jarvis J, Stewart C, O’Brien TD (2022) Determining concentric and eccentric force–velocity profiles during squatting. Eur J Appl Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-021-04875-2
Bobbert MF (2012) Why is the force–velocity relationship in leg press tasks quasi-linear rather than hyperbolic? J Appl Physiol (bethesda, Md: 1985) 112(12):1975–1983. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00787.2011
Cross MR, Brughelli M, Brown SR, Samozino P, Gill ND, Cronin JB, Morin JB (2015) Mechanical properties of sprinting in elite rugby union and rugby league. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 10(6):695–702. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2014-0151
Dorel S, Hautier CA, Rambaud O, Rouffet D, Van Praagh E, Lacour JR, Bourdin M (2005) Torque and power-velocity relationships in cycling: relevance to track sprint performance in world-class cyclists. Int J Sports Med 26(9):739–746. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-830493
Edman KA (1988) Double-hyperbolic force–velocity relation in frog muscle fibres. J Physiol 404:301–321
Edman KA, Mulieri LA, Scubon-Mulieri B (1976) Non-hyperbolic force–velocity relationship in single muscle fibres. Acta Physiol Scand 98(2):143–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1976.tb00234.x
Fenn WO, Marsh BS (1935) Muscular force at different speeds of shortening. J Physiol 85(3):277–297
García-Ramos A, Pérez-Castilla A, Jaric S (2021) Optimisation of applied loads when using the two-point method for assessing the force–velocity relationship during vertical jumps. Sports Biomech 20(3):274–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2018.1545044
Giroux C, Maciejewski H, Ben-Abdessamie A, Chorin F, Lardy J, Ratel S, Rahmani A (2017) Relationship between force–velocity profiles and 1,500-m ergometer performance in young rowers. Int J Sports Med 38(13):992–1000. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-117608
Hahn D, Herzog W, Schwirtz A (2014) Interdependence of torque, joint angle, angular velocity and muscle action during human multi-joint leg extension. Eur J Appl Physiol 114(8):1691–1702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-014-2899-5
Hill AV (1922) The maximum work and mechanical efficiency of human muscles, and their most economical speed. J Physiol 56(1–2):19–41
Hill AV (1938) The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1938.0050
Iglesias-Soler E, Mayo X, Rial-Vázquez J, Morín-Jiménez A, Aracama A, Guerrero-Moreno JM, Jaric S (2019) Reliability of force–velocity parameters obtained from linear and curvilinear regressions for the bench press and squat exercises. J Sports Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1648993
Janicijevic D, García-Ramos A, Knezevic OM, Mirkov DM (2019) Feasibility of the two-point method for assessing the force–velocity relationship during lower-body and upper-body isokinetic tests. J Sports Sci 37(20):2396–2402. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1636523
Jaric S (2016) Two-load method for distinguishing between muscle force, velocity, and power-producing capacities. Sports Med (auckland, NZ) 46(11):1585–1589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0531-z
Jimenez-Reyes P, Samozino P, Brughelli M, Morin JB (2016) Effectiveness of an individualized training based on force–velocity profiling during jumping. Front Physiol 7:677. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2016.00677
Lindberg K, Solberg P, Bjørnsen T, Helland C, Rønnestad B, Thorsen Frank M, Haugen T, Østerås S, Kristoffersen M, Midttun M, Sæland F, Paulsen G (2021a) Force–velocity profiling in athletes: reliability and agreement across methods. PLoS One 16(2):e0245791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245791
Lindberg K, Solberg P, Rønnestad BR, Frank MT, Larsen T, Abusdal G, Berntsen S, Paulsen G, Sveen O, Seynnes O, Bjørnsen T (2021b) Should we individualize training based on force–velocity profiling to improve physical performance in athletes? Scand J Med Sci Sports 31(12):2198–2210. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.14044
Mansson A (2014) Hypothesis and theory: mechanical instabilities and non-uniformities in hereditary sarcomere myopathies. Front Physiol 5:350. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2014.00350
Piazzesi G, Reconditi M, Linari M, Lucii L, Bianco P, Brunello E, Decostre V, Stewart A, Gore DB, Irving TC, Irving M, Lombardi V (2007) Skeletal muscle performance determined by modulation of number of myosin motors rather than motor force or stroke size. Cell 131(4):784–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.045
Schmitt S, Haeufle DFB, Blickhan R, Günther M (2012) Nature as an engineer: one simple concept of a bio-inspired functional artificial muscle. Bioinspir Biomim. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/7/3/036022
Valenzuela PL, Sánchez-Martínez G, Torrontegi E, Vázquez-Carrión J, Montalvo Z, Haff GG (2021) Should we base training prescription on the force–velocity profile? Exploratory study of its between-day reliability and differences between methods. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 16(7):1001–1007. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2020-0308
Acknowledgements
We thank all the participants for their collaboration and involvement in the experiments.
Funding
This work was supported by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of the Spanish Government (MINECO/FEDER, EU) under Grants DEP2015-69386-R and BES-2016-077199; Biomedical Research Networking Center on Frailty and Healthy Aging (CIBERFES) and FEDER funds from the European Union under Grants CB16/10/00477 and CB16/10/00314; and Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte of the Spanish Government under Grant FPU014/05106.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JA, IA, and LMA: conceived and designed research. JA, FP, CR, HG, JS, and PJC: conducted experiments. JA, FP, CR, and PJC: analyzed data. JA, FP, IA, and LMA: wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Olivier Seynnes.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Alcazar, J., Pareja-Blanco, F., Rodriguez-Lopez, C. et al. A novel equation that incorporates the linear and hyperbolic nature of the force–velocity relationship in lower and upper limb exercises. Eur J Appl Physiol 122, 2305–2313 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-05006-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-05006-1