Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Diverting ileostomy in colorectal surgery: when is it necessary?

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The role of fecal diversion using a loop ileostomy in patients undergoing rectal resection and anastomosis is controversial. There has been conflicting evidence on the perceived benefit vs. the morbidity of a defunctioning stoma. This is a review of the relevant surgical literature evaluating the risks, benefits, and costs of constructing a diverting ileostomy in current colorectal surgical practice.

Methods

Retrospective and prospective articles spanning the past 50 years were reviewed to identify the definition of an anastomotic leak (AL), evaluate risk factors for AL, and assess methods of evaluation of the anastomosis. We then pooled the evidence for and against fecal diversion, the incidence and consequences of stomal complications, and the evidence comparing loop ileostomy vs. loop colostomy as the optimal method of fecal diversion.

Results

Evidence shows that despite the fact that fecal diversion does not decrease postoperative mortality, it does significantly decrease the risk of anastomotic leak and the need for urgent reoperation when a leak does occur. Diverting stomas are a low-risk surgical procedure from a technical standpoint but carry substantial postoperative morbidity that can greatly hamper patients’ quality of life and recovery. High-risk patients such as those with low colorectal anastomoses (<10 cm from anal verge), colo-anal anastomoses, technically difficult resections, malnutrition, and male patients seem to reap the greatest benefit from fecal diversion.

Conclusions

Fecal diversion is recommended as a selective tool to protect or ameliorate an anastomotic leak after a colorectal anastomosis. It is most beneficial when used selectively in high-risk patients with low pelvic anastomoses that are at an increased risk for AL. New tools are needed to identify patients at high risk for anastomotic failure after anterior resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rondelli F et al (2012) Is laparoscopic right colectomy more effective than open resection? A meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized studies. Color Dis 14(8):e447–e469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Holdsworth PJ et al (1991) Risk of peritonitis and fatal septicemia and the need to defunction the low anastomosis. Br J Surg 78:196–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hallbook O, Sjodahl R (1996) Anastomotic leakage and functional outcome after anterior resection of the rectum. Br J Surg 83:60–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U et al (2002) Value of a protective stoma in low anterior resections for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1164–1171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mowschenson PM, Critchlow JF, Peppercorn MA (2000) Ileoanal pouch operation. Long-term outcome with or without diverting ileostomy. Arch Surg 135:463–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Machado M, Hallbook O, Goldman S et al (2002) Defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection with colonic pouch for rectal cancer: a comparison between two hospitals with a different policy. Dis Colon Rectum 45:940–945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wong NY, Eu KW (2005) A defunctioning ileostomy does not prevent clinical anastomotic leak after a low anterior resection: a prospective, comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2076–2079

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ikeuchi H, Nakano H, Uchino M et al (2005) Safety of one stage restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1550–1555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Remzi FH, Fazio VW, Gorgun E et al (2006) The outcome after restorative proctocolectomy with or without defunctioning ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 49:470–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Paun BC, Cassie S, MacLean AR, Dixon E, Buie WD (2010) Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 251(5):807–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, Russell EM, Park KG (2001) Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 88(9):1157–1168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W et al (2010) Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 147(3):339–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pakkastie TE, Luukkonen PE, Jarvinen HJ (1994) Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Eur J Surg 160:293–297, discussion 299–300

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L et al (1980) Anastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer: a multicentre study. Br Med J 281:411–414

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morgenstern L, Yamakawa T, Ben-Shoshan M et al (1972) Anastomotic leakage after low colonic anastomosis. Clinical and experimental aspects. Am J Surg 123:104–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Huser N et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 248(1):52–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Montedori A, Cirocchi R, Farinella E, Sciannameo F, Abraha I (2010) Covering ileo- or colostomy in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev (5). Art. No.: CD006878. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006878.pub2

  18. Schwandner O, Schiedeck T, Bruch H (1998) Stoma creation for fecal diversion: is the laparoscopic technique appropriate? Int J Color Dis 13(5–6):251–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Swain B, Ellis N (2002) Laparoscopic-assisted loop ileostomy an acceptable option for temporary fecal diversion after anorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 45(5):705–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kang CY et al (2013) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. JAMA Surg 148(1):65–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ondrula DP, Nelson RL, Prasad ML, Coyle BW, Abcarian H (1992) Multifactorial index of preoperative risk factors in colon resections. Dis Colon Rectum 35(2):117–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nisar PJ, Lavery IC, Kiran RP (2012) Influence of neoadjuvant radiotherapy on anastomotic leak after restorative resection for rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 16(9):1750–1757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sebag-Montefiore D, Stephens RJ, Steele R et al (2009) Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet 373(9666):811–820

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jorgensen T, Harling H (2010) Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors. Color Dis 12(1):37–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL et al (1998) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85:355–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Beard JD, Nicholson ML, Sayers RD, Lloyd D, Everson NW (1990) Intraoperative air testing of colorectal anastomoses: a prospective, randomized trial. Br J Surg 77:1095–1097

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ivanov D, Cvijanovic R, Gvozdenovic L (2011) Intraoperative air testing of colorectal anastomoses. Srp Arh Celok Lek 139:333–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sakanoue Y, Nakao K, Shoji Y, Yanagi H, Kusunoki M, Utsunomiya J (1993) Intraoperative colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 7:84–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schmidt O, Merkel S, Hohenberger W (2003) Anastomotic leakage after low rectal stapler anastomosis: significance of intraoperative anastomotic testing. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:239–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lanthaler M, Biebl M, Mittermair R, Ofner D, Nehoda H (2008) Intraoperative colonoscopy for anastomosis assessment in laparoscopically assisted left-sided colon resection: is it worthwhile? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:27–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lieto E, Orditura M, Castellano P, Pinto M, Zamboli A, De Vita F, Pignatelli C, Galizia G (2011) Endoscopic intraoperative anastomotic testing may avoid early gastrointestinal anastomotic complications: a prospective study. J Gastrointest Surg 15:145–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shamiyeh A, Szabo K, Ulf Wayand W, Zehetner J (2012) Intraoperative endoscopy for the assessment of circular-stapled anastomosis in laparoscopic colon surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:65–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Parmeggiani F, De Angelis N, Carra MC, Bizzarri B, Fornaroli F, Gnocchi A, Madia C, Nervi G, Valle RD, DeAngelis GL (2012) Intraoperative colonoscopy control for colorectal-anastomotic leakage: a new solution for an old problem a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc 75:AB178

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kudszus S, Roesel C, Schachtrupp A, Höer JJ (2010) Intraoperative laser fluorescence angiography in colorectal surgery: a noninvasive analysis to reduce the rate of anastomotic leakage. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395:1025–1030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Bell SW, Walker KG, Rickard MJ et al (2003) Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence. Br J Surg 90(10):1261–1266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Katoh H, Yamashita K, Wang G, Sato T, Nakamura T, Watanabe M (2011) Anastomotic leakage contributes to the risk for systemic recurrence in stage II colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 15(1):120–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P (2011) Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 253(5):890–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dehni N, Schlegel RD, Cunningham C et al (1998) Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 85:1114–1117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Law WI, Chu KW, Ho JW et al (2000) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg 179:92–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P et al (1994) Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 81:1224–1226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mealy K, Burke P, Hyland J (1992) Anterior resection without a defunctioning colostomy: questions of safety. Br J Surg 79:305–307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Antonsen HK, Kronborg O (1987) Early complications after low anterior resection for rectal cancer using the EEA stapling device. A prospective trial. Dis Colon Rectum 30:579–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Andersson M et al (2004) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Color Dis 6:462–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Gastinger I, Marusch F, Steinert R et al (2005) Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 92:1137–1142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Leester B, Asztalos I, Polnyib C (2002) Septic complications after low anterior rectal resection–is diverting stoma still justified? Acta Chir Iugosl 49:67–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Hittinger R et al (1984) Covering stoma for elective anterior resection of the rectum: an outmoded operation? Am J Surg 147:524–530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Enker WE, Merchant N, Cohen AM et al (1999) Safety and efficacy of low anterior resection for rectal cancer: 681 consecutive cases from a specialty service. Ann Surg 230:544–552, discussion 552–554

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Poon RT, Chu KW, Ho JW et al (1999) Prospective evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma for low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. World J Surg 23:463–467, discussion 467–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA et al (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:211–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kessler H, Hermanek P Jr, Wiebelt H (1993) Operative mortality in carcinoma of the rectum. Results of the German Multicentre Study. Int J Color Dis 8:158–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Nurkin S et al (2013) The role of faecal diversion in low rectal cancer: a review of 1791 patients having rectal resection with anastomosis for cancer, with and without a proximal stoma. Color Dis 15(6):e309–e316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Graffner H, Fredlund P, Olsson SA et al (1983) Protective colostomy in low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling instrument. A randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 26:87–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J et al (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246:207–214

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Chude GG, Rayate NV, Patris V, Koshariya M, Jagad R, Kawamoto J, Lygidakis NJ (2008) Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology 55(86–87):1562–1567

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Harris DA, Egbeare D, Jones S, Benjamin H, Woodward A, Foster ME (2005) Complications and mortality following stoma formation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 87(6):427–431

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Shellito PC (1998) Complications of abdominal stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 41(12):1562–1572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Vermeulen J, Gosselink MP, Busschbach JJ, Lange JF (2010) Avoiding or reversing Hartmann’s procedure provides improved quality of life after perforated diverticulitis. J Gastrointest Surg 14(4):651–657

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Roig JV, Cantos M, Balciscueta Z et al (2011) Sociedad Valenciana de Cirugía Cooperative Group. Hartmann’s operation: how often is it reversed and at what cost? A multicentre study. Color Dis 13(12):e396–e402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK (1994) Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37(9):916–920

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Chen F, Stuart M (1996) The morbidity of defunctioning stomata. Aust N Z J Surg 66(4):218–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Porter JA, Salvati EP, Rubin RJ, Eisenstat TE (1989) Complications of colostomies. Dis Colon Rectum 32(4):299–303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Parmar KL, Zammit M, Smith A, Kenyon D, Lees NP, Greater Manchester and Cheshire Colorectal Cancer Network (2011) A prospective audit of early stoma complications in colorectal cancer treatment throughout the Greater Manchester and Cheshire colorectal cancer network. Color Dis 13(8):935–938

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Klink CD, Lioupis K, Binnebösel M et al (2011) Diversion stoma after colorectal surgery: loop colostomy or ileostomy? Int J Color Dis 26(4):431–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Nastro P, Knowles CH, McGrath A, Heyman B, Porrett TR, Lunniss PJ (2010) Complications of intestinal stomas. Br J Surg 97(12):1885–1889

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Cottam J, Richards K, Hasted A, Blackman A (2007) Results of a nationwide prospective audit of stoma complications within 3 weeks of surgery. Color Dis 9(9):834–838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Neuman HB, Park J, Fuzesi S, Temple LK (2012) Rectal cancer patients’ quality of life with a temporary stoma: shifting perspectives. Dis Colon Rectum 55(11):1117–1124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. O’Leary DP, Fide CJ, Foy C, Lucarotti ME (2001) Quality of life after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and temporary loop ileostomy for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 88(9):1216–1220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Macdonald A, Chung D, Fell S, Pickford I (2003) An assessment of surgeons’ abilities to site colostomies accurately. Surgeon 1(6):347–349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Committee Members Wound Ostomy Continence Nurses Society Committee Members (2007) ASCRS and WOCN joint position statement on the value of preoperative stoma marking for patients undergoing fecal ostomy surgery. Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 34(6):627–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Colwell JC, Goldberg M, Carmel J (2001) The state of the standard diversion. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 28(1):6–17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. PJ A g, Bevan L, Macdonald L et al (2003) A prospective audit of stomas—analysis of risk factors and complications and their management. Color Dis 5(1):49–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Marquis P, Marred A, Jamb on B (2003) Quality of life in patients with stomas: the Monteux Study. Ostomy Wound Manage 49(2):48–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Baker ML, Williams RN, Nightingale JM (2011) Causes and management of a high-output stoma. Color Dis 13(2):191–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Serra-Aracil X, Bombardo-Junca J, Moreno-Matias J et al (2009) Randomized, controlled, prospective trial of the use of a mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Ann Surg 249(4):583–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Brown H, Randle J (2005) Living with a stoma: a review of the literature. J Clin Nurs 14:74–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Robertson I, Leung E, Hughes D et al (2005) Prospective analysis of stoma-related complications. Color Dis 7(3):279–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Simmons KL, Smith JA, Bobb K-A, Liles LLM (2007) Adjustment to colostomy: stoma acceptance, stoma care self-efficacy and interpersonal relationships. J Adv Nurs 60:627–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Danielsen AK et al (2013) Patient education has a positive effect in patients with a stoma: a systematic review. Color Dis 15(6):e276–e283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Khoury GA, Lewis MC, Meleagros L, Lewis AA (1986) Colostomy or ileostomy after colorectal anastomosis?: a randomized trial. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 69:5–7

    Google Scholar 

  80. Williams NS, Nasmyth DG, Jones D, Smith AH (1986) Defunctioning stomas: a prospective controlled trial comparing loop ileostomy with loop transverse colostomy. Br J Surg 73:566–570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, Lagaay MB, Gooszen HG (1998) Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy. Br J Surg 85:76–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Law WL, Chu KW, Choi K (2002) Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg 89:704–708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Göhring U, Lehner B, Schlag P (1988) Ileostomy versus colostomy as temporary deviation stoma in relation to stoma closure. Chirurg 59(12):842–844

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Güenaga KF, Lustosa SAS, Saad SS, Saconato H, Matos D (2007) Ileostomy or colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev, Issue 1. Art.No.: CD004647. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004647.pub2

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Irvine School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, 333 City Blvd. West Suite 850, Orange, CA, 92868, USA

    Mark H. Hanna, Alessio Vinci & Alessio Pigazzi

Authors
  1. Mark H. Hanna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alessio Vinci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alessio Pigazzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessio Pigazzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hanna, M.H., Vinci, A. & Pigazzi, A. Diverting ileostomy in colorectal surgery: when is it necessary?. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400, 145–152 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-015-1275-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-015-1275-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation