Abstract
Community ecologists have attempted to explain species abundance distribution (SAD) shape for more than 80 years, but usually without relating SAD shape explicitly to ecological variables. We explored whether the scale (total assemblage abundance) and shape (assemblage evenness) of avifaunal SADs were related to ecological covariates. We used data on avifaunas, in-site habitat structure and landscape context that were assembled from previous studies; this amounted to 197 transects distributed across 16,000 km2 of the box-ironbark forests of southeastern Australia. We used Bayesian conditional autoregressive models to link SAD scale and shape to these ecological covariates. Variation in SAD scale was relatable to some ecological covariates, especially to landscape vegetation cover and to tree height. We could not find any relationships between SAD shape and ecological covariates. SAD shape, the core component in SAD theory, may hold little information about how assemblages are governed ecologically and may result from statistical processes, which, if general, would indicate that SAD shape is not useful for distinguishing among theories of assemblage structure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Besag J, Kooperberg C (1995) On conditional and intrinsic autoregressions. Biometrika 82:733–746
Bulmer MG (1974) On fitting the Poisson lognormal distribution to species-abundance data. Biometrics 30:101–110
Clarke A, Gaston KJ (2006) Climate, energy and diversity. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273:2257–2266
Connolly SR, Dornelas M, Bellwood DR, Hughes TP (2009) Testing species abundance models: a new bootstrap approach applied to Indo-Pacific coral reefs. Ecology 90:3138–3149
Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM, Hawkins BA (2003) Spatial autocorrelation and red herrings in geographical ecology. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:53–64
Dornelas M, Moonen AC, Magurran AE, Barberi P (2009) Species abundance distributions reveal environmental heterogeneity in modified landscapes. J Appl Ecol 46:666–672
DSE (2006) Tree Cover Grid (TREE25) Metadata. Victorian Spatial Data Directory. Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne
Dunstan PK, Foster SD (2011) RAD biodiversity: prediction of rank abundance distributions from deep water benthic assemblages. Ecography 34:798–806
ECC (2001) Box–ironbark forests and woodlands investigation: final report. Environment Conservation Council, Melbourne
Engen S, Grotan V, Saether BE (2011) Estimating similarity of communities: a parametric approach to spatio-temporal analysis of species diversity. Ecography 34:220–231
ESRI (2002) ArcGIS 8.3 Geographic information system. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands
Etienne RS (2005) A new sampling formula for neutral biodiversity. Ecol Lett 8:253–260
Fisher RA, Corbet AS, Williams CB (1943) The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. J Anim Ecol 12:42–58
Foster SD, Dunstan PK (2010) The analysis of biodiversity using rank abundance distributions. Biometrics 66:186–195
Harte J, Zillio T, Conlisk E, Smith AB (2008) Maximum entropy and the state-variable approach to macroecology. Ecology 89:2700–2711
Harwood W, Mac Nally R (2005) Geometry of large woodland remnants and its influence on avifaunal distributions. Landsc Ecol 20:401–416
Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Jeffreys H (1961) Theory of probability. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lichstein JW, Simons TR, Shriner SA, Franzreb KE (2002) Spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive models in ecology. Ecol Monogr 72:445–463
Link WA, Barker RJ (2010) Bayesian inference: with ecological applications, 1st edn. Elsevier/Academic Press, Amsterdam/Boston
Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D (2000) WinBUGS—A Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat Comput 10:325–337
Lunn DJ, Best N, Whittaker JC (2009) Generic reversible jump MCMC using graphical models. Stat Comput 19:395–408
Mac Nally R (2000) Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: the distinction between—and reconciliation of—‘predictive’ and ‘explanatory’ models. Biodivers Conserv 9:655–671
Mac Nally R (2007) Use of the abundance spectrum and relative-abundance distributions to analyze assemblage change in massively altered landscapes. Am Nat 170:319–330
Mac Nally R, McGoldrick JM (1997) Landscape dynamics of bird communities in relation to mass flowering in some eucalypt forests of central Victoria, Australia. J Avian Biol 28:171–183
Mac Nally R, Bennett AF, Horrocks G (2000a) Forecasting the impacts of habitat fragmentation. Evaluation of species-specific predictions of the impact of habitat fragmentation on birds in the box-ironbark forests of central Victoria, Australia. Biol Conserv 95:7–29
Mac Nally R, Soderquist TR, Tzaros C (2000b) The conservation value of mesic gullies in dry forest landscapes: avian assemblages in the box-ironbark ecosystem of southern Australia. Biol Conserv 93:293–302
Mac Nally R, Bennett AF, Thomson JR, Radford JQ, Unmack G, Horrocks G, Vesk P (2009) Collapse of an avifauna: climate change appears to exacerbate habitat loss and degradation. Divers Distrib 15:720–730
Mac Nally R, Bowen M, Howes A, McAlpine C, Maron M (2012) Despotic, high-impact species and sub-continental scale control of avian assemblage structure. Ecology 93:668–678
MacArthur RH (1957) On the relative abundance of species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 43:293–295
Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell, Oxford
Magurran AE, Henderson PA (2003) Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distributions. Nature 422:714–716
McCarthy MA, Masters PIP (2005) Profiting from prior information in Bayesian analyses of ecological data. J Appl Ecol 42:1012–1019
McGill BJ (2003) Strong and weak tests of macroecological theory. Oikos 102:679–685
McGill BJ (2010) Towards a unification of unified theories of biodiversity. Ecol Lett 13:627–642
McGill BJ, Nekola JC (2010) Mechanisms in macroecology: AWOL or purloined letter? Towards a pragmatic view of mechanism. Oikos 119:591–603
McGill BJ, Etienne RS, Gray JS, Alonso D, Anderson MJ, Benecha HK, Dornelas M, Enquist BJ, Green JL, He FL, Hurlbert AH, Magurran AE, Marquet PA, Maurer BA, Ostling A, Soykan CU, Ugland KI, White EP (2007) Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. Ecol Lett 10:995–1015
Motomura I (1932) On the statistical treatment of communities. Zool Mag 44:379–383
Nekola JC, Brown JH (2007) The wealth of species: ecological communities, complex systems and the legacy of Frank Preston. Ecol Lett 10:188–196
Pielou EC (1977) Mathematical ecology. Wiley, New York
Preston FW (1950) Gas laws and wealth laws. Sci Mon 71:309–311
Preston FW (1962) Canonical distributions of commonness and rarity. Ecology 43:185
Raupach MR, Kirby JM, Barrett DJ, Briggs PR, Lu H, Zhang L (2001) Balances of water, carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in Australian landscapes: (2) model formulation and testing. CSIRO Land and Water technical report 41/01
Sizling AL, Storch D, Sizlingova E, Reif J, Gaston KJ (2009) Species abundance distribution results from a spatial analogy of central limit theorem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:6691–6695
Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, van der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B 64:583–640
Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N, Lunn D (2003) WinBUGS user manual, version 1.4. MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge
Sugihara G (1980) Minimal community structure: an explanation of species abundance patterns. Am Nat 116:770–787
Thompson R, Townsend C (2006) A truce with neutral theory: local deterministic factors, species traits and dispersal limitation together determine patterns of diversity in stream invertebrates. J Anim Ecol 75:476–484
Thomson JR, Moilanen A, Vesk P, Bennett AF, Mac Nally R (2009) Where and when to revegetate: a quantitative method for scheduling landscape reconstruction. Ecol Appl 19:817–828
Thomson JR, Kimmerer WJ, Brown LR, Newman KB, Mac Nally R, Bennett WA, Feyrer F, Fleishman E (2010) Bayesian change point analysis of abundance trends for pelagic fishes in the upper San Francisco Estuary. Ecol Appl 20:1431–1448
Tokeshi M (1993) Species abundance patterns and community structure. Adv Ecol Res 24:111–186
Vesk P, Nolan R, Thomson J, Dorrough J, Mac Nally R (2008) Time lags in provision of habitat resources through revegetation. Biol Conserv 141:174–186
Volkov I, Banavar JR, Hubbell SP, Maritan A (2003) Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology. Nature 424:1035–1037
Whittaker RH (1965) Dominance and diversity in land plant communities. Science 147:250
Wootton JT (2005) Field parameterization and experimental test of the neutral theory of biodiversity. Nature 433:309–312
Yen JDL, Thomson JR, Vesk PA, Mac Nally R (2011) To what are woodland birds responding? Inference on relative importance of in-site habitat variables using multiple ensemble habitat-modelling techniques. Ecography 34:946–954
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank Greg Horrocks, Todd Soderquist, Walter Harwood, and many others for their efforts in the field. Katherine Harrisson provided helpful comments on a draft manuscript. Parts of the work were supported by Australian Research Council grants nos LP0560518, DP0984170, DP0343898 and LP0990038. This paper is contribution no. 241 from the Australian Centre for Biodiversity, Monash University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Chris Whelan.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yen, J.D.L., Thomson, J.R. & Mac Nally, R. Is there an ecological basis for species abundance distributions?. Oecologia 171, 517–525 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2438-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2438-1